Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 09:45:25 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 ... 142 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Pollard's kangaroo ECDLP solver  (Read 55654 times)
WanderingPhilospher
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 219

Shooters Shoot...


View Profile
May 23, 2020, 05:25:14 PM
 #261

Doing some tests with a 1070ti.
Why playing with OC does not affect hashrate ?


I'm not sure but I noticed the same thing...I normally adjust volts, etc. and it seemed to decrease the MKey rate a small percentage.
1714859125
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714859125

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714859125
Reply with quote  #2

1714859125
Report to moderator
Every time a block is mined, a certain amount of BTC (called the subsidy) is created out of thin air and given to the miner. The subsidy halves every four years and will reach 0 in about 130 years.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714859125
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714859125

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714859125
Reply with quote  #2

1714859125
Report to moderator
1714859125
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714859125

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714859125
Reply with quote  #2

1714859125
Report to moderator
1714859125
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714859125

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714859125
Reply with quote  #2

1714859125
Report to moderator
WhyMe
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 661
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 23, 2020, 05:32:14 PM
 #262

Did some other tests :
1070 : 284MKs
1070ti : 291MKs
1080 : 306MKs
Why so less difference ?

All 3 cards are on 1x riser, but I tested 1070ti on 16x and there's no difference with 1x
Etar
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 312


View Profile
May 23, 2020, 05:36:17 PM
 #263

Did some other tests :
1070 : 284MKs
1070ti : 291MKs
1080 : 306MKs
Why so less difference ?

All 3 cards are on 1x riser, but I tested 1070ti on 16x and there's no difference with 1x
6x1070 1697Mkey/s, but it is no good idea used 1000 series in calculations.
Huge amount of power and result little bit more as 1 rtx 2080ti, best card for calculation power/mkeys 2000 series
WhyMe
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 661
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 23, 2020, 05:40:13 PM
 #264

I'm testing with what I already have Smiley
Have some numbers on 2000 series ?
Etar
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 312


View Profile
May 23, 2020, 05:43:10 PM
 #265

I'm testing with what I already have Smiley
Have some numbers on 2000 series ?
5x1066=1050mkeys
6x1070=1690mkeys
10x1080ti=4200mkeys
6x2070 = 4900mkeys
8x2080ti = 9000mkeys
4xV100 = 7200mkeys
that what i tested
WhyMe
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 661
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 23, 2020, 05:48:35 PM
 #266

Thanks
WhyMe
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 661
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 23, 2020, 05:56:02 PM
 #267

With prices I see here, 1MKs on 2080ti is 200% of 1MKs on 2070 !
Etar
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 312


View Profile
May 23, 2020, 06:01:48 PM
 #268

With prices I see here, 1MKs on 2080ti is 200% of 1MKs on 2070 !
i agree with you that 2070 is the best card to calculation and mining in 2000series by criterion cost/hashrate/power
WanderingPhilospher
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 219

Shooters Shoot...


View Profile
May 23, 2020, 06:13:16 PM
 #269

Ok, I figured out how to see the difference; my NB_JUMP has to be 32 or less and I can then see about a 2^7 difference in avg jumps at 40 bit range. Will test and compare later today.
Do not forget to put the seed before the table and after.
You can check this:
Code:
by Pollard (.. The best choice of m (mean jump size: 2^27) is w^(1/2)/2 ..) 
Create Jump Table (size: 32) Max Jump: 2^28
Jump: 0 Distance: 1
Jump: 1 Distance: 2
Jump: 2 Distance: 4
Jump: 3 Distance: 8
Jump: 4 Distance: 10
Jump: 5 Distance: 20
Jump: 6 Distance: 40
Jump: 7 Distance: 80
Jump: 8 Distance: 100
Jump: 9 Distance: 200
Jump: 10 Distance: 400
Jump: 11 Distance: 800
Jump: 12 Distance: 1000
Jump: 13 Distance: 2000
Jump: 14 Distance: 4000
Jump: 15 Distance: 8000
Jump: 16 Distance: 5FF2560
Jump: 17 Distance: D25C0B2
Jump: 18 Distance: 93C08DF
Jump: 19 Distance: E01F5E3
Jump: 20 Distance: BEE16A6
Jump: 21 Distance: A3F7E94
Jump: 22 Distance: B660AF2
Jump: 23 Distance: D180EA
Jump: 24 Distance: 36B8F2
Jump: 25 Distance: 1976C19
Jump: 26 Distance: B4BD788
Jump: 27 Distance: A4193F8
Jump: 28 Distance: C82D7F7
Jump: 29 Distance: B42ABDF
Jump: 30 Distance: 68FDB3B
Jump: 31 Distance: 95F559
Jump Avg distance: 2^26.03
I do.

My results:
Code:
Range width: 2^40
Jump: 0 Distance: 1
Jump: 1 Distance: 2
Jump: 2 Distance: 4
Jump: 3 Distance: 8
Jump: 4 Distance: 10
Jump: 5 Distance: 20
Jump: 6 Distance: 40
Jump: 7 Distance: 80
Jump: 8 Distance: 100
Jump: 9 Distance: 200
Jump: 10 Distance: 400
Jump: 11 Distance: 800
Jump: 12 Distance: 1000
Jump: 13 Distance: 2000
Jump: 14 Distance: 4000
Jump: 15 Distance: 8000
Jump: 16 Distance: AAF37
Jump: 17 Distance: 141FFB
Jump: 18 Distance: D8795
Jump: 19 Distance: 5100D
Jump: 20 Distance: 96CE9
Jump: 21 Distance: C66E9
Jump: 22 Distance: 76A30
Jump: 23 Distance: 1416AC
Jump: 24 Distance: 18D
Jump: 25 Distance: 1EB7B5
Jump: 26 Distance: 45C0E
Jump: 27 Distance: 1F48AA
Jump: 28 Distance: 2E7AC
Jump: 29 Distance: 7A66D
Jump: 30 Distance: 179085
Jump: 31 Distance: E4B99
Jump Avg distance: 2^18.74
virus-cyber
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 24, 2020, 07:15:28 AM
 #270

zielar
I hope you do not find you are greedy
and they will be taken from you again
MrFreeDragon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 443
Merit: 350


View Profile
May 24, 2020, 07:57:28 AM
 #271

Server autorestart now works fine. You calmed me down, gentlemen. I must admit that I hope to find # 110 in the next few days ... I will remember you if I do it, and of course about the author of this tool, to which I already owe a lot :-)
Greetings !

How much power are you going to use for this task?

Etar
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 312


View Profile
May 24, 2020, 09:20:26 AM
 #272

@JeanLuc I have a suggestion regarding the server and client side.
I think that it will not optimally support a constant client-server connection. Firstly, because if data is not transmitted to keep connection, you need to play ping ping from time to time.
And Windows does not always work out the client shutdown correctly. If internet broken on client side, windows os on server side don`t know about this and keep this connection like live.
And this can lead to errors in the socket when trying to send data to an already non-existent connection.
In my opinion, it would be better if the client accumulated its DPs before some moment, and then sent them to the server at once.
The amount of accumulated dp should be related to the size of dp bit.
The second is that only the client should be the initiator of all messages, again to avoid errors in the socket.
In this case, even if the server crashes, the clients will still continue job and accumulate their dp and after the server is online they will be sent.
zielar
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 277
Merit: 106


View Profile
May 24, 2020, 12:37:40 PM
 #273

Server autorestart now works fine. You calmed me down, gentlemen. I must admit that I hope to find # 110 in the next few days ... I will remember you if I do it, and of course about the author of this tool, to which I already owe a lot :-)
Greetings !

How much power are you going to use for this task?

I have currently engaged a total power of 460000Mkeys/s.
#110 I have at the moment [DP Count 2^26.87 / 2^27.55]

If you want - you can send me a donation to my BTC wallet address 31hgbukdkehcuxcedchkdbsrygegyefbvd
Elliptic23
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 3


View Profile
May 24, 2020, 01:37:23 PM
 #274

Server autorestart now works fine. You calmed me down, gentlemen. I must admit that I hope to find # 110 in the next few days ... I will remember you if I do it, and of course about the author of this tool, to which I already owe a lot :-)
Greetings !

How much power are you going to use for this task?

I have currently engaged a total power of 460000Mkeys/s.
#110 I have at the moment [DP Count 2^26.87 / 2^27.55]

Why even bother with #110 with that kind of power? Now theres no point in anyone else even trying to solve it because it's almost certain you will.
arulbero
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1915
Merit: 2074


View Profile
May 24, 2020, 01:45:21 PM
 #275

I have currently engaged a total power of 460000Mkeys/s.
#110 I have at the moment [DP Count 2^26.87 / 2^27.55]

The Pollard's kangaroo ECDLP solver needs on average about 2*(2^(109/2)) = 2^55.5 steps to retrieve this private key, with a total power of 460000Mkeys/s =  2^38.8 steps/sec it would take 2^16.7 seconds, about 30 hours.

With the same power, for the key #115 (114 bit) it would take 2^19.2 seconds,  about 170 hours (7 days).
dextronomous
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 428
Merit: 105


View Profile
May 24, 2020, 02:05:47 PM
 #276

so we all got no chance again,
can close this thread now, guess after all finding money is a job.
Etar
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 312


View Profile
May 24, 2020, 02:14:43 PM
 #277

so we all got no chance again,
can close this thread now, guess after all finding money is a job.

This topic is not about making money, but about the ability to cut a difficult task like finding the key to the puzzle 110.
Which before that was extremely difficult to solve.
Moreover, JeanLuc has a couple more tricks in the warehouse to improve his brainchild, I'm sure.
After all, no one forbids joining in the search for a key. Why spend each separately a bunch of electricity and money, if you can combine work and do it much more efficiently.
Can create a common pool and solve problems together, divide production in proportion to the work performed.
dextronomous
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 428
Merit: 105


View Profile
May 24, 2020, 02:18:12 PM
 #278

i know i am in jeanluc's house now,
know that man, his software,
difficult i know, meant to say, dang 460000,
damn so that i almost forgot one 0. wtf,
prolly you already got those moneyz. so wth.
said nough, no joining the pool thanks.
all good luck,. with not that much of those moneys,
MrFreeDragon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 443
Merit: 350


View Profile
May 24, 2020, 02:33:15 PM
 #279

so we all got no chance again,
can close this thread now, guess after all finding money is a job.

This message is just one big LOL  Grin
What kind of chances did you expect without developing the solver and without enough power to solve?

Jean_Luc made a great job developing the tool and making it available for the public. It also helped him to implement the improvements as he had the feedback. All other developers did not publish the code, but just were trying to sell it.

Real life is not a fairy tale where one man grants the super fast code to you, and another man grants access to super high power.

MrFreeDragon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 443
Merit: 350


View Profile
May 24, 2020, 02:35:48 PM
 #280

Server autorestart now works fine. You calmed me down, gentlemen. I must admit that I hope to find # 110 in the next few days ... I will remember you if I do it, and of course about the author of this tool, to which I already owe a lot :-)
Greetings !

How much power are you going to use for this task?

I have currently engaged a total power of 460000Mkeys/s.
#110 I have at the moment [DP Count 2^26.87 / 2^27.55]

This is really huge power! ) Is it like 300-400 cards Tesla V100 / GTX 2080ti ?

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 ... 142 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!