Would you like to become a co-owner of a decentralized world bank?

[Bitcoin2009]

To activate tokens in BSC which is currently the most popular only costs around $2500, of course this is a good opportunity for anyone to create a project and with a capital of around $1 million it is enough to pump at the beginning and then get a fast RoI.

[1714859755]

1714859755

[VictorProsh]

The OP has a solution which is looking for a problem.

In other words, he is full of crap.

You don't need a smart contract to accomplish this. Bitcoin is doing it already and it is the ultimate smart contract. It is decentralized, it can't be seized, it deflationary. Bitcoin is the ultimate decentralized world bank and you are participating whenever you use it. You just don't need anything else. Don't make this unnecessarily complicated.

At first glance, it seems logical, but if you drop deeper, it turns out that the bulk of all bitcoins are in the hands of a very narrow circle of people who manage volatility and increase their share even more with the help of manipulation. To counter this, there is currently no insurance, so banks do not lend for fear of losing their assets. In my project, this insurance is available for banks.

[Ucy]

What is the main problem you want to solve with this? What makes you think more problems won't be created trying to solve the problem.

Do you have examples of assets that do not or will not lose value?

Your idea is very interesting though

Good question.
In my opinion, the main problem is that everyone is trying to solve the new decentralized financial system within the framework of the old proven monetary system. This mistake is made by everyone who is trying to come up with another stable coin by tying it to the dollar or another Fiat. Satoshi proposed another solution for the development of a new decentralized economy and everyone together undertook to link Bitcoin to the Dollar, everyone began to print their own stable coins without understanding the basics of the value of decentralized finance, this is the same as the treasury began to print dollar No. 1, No. 2, No. 3, etc. as much as necessary and we will do.
I solved this problem with my project by creating an example of an asset that under no circumstances can be devalued because it is not tied to Fiat, which means it cannot be reset.

Give me some time to go through your work and understand exactly what it's about.
Are you a programmer?

Central means controlled specifically by someone.
The World Bank is a Decentralized Bank with no center, managed simultaneously by all its co–owners, wherever they are. This bank, accumulating the financial asset of its owners, brings profit to everyone. Its main advantage is that it cannot be bankrupted.
Decentralization has no center.

A truly Decentralized Bank with no center should be very difficult to centralize. There are several things that disqualify World Bank from being considered a Decentrized Bank, eg Privacy/Anonimity of owners, barrier of entry etc

If you explain why it is necessary to centralize a decentralized bank, then I will try to answer. If you think that your anonymity is at risk in this bank, then it seems to me that everyone is responsible for the anonymity of their wallet address, there is no verification in this bank.

I mean those who control a decentralized system should be anonymous, or their privacy should be well protected otherwise a bad actor who wants to centralize the system could easily hunt them down and get them to surrender control & do whatever he wants them to do. I developed a project that not only anonymize participants but regularly randomize them to make such takeover almost impossible, yet the participants can be punished when they try to hurt the system while being anonymous.
Anonymity needs to be guaranteed to participants to prevent a takeover and centralization a decentralized system.

I don't understand you at all, can a system be decentralized if its control is carried out by anonymous people, who, according to you, are regularly randomized? In my opinion, this is pseudo decentralization.

Victor, I'm talking about  Decentralized Network that allows participants to be anonymous. As far as I tell, you can't identify typical Node runners by their names, better still a Network does not identify you by your real name (maybe Google the dictionary meaning of anonymous)... Participants can be Anonymous according to Satoshi.    In certain cases, participants could use their addresses instead of names.
In regards to randomization, that could be used to enhance privacy/anonymity feature of a decentralized network by making it hard for bad actors to ide-anonymize their person of interest

[VictorProsh]

Something we have gone in the direction of a decentralized network, although your previous question was

What is the main problem you want to solve with this? What makes you think more problems won't be created trying to solve the problem.

Do you have examples of assets that do not or will not lose value?

Your idea is very interesting though/quote]
I'm just trying to convey to everyone the solution to this problem with this project.
39.   Now the main investment, transforming into a decentralized financial liquid asset of bond tokens, has a growth trend and under no circumstances can be frozen, reset to zero, devalued, it becomes possible to directly place any Fiat in a decentralized crypto economy through the crypto currency Ethereum. Investing and lending secured by token-bonds will become very profitable and safe. Bond tokens produced by a real financial asset replacing the turnover of ETH in deposit becomes a reliable settlement coin between counterparties.

Take a look at the chart confirming the limited issue of the bank's gold shares, there cannot be more than 10 million of them.

[Ucy]

Smart idea Victor. That's why I'm interested. Wish you could resolve the issue I spoke about concerning zero devaluation.

By the way, if you are a programmer, I could work with you. I'm particularly interested in guidance. I'm deep into this & have had past offers from couple of people to work with them .. unfortunately I didn't accept them due to certain reasons. It's becoming more urgent to develop something tough & useful before it's too late

[Lambe Ndumble]

Of course, a good offer if it can become a co -owner of Cryptocurrencies decentralization of the bank, to make a new project requires large capital, so the easy thing is to join the top projects such as BNB, Solana or others.

[VictorProsh]

Smart idea Victor. That's why I'm interested. Wish you could resolve the issue I spoke about concerning zero devaluation.

By the way, if you are a programmer, I could work with you. I'm particularly interested in guidance. I'm deep into this & have had past offers from couple of people to work with them .. unfortunately I didn't accept them due to certain reasons. It's becoming more urgent to develop something tough & useful before it's too late

Unfortunately, I'm not a programmer, I'm looking for programmers who can bring this complex project to life. If you understand how to implement this idea, you are welcome, I accept any help in cooperation. I was offered a team of programmers to implement this project, but the first question they were interested in was not how it works and what to do it for, but what my budget is. I understand that any work must be paid for and if someone paid me for my development, which I have been doing for many years, I would be able to pay the cost of the programmers' work. I also offered programmers joint participation in the development of the project, as a result of which, after its implementation, they would earn much more than their costs, but everyone is interested in income here and now.

[Ucy]

Smart idea Victor. That's why I'm interested. Wish you could resolve the issue I spoke about concerning zero devaluation.

By the way, if you are a programmer, I could work with you. I'm particularly interested in guidance. I'm deep into this & have had past offers from couple of people to work with them .. unfortunately I didn't accept them due to certain reasons. It's becoming more urgent to develop something tough & useful before it's too late

Unfortunately, I'm not a programmer, I'm looking for programmers who can bring this complex project to life. If you understand how to implement this idea, you are welcome, I accept any help in cooperation. I was offered a team of programmers to implement this project, but the first question they were interested in was not how it works and what to do it for, but what my budget is. I understand that any work must be paid for and if someone paid me for my development, which I have been doing for many years, I would be able to pay the cost of the programmers' work. I also offered programmers joint participation in the development of the project, as a result of which, after its implementation, they would earn much more than their costs, but everyone is interested in income here and now.

Ofcourse, lack of funding is always part of the problem, but I'm not interesting in that.  Idea & gifted programmers should be ready first then funding will come, especially if your funder is convinced.

In regards to the funding, I could advise you to raise it from the Market. "He" is about to move price up. It's hard to convince this faithless world that price can actually be moved by him. Just believe!

[VictorProsh]

Smart idea Victor. That's why I'm interested. Wish you could resolve the issue I spoke about concerning zero devaluation.

By the way, if you are a programmer, I could work with you. I'm particularly interested in guidance. I'm deep into this & have had past offers from couple of people to work with them .. unfortunately I didn't accept them due to certain reasons. It's becoming more urgent to develop something tough & useful before it's too late

Unfortunately, I'm not a programmer, I'm looking for programmers who can bring this complex project to life. If you understand how to implement this idea, you are welcome, I accept any help in cooperation. I was offered a team of programmers to implement this project, but the first question they were interested in was not how it works and what to do it for, but what my budget is. I understand that any work must be paid for and if someone paid me for my development, which I have been doing for many years, I would be able to pay the cost of the programmers' work. I also offered programmers joint participation in the development of the project, as a result of which, after its implementation, they would earn much more than their costs, but everyone is interested in income here and now.

Ofcourse, lack of funding is always part of the problem, but I'm not interesting in that.  Idea & gifted programmers should be ready first then funding will come, especially if your funder is convinced.

In regards to the funding, I could advise you to raise it from the Market. "He" is about to move price up. It's hard to convince this faithless world that price can actually be moved by him. Just believe!

If I had a sponsor, the project would already be working and you wouldn't have to persuade everyone to follow you to move the price, the project would do it for you. Your efforts to convince everyone of the correctness of your idea are in vain, since not everyone believes in God, most believe in the golden calf, and not in the mission.

[Sang Prabu]

Of course this is a good offer because the co-owner of a crypto bank is a promising thing, especially if the crypto we lead can skyrocket like Solana, Polygon or others, millions of dollars a year salary is certainly easy for us to get.

[Cryptomultiplier]

Sure, I would love to...I didn't concur because it sounded like money plus, but because if it is called a decentralized system, I believe it is an answer to remote work. I love remote work from any location and speaking about to co-own; I would champion the cause of a decentralized system because my interest shows I do believe it will one day be world unitarian in policy for commerce and trade.