You should probably leave Royse777 out of this until you have some actual evidence. This guilt via association you are tying to present here is no better than what the clown clan does.
This is not based on any guilt by association. I am primarily describing his own individual actions.
There is undeniable proof of lauda scamming upon which I have based the flag.
Anyone seeking to prevent the flag is clearly trying to prevent a valid warning being placed upon a scammer.
There is no other possibility. Unless they can debunk the evidence as false.
This is a deliberate and willful attempt to protect and support scammers.
This is a deliberate and willful attempt to deprive honest member of a valid scammer warning.
It is one thing to pretend you dont have time to review hard evidence of scammers you are supporting hence you can claim you have not examined the evidence of undeniable scamming.
It is certainly not okay to say you have reviewed the undeniable evidence of scamming but are willing to block the warning to honest members without offering a full debunking of the evidence that you claim to have found fault with sufficiently that you must act to block it
He is being given full opportunity to demonstrate otherwise. He is refusing.
He can
1. Debunk the proof of scamming here in public.
2. He can withdraw his support for blocking a legitimate scam warning on a proven scammer
There is no guilt by association. His own actions are the basis are simply being documented.
I am claiming he is directly guilty of blocking my legitimate scam warning on a scammer. I claim he is doing this wilfully and deliberately since he is unwilling to explain in detail the flaws in the proof of scam I have presented.
This is not due to him simply asking lauda to work on his covid 19 " project"
This is not a red tag. This is a factual open and transparent account of events.
He can at anytime successfully demonstrate that my evidence for the lauda being a scammer is false and should be prevented
Since he is refusing to debunk the evidence the flag is based upon but still insists he must prevent the valid scammer warning then for now he is clearly supporting scammers.
The truth will not be concealed.
I'm not looking to debate or seek approval from anyone for describing the truth.
Royse777 the scammer supporter can stop supporting scammers directly and stop depriving honest members of important warnings at any point. Then I will simply alter the text to describe the truth as it stands.
Or he can demonstrate I am not telling the truth.
There is no other eventuality.