ha. and there blows badeckers whole concept of herd immunity
the videos first point of 'kosh postulum' saying:
'a virus must only exist in a sick person and not a healthy person'
why is this wrong:
well. that means there are is no asymptomatic people if the postulum is true
well. the healthy people will never get immune if they never get sick
thus population who had it is small
so which is it badecker
The point is finding the virus. If you can't find the virus in the sick people, how would you ever be able to find it in the healthy people... no matter who is right, Koch or Rivers?
Rivers (1937) didn't include Koch's (1884) point that that viruses aren't found in healthy people. Notice the dates? Pasteur and others were barely identifying viruses, and didn't even know most of the time what they had found regarding viruses at that time.
The fact that Dr. Andrew Kaufman (the narrating doctor) used River's criteria, shows that Kock's material is really irrelevant to the whole thing you are talking about. If you don't like what Dr. Koch wrote, perhaps you should start a thread about it in the Off Topic section.
why do you drink bleach and inject vitamins if you dont need to cleanse your body or fuel your immune system
I could ask the same question of you. You drink bleach in the same way I do... through the mouth. The only difference might be the quantity, and the fact that you are a little fearful of calling a spade a spade.
In addition, many topical salves and creams, etc., include forms of bleach in them that are absorbed into the the body through the skin, to cure or control some form of malady in the skin. But the absorption doesn't stop there. They are often absorbed and travel throughout the whole body.
Wake up and see that not only bleach is getting into you, but all kinds of other chemicals, as well... especially if you are receiving chemotherapy.
if no one is asymptomatic then only 1million americans have had it(0.3%) as they are the symptomatic ones.
which debunks any narrative that its wide spread and just not tested due to asymptomatic spread
Well, you could say
if this and
if that all day. Your point?
see how easy your scripts fall apart when you grab random crap but dont actually research it.
See how easy your script falls apart when you see the rest of my script which you were intentionally and maliciously ignoring?
there are actual PCR tests that show its a new virus and its not the exact same as previous viruses.
millions of people around the word have had this test.
Do you have verification by anyone who goes into the detail of the testing as Dr. Kaufman does? If you do, why haven't you linked it, or at least shown where to go to read it? After all, Dr. Kaufman shows that the original testing was entirely inconclusive, and was in some cases a bunch of lies put out by some of the testers.
so which is it
a) the virus does exist but only in those symptomatic, meaning no asymptomatic herd immunity possible
b) the virus does exist and is ~20% symptomatic
Again, entirely irrelevant to determining if there even is a Covid-19 virus, as shown by Dr. Kaufman.
or are you going to go with your lame scripts
where you cant even choose
if it does or doesnt exist or if no one has had it or everyone has had it
Does it ever embarrass you, even a little, when you are shown all your mistakes? You seem to not even be able to comprehend something enough to formulate the right questions about it. And in this case, when it is shown to you in videos, with the writing being read to you.
Somehow you are caught up in wanting something to exist so badly, that you pass right by the people who are showing you how it can't exist by any means that are being used.
But, there is that little deal about you really wanting to show the CV pandemic scam without your true desires being revealed to your peers. So, thanks for your help in revealing that the CV pandemic is fake.
