There are no opinions, there are simply the correct and accurate descriptions of independently verifiable behaviours previously documented here on this forums history.
Everything that I have said is true. I don't have time to detail every post but people have never refuted even a single core point I have made successfully. That is not a matter of opinion.
You may take every event that I have said has happened as having happened. I would not provide them with excuse to prove me incorrect.
These threads can get you started. I did actually give you more than enough to confirm you only needed to google it all.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5231720.0https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.0Sadly watered down quite a bit since lauda bullied or traded with pn7/quickseller to wash each others balls a little bit and mutually remove long held red tags suddenly both realize the other is not the most dangerous member on bct. Laudas pill addiction thread, the extortion thread redacted somewhat and now there is not even a reference to it in quicksellers newly adapted neutral tag. He obviously doesnt want people to read that thread anymore and give ppl.a chance to make up their own minds. I mean why would you remove the reference link? Must be part of laudas demands. Poor old pn7/qs I do actually feel he was forced into this deal with the devil.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5170789.0What a brilliant and masterful thread by a one man army. Crushing all before him. I salute Toaa. I really can't say who I would rather meet in person him or ch. I mean ch for the kudos and historical importance but Toaa is perhaps even more fun. I do miss them both. Am I messing with you? Absolutely not.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5190369.0https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5181755.msg52361217#msg52361217https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5214166.0Nerdius or TPOTO as I like to call him previously ran after and sucked up to another scammer he assumed was female alia
Google can provide some fun reading on that.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088852.0This thread is under stating the insoluble problems since the merit was yet to be conflated with trust although the insightful member (aka the same one that crushed laudas lies and scamming resulting in a 2 000 000 000 usd compensation offer to the forum 20 000 000 at that time ) specifically warned against binding the two.
Deeper related insoluble issues with merit and subjective tagging
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226886.msg53872527#msg53872527https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5184281.msg52443215#msg52443215It is trivial to find the original ch coming to meta merit cycling threads to peruse
Once you understand clearly the dangers and Implications of the meaningless and damaging merit / trust design and the insoluble problems it creates specifically with crushing free speech.
Once you understand there is clear evidence of these same undeniable scammers and scammer supporting scumbags all abusing every aspect of the merit/trust system
Once you understand that merit and trust are clearly used as carrot and stick to crush free speech and actually assist scamming and prevent scammers being punished whilst punishing whistleblowers
Once you understand that this is not opinion but observable independently verifiable documented evidence.
There are hundreds of links from ch , toaa, truth or dare, myself and many others that provide clear undeniable evidence of confirmed and documented scammers infesting the systems of control and using them to facilitate scamming but it has been a long day start with the links I just found now in 10mis of my time.
Then if you want to tell me more about your heros and how brilliant the systems of control are I can hear your points.
One must be careful after being shown direct incontrovertible proof of financially motivated wrongdoing or direct scamming not to defend or excuse or praise their dangerous behaviors else risk being correctly called out as a scammer supporter or defender.
I would strongly recommend the posts of Toaa. Ch was good and achieved the most but was prone to rambling and slightly teasing people a little. Make no mistake though he helped many find not only the truth but extreme wealth with some of his predictions.
The member was obsessed with things being fair and was the first to attack many huge scams.
If there are things I have said you feel you can debunk. Take a shot but dont make up silly excuses for scammers else I will be most upset.
Take your time. Read as much as you can. Then reply.
I stand by each of my points. I feel each one is indisputable and has proven so thus far. I dont seek to take the credit these points originate from ch or Toaa some say they are one and the same. Then again any member that speaks the truth and opposes scammers with hard evidence is apparently ch.
This post is a bit rushed I have had a long day and it is late I'm on my phone.
Detail your points with examples.
And no we can not forget and pass over the members you mention they are key to the abuse and manipulation here and these are the very same members that should not be getting paid to destroy the forums free speech. They are the very foundation of the on topic discussion.
I would not conflate effort expounded with being net positive.... scamming, defending scammers and trust abusing and trying to dress up merit as a useful valuable metric....yes takes some effort. Locating, collecting and cooking dog shit takes effort but I would not say it is of net benefit to the people being served it under the guise of meatballs.
I prefer your sarcasm to your ranting highly misleading and dangerous untruths.
Detailed rebuttals not " all of that seems like a pile of shit" specific examples you can debunk. If there are points you are unable to verify as true from those links, that I have made previously, then detail them specifically.
I may tidy this up and pull up a few links more tomorrow when I awake in the morning.
In short every event I have specifically mentioned has taken place.
The fact you have lauda in your trust includes is rather concerning.
The fact you have detailed knowledge of hackers alleged ico bumping but no knowledge at all of any of laudas scamming, extorting, trust abusing, racism, dubious escrowing practises is unlikely
Are you sure you are not close to lauda? When I say close I mean like possessing his actual body entirely or perhaps a siamese twin? Maybe you are simply undercover when you are lauda ? Hey maybe you are doing an undercover agents sting on lauda?
Perhaps my fav thread of all time especially page 2. If you know the history of these scammers as you should now this is classic ch.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5123752.0