Bitcoin Forum
July 13, 2024, 10:43:29 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Early Funded Lealanas  (Read 374 times)
Verndog (OP)
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 244
Merit: 4


View Profile
June 17, 2020, 12:21:19 AM
Merited by Room101 (1)
 #1

I have an interesting Lealana 0.1 BTC brass coin. It was funded on 6/27/12 and only funded with 0.0085 BTC. Anybody have an earlier funded Lealana or one that was underfunded?  First Bits are: 185fFdTX.

Any info would be appreciated.
rxalts
Copper Member
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 351



View Profile
June 17, 2020, 12:24:03 AM
Merited by anonymousminer (1)
 #2

I have an interesting Lealana 0.1 BTC brass coin. It was funded on 6/27/12 and only funded with 0.0085 BTC. Anybody have an earlier funded Lealana or one that was underfunded?  First Bits are: 185fFdTX.

Any info would be appreciated.

Where are you getting the information for 0.0085? I pulled the first bits on smartbit and it shows the following address has 0.1 BTC funded in July 2017:

https://www.smartbit.com.au/address/185fFdTXvmcNQAqcmcQXWxrcUttD33uPGE
Verndog (OP)
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 244
Merit: 4


View Profile
June 17, 2020, 12:27:58 AM
 #3

I used walletexplorer.com.  Makes me feel better looking at your link. Id rather have 0.1 bitcoin than 0.085. Why is wallet explorer different?
anonymousminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1242



View Profile
June 17, 2020, 12:30:37 AM
Merited by rxalts (1)
 #4

I see 0.1BTC

https://blockchair.com/search?q=185fFdTXvmcNQAqcmcQXWxrcUttD33uPGE


edit:
wallet explorer is fine as well.... I see 0.1 - 07/12/2017 - 13:28:11

https://www.walletexplorer.com/address/185fFdTXvmcNQAqcmcQXWxrcUttD33uPGE


rxalts
Copper Member
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 351



View Profile
June 17, 2020, 12:33:22 AM
 #5

I used walletexplorer.com.  Makes me feel better looking at your link. Id rather have 0.1 bitcoin than 0.085. Why is wallet explorer different?

I am not quite sure as I have not used walletexplorer so another user may be able to chime in here. Are you possibly looking at a different address on the site? definitely much better to have 0.1 than 0.0085  Grin
Verndog (OP)
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 244
Merit: 4


View Profile
June 17, 2020, 12:36:54 AM
 #6

Thank you all for your help. I am going to shrink back into the corner. Have a great night.
anonymousminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1242



View Profile
June 17, 2020, 12:38:17 AM
 #7

Thank you all for your help. I am going to shrink back into the corner. Have a great night.

All good.  It happens.  Happy to help.
Ramelius
Member
**
Online Online

Activity: 857
Merit: 28


View Profile
June 17, 2020, 12:38:40 AM
 #8

For some reason walletexplorer is giving you the wrong address.

Your address has the the first “f” in lower case. But walletexplorer is giving you the “F” upper case address after it searches

185fFdTX - your address’s first 8 characters

185FFDTX4FHMJ4uKKCdK9ciUqcrRoKUuLP - address walletexplorer is giving you

Room101
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 541
Merit: 362


Rules not Rulers


View Profile
June 17, 2020, 12:38:44 AM
 #9

They are pointing at different addresses:

185FFDTX4FHMJ4uKKCdK9ciUqcrRoKUuLP 0.0085

185fFdTXvmcNQAqcmcQXWxrcUttD33uPGE 0.1

first bits are the same, except for capitalization, which matters in old addresses, but not the new bech32 ones

Ninja'd...Hi Ramelius, hope you're doing well Smiley

Bitcoin is the greatest form of protest there is. Vote in the only way that really counts: with your money.
Verndog (OP)
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 244
Merit: 4


View Profile
June 17, 2020, 01:00:51 AM
 #10

That explains it. Again, thank you and sorry to waste your time. Helped me out though.
rxalts
Copper Member
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 351



View Profile
June 17, 2020, 01:03:41 AM
Merited by iBitcoinHongKong8 (5)
 #11

That explains it. Again, thank you and sorry to waste your time. Helped me out though.

Not a waste of our time, always glad to help fellow collectors out  Smiley
Room101
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 541
Merit: 362


Rules not Rulers


View Profile
June 17, 2020, 01:05:22 AM
 #12

Don't apologise, happy to help! Smiley It's actually the first time I have seen a collision between first bits, which makes it interesting in itself, and I was not aware that walletexplorer.com was matching against non capitalized characters, which is also good to know! Helpful post for me! Thanks Smiley

Bitcoin is the greatest form of protest there is. Vote in the only way that really counts: with your money.
Agrawas
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 501

https://rollbit.com/referral/Agrawas


View Profile WWW
June 17, 2020, 02:07:03 AM
 #13

Guys, i had the same issue with one of the coins that MJ was auctioning a while back. The address returned had a different loaded amount.

After little research, I found the issue was with walletexplorer since it is case insensitive and if u are lucky u might get the right address and in some cases u might get other address if same firstbits exist in different case. That day on, i started using https://www.smartbit.com.au/ which actually does the case sensitive search.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!