Despite Many Participants, You Can Still Get Huge Rewards In Bounty.

[trauchot]

There are different situations, because it happens when you participate in social networks bounties and in videos or articles bounties, and at the end, when the bounty ends and you check your tokens and you see that sometimes you get more tokens for social networks than for articles or videos.

[1714751690]

1714751690

[1714751690]

1714751690

[1714751690]

1714751690

[1714751690]

1714751690

[1714751690]

1714751690

[Cryptpogz1]

it depends on what campaign you are participating in for example if you can provide something valuable like translation or having a lot of subscribers followers u can still make a decent profit and stand out.

[malekbaba]

Video campaign, article writting, blog posting etc tasks are relatively tough. Need skills, good knowledge about blockchain, have to be good in grammer. So, hard workers will get higher reward. But not easily.
I usually avoid the campaigns, already have thousands of participants.

[Francis Freeman]

As long as you select a good project which has a valid use case it doesn't matter how many participants it has the bounty will surely reward you. For example I am in Payaccept now and I have high hopes for it to succeed .

[jpnl0006]

Many Bounty Hunters Are Increasing Daily On A Regular Basis Thereby Causing Many Hunters Feels Reluctant Of Paticipating In Nowaday Bounties Because Of Low And Unappreciated Rewards. Campaigns Managed By Bounty Detective Seems To Be Stressful Because Of Its Long Duration Of 12 Weeks And At The End Hunters Still Getting Poor Rewards Of $5, Lol. 😂


I Have Observed So Many Times That Article And Video Campaigns Have Less Participants While Hunters Feels It's Much Stressful And Brainstorming. Bounty Hunting Is All About Sacrificing Time, Energy, Data And Electricity. Now For You To Be A Good Hunter With High Rewards, You Have To Participate In Article And Video Campaigns Only, For Lower Ranks On Forum And Sometimes Signature Campaigns For Higher Ranks, Meanwhile Participating In Social Media Campaigns Gives Less Reward Because Of Many Participants. Try This And You Gonna Appreciate Me.

It will actually be an honor to gt the list of projects that i can involve myself in that can pay me those big  and huge rewards you talk about. I have done loads of jobs in expectant of the rewards that can be compared to the type that was paid before now and it is not forth coming. So, please update me with the list of projects, thanks.

[malekbaba]

Dear OP, A good bounty manager will still be a good, if the project fails. No one knows what will happen to a project in future. We just experiment, sometimes we get good result and add value to a token. Sometimes we get hurt from a outcome. Thats it. A good manager is one who performs cordially, helps community. Inspite of his effort, even a good manager's project may fail.

[Surrapatt]

It will actually be an honor to gt the list of projects that i can involve myself in that can pay me those big  and huge rewards you talk about. I have done loads of jobs in expectant of the rewards that can be compared to the type that was paid before now and it is not forth coming. So, please update me with the list of projects, thanks.

Every day new projects are always born by project developers, so it will be a little difficult if someone makes a list for the project every day, especially for the subject of the project there is also a special sub forum that you can see and read carefully, so take your time. for it and never be lazy to read it.

[deathcode]

Dear OP, A good bounty manager will still be a good, if the project fails. No one knows what will happen to a project in future. We just experiment, sometimes we get good result and add value to a token. Sometimes we get hurt from a outcome. Thats it. A good manager is one who performs cordially, helps community. Inspite of his effort, even a good manager's project may fail.

You are right, a good manager is not only seen from his successful projects. How to manage participants, as well as rules that might be liked by a bounty hunter, can make him a good manager even though not all projects that are handled are successful.

If you look at the Bubbalex manager, you can see that all the projects are successful and the community is also growing well. but not all of them are successful. If you look at the Agareum project that was finished almost a year ago and it looks like everything looks bad.

[bakasabo]

As long as you select a good project which has a valid use case it doesn't matter how many participants it has the bounty will surely reward you. For example I am in Payaccept now and I have high hopes for it to succeed .

Do you count Payaccept as a good bounty? I happen to participate in it also (only in social media campaigns). Now is the last, 12th week of the campaign and spreadsheets are filled only till week 4 for social media, and signatures till week 7. Can you be sure that all your stakes will be counted correctly, or you did something wrong on week 5 and worked other weeks for 0 stakes? Bounty manager is a weird guy in telegram group - he says he fills all the spreadsheet data offline and will update online table on the last day.

[lionheart78]

Video campaign, article writting, blog posting etc tasks are relatively tough. Need skills, good knowledge about blockchain, have to be good in grammer. So, hard workers will get higher reward. But not easily.
I usually avoid the campaigns, already have thousands of participants.

Indeed, video campaign also needs at least a basic level of video editing.  I have seen several participants joining this campaign but lack that basic skill.  They just record and upload, so I think this would be one of the better campaign to join if one has skills in video editing since it will surely give a good reward if the bounty manager appreaciate high quality works..  the only negative side of this is, if they also consider the number of views and not just the video creation itself.  This will only means that a poorly created video can outpay the quality one if they beat it to views.

Could any one reccomend a reputable bounty manager though. I've done a few where the payoff was well completely unsatisfactory. And really makes you feel like a chump

I heard bubbalex and BountyDetective are quite reputable in altcoin bounty management.  Also there is Hhampuz, Yahoo62278, Darkstar_, Zwei and many more that is very reputable when it comes to managing  BTC weekly payment campaign.

[bakasabo]

I heard bubbalex and BountyDetective are quite reputable in altcoin bounty management.  

I disagree. They are popular, but doubt that reputed. I've made a short review of bounty campaign under their management in 2020. Info is 1 month old and here is what have changed- HOMT, 3WM and TERRACREDIT campaigns are finished now. Nothing has been distributed so far. Also I had some troubles with TERRACREDIT - I've participated in it, but havent found myself in spreadsheet. I've made a question in complaint form and this question was answered in 2 weeks after "spreadsheets are turned to project owners".

And their "distribution guaranteed" - they guarantee, but say that bounty hunters participate in campaigns by their own risk. If the projects is scam, unsuccessful, postpones or refuses to distribute rewards - that is not of their business. 

[bobyhodob]

Dear OP, A good bounty manager will still be a good, if the project fails. No one knows what will happen to a project in future. We just experiment, sometimes we get good result and add value to a token. Sometimes we get hurt from a outcome. Thats it. A good manager is one who performs cordially, helps community. Inspite of his effort, even a good manager's project may fail.

Usually what makes the project fail to pay and make many participants disappointed is because the CEO did not pay the participants directly and did not match what had been agreed upon, the bounty manager's job was only to manage the participants of the bounty campaign, while the payment then it is the developer's business, but if you realize that sometimes there are bounty managers who already hold the payment allocation for the bounty campaign participants.

[Squezzi55]

Could any one reccomend a reputable bounty manager though. I've done a few where the payoff was well completely unsatisfactory. And really makes you feel like a chump

You just have to keep trying friend, even reputable bounty managers introduce projects that turned bad later, whatever will happen to a bounty project after bounty is over will always remain unknown to everyone, bounties are base on lucks

[Fivestar4everMVP]

I personally stopped participating in social media campaigns a long time ago, it's always a waste of time and effort, i prefer to participate in signature campaigns cus the pay is always better even if they are many participants, just like the op said, those with lower ranks in here can always opt for article and video campaigns, though they can be very stressful though.

[lienfaye]

I personally stopped participating in social media campaigns a long time ago, it's always a waste of time and effort, i prefer to participate in signature campaigns cus the pay is always better even if they are many participants, just like the op said, those with lower ranks in here can always opt for article and video campaigns, though they can be very stressful though.

Well yes the bounty signature campaigns are giving much better rewards compared to social media campaigns, but I think this should not be our first concern. Because no matter how good the rewards is (despite of having many participants) if the project itself is not doing good then it will all be wasted. It can fail or turn as scam, thats why before we look for projects allocation for each promotion check first if it has potential to succeed in the future.

[New_order]

As long as you select a good project which has a valid use case it doesn't matter how many participants it has the bounty will surely reward you. For example I am in Payaccept now and I have high hopes for it to succeed .

It's true that a project must have a very good use case to acquire good demand but if too many bounty hunters promote such project the reward won't be much, I still prefer bounties that introduce limited participants and fixed tokens, if none like this happens be ready to join multiple campaigns at once to atleast get good reward

[CashbackLover]

Too many participants will always ruin rewards for bounty hunters, I've learned my lessons and nothing can change that, bounty projects like ARCS and IQCash are good example about why unlimited participants is a bad choice, these projects are trading already but bounty manager or team allowed too many participants and in the end many get 10$ to 15$ from these projects, bounty hunters that participate in Cartesi bounty are able to make 100$ to 500$ simply because the BM use limited participants

[bakasabo]

Too many participants will always ruin rewards for bounty hunters, I've learned my lessons and nothing can change that, bounty projects like ARCS and IQCash are good example about why unlimited participants is a bad choice, these projects are trading already but bounty manager or team allowed too many participants and in the end many get 10$ to 15$ from these projects, bounty hunters that participate in Cartesi bounty are able to make 100$ to 500$ simply because the BM use limited participants

Cartesi is not the best example in this case. Bounty hunters managed to get high rewards mostly because of IEO and listing on Binance.
Despite it, it will be really hard for Cartesi to stand out in cryptocommunity with only 1 product case (Creeps game) and that time DApps on Linux where not the most demanded ones.

[deathcode]

Too many participants will always ruin rewards for bounty hunters, I've learned my lessons and nothing can change that, bounty projects like ARCS and IQCash are good example about why unlimited participants is a bad choice, these projects are trading already but bounty manager or team allowed too many participants and in the end many get 10$ to 15$ from these projects, bounty hunters that participate in Cartesi bounty are able to make 100$ to 500$ simply because the BM use limited participants

Cartesi is not the best example in this case. Bounty hunters managed to get high rewards mostly because of IEO and listing on Binance.
Despite it, it will be really hard for Cartesi to stand out in cryptocommunity with only 1 product case (Creeps game) and that time DApps on Linux where not the most demanded ones.

That's right, cartesi has the support of a successful IEO and exchange. they can manage bounty participants well, especially with a limited number, and also the distribution is done gradually. it keeps the result from having a bad change.
most bounties that have a large number of participants will not generate large payments. as for those of great value, it does not happen quickly. takes a long time to wait for the price to get better.

[southerngentuk]

I would join only those campaigns which have been added to exchanges, I would appreciate if they make the number of participants limited, quality is more important than quantity, why some people don't understand that!
I think they need to stop newbies to run bounties, at least people don't put their efforts on scams like unidapp things!