WanderingPhilospher
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 234
Shooters Shoot...
|
|
May 23, 2020, 05:25:14 PM |
|
Doing some tests with a 1070ti. Why playing with OC does not affect hashrate ?
I'm not sure but I noticed the same thing...I normally adjust volts, etc. and it seemed to decrease the MKey rate a small percentage.
|
|
|
|
WhyMe
|
|
May 23, 2020, 05:32:14 PM |
|
Did some other tests : 1070 : 284MKs 1070ti : 291MKs 1080 : 306MKs Why so less difference ?
All 3 cards are on 1x riser, but I tested 1070ti on 16x and there's no difference with 1x
|
|
|
|
Etar
|
|
May 23, 2020, 05:36:17 PM |
|
Did some other tests : 1070 : 284MKs 1070ti : 291MKs 1080 : 306MKs Why so less difference ?
All 3 cards are on 1x riser, but I tested 1070ti on 16x and there's no difference with 1x
6x1070 1697Mkey/s, but it is no good idea used 1000 series in calculations. Huge amount of power and result little bit more as 1 rtx 2080ti, best card for calculation power/mkeys 2000 series
|
|
|
|
WhyMe
|
|
May 23, 2020, 05:40:13 PM |
|
I'm testing with what I already have Have some numbers on 2000 series ?
|
|
|
|
Etar
|
|
May 23, 2020, 05:43:10 PM |
|
I'm testing with what I already have Have some numbers on 2000 series ? 5x1066=1050mkeys 6x1070=1690mkeys 10x1080ti=4200mkeys 6x2070 = 4900mkeys 8x2080ti = 9000mkeys 4xV100 = 7200mkeys that what i tested
|
|
|
|
WhyMe
|
|
May 23, 2020, 05:48:35 PM |
|
Thanks
|
|
|
|
WhyMe
|
|
May 23, 2020, 05:56:02 PM |
|
With prices I see here, 1MKs on 2080ti is 200% of 1MKs on 2070 !
|
|
|
|
Etar
|
|
May 23, 2020, 06:01:48 PM |
|
With prices I see here, 1MKs on 2080ti is 200% of 1MKs on 2070 !
i agree with you that 2070 is the best card to calculation and mining in 2000series by criterion cost/hashrate/power
|
|
|
|
WanderingPhilospher
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 234
Shooters Shoot...
|
|
May 23, 2020, 06:13:16 PM |
|
Ok, I figured out how to see the difference; my NB_JUMP has to be 32 or less and I can then see about a 2^7 difference in avg jumps at 40 bit range. Will test and compare later today.
Do not forget to put the seed before the table and after. You can check this: by Pollard (.. The best choice of m (mean jump size: 2^27) is w^(1/2)/2 ..) Create Jump Table (size: 32) Max Jump: 2^28 Jump: 0 Distance: 1 Jump: 1 Distance: 2 Jump: 2 Distance: 4 Jump: 3 Distance: 8 Jump: 4 Distance: 10 Jump: 5 Distance: 20 Jump: 6 Distance: 40 Jump: 7 Distance: 80 Jump: 8 Distance: 100 Jump: 9 Distance: 200 Jump: 10 Distance: 400 Jump: 11 Distance: 800 Jump: 12 Distance: 1000 Jump: 13 Distance: 2000 Jump: 14 Distance: 4000 Jump: 15 Distance: 8000 Jump: 16 Distance: 5FF2560 Jump: 17 Distance: D25C0B2 Jump: 18 Distance: 93C08DF Jump: 19 Distance: E01F5E3 Jump: 20 Distance: BEE16A6 Jump: 21 Distance: A3F7E94 Jump: 22 Distance: B660AF2 Jump: 23 Distance: D180EA Jump: 24 Distance: 36B8F2 Jump: 25 Distance: 1976C19 Jump: 26 Distance: B4BD788 Jump: 27 Distance: A4193F8 Jump: 28 Distance: C82D7F7 Jump: 29 Distance: B42ABDF Jump: 30 Distance: 68FDB3B Jump: 31 Distance: 95F559 Jump Avg distance: 2^26.03
I do. My results: Range width: 2^40 Jump: 0 Distance: 1 Jump: 1 Distance: 2 Jump: 2 Distance: 4 Jump: 3 Distance: 8 Jump: 4 Distance: 10 Jump: 5 Distance: 20 Jump: 6 Distance: 40 Jump: 7 Distance: 80 Jump: 8 Distance: 100 Jump: 9 Distance: 200 Jump: 10 Distance: 400 Jump: 11 Distance: 800 Jump: 12 Distance: 1000 Jump: 13 Distance: 2000 Jump: 14 Distance: 4000 Jump: 15 Distance: 8000 Jump: 16 Distance: AAF37 Jump: 17 Distance: 141FFB Jump: 18 Distance: D8795 Jump: 19 Distance: 5100D Jump: 20 Distance: 96CE9 Jump: 21 Distance: C66E9 Jump: 22 Distance: 76A30 Jump: 23 Distance: 1416AC Jump: 24 Distance: 18D Jump: 25 Distance: 1EB7B5 Jump: 26 Distance: 45C0E Jump: 27 Distance: 1F48AA Jump: 28 Distance: 2E7AC Jump: 29 Distance: 7A66D Jump: 30 Distance: 179085 Jump: 31 Distance: E4B99 Jump Avg distance: 2^18.74
|
|
|
|
virus-cyber
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
May 24, 2020, 07:15:28 AM |
|
zielar I hope you do not find you are greedy and they will be taken from you again
|
|
|
|
MrFreeDragon
|
|
May 24, 2020, 07:57:28 AM |
|
Server autorestart now works fine. You calmed me down, gentlemen. I must admit that I hope to find # 110 in the next few days ... I will remember you if I do it, and of course about the author of this tool, to which I already owe a lot :-) Greetings !
How much power are you going to use for this task?
|
|
|
|
Etar
|
|
May 24, 2020, 09:20:26 AM |
|
@JeanLuc I have a suggestion regarding the server and client side. I think that it will not optimally support a constant client-server connection. Firstly, because if data is not transmitted to keep connection, you need to play ping ping from time to time. And Windows does not always work out the client shutdown correctly. If internet broken on client side, windows os on server side don`t know about this and keep this connection like live. And this can lead to errors in the socket when trying to send data to an already non-existent connection. In my opinion, it would be better if the client accumulated its DPs before some moment, and then sent them to the server at once. The amount of accumulated dp should be related to the size of dp bit. The second is that only the client should be the initiator of all messages, again to avoid errors in the socket. In this case, even if the server crashes, the clients will still continue job and accumulate their dp and after the server is online they will be sent.
|
|
|
|
zielar
|
|
May 24, 2020, 12:37:40 PM |
|
Server autorestart now works fine. You calmed me down, gentlemen. I must admit that I hope to find # 110 in the next few days ... I will remember you if I do it, and of course about the author of this tool, to which I already owe a lot :-) Greetings !
How much power are you going to use for this task? I have currently engaged a total power of 460000Mkeys/s. #110 I have at the moment [DP Count 2^26.87 / 2^27.55]
|
If you want - you can send me a donation to my BTC wallet address 31hgbukdkehcuxcedchkdbsrygegyefbvd
|
|
|
Elliptic23
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 3
|
|
May 24, 2020, 01:37:23 PM |
|
Server autorestart now works fine. You calmed me down, gentlemen. I must admit that I hope to find # 110 in the next few days ... I will remember you if I do it, and of course about the author of this tool, to which I already owe a lot :-) Greetings !
How much power are you going to use for this task? I have currently engaged a total power of 460000Mkeys/s. #110 I have at the moment [DP Count 2^26.87 / 2^27.55] Why even bother with #110 with that kind of power? Now theres no point in anyone else even trying to solve it because it's almost certain you will.
|
|
|
|
arulbero
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1915
Merit: 2074
|
|
May 24, 2020, 01:45:21 PM |
|
I have currently engaged a total power of 460000Mkeys/s. #110 I have at the moment [DP Count 2^26.87 / 2^27.55]
The Pollard's kangaroo ECDLP solver needs on average about 2*(2^(109/2)) = 2^55.5 steps to retrieve this private key, with a total power of 460000Mkeys/s = 2^38.8 steps/sec it would take 2^16.7 seconds, about 30 hours. With the same power, for the key #115 (114 bit) it would take 2^19.2 seconds, about 170 hours (7 days).
|
|
|
|
dextronomous
|
|
May 24, 2020, 02:05:47 PM |
|
so we all got no chance again, can close this thread now, guess after all finding money is a job.
|
|
|
|
Etar
|
|
May 24, 2020, 02:14:43 PM |
|
so we all got no chance again, can close this thread now, guess after all finding money is a job.
This topic is not about making money, but about the ability to cut a difficult task like finding the key to the puzzle 110. Which before that was extremely difficult to solve. Moreover, JeanLuc has a couple more tricks in the warehouse to improve his brainchild, I'm sure. After all, no one forbids joining in the search for a key. Why spend each separately a bunch of electricity and money, if you can combine work and do it much more efficiently. Can create a common pool and solve problems together, divide production in proportion to the work performed.
|
|
|
|
dextronomous
|
|
May 24, 2020, 02:18:12 PM |
|
i know i am in jeanluc's house now, know that man, his software, difficult i know, meant to say, dang 460000, damn so that i almost forgot one 0. wtf, prolly you already got those moneyz. so wth. said nough, no joining the pool thanks. all good luck,. with not that much of those moneys,
|
|
|
|
MrFreeDragon
|
|
May 24, 2020, 02:33:15 PM |
|
so we all got no chance again, can close this thread now, guess after all finding money is a job.
This message is just one big LOL What kind of chances did you expect without developing the solver and without enough power to solve? Jean_Luc made a great job developing the tool and making it available for the public. It also helped him to implement the improvements as he had the feedback. All other developers did not publish the code, but just were trying to sell it. Real life is not a fairy tale where one man grants the super fast code to you, and another man grants access to super high power.
|
|
|
|
MrFreeDragon
|
|
May 24, 2020, 02:35:48 PM |
|
Server autorestart now works fine. You calmed me down, gentlemen. I must admit that I hope to find # 110 in the next few days ... I will remember you if I do it, and of course about the author of this tool, to which I already owe a lot :-) Greetings !
How much power are you going to use for this task? I have currently engaged a total power of 460000Mkeys/s. #110 I have at the moment [DP Count 2^26.87 / 2^27.55] This is really huge power! ) Is it like 300-400 cards Tesla V100 / GTX 2080ti ?
|
|
|
|
|