Bounty or Airdrop kill project?

[restuibu]

no, bounties and airdrops never kill projects, tokens for bounties and airdrops are less than 2%, while the bonuses that investors get are far more than the bounty and airdrop allocations. those who dump on the exchange are of course investors, but if the project is good and there is a lot of demand in the market, the project will not experience a dump

[Cheesus]

Mate, you have a lack of research or experience, try to research before making a statement like this. Nowadays, bounty allocation not greater than 1% or 20-50K USD, So, if hunters sell their token, how can a project die for 1% of total supply? Many projects paid their hunters full at one time, and they are still growing stronger! So, you are wrong, bounty campaign is to promote a crypto project, not to kill it!

[torrantz]

no, bounties and airdrops never kill projects, tokens for bounties and airdrops are less than 2%, while the bonuses that investors get are far more than the bounty and airdrop allocations. those who dump on the exchange are of course investors, but if the project is good and there is a lot of demand in the market, the project will not experience a dump

The hunters needed a lot of time before their can receive their payments too and then that doesn't make sense to attack the hunters that become the main causes for all of the dumps that happened in altcoins. Some people have made wrong accusations about this.

[palle11]

I dont know what you think guys but i think airdrop and bounty kill the project let say after the project finish the ico all the bounty and airdrop hnter sell their coin/token , this make te price go low.Since all of bounty and airdrp hunter did not care about the project.

You need to also look at the revise side. I mean two issues here :
One is, if bounty hunters don't make advertisement for the ICO via different channels, example through signature, social media accounts, blogs, articles, videos etc many people won't hear the project.
Two, ICO developers should have use case projects and with such projects, no matter the dump after distribution of tokens, the token won't drop totally but would have corrections from the drop until it exhaust the dump from hunters and other investors before it would fly. And some nice projects won't even drop with dump, example, cartesi.
The third is listing in good exchange.

[Ani_]

no, bounties and airdrops never kill projects, tokens for bounties and airdrops are less than 2%, while the bonuses that investors get are far more than the bounty and airdrop allocations. those who dump on the exchange are of course investors, but if the project is good and there is a lot of demand in the market, the project will not experience a dump

The hunters needed a lot of time before their can receive their payments too and then that doesn't make sense to attack the hunters that become the main causes for all of the dumps that happened in altcoins. Some people have made wrong accusations about this.

their effort so hard for months, and even some project need complexe task. if price dumped in market its not totally be bounty hunter fault, they already work hard and ofcourse want to get best reward. so its not totally true if many people blamed them. we must appreciate bounty hunter and give good support for them

Agreed. That's how hunters lost hope and does not trust projects anymore. On the other side, projects can not do anything without bounty hunters because, at the end of the day - those people, willing to be the first on the market to help projects & work for tokens, are the best foundation of the community and user database.

Hope things gonna change because trust is the main value of the blockchain tech.

[Crypto_lion]

I don't believe that bounty and airdrop will kill then project . Every project needs some kind of marketing to get to the audience and bounty is one of the proven way to reach the crypto community easily . So I would say they are necessary.

[zulfi125]

work, and when received the tokens, then everyone wants to encash their rewards to sold out the altcoins. Still, most of the projects not paying in advance before the launch of altcoins are paying after many months of launch, and some are not paying even after many years, so this is the wrong perception about bounty hunter or airdrop holder kill the project.

[umbara ardian]

Mate, you have a lack of research or experience, try to research before making a statement like this. Nowadays, bounty allocation not greater than 1% or 20-50K USD, So, if hunters sell their token, how can a project die for 1% of total supply? Many projects paid their hunters full at one time, and they are still growing stronger! So, you are wrong, bounty campaign is to promote a crypto project, not to kill it!

Seriously, if the project has no liquidity, I believe it also collapsed by the few tokens you sold. I have seen many projects that only have $ 500-1000 volume per day and you want to sell $ 20k, the price will definitely decrease many times

[Vishnu.Reang]

work, and when received the tokens, then everyone wants to encash their rewards to sold out the altcoins. Still, most of the projects not paying in advance before the launch of altcoins are paying after many months of launch, and some are not paying even after many years, so this is the wrong perception about bounty hunter or airdrop holder kill the project.

Obviously when someone works so hard for so many months, he deserve to get his payment on time. That's why I have always argued that at least a small part of the payment (10% or 20%) may be paid in ETH/BTC/USDT. That would give some consolation to the bounty hunters. The bounty hunters are the group which suffers maximum loses when a project fails. Their effort is wasted.

[Vilagra]

Private investors kill projects more than bounty hunters, they buy their token on private rounds with price couple time less than public sale, then sell it on the exchange and take their profit and general investors incur losses. Bounty hunters have only small percent from pool but privat investors have much bigger amount of tokens and affect the price much more.

[bluebit25]

work, and when received the tokens, then everyone wants to encash their rewards to sold out the altcoins. Still, most of the projects not paying in advance before the launch of altcoins are paying after many months of launch, and some are not paying even after many years, so this is the wrong perception about bounty hunter or airdrop holder kill the project.

Obviously when someone works so hard for so many months, he deserve to get his payment on time. That's why I have always argued that at least a small part of the payment (10% or 20%) may be paid in ETH/BTC/USDT. That would give some consolation to the bounty hunters. The bounty hunters are the group which suffers maximum loses when a project fails. Their effort is wasted.

But 99% of those projects will delay distribution, they will find many different reasons to delay it. Like the blockburn campaign I participated in, they delayed it for 6 months and now continue to extend it. It's a bounty hunter abuse and we need a way to deal with it

[havoc928]

Private investors kill projects more than bounty hunters, they buy their token on private rounds with price couple time less then public sale, then sell it on the exchange and take their profit and general investors incur looses. Bounty hunters have only small precent from pool but privat investors have much bigger amount token and affect on price much more.

This is the fact! Bounty hunters only receive a small allocation of the tokens, how can they kill the project by selling those small amount? Furthermore, as a bounty hunter, I have to say that there is no reason for us to destroy a project, it doesn't bring any benefits for us. We only focus on doing our jobs, then after receiving the rewards, we have the right to decide whether to hold or to sell them!

[terizla]

In my opinion, bounty and airdrop hunters didn't kill the project.
They just want their rewards after doing task.
If you think kill project is the fall of price after list exchange, there is not bounty/airdrop hunters fault.
Because most of crypto project is like that.

[bgaf]

Not at all. How come you can based the survival of the project on bounty and airdrop dropped? Thats an irationale reasoning. If a project is really good they will not be affected by the dumped of the tokens. They could strategy a way on how dumping would avoid like some projects did on tokoin, cartesi and dia. They all distributed on a timely manner to avoid simultaneously dropped from bounty. Well not a bad idea and also can be tolerated by understanding hunters.

[BitcoinHunt3r]

I dont know what you think guys but i think airdrop and bounty kill the project let say after the project finish the ico all the bounty and airdrop hnter sell their coin/token , this make te price go low.Since all of bounty and airdrp hunter did not care about the project.

For me, who do bounty campaign and airdrops and sometime make research about the project, allocation on bounty campaign is very small. Bigger allocation is on presale and bonus for who buy in a certain time.  And sometimes, investor who think that they already take profit even with ICO price because they get more tokens when buy it earlier, will sell all of their tokens and it is a big amount of money.

[Restmand]

I dont know what you think guys but i think airdrop and bounty kill the project let say after the project finish the ico all the bounty and airdrop hnter sell their coin/token , this make te price go low.Since all of bounty and airdrp hunter did not care about the project.

I dont think bounty hunters kill the project in the contrary bounty hunters have played a greater part in order for the project to be successful. Especially if lot of bounty hunters joined the project, the project has big potential to be successful. Anyway if the project ends and the token received will sold byt the hunters maybe this is not the reason why the project killed, it depends upon the team behind the projects. This is only in my own opinion.

[semobo]

In my opinion, bounty and airdrop hunters didn't kill the project.
They just want their rewards after doing task.
If you think kill project is the fall of price after list exchange, there is not bounty/airdrop hunters fault.
Because most of crypto project is like that.

Discounts kill most of the projects to be honest, project team give attractive 30% even 50% offers for early investors, those people are the one dump the tokens straight away when it listed on exchange.If bounties seems killing the project then better the project pay in bitcoin so there won't be any dump on the token's price from hunters.

[BlackFor3st]

You have a point in your opinion but I cannot totally agree with you because I can see that you are still a newbie in terms of marketing side.

Airdrops and bounties are part of marketing plan meaning their allocation is already set from the start of the project and the team will make
sure that their allocation for that type of marketing will not affect the entire price of their coins/tokens once it will reach the exchange.

Most of the budget for bounties and airdrops are ranging from 2-4% only of the total supply, even all the bounty hunters will sell their share do you think it can affect the price that much?
The answer is no, those project who fail to maintain their price upon reaching the exchange are usually a shit projects. Either the team will dump their share or their big investors will dump their investment.

[Google+]

I dont know what you think guys but i think airdrop and bounty kill the project let say after the project finish the ico all the bounty and airdrop hnter sell their coin/token , this make te price go low.Since all of bounty and airdrp hunter did not care about the project.

I dont think bounty hunters kill the project in the contrary bounty hunters have played a greater part in order for the project to be successful. Especially if lot of bounty hunters joined the project, the project has big potential to be successful. Anyway if the project ends and the token received will sold byt the hunters maybe this is not the reason why the project killed, it depends upon the team behind the projects. This is only in my own opinion.

Great that makes a lot of projects destroyed because they give a lot of bonuses to investors at the beginning, the bonus should not be given that much, only need to use a 10-20% bonus is enough to get the profit from the assets invested.

[raidarksword]

In my opinion, bounty and airdrop hunters didn't kill the project.
They just want their rewards after doing task.
If you think kill project is the fall of price after list exchange, there is not bounty/airdrop hunters fault.
Because most of crypto project is like that.

I also believe that bounty hunters like us are one of the vital force to make a project succeed in the market despite the negativity of people calling us dumpers or project killers. Infact, hunters are just doing the job and claiming the rewards what they deserves most and that's token rewards. We can decide it to sell or hold, it really depends of the minds of  other hunters what they gonna do about it.