So because you can lie as a basis for a red tag you just want to hand out, then I should be concerned if OG had allegedly said something about you that he has not as yet provided any proof of?
Your lie is there. It is independently verifiable. You said you suffered brain death with what you estimated 10% reduced function.
You then say that I am lying for saying you suffered brain death ..as a basis for a tag.
Like many of the red tags you give out they are bogus and dangerous.
You also block flags against undeniable scammers.
I do not trust you since along with that you seem to be very friendly and praise 2 proven scammers.
1 of which you have previously admitted you were scared to tag because they would tag you back and ruin your account.
How you ever hope to prove you did not or never did admit to OG you are a pedo is impossible.
You could argue he needs to produce evidence or it is an unsubstantiated claim. That is entirely different. Even that does not prove he is lying that you admitted it to him.
I can't say either way what you have told OG previously. However since you can't remember telling the entire board who cared to read you suffered brain death and 10% reduced function then...
Why would you even bring this up again? I have seen others mention you in that light on here but have not seen any proof of that myself.
I doubt you would keep going one about such a thing if there was some truth in it.
However you are a trust abusing scammer supporter and enabler so that is primary focus with you scumbag.
Anyway you can't say you can tell independently verifiable lies as a basis for red trust just because you claim others have done so to you.