Eventually, 1xbit has launched its new Signature campaign. (Update: 26-05-2021)

[Bitcoin_Arena]

There are people like JollyGood who would change their negative into neutral just when a campaign is launched .. just like Jolly changed his feedback for bestchange so maybe a good idea to run a campaign, pay some coins to dogs and get the negative feedback removed. Well done.

Did you even fall the whole accusation against bestchange how it was concluded? When did bestchange ever scam anyone? Can you point it out? Stop this crap of comparing the bestchange situation to serial scammers like 1xbit


Lol, they did ignore what i wrote in the other thread of theirs. Stupid Move. Good luck getting rid of the new negative ratings on your profile  1xbit_official. You just made things worse.

I don't want to be the prophet of doom but the attempt to clean their negative ratings using a signature campaign could be a total fail. Just remember what happened to the likes of Yobit, Livecoin, p2pb2b2...  

[suchmoon]

Actually, flag is invalid:

Anyone supporting this flag please think this through. I think type 2 or 3 flags should be created by actual victims and if evidence is there - you can support those, making type 1 redundant. Failing to do that, to base a type 1 flag on circumstantial evidence you need to be able to show how an average person is at high-risk of losing money with 1xBit.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I noticed that there were a lot of members withdrawing their applications in the campaign thread.  Did I miss a thread in which someone threatened to tag campaign participants?  There could be no other reason for a bunch of people deciding not to participate, and I've never seen the first few pages of a campaign ANN thread look like 1xbit's does.

That being said, 1xbit is doing nothing to clear their name from the initial scam accusation, so I'm sure the tags will remain till that happens.

Man, I don't even remember what the deal is with 1xbit; I'll have to look at their feedback after posting this.  Anyway, not addressing multiple scam accusations is the tactic Yobit has taken for years, and it's not the right way to handle things if you're the business being accused of scamming.  

Edit:
Ah, I guess this is a bunch of old issues coming to the fore because of this thread.  I understand now, though I barely remember their name.

[examplens]

I noticed that there were a lot of members withdrawing their applications in the campaign thread.  Did I miss a thread in which someone threatened to tag campaign participants?  There could be no other reason for a bunch of people deciding not to participate, and I've never seen the first few pages of a campaign ANN thread look like 1xbit's does.
 

I think this thread is in question, he caused a mass withdrawal.
they automatically write the application post, now withdraw their application instructed by previous experience with Yobit campaign and tagging users from there. plus it's not some serious money offered there, not worth the risk to ruin account because of 1xbit.

[LTU_btc]

There is several warnings about 1xbit in campaign thread given, so this why probably some users withdraw their applications. Seems that many people applying immediately after seing open campaign without making even minimal research about website that they are going to promote.
1xbit don't have escrow for their campaign, but I doubt that they are going to scam participants - it probably would be too much even for 1xbit. What is more concerning that they didn't hired campaign manager and they are going to manage campaign themselves.
And after all, did they solved at least one scam accusation? Because I haven't seen anything.

[suchmoon]

And after all, did they solved at least one scam accusation?

No. They opened a thread offering to resolve issues, waited for a couple of days, got a couple of complaints, and rejected them. It seems to have been a show with no real intent to fix anything.

[dkbit98]

They opened topic to offer 'fake helping people' who accused them for scam before, just so they could start their new bounty campaign.
Super fast way to get many negative feedbacks on their profile.
Question is what will happen to all the people who applied for campaign... maybe yobit2 scenario?
I am waiting to see how this story will end

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bsXUQSfQ6fXp1ynWscbBK9jm2Lvxok4Myu2OwvO-EEU/edit?usp=sharing

[suchmoon]

Question is what will happen to all the people who applied for campaign... maybe yobit2 scenario?

My suggestion would be to ignore the lemmings. Unlike yobit's investbox bullshit that broke the proverbial camel's back, this is not an obvious ponzi.

[GazetaBitcoin]

Support/oppose flag type-1: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2204

Flag supported.

I just noticed another thing which is sort of funny:

@1xbet you should run signature campaign here, you will clean your status in no time... 

Ironically or not, after marlboroza posted that suggestion (in an obvious humorous manner), they just started the signature campaign lol. What were the odds?

[AB de Royse777]

@1xbet you should run signature campaign here, you will clean your status in no time... 

Ironically or not, after marlboroza posted that suggestion (in an obvious humorous manner), they just started the signature campaign lol. What were the odds?

That's it!
marlboroza and 1xBet are working together :-D

[Upgrade00]

1xbit has currently discontinued their signature campaign and locked the thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5267371.msg54973195#msg54973195

[AB de Royse777]

1xbit has currently discontinued their signature campaign and locked the thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5267371.msg54973195#msg54973195

We don't want participants of our campaign to receive negative feedback for wearing our signature, that's why we are pausing the campaign.

We will relaunch it once there is a fertile environment for launching it.  (locking thread to avoid off topic posts)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5267371.msg54973195#msg54973195


I like the reasoning though. :-D

[LoyceV]

Users are usualy accused of cheating when:
 - multiaccounting

I've always wondered why the casino gets to keep the player's profit and thus make more money for themselves. I'd say this shouldn't earn the casino money, so even if the player can't have it, some charity might be a good option.

- arbitraging

I'm not familiar with this. Is it related to sport betting?

- using VPN/proxy to connect from a banned country

Is this really different than physically travelling abroad to gamble online?

- abusing bonuses

This I can agree with.

- exploiting vulnerabilities on the website or taking advantage of bugs on the game itself

This I can agree with too. And I don't understand why the casino would say to return the deposited funds in this case.

- double spending a deposit transaction on casinos accepting zero-confirmation transactions

That's just dumb, wait for at least a confirmation. As far as I know there isn't a single exchange that accepts zero-confirmation transactions, why would a casino be any different?

There are different ways for users to cheat but the problem and what happens usually is that casinos use the above excuses to ban whover they want without having to provide any evidence.

All the more reason the casino shouldn't profit from banning users.

[dkbit98]

1xbit has currently discontinued their signature campaign and locked the thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5267371.msg54973195#msg54973195

What a 'surprise'
They need to work much harder to fix things here in bitcointalk forum.
We are all waiting for more 'fertile' times

marlboroza and 1xBet are working together :-D

He has a weird sense of humor

[Pffrt]

And after all, did they solved at least one scam accusation? Because I haven't seen anything.

They had rejected all the complaint because all the cases were related to multi-accounting, may be?
If yobit can run their campaign here by the name of cryptotalk, if other gambling sites can run their service without any problem even after doing shady things, then what's wrong with running 1xbit sig campaign? Well, they could simply create a gambling forum and ask everyone to create an account on their site and hire a reputed and respected campaign manager, the campaign would be legal. But they are more clever and tried to manage the campaign themselves.

[wxa7115]

- arbitraging

I'm not familiar with this. Is it related to sport betting?

Arbitraging in sports bets is no different than arbitraging stocks or cryptocurrencies, as an example suppose there is a coin trading at 1 dollar in an exchange but in a different exchange the coin is trading at 1.05 dollars, in theory you could buy the coin at the exchange where it is the cheapest and then sell it for a profit in the exchange in which is more expensive.

A similar process can be achieved with sports bets but instead of looking at the price you will be looking at the odds offered by the casinos, obviously even if this is not cheating in any way casinos do not like arbers as they do not lose money like the average gambler does.

[electronicash]

1xbit has currently discontinued their signature campaign and locked the thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5267371.msg54973195#msg54973195

What a 'surprise'
They need to work much harder to fix things here in bitcointalk forum.
We are all waiting for more 'fertile' times

marlboroza and 1xBet are working together :-D

He has a weird sense of humor

its obvious that it has a smiley to it but 1xbit just took it seriously that makes it funnier.

they need more funds to rebuild their reputation to the community, they'd made so much scam almost too impossible to fix already that they gave up even before starting to repair it. they deleted their reputation thread where they intend to fix the scam accusations. they should have express they are willing to fix the accusations while the signature campaign is running, it might just help them.

[marlboroza]

its obvious that it has a smiley to it but 1xbit just took it seriously that makes it funnier.

Well, it came trough my mind that 1xbit will take this seriously so I removed that line but as someone quoted it I placed it back and added smiley.
Maybe they should create new account and resolve al....

[AB de Royse777]

Maybe they should create new account and resolve al....

Is this another one coming from you? Now once they will do that then we will have 100% confirmation that you and them are working together. Maybe you are an alt of them :-P

[TalkStar]

1xbit has currently discontinued their signature campaign and locked the thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5267371.msg54973195#msg54973195

At last they realised that their aggressive move will not gonna bring good results for them. Lets see how much time they take to resolve their issues.  

What a 'surprise'
They need to work much harder to fix things here in bitcointalk forum.
We are all waiting for more 'fertile' times

Much surprising for the participants who applied and deleted their applications after getting the confirmation from 1xBit.

Maybe they should create new account and resolve al....

Maybe this time they are not going to follow your suggestion. Although anything is possible when its "1xBit".