Bounty or Airdrop kill project?

[CryptoTalk365]

I dont know what you think guys but i think airdrop and bounty kill the project let say after the project finish the ico all the bounty and airdrop hnter sell their coin/token , this make te price go low.Since all of bounty and airdrp hunter did not care about the project.

[kingzpro]

I dont know what you think guys but i think airdrop and bounty kill the project let say after the project finish the ico all the bounty and airdrop hnter sell their coin/token , this make te price go low.Since all of bounty and airdrp hunter did not care about the project.

This is a very old allegation and does not matter. You know even if everyone accept that bounty hunters dump all their coins as soon as they receive them. Keep in mind that bounty hunters promoted the project everyday and helped them to raise the funds so this is there hard earned rewards and they are free to do so.
Secondly if team is concerned about this thing they can pay rewards in equivalent usdt, btc or eth  this way bounty hunters will not have any tokens to dump infact they will be happy to directly receive liquid assets.
Thirdly if there is no option for team to pay in usdt then they should pay in tokens and on exchanges put a big buy order so that even if bounty hunters dump the price do not completely crash.
So you see there are many solutions and team have the options to avoid this situation so each stake holder has to be responsible and do not just state same old story everytime.

[funex]

I don't totally agree with your point  friend. i have seen some projects doing bounty and distributing rewards to hunters without it really  affecting their price .  And if developers think Airdrop and bounty will kill their projects then let them pay in stable coin like USDT that is what  a few serious developers do .
 
 Also there are situation where developers and investors dump prices of projects even before distributing bounty rewards. Dogdata for instance have not distributed bounty rewards yet the price of token is really dumped by team and early investors who bought with a lot of bonus.

[MonsterV]

dead project is not because the airdropper or bounty hunter because they are not really getting their coin for free , they are getting that coin  from doing airdrop or bounty task, they deserved to sell anytime they want, cause of failed project is when the project is not really raise their targeted to raise and failed to add liquidity on public market and then the price will dump, its no airdropper or bounty hunter fault. its failed because of the project it self

[ahyadinnn]

bounty hunter is not the cause of the death of a project, sometimes many bounty hunters always save coins from the project and expect prices to rise, but in reality no, they are held longer will further decrease in price, not yet again sometimes the distribution of bounty's coins is always delayed, and after the coin is sent the price has been badly destroyed

[asriloni]

I dont know what you think guys but i think airdrop and bounty kill the project let say after the project finish the ico all the bounty and airdrop hnter sell their coin/token , this make te price go low.Since all of bounty and airdrp hunter did not care about the project.

This is something that must be re-corrected again and bounty and airdrop didn't kill the project and you should take a look at how OIKOS, HEX and various altcoins can be even greater caused by the campaign that has already attracted mass adopters. It's about how much daily trade volume that has already gotten by the token.
Even spycee that has a very low daily trade volume didn't get a lot of impact too.

[blue Snow]

I dont know what you think guys but i think airdrop and bounty kill the project let say after the project finish the ico all the bounty and airdrop hnter sell their coin/token , this make te price go low.Since all of bounty and airdrp hunter did not care about the project.

The main purpose of airdrop and bounty is marketing the product, The company should have a plan about this, by reward hunter with the token, the company should have to plan what happens the next if hunter sold it (it's not the fault because the hunter needs back capital). If the company had a good plan of how to managing the product, they did not pay as a token but another valuable like Bitcoin or Ethereum.

I am noticed, Who kill the project is company self not by the bounty hunter. the Company handled by a bad manager and doesn't have much knowledge aka beginner.

[WalkerIVIV]

bounty hunter is not the cause of the death of a project, sometimes many bounty hunters always save coins from the project and expect prices to rise, but in reality no, they are held longer will further decrease in price, not yet again sometimes the distribution of bounty's coins is always delayed, and after the coin is sent the price has been badly destroyed

It's better for him to see the reality that was happening before. the only scam project that didn't get any demand from the market that has become a dead project but it's not always caused by the bounty participants too caused by so many times hunters got zero reward from their effort and they can't even sell it into the market.

[Python Master]

Old topic that was discussed hundred times here. Why don't you search and read some old threads about this i'm sure you will get the answer. It's a stupid question. In the past why all projects ran bounty & airdrop and they were still very successful?

[aioc]

I dont know what you think guys but i think airdrop and bounty kill the project let say after the project finish the ico all the bounty and airdrop hnter sell their coin/token , this make te price go low.Since all of bounty and airdrp hunter did not care about the project.

I think you should educate yourself first before posting nonsense post, this has been addressed so many times and logic tells us that this is not correct if you hate bounty hunters or airdrops then do not participate at all but do not give wrong information, you should not use the word all if you do know the fact.

[Kupid002]

I dont know what you think guys but i think airdrop and bounty kill the project let say after the project finish the ico all the bounty and airdrop hnter sell their coin/token , this make te price go low.Since all of bounty and airdrp hunter did not care about the project.

IF its really kill project then why they make it ? Why they always have a bounties and airdrop to give to users?

Hunters and airdropers is always looking for a money to grab from a project , in fact every  project know what will going to happen  if they give that free coins to any, if they are really care about the price movement then they will always find away to advertise their project without even using any single supply they have.

[sfireman]

I don't totally agree with your point  friend. i have seen some projects doing bounty and distributing rewards to hunters without it really  affecting their price .  And if developers think Airdrop and bounty will kill their projects then let them pay in stable coin like USDT that is what  a few serious developers do .
 
 Also there are situation where developers and investors dump prices of projects even before distributing bounty rewards. Dogdata for instance have not distributed bounty rewards yet the price of token is really dumped by team and early investors who bought with a lot of bonus.

This is so true! No bounty or airdrop has the ability to kill the project. Why do people keep thinking that because bounty hunters dump the tokens that lead to the failure of the project? To be fair, the project is failed because of its own plan. Don't blame bounty hunters when the project doesn't have the ability to develop as your expectation. You're right that if the developers are worry they totally can pay bounty hunters with stable coins!

[WiND33]

I think that the statement that bounty hunters are killing the project is not true. These guys publish in various news channels and features of the project, thanks to which more and more people will learn about it.

Since the topic of cryptocurrency is quite specific, every second man in it is a potential investor, so this is work directly with the target audience. It makes sense that every work should be paid, which is why the bounty hunters receive tokens.
Another thing is how the project's economy is built. Usually, the bounty pool is 1-2% of the number of tokens, which cannot significantly affect the cryptocurrency price rate. If the project is not a scam, then the team will provide for a possible drain of tokens by buying out its share on the exchange and restoring the rate.

I definitely believe that without the bounty there would not have been such a surge of interest in blockchain startups.

[Gorosden]

I dont know what you think guys but i think airdrop and bounty kill the project let say after the project finish the ico all the bounty and airdrop hnter sell their coin/token , this make te price go low.Since all of bounty and airdrp hunter did not care about the project.

Let's pretend you are right, must new projects introduce bounties and airdrops? No! But they do anyway, meaning that they are getting something from bounties and airdrops and that's can awareness, you need to understand what bounties and airdrops do for projects

[Phoenix_PROG]

You are wrong, developers need bounty hunters to promote their projects so that the project can attract many investors through forums and social media websites like medium, LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter etc, in return bounty hunters are paid for their work, we aren't responsible for the death of projects.

[Phoenix_PROG]

OP you need to look around bounties section on this forum to see do yourself, check all bounties on there and you will see that out of 100% max supply of a project bounty hunters are only given 0.01%  of max supply, only a bad project will drop in value because of that little supply

[maxreish]

If they will remove it, the promotions of the project will be failed. Participants who are going to receive the token rewards usually sell it and that's normal. I don't think we have to point fingers and blame the airdops for the dumping reasons. Successful projects stay even participants sell their coins. I have seen one thread here about giving away token rewards in three parts to prevent huge dump of their tokens. Maybe, if all of the projects will do this,  this will solve the issue of huge dump after launching

[TheClownSong]

I dont know what you think guys but i think airdrop and bounty kill the project let say after the project finish the ico all the bounty and airdrop hnter sell their coin/token , this make te price go low.Since all of bounty and airdrp hunter did not care about the project.

There are two different opinions and I think that depends on each other's perceptions. Bounty and airdrop can be profitable because there are many hunters who prefer to hold for the long term if the project is good and even buy directly in the market and this can make the sales volume in the market even greater. But bounty hunters also sometimes sell right away as soon as the exchanger starts listing the token which results in a price reduction

[Claudio99]

Bounties promotions is what spreads words about a new project and bounty hunters got paid in the projects native token most times, the bounty allocations are always smaller, too small to drag the project down, what I've planned to always do is never promote a project that has bad use case

[yhiaali3]

This is true, although the distribution of Airdrop and Bounty has a great importance and a large role in the spread of the project on a large scale, but as you say, it also has a significant negative in that most of those who obtain free coins from Airdrop or Bounty sell them immediately at any available price and this leads to Excess supply and lack of demand for this coin, which causes a decrease in the price of the coin for the project.