Do I need ICO?

[campusnet]

I think you need to have a strong team to make your project attractive and trusted by investors. Without a solid team, your project will fail. I am not sure whether ICO will succeed when investors or Bounty hunters no longer trust ICO. Maybe you need with IEO but as I said, You must have a strong and solid team.

You're right, a strong team and interesting projects are the main capital. but now does anyone believe in ICO? the currently more popular fundraising system may be IEO. it also does not guarantee the success of the project. very difficult to find investors to project at this time.

[riso2015]

In my opinion it is not a good idea to make ICO projects, because investors are no longer interested. My advice if you have expertise
technology and can develop it. Try making IEO projects, because they are more trusted. But IEO projects cannot be developed by
yourself, you must create a team that can develop IEO projects and promote them. You also need to have a large enough capital,
to be able to work with popular exchanges. Because the best key to successfully making IEO projects is that they must be listed on
popular exchanges.

Agree, if you want to make an IEO then choose an Exchange that has been trusted by investors, such as Binance, Okex or Kucoin. Indeed, we have to spend a large capital but that's okay, because we will get commensurate results. I see OP is an experienced person, so I am sure OP can build a solid team.

[davidroux]

I think you need to have a strong team to make your project attractive and trusted by investors. Without a solid team, your project will fail. I am not sure whether ICO will succeed when investors or Bounty hunters no longer trust ICO. Maybe you need with IEO but as I said, You must have a strong and solid team.

If an ICO project does not have a large partner and many people are interested in it, even if they run many marketing campaigns, that project cannot cause investors to change their minds because for them ICO is all scam projects. In my opinion, you should only choose investment when you understand the project and have available exchanges for liquidity because if you do not check this, you will have to spend a lot of time waiting.

[bayudndy]

I think you need to have a strong team to make your project attractive and trusted by investors. Without a solid team, your project will fail. I am not sure whether ICO will succeed when investors or Bounty hunters no longer trust ICO. Maybe you need with IEO but as I said, You must have a strong and solid team.

You're right, a strong team and interesting projects are the main capital. but now does anyone believe in ICO? the currently more popular fundraising system may be IEO. it also does not guarantee the success of the project. very difficult to find investors to project at this time.

Investors will never risk investing in ICOs at this time, the risk for ICOs is too high and too difficult for them to make a profit from it. And I agree with you, projects should focus on IEO in order to raise funds

[Greatdev]

I ’m a technician, but I do n’t know how to promote it.
I hope that like Satoshi Nakamoto, there is no ICO, no pre-mining, but no one will develop for free. All need money.
The isomorphic multi-chain solution was designed by myself. The core technology has been implemented and verified to be feasible.

I can complete the technical project by myself.
I have developed the first technical version and will finish the second technical version.
The next plan is an application, which requires a formal team and a lot of funding.
The project is online more than half a year, but the promotion is slow.

If promotion is slow you should consider IEO, get in touch with exchanges like bithumb, upbit, Probit exchange and few others, also be aware that some exchanges have bad influence on projects, you need to do research on that, there is fake volumes and watch trades

[ElmedoRator]

I ’m a technician, but I do n’t know how to promote it.
I hope that like Satoshi Nakamoto, there is no ICO, no pre-mining, but no one will develop for free. All need money.
The isomorphic multi-chain solution was designed by myself. The core technology has been implemented and verified to be feasible.

I can complete the technical project by myself.
I have developed the first technical version and will finish the second technical version.
The next plan is an application, which requires a formal team and a lot of funding.
The project is online more than half a year, but the promotion is slow.

If promotion is slow you should consider IEO, get in touch with exchanges like bithumb, upbit, Probit exchange and few others, also be aware that some exchanges have bad influence on projects, you need to do research on that, there is fake volumes and watch trades

These are small exchanges in this market, and if you do IEO there it is very difficult to raise funds, and the price of the token will collapse many times after being listed. So choose larger exchanges to negotiate the IEO

[beveryu778]

I think you need to have a strong team to make your project attractive and trusted by investors. Without a solid team, your project will fail. I am not sure whether ICO will succeed when investors or Bounty hunters no longer trust ICO. Maybe you need with IEO but as I said, You must have a strong and solid team.

Yes, I agree with your opinion on this topic, having a great team can make a lot of difference. Because behind every successful project there is a team that may put continuous effort until it gets succeeds. That's why it is a very essential part of having a productive team behind the project to make the project hugely successful.

[SyndicateLabs]

If your project has enough budget to develop in the first phase, then I think you should not do an ICO. But if you start with the project and don't have the budget, then you need to raise funds from the community. But ICOs are not a good choice, try contacting the exchanges and deals IEO with them

[irixo10]

I ’m a technician, but I do n’t know how to promote it.
I hope that like Satoshi Nakamoto, there is no ICO, no pre-mining, but no one will develop for free. All need money.
The isomorphic multi-chain solution was designed by myself. The core technology has been implemented and verified to be feasible.

I can complete the technical project by myself.
I have developed the first technical version and will finish the second technical version.
The next plan is an application, which requires a formal team and a lot of funding.
The project is online more than half a year, but the promotion is slow.

First you need to know that, your idea need to be in a state in which it can be promoted. Secondly you need a team which can help put finishing touches on the idea which is to be promoted, remember no man knows it all, therefore you need one or two ideas, suggestions etc from other experts to enhance your potential platform. Then lastly, the Important part, you need funding to succeed no matter how you see it. There have been projects which uses their money to push up the idea, list on a medium exchange, attract investors and then go higher, while there are some who went for public fundraising, in the aspect of public fundraising I suggest you go for IEO and forget about ICO.

[Google+]

If your project has enough budget to develop in the first phase, then I think you should not do an ICO. But if you start with the project and don't have the budget, then you need to raise funds from the community. But ICOs are not a good choice, try contacting the exchanges and deals IEO with them

ICO's death is already clearly seen when many ICOs and developers are scamming so that no one is interested in ico anymore, maybe the developer should try to find other ways to collect funds.

[robelneo]

I ’m a technician, but I do n’t know how to promote it.
I hope that like Satoshi Nakamoto, there is no ICO, no pre-mining, but no one will develop for free. All need money.
The isomorphic multi-chain solution was designed by myself. The core technology has been implemented and verified to be feasible.

I can complete the technical project by myself.
I have developed the first technical version and will finish the second technical version.
The next plan is an application, which requires a formal team and a lot of funding.
The project is online more than half a year, but the promotion is slow.

Since you have everything in place and you seem to be dedicated to making this possible, why not there are still projects that do ICO, but it's more challenging doing an ICO than IEO now, people tend to draw away from ICO obviously because of the bad reputation it generates in the last two years and investors are favoring IEO now than ICO.

If you are up to the challenge and you are dedicated and you are sincere then you can proceed I wish you luck, be sure to create a good announcement thread so potential investors will notice your project.

[drumamat]

Advertising is the engine of trade. But in order to run this engine, developers alone will not be enough. But I can say that advertising can be done without huge expenses for it. It all depends on the Manager.

[Gorosden]

I ’m a technician, but I do n’t know how to promote it.
I hope that like Satoshi Nakamoto, there is no ICO, no pre-mining, but no one will develop for free. All need money.
The isomorphic multi-chain solution was designed by myself. The core technology has been implemented and verified to be feasible.

I can complete the technical project by myself.
I have developed the first technical version and will finish the second technical version.
The next plan is an application, which requires a formal team and a lot of funding.
The project is online more than half a year, but the promotion is slow.

You don't need ICO, new projects don't use ICO to raise funds anymore because ICO reputations got ruined by scammers, the only solution now is IEO, if your project is very good enough you will raise fund successfully and exchanges results differs so choose good exchange

[BLTC]

It a tough ask. The main reason of the ICO is to gather funds for your project. But with creativity, time, experience and a little bit of dazzling i believe that you can get a great project on your hands. 

[Divinespark]

If your project has enough budget to develop in the first phase, then I think you should not do an ICO. But if you start with the project and don't have the budget, then you need to raise funds from the community. But ICOs are not a good choice, try contacting the exchanges and deals IEO with them

ICO's death is already clearly seen when many ICOs and developers are scamming so that no one is interested in ico anymore, maybe the developer should try to find other ways to collect funds.

IEO will be the next choice for new projects. But in order to be successful with IEO, you need to do it at leading exchanges in this market such as Binance, Okex, Kucoin, Gate ... but these exchanges will also have a lot of requirements for the new project

[josgandosbro]

So are you saying you want to be anonymous like Satoshi? I don't think that's possible, why? projects that have a real team alone can fool many people and many investors who don't trust. what's more without a transparent team of course it would be very impossible.