Solution to too many promoters

[Utoy101]

I know that scam bounty projects still shows up on this forum from time to time but after managing to promote the bounty that's not a scam you end up with very low bounty reward, why ? I think the problem about bounties is we have too few bounty campaigns and too many bounty hunters

JUST IF

Just if bounty managers and project teams can start limiting bounty hunters the reward will still be fair enough, how can 500 participants share 3000$ bounty allocation?

Where are the bounties with fixed bounty allocations? After doing some digging on past bounty campaigns I noticed many of them have fixed rewards, this is good or limited participants

What do you think??

Your suggestion is good, however, the aim of every bounty is to provide as much promotion as possible and from where the teams and bounty managers stand, having a limited bounty participants dosen't really bode well for them as the more hunter participate in the campaign, the more promotion and relevance they will get. So the fact still remains, it is the duty of every hunter to make due and diligence research about a campaign ranging from the potentials of the project, to the total bounty pool and as well the number of participants already participating in the campaign

[Harlot]

You won't be convincing anyone devs and their projects won't limit themselves in this forum. They will always want to have as much exposure as possible on the fund they don't have that's why they always max out the participants as this is their only way of marketing if they don't have funds for that. Devs don't care about post qualities in the forum or what sections they do it in as long as the participant is wearing their signature they'll be rewarded a stake. Also its their project and it is really up to you if you consider their rewards fair before you join/participate with their project.

[NS-Soul]

I know that scam bounty projects still shows up on this forum from time to time but after managing to promote the bounty that's not a scam you end up with very low bounty reward, why ? I think the problem about bounties is we have too few bounty campaigns and too many bounty hunters

JUST IF

Just if bounty managers and project teams can start limiting bounty hunters the reward will still be fair enough, how can 500 participants share 3000$ bounty allocation?

Where are the bounties with fixed bounty allocations? After doing some digging on past bounty campaigns I noticed many of them have fixed rewards, this is good or limited participants

What do you think??

Well limiting is a good idea so the rewards is not that small but in reality it will not happen specially in social media because they want many promoters of their project so many investor would noticed it the more promoters the more exposure of the project specially if they will share it on different facebook group that having big number of members.

[azmirihaque]

This is good idea for limiting participant. If it is implemented, participants will get more payment. But is project team will really do it? I think, they will always avoid it because they are getting more promotion with the same budget. So, if there would be some rules of the forum relating to bounty program like minimum payment for every participant, specific joining time, submitting the budget to the forum authority before starting campaign etc, the scamer couldn't take the advantage and both was befitted.

[Romeotom]

The good idea for limited bounty participate with with consider fixed rewards because one of the important thinking investors profits. We know many projects want promote with lots of bounty rewards even thinking me totally a unless project. Therefore a real project want fixed rewards analysis there investors profits.

[hushpupppy]

I know that scam bounty projects still shows up on this forum from time to time but after managing to promote the bounty that's not a scam you end up with very low bounty reward, why ? I think the problem about bounties is we have too few bounty campaigns and too many bounty hunters

JUST IF

Just if bounty managers and project teams can start limiting bounty hunters the reward will still be fair enough, how can 500 participants share 3000$ bounty allocation?

Where are the bounties with fixed bounty allocations? After doing some digging on past bounty campaigns I noticed many of them have fixed rewards, this is good or limited participants

What do you think??

The truth is that fixed rewards do not solve a lot of the puzzle, but instead limiting participants.
And believe me, limiting participants will go a long way to ensuring good contents, reduce spam and help the bounty manager to duly monitor the cause of the promotion.

[tabas]

The good idea for limited bounty participate with with consider fixed rewards because one of the important thinking investors profits. We know many projects want promote with lots of bounty rewards even thinking me totally a unless project. Therefore a real project want fixed rewards analysis there investors profits.

A real project won't determine the number of its bounty hunters. A project with or without limitation to bounty hunters can be real or fake. The thinking of making a project with fixed participants is just to limit the budget of a campaign.
This is why some bounties don't look to the bounty pool rewards they have because they can get many people to join them which is in favor of them.

[Jonyshake71]

Limiting bounty participators is a wise idea to have good bounty reward. But project teams don't want to limit hunters because hunters helps them a lot to promote their project & make successful. So most of them request bounty manager not to limit bounty

[ije07]

yes, regarding the allocation of fixed prizes to the current gift project it is true that it is different from before. Today there are many good projects but there are many participants. I also agree that the bounty project can limit participants in every part of the campaign they launch, especially in the signature slot.

[farukahmed]

Promoters are DNA sequences whose purpose is not to encode information about the organism itself, but rather they serve as a kind of "On" switch to initiate the biological process of transcription for the genes which follow the promoter DNA sequence. The legal position of promoters is that he is neither agent nor employee of the company but he stands in fiduciary capacity.

[someone703]

yes, regarding the allocation of fixed prizes to the current gift project it is true that it is different from before. Today there are many good projects but there are many participants. I also agree that the bounty project can limit participants in every part of the campaign they launch, especially in the signature slot.

Agree with you, they should restrict participants in the signature campaign to ensure rewards for participants. Typically, each campaign only needs 50-100 people to participate in the signature campaign

[Retainly_Collie]

I know that scam bounty projects still shows up on this forum from time to time but after managing to promote the bounty that's not a scam you end up with very low bounty reward, why ? I think the problem about bounties is we have too few bounty campaigns and too many bounty hunters

JUST IF

Just if bounty managers and project teams can start limiting bounty hunters the reward will still be fair enough, how can 500 participants share 3000$ bounty allocation?

Where are the bounties with fixed bounty allocations? After doing some digging on past bounty campaigns I noticed many of them have fixed rewards, this is good or limited participants

What do you think??

The truth is that fixed rewards do not solve a lot of the puzzle, but instead limiting participants.
And believe me, limiting participants will go a long way to ensuring good contents, reduce spam and help the bounty manager to duly monitor the cause of the promotion.

Limiting participants is always a good choice. The project will receive people who support them for a long time. I was surprised that near the end of the campaign, there were so many accounts participating in the campaign because the project had a lot of good news or an IEO implementation.

[kceekcee]

This is an easy situation, the perfect solution to too many promoters is to have a Bounty participants cap.

It worked well with spyce Bounty and also with hybrix Bounty.
Then flexible rules, such as removal of anyone that doesn't submit task in 2 consecutive weeks etc

[andycarrol]

This is an easy situation, the perfect solution to too many promoters is to have a Bounty participants cap.

It worked well with spyce Bounty and also with hybrix Bounty.
Then flexible rules, such as removal of anyone that doesn't submit task in 2 consecutive weeks etc

I think when too many people do promotions then you should be able to try to do more research about the project being developed and whether the project is useful for many people or not because cryptocurrency price movements depend on the projects being developed and depending on demand.

[adibi12]

it is a very good idea, but every project teams and manager needs more participants so that their promotional targets are easily achieved, and get more investors, because with more promotion participants more investors will be confident in the project.

[Convery]

Now bounty managers and ICO team value more money than anytime before. Few years ago there wasn´t problem to giveaway 1 million usd to bounty promoters, but now the situation changed, they care about every dollar.

[Teraboy]

Now bounty managers and ICO team value more money than anytime before. Few years ago there wasn´t problem to giveaway 1 million usd to bounty promoters, but now the situation changed, they care about every dollar.

It caused by the situation is much more difficult when there will be more coins exist in the market and the money will have divided even more. The problem the team is also doesn't even wanna use some of their money at least to pay the hunters.

It's better to give a limitation to the participants to make sure everyone will get what they deserve to get from their effort.

[SacriFries11]

Now bounty managers and ICO team value more money than anytime before. Few years ago there wasn´t problem to giveaway 1 million usd to bounty promoters, but now the situation changed, they care about every dollar.

If BM have already a lot of experience managing bounty campaign. I'm sure he will figure it out how to deal even it have many of participants. There are some BM that being fixed with their reward weekly but do not limit their participants. It's attract many participants to join to their campaign. If I'm going to get back in joining bounty campaigns, I don't care if its high o low reward as long as its legit and they will pay in the end but of course its a good project as well.

[CaVO32]

it is a very good idea, but every project teams and manager needs more participants so that their promotional targets are easily achieved, and get more investors, because with more promotion participants more investors will be confident in the project.

with that kind of mindset that you will encounter both for the project team and BM, the choice is left to the bounty hunter if he will join or not, with the possibility of getting small reward as they continue accepting participants. one can't dictate about the decision of the team, they can only suggest but the final decision is still on the team. so if the team will keep on accepting participants for the sake of their exposure, then, it is on the bounty hunter whether he will continue promoting the project or not. the earlier you quit, the less resources/effort you wasted before it's too late. the decision is yours.

[ethereumhunter]

yes, regarding the allocation of fixed prizes to the current gift project it is true that it is different from before. Today there are many good projects but there are many participants. I also agree that the bounty project can limit participants in every part of the campaign they launch, especially in the signature slot.

That is because many participants want to make money from the project, so they join in the same project. Limiting the participants can be a good idea to the project because they don't have to confuse to handle so many participants, and they can focus on the project too. Besides that, the reward for every participant can be increased if the limiting is applied to the campaign. But we never know what suits for the project because I think some project will be okay if they have so many participants in their project.