Bitcoin Forum
May 07, 2024, 03:09:08 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: HONEYWELL Quantum Computer: what does it mean to BTC  (Read 623 times)
Cnut237
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1277



View Profile
July 01, 2020, 08:21:19 AM
 #41

~

Here's some evidence of wave-particle duality:


https://www.labbulletin.com/articles/20130513_4






1715094548
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715094548

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715094548
Reply with quote  #2

1715094548
Report to moderator
1715094548
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715094548

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715094548
Reply with quote  #2

1715094548
Report to moderator
"Bitcoin: mining our own business since 2009" -- Pieter Wuille
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715094548
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715094548

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715094548
Reply with quote  #2

1715094548
Report to moderator
1715094548
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715094548

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715094548
Reply with quote  #2

1715094548
Report to moderator
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4214
Merit: 4475



View Profile
July 01, 2020, 09:01:31 AM
Last edit: July 01, 2020, 10:01:17 AM by franky1
 #42

lol
thats funny
once you realise the stuff of the pico level and then go back to the macro level/micro level you realise whats described in the 'duality' is not accurate. its been simplified into macro-micro observational words

lets just try using 'particle' as compressed wave causing resistance.
and lightwave as uncompressed wave free to flow

the duality experiment you showed is where when light waves are projected through a wall with 2 slits. the light waves before the wall are hundreds of light waves beaming out each at different degrees of 360o from the light source
technically millions of waves each at different 360,000micro degrees...
technically billions of waves each at different 360,000,000nano degrees
technically trillions of waves each at different 360,000,000,000pic degree's
depending on the level/how accurately your able to observe/measure then smaller bits in between

but lets stick with macro (normal human eye 360 level observation)
and when going through the slits 2 beams carry on straight. and the rest dont get through due to the wall

but the waves just a couple micro/nano/pico degree's +/- hit the wall(particle of compressed waves) and the interference resists the light wave and bounces(reflects) the light wave in the opposite direction  than its input angle

so instead of seeing just 2 beams f light going straight through the slot. you see it spread out in multiple angles. because of the effect/interference from the wall edges

but now we are just diverting far off the QC topic.

the while theory is that at macro level of just 360o light your observation would be that only 2 beams of light get through and they continue on in a straight line from source through the slit to the there side.
where as at micro 360,000o there would be some reflection off the edges of the slits

..
at pico level its explaining that the waves of the wall interfere and resist the waves of light
at macro level its saying that 'light bends' and is not acting light a wave in one direction but like a solid coil/spring that can be bent around corners

..
its just explaining at human eye level
'oh my god its magic, light can bend'
vs science
'its about the reflection of light due to the interference from the slits in the wall' and also the interference of the other waves of light

heck even the article you link explains the experiment is about the defraction due to the interference from the grating

what will be mind blowing is when you get to the pico level understanding of everything is a wave or more precisely zillions of waves.
and the makeup/mix and their interference/resistance strengths on each other determine what property it has at the micro/macro scale

and 'splitting an atom' is not a macro illusion of cutting apple in half. but instead resisting the electro/radio/light wavelenths away to get to the gamma waves protected within those other lower wavelength 'shells'(layers)

we could them move into the more detailed positive gamma and negative gamma. but i think we have gone way passed the QC topic

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
Cnut237
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1277



View Profile
July 01, 2020, 09:31:40 AM
 #43

but i think we have gone way passed the QC topic

Agreed, let's leave it there or we will just continue forever. We each have a different understanding of what wave-particle duality means.






Pages: « 1 2 [3]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!