Not going to argue with the "gamble for fun" part, cos those are my thoughts too. But I think that when we say that something is inevitable we should specify, during what period of time. I mean, you can go bust in a matter of minutes because of bad luck, but, however hard I tried, I failed to find any reliable information on after how many bets you are guaranteed to lose to the house. I have an impression that it is something closer to billions rather than to hundreds. And it really makes me laugh when someone who lost $200 to a roulette game within just 50 spins is told by his friends: "There's a house edge! What were you expecting?!"
I will always disagree in this mindset "Gamble just for fun" to avoid things you don't wanted, okay? but we still cannot deny the fact that even though we're having "fun" (pun intended)
Could you explain where's pun here? I'm a big fan of those and just want to know what I'm missing (other than pun and fun rhyming perfectly)
Not all of the people could enjoy gambling especially those people that don't have plenty of money
If we think about that, it more and more starts to look like a self-defeating argument
Really, if you don't enjoy gambling as a process, i.e. you are not an adrenaline junkie of sorts (as most gamblers are deep down inside)
and you are continually losing to the house, which is kinda set in stone (at least as long as we are talking about games of chance, e.g. dice), then what forces you to come back and play again? It simply makes no sense unless you get a kick out of it, even if it is an emotional roller coaster (at first you feel exalted and then depressed)