Satoshi banned!

[andreibi]

In any case, if the real Satoshi were to want his account back, he would message the forum admin with a signed BTC address known to belong to him.

[1714948940]

1714948940

[1714948940]

1714948940

[1714948940]

1714948940

[1714948940]

1714948940

[YOSHIE]

Even though it exists, it's very rare to find a "suicide boss".

@Satoshi, founder of this Forum, today he is banning himself, maybe, tomorrow he will do something else to his own account, it is not surprising if @Satoshi does something strange for himself.

There are no bans, the exact rules for @satoshi, here permanently, it is just a 'joke'. Very funny.

thank you @Satoshi, everyone was amazed, quite funny.

[LoyceV]

Now, if the only way of locking is banning, then maybe BPIP and LoyceV tools (and maybe others available) should add an exception and for Satoshi account write "locked for security reasons" instead of the ugly looking "banned".

All he has to do is post

Seriously though, it turned out it wasn't a good idea to share this data, so I'll remove satoshi (and 400,000 other users) from my list. I'm currently still processing the data. I'll use my original data again for future updates. I won't edit this week's "glitch" in my Trust list viewer, but it will be a one-time thing.

[nutildah]

Seriously though, it turned out it wasn't a good idea to share this data, so I'll remove satoshi (and 400,000 other users) from my list.

Why was it not a good idea? Maybe just remove satoshi?

[LoyceV]

Why was it not a good idea?

I didn't ask, but if I have to guess: it's supposed to be for Mod eyes only.

[UserU]

I wished satoshi could come back in our lives and we know who exactly is satoshi 
Only Craig Wright  will be happy to see this and will try to make drama out of it. Rest we all know the account is banned for security reasons as stated by many.

That guy sure did, but it fizzled out