What more can a project teams wish for ???

[Festac]

Some projects that ends on p2pb2b exchange and other like p2pb2b exchange are doing it willingly, they either don't have enough fund for top exchanges or they willingly list on p2pb2b exchange because they don't plan to stay for long

[shoreno]

This is why I've Zero my mind that serious projects will always aim for top exchanges, the results are already clear as crystal

but why ? your tired of assuming because projects always end up on top exchanges ? or you mean to say that even if they end up on listing on top exchange success are still not guaranteed because of the reasons that you said . its okay if thats the case but no because there are serious projects that cant get thier self listed on a top exchange . it could be they are lack of money or thier project isnt qualified for what the exchange ask for . money and quality are the two that they want more

[Towerbreeze]

Remember, not all projects on top exchanges are that good, few died after few years and the top exchanges teams had no choice but to delist such projects from their exchanges, this year so far binance exchange have delisted 4 to 5 different altcoins

[GreenStox]

the best exchange will see the project they will choose, in the sense that it is they who determine that the project will be listed on their exchange and have a ieo on their exchange.
while projects that have to pay upfront to do ieo may still not be able to raise funds at the exchange top.
but there is still an opportunity for a listing if it's good, then they will invite them to join.

[Maxstl007]

Lack of funds can be the reason for some team not to list their token on big exchanges and some projects use case are bad that top exchanges will turn them down, the best advice to give is for developers to stop building crappy projects

[andycarrol]

Remember, not all projects on top exchanges are that good, few died after few years and the top exchanges teams had no choice but to delist such projects from their exchanges, this year so far binance exchange have delisted 4 to 5 different altcoins

when there is an altcoin that is removed from a good exchange place such as a Binance exchange place, it does not respect the exchange platform and does not appreciate the development of the project, thus making the cryptocurrency name damaged because there is no good development of the project and the developer.

[Sourhearrt]

The secret to success using IEO is through top exchanges, big exchanges like binance and kucoin will give your project good exposure and drive big waves of investors and make good volume and liquidity available, stay way from low exchanges like p2pb2b and exmarket exchange

[jademaxsuy]

Yes, most of the ICO promise this especially if they are planning to scam more investors in their crowd sourcing scheme. There is really no way to identify that the project could really be successful if it sold out all of the tokens. Others are just making the numbers so that they can get more funds from the crowd. I have seen some few projects who were sold out on their token sale and even boasting on the ads that they were done on one of the football games. Many were happy on that project especially the investors but until now the project had nowhere to be found the team are not active anymore and probably they ran away with the crowd fund. This is how the ICO projects work here. They earn money by making a fraud project making you believe that the project is real that will be able to double your money fast and easy.

[kateycoin]

It's always for the best interest of the project if they use top exchanges to raise fund, there will be better results

1. Enough money for future developments
2. High trading volumes and enough liquidity
3. Exposure to more investors and whales and even traders

what more can a project team want?

This is why I've Zero my mind that serious projects will always aim for top exchanges, the results are already clear as crystal

Of course all things are we want to see in the project because we can decide properly if the project is really good to support until in the future. You are right too its important that the project have enough money to develop their project which is that's the reason of some project thats why they failed. is because shorts in funds.Social media is the best way to promote their project so they can get investor to invest. And most of all the value of the their token or coin,we know that now a days that value of coin is very important for investor.

[SyndicateLabs]

I too believe that serious projects will always aim for top exchanges to raise fund and to have better investors, marketcap, volume and good liquidity, but not all small projects that use small exchanges are scam either, there are presently many small projects that's been around since 2017 and still good till today

In order for them to go to the top exchanges in this market, they need to have a large budget to pay for it. So it's very difficult for new projects because the majority of cashew projects start from zero

[Finestream]

This is why I've Zero my mind that serious projects will always aim for top exchanges, the results are already clear as crystal

True, because a serious project nowadays spend for the listed in big exchange, unlike before that they can easily raise money from ICO without taking out from their personal pocket as their investment. Now, things have changed, since ICO is not anymore selling and IEO is the new trend, they are force to invest for the project to be listed in big exchange and to have a good opportunity to raise the target funds, thus, it helps reduce the scammers in the space as most scammers are just running ICO.

[el kaka22]

If you can get a top exchange to list you that would be awesome obviously but just because you can't get a top exchange to list you doesn't mean that you will stop.

There are tons of coins that started out with bad and small exchanges and slowly grew to be bigger and eventually got picked up by the giant exchanges as well, it just took them some time, the nature of a project is usually not going out big all at once but to gradually become bigger and bigger if they can, obviously not many can do that but the ones that did it stayed up.

I remember when IOTA was so big that people thought it could actually go over bitcoin at one point, why? Because, on its first days and weeks it became HUGE and ranked as high as top 5 on its first month, where is now? 24th, that is why early on is not the one that matters, it matters what you do later.

[btcholder]

Genuinely these are key points what a project really want. If you are thinking of a top rated exchange then you have to give them huge amount fee for your coin. So serious projects own't hesitate to do that because they want to build up their project but which projects are not serious enough they always try to find low quality exchange for their coin. But it's always important to choose a good quality exchange if they want to develop their coin/token.
Besides these points it's also important to develop their own product and make their asset (token) more use able (like fiat).

[rathaha10]

It's always for the best interest of the project if they use top exchanges to raise fund, there will be better results

1. Enough money for future developments
2. High trading volumes and enough liquidity
3. Exposure to more investors and whales and even traders

what more can a project team want?

This is why I've Zero my mind that serious projects will always aim for top exchanges, the results are already clear as crystal

I agree with you, Good exchange provide teams with lots of opportunity centered around fundraising and good tokenomics and it also contributes greatly to the future development of the project but not let's forget they need to have a well defined visions, aims and objectives in order to be able to deliver the product because i've seen many projects abandoned their project development after raising huge funds and got listed on exchanges

[Kotone]

Everyone knows that already. I believe that good project usually do this way. However there are cases that new project settles with low market exchange and gradually enter medium to big market for market purposes. This us also working and can be judged as serious too. Its depend on the project strategy. But I like some of these projects that started this way, cause the hype and market price increase as they been listed slowly. Cause people noticed them.

[Free1bitco.in]

If you can get a top exchange to list you that would be awesome obviously but just because you can't get a top exchange to list you doesn't mean that you will stop.

but the exchange is also an important point in this regard. I am sure that every serious developer who wants to develop his project, certainly hopes that his tokens will enter the popular exchange. this is evidenced that every message sent on a group telegram will definitely try to offer a popular exchange to attract more investors and users.

[CuriousGeorge]

It's always for the best interest of the project if they use top exchanges to raise fund, there will be better results

1. Enough money for future developments
2. High trading volumes and enough liquidity
3. Exposure to more investors and whales and even traders

what more can a project team want?

This is why I've Zero my mind that serious projects will always aim for top exchanges, the results are already clear as crystal

When a project or token can be listed on a large exchanger such as Binance, investor confidence in the project will increase and this will keep the price going up. Large exchangers provide opportunities for growing transactions and also increase liquidity so that they will add new investors so it is not surprising that all coveted projects can be listed on large exchangers.

Binance will trigger the investors to invest in such project. Remember it's not about the technical aspects but when a coin can be listed on the binance exchange site and then it will be getting massive demand from the various community too.

[mezzaluna]

It's always for the best interest of the project if they use top exchanges to raise fund, there will be better results

1. Enough money for future developments
2. High trading volumes and enough liquidity
3. Exposure to more investors and whales and even traders

what more can a project team want?

Another thing to add are to add plans for continuous development of their whole platform. If they want enough money and better exposure, they need to make sure that they are willing to add more needed features that are available on their platform that will make them popular and from there, they should just go stable to being a useful and profitable platform.

[Gorosden]

It's entirely fair to judge a project through the Exchanges they plan to use for IEO, if it's a small exchange it means the team aren't that serious with the project and if it's a top exchange then they already know what impact top exchanges will bring to their project

[lenovop-70]

New projects that sell at large exchangers, in my opinion the project is very good. The big exchanger will definitely verify the project, starting from the developer team or the readiness of the product produced because it concerns the reputation held by the exchanger.

You are right, i used that way too to identify the new project launched, this method often works for me who don't want to be difficult to identify whether a project is good or bad. check the cartesi price month ago, and check the last price today, it was profitable, the IEO was on binance, thats proof how the market team is so smart in screening a project for us.