[overview] DT1 Strength & Eligibility Statistics

[dragonvslinux]

DT1 Strength & Eligibility Statistics. Updated: Week 387 / 15/06/26

For DefaultTrust Strength Statistics see here

x-axis = weeks | y-axis = strength
(unless otherwise specified)


Weekly DT1 Eligibility




Note: Excludes the anomalies from first four months of data after DT changes (February–May 2019): 59, 68, 80, and 88.
 




Weekly DT1 Average/Total Strength









Weekly DT1 Member Strength








All Time Total Stats






 

Note: Positive/negative strength distribution based on DT1 members with overall positive or negative strength. Positive legend doesn't include all members, too many to list.


Source: DT1-strength.txt | Reference: DT1-strength of 211 users in 113 weeks (weekly updates)

[dragonvslinux]

Changelog

• June 20th 2020
• July 5th 2020
• February 25th 2023 - Week 215
• March 4th 2023 - Week 216
• March 11th 2023 - Week 217
• August 26th 2023 - Week 241
• DT1 charts replaced with DT charts
• June 15th 2026 - Week 387 (see updates)

[dragonvslinux]

I would love to see updated graphs

Done. Also added total DT1 strength/weakness based on 200 weeks of data, as well as represented in the way strength & weakness is distributed.

Weakness = <0 DT1 Strength. Positive strength represented by >0. Neutral strength of 0 is ignored.

[dragonvslinux]

Have updated again now Week 216 data dump is available post DT reshuffle. Mainly to check how easy and quick it would be to update these charts in a more automated way.

For Week 215 (pre DT changes) charts see here. Will otherwise aim to update main charts post DT reshuffles (once there are enough changes), as opposed to each week.

Total "All Time" DT1 Positive/Negative Strength statistics will be updated periodically, maybe every few months, unless otherwise requested.

If there are any charts you'd like to based on available data, feel free to ask.

[dragonvslinux]

More charts after remembering how to use SUMIF and COUNTIF equations

Arguably more useful than any of the others imo, as focuses on the overall trend of DT1 positive/negative strength over the past 4 years, as opposed to individual members statistics.

Included 50, 100 & 200 Week MAs and "power trendlines" where I felt it was relevant 

   

   

One thing I will say is compared to 2-3 years ago (Weeks 50-100 in particular), there are now many less excluded DT1 members. At the high it was 15/100 and now is back down to 5/100. Likewise the amount of total negative strength was more than -80 at it's highs, whereas now it's currently less -20 with an average of around -40. So does this mean DT is working in the way it was intended, or the opposite?

It seems statistically speaking DT1 data has "balanced out", ie creating and maintaining averages after a lot of volatility in the early years, whether that's a good thing or not...

[LoyceV]

Any idea why there are only 99 DT1-users in the last month? There should be 100. Did I miss someone in my data dump?

[dragonvslinux]

Any idea why there are only 99 DT1-users in the last month? There should be 100. Did I miss someone in my data dump?

Oops no that's my bad thanks for pointing out. Missed out the last row for some reason! Will correct charts...

Edit: Done, should be correct now. If you spot any other errors let me know.

[igebotz]

Any idea why there are only 99 DT1-users in the last month? There should be 100. Did I miss someone in my data dump?

Oops no that's my bad thanks for pointing out. Missed out the last row for some reason! Will correct charts...

Edit: Done, should be correct now. If you spot any other errors let me know.

Beautiful charts. weldone

OP Igebotz IS on the official list, but Igehhh (old) is on your own charts. Is there a reason for this? I'd appreciate it if you kept your charts updated with the new name.

where does my DT positive strength falls 2% or 1%?

[LoyceV]

OP Igebotz IS on the official list, but Igehhh (old) is on your own charts. Is there a reason for this?

That's on me, I forgot to (manually) adjust some names in this part of my data. The Pharmacist was still in there too.
I've updated it. If you find anyone else who's name change I missed, please let me know.

[dragonvslinux]

Updated: Week 217 + some formatting changes/improvements, notably some y-axis' reversed.

OP Igebotz IS on the official list, but Igehhh (old) is on your own charts. Is there a reason for this?

That's on me, I forgot to (manually) adjust some names in this part of my data. The Pharmacist was still in there too.
I've updated it. If you find anyone else who's name change I missed, please let me know.

Thanks Loyce.

I'd appreciate it if you kept your charts updated with the new name.

Now includes your new name 


New chart for this week based on monthly data:

[dbc23]

Updated: Week 217 + some formatting changes/improvements, notably some y-axis' reversed.
New chart for this week based on monthly data:

Nice work @ dragonvslinux i was wondering why a bar chart wasn't included in the new update, Line chart still has a good information the line width is bold enough, but it will be nice too to have comments for users who can't read charts. Secondly i don't know how this datas are generated do you have generate them automatically or you enter them on and save them on csv files before visualisation?. I will love to assist in the visualisation if permitted a way to test my skills as well.

[dragonvslinux]

Nice work @ dragonvslinux i was wondering why a bar chart wasn't included in the new update, Line chart still has a good information the line width is bold enough, but it will be nice too to have comments for users who can't read charts.

I did initially start with a bar chart for eligible DT1 members, but then changed it to line chart in order to include 20 & 50 Month moving averages. As otherwise the MAs are hidden behind the bars, or otherwise difficult to see even with transparency. I do acknowledge your concern that it's difficult for users who don't read charts, but not convinced a bar chart is easier to read than a line chart, if anything I think the opposite.

Secondly i don't know how this datas are generated do you have generate them automatically or you enter them on and save them on csv files before visualisation?. I will love to assist in the visualisation if permitted a way to test my skills as well.

The data itself is imported from this raw source which is used to update the charts. So basically it's a copy & paste job for the charts to update themselves, with a bit of tweaking by creating a new column prior to C&P.

I appreciate the offer for assistance with visualisation, at the moment it's not required though unless you have any other suggestions. But I'll PM you if I get bored with updates if it's something that interests you.

[dbc23]

The data itself is imported from this raw source which is used to update the charts. So basically it's a copy & paste job for the charts to update themselves, with a bit of tweaking by creating a new column prior to C&P.

I appreciate the offer for assistance with visualisation, at the moment it's not required though unless you have any other suggestions. But I'll PM you if I get bored with updates if it's something that interests you.

I also appreciate the time you took to reply. Thanks for the data source as well, Will be glad  and honoured to receive a pm when you are bored visualising. I noticed most new columns added and the MAs when updating the thread, I now understand why your had to stick to line chart.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I had to check that thread to see if I posted in it, because I completely forgot this was a thing--but I did:

It's odd to find myself in the top 10 "strongest" DT1 members.  Don't know how I ended up in that list, but I appreciate the trust members apparently have in me.

Being on DT means a hell of a lot less to me now than it did some years ago, but seeing my standing in the all-time stats kinda warms my heart and I'm still grateful for everyone who trusts me (for whatever that's worth).

Love the data presentation!

[dragonvslinux]

I had to check that thread to see if I posted in it, because I completely forgot this was a thing--but I did:

It's odd to find myself in the top 10 "strongest" DT1 members.  Don't know how I ended up in that list, but I appreciate the trust members apparently have in me.

Being on DT means a hell of a lot less to me now than it did some years ago, but seeing my standing in the all-time stats kinda warms my heart and I'm still grateful for everyone who trusts me (for whatever that's worth).

Love the data presentation!

It's probably as your average DT1 strength over past 1-2 years (when you were DT1) was around 30. Without wiping your trust list, you'd probably be in 4th place right now overall, as opposed to 6th 



Not that you care about your DT1 strength, or being DT1 at all anymore am aware, but thought this chart might interest you. Notably your current DT2 strength reflects your average DT1 strength 

[dragonvslinux]

Weekly charts (first 5) updated after DT1 changes. For last months charts (11/03) see here.

   

   

Not many changes to be observed since last month other than different DT1 members are now included in the charts.

[dragonvslinux]

Images have all expired or something. Has been a few months so have done another update from last weeks data.

[LoyceV]

Images have all expired or something.

Where have you been? It was hard to miss:
TalkImg.com - Image hosting for BitcoinTalk
[Script] Imgur to TalkImg - automatically fix your broken images
Poll on solving the imgur issue
[get yours] Images from imgur + All links to your own posts

Has been a few months so have done another update from last weeks data.

Appreciated!

[dragonvslinux]

Has been a few years, charts updated  

Updates
- Added "Weekly DT1 Member Strength" charts, this was in order to have a more thorough overview of the rise in DT1 Average Positive Strength, as well as decline in DT1 Average Negative Strength.
- Expanded Top 30 / Bottom 30 to Top 50 / Bottom 50 All-Time Total DT1 Strength, similar to DT Strength Statistics. Previous version can be found here per changelog.

Analysis
- DT1 Eligibility has seen a sharp decline in the past year since relative stability from mid 2021 until the end of 2024, when it was fluctuating around it's long-term moving averages. The long-term trend is now down, reaching it's lowest level in ~7 years.
- The number of DT1 Included and Excluded members remains largely unchanged overall, fluctuating between 90 and 97 with an average of approximately 5 exclusions per week. The past 18 months has seen a slight uptick in Included Members however.
- Average DT1 Positive Strength has reached it's highest level in approximately 6 years (12), highlighting a long-term uptrend has formed in the past year after relative stability (see Total Positive DT1 Strength and it's moving averages).
- The number of DT1 Members by Strength highlights the increased centralization within DT1, with >4 reaching it's highest level since 2019 this year, and >9, >19, >29 also climbing and returning to the highest levels since 2019/2020.
- Average DT1 Negative Strength continues to decline and remains at lows (-8). In contrast, Total DT1 Negative Strength remains relatively stable at -40, around it's short to long-term averages located at -35 to -37.
- The divergence between Average DT1 Negative Strength and it's Weekly Total can be explained by the slight decrease in Excluded DT1 Members in the past ~18 months (Excluded Members reduced by half creates a considerable difference).

Summary
- The DT1 network has seen an increase in centralisation in the past ~18 months and specifically in the past year. This is otherwise unrelated to DT1 Eligibility, despite it's sharp decline and downwards trend.

Disclaimer
- This isn't an analysis of DefaultTrust, this data is only based on DT1. Further charting and analysis is required in order to determine if this centralization is reflective of the DT network overall, or only effects DT1.

Edit: For recent analysis on DefaultTrust statistics, see here.

[LoyceV]

- DT1 Eligibility has seen a sharp decline in the past year

That's (at least partially) because the criteria were changed just over a year ago.