The success of IEO is Exchange

[Yamifoud]

The success of ICO lies in the hand of huge partnership support, huge investors and trust but since scammers canes around ICO trust was ruined but now what we have left is IEO, and I will keep repeating myself over and over for new projects that the success of an IEO is top exchanges, no matter how good your use case is, if you choose p2pb2b or vindax over Okex or binance just have it at the back of your mind that failure awaits you with 80% chance over 100%

It could be a big factor also but one thing that could help and become productive as their goal to be is to have a working product. In fact, not all projects that are listed on the top exchanges will be given a chance to walk on the alley and take the lead over the others. Investors are much looking for a project that gives benefits to everyone because this is a reason to increase their market demand. It was the team engagement that could make the project fully succeed not the exchanges itself.

[1715023681]

1715023681

[1715023681]

1715023681

[Alohadanc3]

Yes,you are very much right about this. The goal of ico and ieo might be same but the process make it very much different form other. In icos people's check many things like team, partnership,any big names in team, MVP and many more things. But now in ieo culture if binance announce a ieo we all know it gonna be reached hardcap in minutes. But if a project come with great setup but ieo in a small exchanges theni ts not gonna win. But it's also true most of big ieos atleast not in scamming side. But most of the small or bad project have that problem.

[poodle63]

The success of ICO lies in the hand of huge partnership support, huge investors and trust but since scammers canes around ICO trust was ruined but now what we have left is IEO, and I will keep repeating myself over and over for new projects that the success of an IEO is top exchanges, no matter how good your use case is, if you choose p2pb2b or vindax over Okex or binance just have it at the back of your mind that failure awaits you with 80% chance over 100%

It could be a big factor also but one thing that could help and become productive as their goal to be is to have a working product. In fact, not all projects that are listed on the top exchanges will be given a chance to walk on the alley and take the lead over the others. Investors are much looking for a project that gives benefits to everyone because this is a reason to increase their market demand. It was the team engagement that could make the project fully succeed not the exchanges itself.

sorry to break the bubble but your statement is so wrong, investor don't care about its benefit although some investor might care about that but majority are not really fond of that, what they care is just money. as you can see there are many trashy project around but as long as the project having good back up popular advisor or good exchange they would succeed, that's why exchange is also a big factor.

[awakpane]

I agree with you, indeed the success of IEO is in the Exchange if you want IEO to be successful and the tokens have a long term, then it's better to choose a good and trusted exchange. indeed if we see lately many IOEs have chosen p2pb2b or vindax even though both exchanges have bad reputations.

I think you have to be careful when you want to participate in IEO which is held at the exchange place because many cases end up scamming and making cryptocurrency worse, like the case that is still a hit now is the BCNEX exchange place where at that time it was able to get a hardcap but currently exposed to a case and ends up a scam.

Correct. indeed we need to be vigilant before participating in IEO held in exchanges that have a bad reputation. I think there needs to be an authority to prevent the exchange of scams that continue to roam in the crypto world so that others can avoid loss.

[ViralNation]

For me personally, I only invest in top tier coins. For example my recent investment - Creditcoin, ,the reason i invested into it is because of the press release and the news about how coinbase invested into the project.

[reallester]

The success of ICO lies in the hand of huge partnership support, huge investors and trust but since scammers canes around ICO trust was ruined but now what we have left is IEO, and I will keep repeating myself over and over for new projects that the success of an IEO is top exchanges, no matter how good your use case is, if you choose p2pb2b or vindax over Okex or binance just have it at the back of your mind that failure awaits you with 80% chance over 100%

You are absolutely right. No matter how bright your roadmap and whitepaper looks, listing our IEO on shitty exchanges say Vindax, P2PB2B, Probit exchanges etc will mark the beginning of your downfall. This is because over time, no IEO listed in these exchanges perform well. So the importance of good exchanges in projects cannot be overemphasized.

[Anonylz]

Ofcourse, what good is a project without an exchange? Not just any but a good one, This is why project needs to make exchange listing top priority, listing on the right exchange will certainly help the project during the ieo process, but unfortunately some project don't see it that way, rather, they will choose the cheapest of all neglecting the damage it might cause to the growth of the project, I think most serious project always put this into account which is very necessary.

[smyslov]

Ofcourse, what good is a project without an exchange? Not just any but a good one, This is why project needs to make exchange listing top priority, listing on the right exchange will certainly help the project during the ieo process, but unfortunately some project don't see it that way, rather, they will choose the cheapest of all neglecting the damage it might cause to the growth of the project, I think most serious project always put this into account which is very necessary.

Every project wants to hold their IEO in top exchange but the fees and the criteria are just too much or they are not qualified so their only chances are those exchanges where they have a good chance to qualified and offered a much-lowered fee, but holding your IEO on top exchanges like Binance and Kucoin can really help their cause.

[XCANA]

You are correct, most of the successful ieo on the big exchanges are not better than those who have struggled to raise enough capital for the project, it's all down to how big the exchange is.

Agreed with you, this keep me wondering when things had  changed so drastically since the arrival of this IEO. We have seen many projects huge source of funds within their project environment and these types always distinguishe themselves from the fake funds or compelling exchange participants to buy into unwanted projects just to hold their tokens. Big exchanges that conducted ieo have been seen successful due to their large users on their platforms. The more buggerj the exchanges the more funds they're likely to raise.

[ViralNation]

Creditcoin didn't do an IEO and it was still successful because it was backed by Coinbase and Y combinator. The exchange is important but so are the investors behind the project.

[gweedo]

For me personally, I only invest in top tier coins. For example my recent investment - Creditcoin, ,the reason i invested into it is because of the press release and the news about how coinbase invested into the project.

Are you kidding me? Creditcoin is the leading currency in this market? For me this is one of the shitcoin in this market. For years, this altcoin still could not function like their roadmap and did not have any updates, and it looks like it's going to die this year

[Smitty Werben Man Jensen]

from what I observed is like that, good IEO is only held by good exchanges, you must know Harmony or even the one that is finished is Cartesi, both of these projects have successfully launched IEO on Binance, yup because Binance is a big exchange it is easy to find investors , if Harmony and Cartesi are held in exchanges like p2pb2b or probit, I'm sure 90% will fail

[Fesatmas]

from what I observed is like that, good IEO is only held by good exchanges, you must know Harmony or even the one that is finished is Cartesi, both of these projects have successfully launched IEO on Binance, yup because Binance is a big exchange it is easy to find investors , if Harmony and Cartesi are held in exchanges like p2pb2b or probit, I'm sure 90% will fail

There is no need to doubt about IEO in Binance because most of it is always successful, even many investors who fight to get a lottery will be able to participate in IEO in Binance, meaning that large exchanges always provide benefits for their investors.

But you see the KingCasino project did an IEO in the first round at a price of $ 0.5 and sold 25,000,000 KCT equivalent to more than $ 10M and was done at the p2pb2b and Latoken exchanges.

https://twitter.com/kingcasino888/status/1249986637804613632

[abel1337]

from what I observed is like that, good IEO is only held by good exchanges, you must know Harmony or even the one that is finished is Cartesi, both of these projects have successfully launched IEO on Binance, yup because Binance is a big exchange it is easy to find investors , if Harmony and Cartesi are held in exchanges like p2pb2b or probit, I'm sure 90% will fail

I believe that Exchange is one part of the reason why a certain IEO is successful. On the given scenario that Harmony and Cartesi got a successful IEO is somehow because of the exchange, Binance is one of the most famous and reputated exchanges today and no wonder that they have a bunch of users than any other exchange which means more promotion to the IEO project. There are some successful IEO happened inside Binance and project devs would probably choose to initiate their IEO there to gain more trust in the investors.

[mdzahed134]

Large exchanges have a large community and reputation too, so making IEO done there can be easily successful, if only exchanging with fake volume will make the project die, like the exchange you said

I get that a large exchange has a large community, but even Binance with their big communities now don't dare to do IEOs too much because they really angered their communities by running a lot of Launchpad projects and then simply went to delist them when they weren't doing so well. Binance has fake volume too, but they didn't create it, bots of projects did.

Binance is different from another exchanges. As far as top exchange all of IEO's definitely will made big influence, you know how much excited all of people before binance new launched. Will never delist in the new projects, which aren’t make good trade volume than those can be delist, but they’re delisted so many tokens in every year.             

[Romeotom]

You are right but other thinking, do you know bitcoin more difference from another exchange, almost i am very excited when a project coming with IEO binance launched. They are have few projects manage IEO in popular exchange as lot of project want small exchange for promoting IEO.

[TheICE007]

You are right,after scammers contributed to spoil the reign of initial exchange Offering, the reign of initial exchange Offering took off ,the exchange where the initial exchange Offering is carried is very important,that alone does not contribute to the growth and success of the project,the use case is very important and also the marketing strategy of the team ,all joined together gives a successful project.

[Psynthax]

from what I observed is like that, good IEO is only held by good exchanges, you must know Harmony or even the one that is finished is Cartesi, both of these projects have successfully launched IEO on Binance, yup because Binance is a big exchange it is easy to find investors , if Harmony and Cartesi are held in exchanges like p2pb2b or probit, I'm sure 90% will fail

I believe that Exchange is one part of the reason why a certain IEO is successful. On the given scenario that Harmony and Cartesi got a successful IEO is somehow because of the exchange, Binance is one of the most famous and reputated exchanges today and no wonder that they have a bunch of users than any other exchange which means more promotion to the IEO project. There are some successful IEO happened inside Binance and project devs would probably choose to initiate their IEO there to gain more trust in the investors.

Binance is really way ahead of its competitor in term of marketing and hyping up about the project they have. Other exchanges are just outright shoving the project to people's throat meanwhile binance only do IEO once a month and they are selecting it carefully. as much as I hate this kind of centralized exchange they have done a good job in this field

[ViralNation]

IEO is only good on reputable exchanges. But from what i've seen most legitamate projects with REAL instituional investors simply skip the IEO / ICO public sales and basically collect money easily from private sales and then list directly onto exchanges.

For example Creditcoin , invested in by coinbase, y combinator, youtube, etc, just listed directly onto bittrex and OKEX and the price has already gone up 30x

[Kelvinid]

Some projects today IEO/ICO have their own exchanger and obviously, they are not having the interest to enlist their project into other exchanges.
Not the thing that they won't make a good marketing strategy but we know investors are usually focusing on the known exchanger which leads the others to be ignored. Then, this is a thing that could bring those projects has a lesser chance to succeed than those who are listed to the big names exchanges. That is how it affects the future of a particular IEO/ICO and that will lies (mostly) in the hands of the exchanger.