If you are using the martingale strategy, it's not going to work on an 85% win chance. You wouldn't get enough capital back when you lose that, you need consecutive wins to recover what you lost, which is possible, but it's possible to lose too.
The Martingale strategy will
always end up bad, the more you play the more the chances of consecutive losses that will either push the needed bet beyond the maximum allowed one will bankrupt you.
Just think if the next five would be also lost, from 0.25 it would have been 0.5,1,2,4,8 a total of almost 16BTC.
If he had tried to play with 5000 sat means he would need 320 000 winning bets just to cover the loss, at which point he will hit another 18 losing row.
Bitsler is scame took my life nearly )
Nobody took your "life", you have no idea what that really means.
You've thought you could use a strategy that is known for a century to fail to try to earn money.
If Martingale would be a bulletproof strategy to win don't you think everyone would use it and everybody would be rich?
Anyhow, the strategy of the OP is a bit confusing,
He used to double the bet as he said but betting on the 85%, that would not earn him anything even if he wins.
He bets 1 sat on 85% he loses
He bets 2 sat on 85% he wins he gets 2.32...means he lost 0,68