Quality Projects Revival

[Rengga Jati]

...There were some good projects that got discouraged and closed the projects due to low or no funding in the bear market. My personal suggestion would be that the teams should consider reviving their projects now, modify them according to new market needs and then come up with an MVP and then start IEO or ITO as the market conditions seem to be improved now.

The most reasons why a project was failed at the moment:
1. Similar ideas with other projects
2. No funds enough
3. No creative, innovative, and also developing team members.
4. No good marketing strategy
Well, it may be an idea to revive those good and potential projects. But there must be notes that will not make the projects failed again as happened previously. However, will the team really go to this chance? Probably they will prefer to create new projects that really fit the concept of today's crypto world and necessities than reviving their old projects.

[1714484087]

1714484087

[coupable]

Dead projects are dead projects. They can't be revived. Although the concept can be adopted otherwise and lunched in another project.
Most of the dead projects are scams even the concept looks promising. But promising doesn't always mean real.
However, i would like to mention Doge coin project, which has been left by its team and the progress in developement stopped in early stages. And as the project is still alive by its community, then why not the developement to continue by another team. This just an idea and not truly certain if it's possible to go on with.

[oscarftw]

I'm sorry to tell you that I don't have one to advise you. Because of inactive for a long time, but what will you do? Invest again in these projects will not be worth it. But I see so many projects that are still active in telegram groups but those weren't failed projects. These projects raise only low money and try to survive.

[maxreish]

The modification of uncontinued project can possibly be done. If for the reason why the project stopped was because of the lack of funds, they should settle it first before proceeding to switch into another way to improve their project.

On the other hand, I don't think it is effective for them to relive their abandoned project. Why don't they just make a new project with a fresh, sincere and new motive in crypto industry? With of course, great product. If one project's determined purpose is build, other things will follow.

[Kotone]

Maybe they will got success of they rename their projects into DEFI because that much hype is getting on those projects.But I will say they have less chance of getting reveived into a successful one and also they need investors to give funds for the IEO process which isn't going to happen anyways.

Thats the thing after the hype of defi everyone seems to find a way to join it. Im sure most of the dead projects are working already to change their concept into defi hype. Im not sure but there are certain project I know exist before now opening up sales, has anyonr heard open predict? I think if Im not mistaken, there is a token traded before but now I see them doing a lots of AMA and will have a sale.

[bgaf]

Which projects or coins come to your mind that could have done well if they were able to raise decent funds?
Also if someone from the team of such projects reads this, he/she can share his thoughts and opinion too.

Im thinking dfinance will have a good result. As far as I know they are a project originally from wingsdao, and they launch the dfinance, a new regime of their predecessor. When I visit their telegram they said that they will conduct a swap from wings to dfi coin. Im not sure if they gonna go for any token sale cause the budget looks like not a problem as they have enough funds. I assume a success for this one. Unfrotunately already joined payaccept, they had a campaign too but I dont want to jumping from campaign to campaign.

[imstillthebest]

all projects can do well if let say they meet their required funds because money can do anything . they can hire good devs with that and they can pay to make a good advertisement , etc  but how can they end up gathering good amounts of cash if people simply not attracted to them because they created a poor plan  or a poor product  . now i know why op created this thread  . they can revive or restart again but this time they must give thier best shot

[Google+]

all projects can do well if let say they meet their required funds because money can do anything . they can hire good devs with that and they can pay to make a good advertisement , etc  but how can they end up gathering good amounts of cash if people simply not attracted to them because they created a poor plan  or a poor product  . now i know why op created this thread  . they can revive or restart again but this time they must give thier best shot

the money they get when offering to investors depends on how the concept of the project is, when they have a project that is very useful for many people then it will definitely be easy to have a good price on an exchange and of course the project will have a lot of support.

[danherbias07]

I forgot the names of the projects that I joined.
But some of them are really cool.
Yes, that would be a great idea if they can come back.

That is, if they can still afford to do so since they already experienced how it end up.
I mean, it will be another risk.

[Apostlekin$$$]

Cartesi is one of the most obvious examples of successful ICO projects in recent years. there were also many projects that made strong development and brought a large amount of profit. the main thing is to do a good analysis

Either good use cases or utility the risks aren't totally erased yet, there are few good projects in the past that has very good beginning and as time passes by the project will be ruined, after finding good projects always play safe by invest minimal amount you can afford to lose

[tourist2079]

Cartesi is one of the most obvious examples of successful ICO projects in recent years. there were also many projects that made strong development and brought a large amount of profit. the main thing is to do a good analysis

Cartesi is really good. That's why I didn't miss the next campaign of Bubbalex manager. DIA looks more promising to me. Although OP's wants to old projects name that failed success. "Files.fm" campaign was good for me, they were sorry for hunters because enough funds didn't rise. This project has a good partnership, but the funds raised weren't enough.

Latest company conducted by bubbalex - DIA is the open-source platform for transparent, community-verified
price oracles for DeFi applications. She also promises to bring a good profit

[Crypto_lion]

Look at the projects that withstood the bear market and have a working product now and if they they partnership with some big companies then that would be the projects I would go for.

[bigcash2011]

I was thinking about it so i thought to post about it here and discuss about this matter. Actually I have seen many good projects that either paused or cancelled there projects due to long bears market and decline of ICOs, I am talking about 2018 and onwards.
There were some good projects that got discouraged and closed the projects due to low or no funding in the bear market. My personal suggestion would be that the teams should consider reviving their projects now, modify them according to new market needs and then come up with a MVP and then start IEO or ITO as the market conditions seems to be improved now.
So what do you guys think about it?
Which projects or coins come to your mind that could have done well if they were able to raise decent funds?
Also if someone from the team of such projects reads this, he/she can share his thoughts and opinion too.

Only high quality projects with serious use cases and especially those that are in demand in the current market should consider reviving their projects and the better thing will be if they find a big partner or angel investor to do so.

[xOdiumNostrumx]

Many 2017 projects went bankrupt because of their poor fund management, just remember the ICO craze back then, projects were successfully raising tens of millions just because of their shiny websites and decent whitepapers. But if their short-sightedness resulted in bankruptcy because they failed to foresee a relatively long crypto winter, its on them. Maybe they could achieve their goals with additional funding now, but I doubt people will invest in half-dead projects as the market is full of vibrant new projects that provide a much better investing opportunity.

[fuer44]

yes, there are many who end up not continuing their project until it is listed on the market exchanger. starting from 2018, tens or maybe even hundreds of projects have been neglected due to several factors. the first may be due to the never ending bearish and resulting in a decrease in the ico rate as well and finally many lose prices and don't even reach the exchange market. actually that is not the main problem, keep running the project and someday will definitely get investors for it. but it is indeed difficult, in the 2018-2020 period ICO really lost its trust and it actually made the ICO rate fall even further. should now be a turning point if the project team starts getting serious about the project and things will return to normal or even better.

[rhomelmabini]

Which projects or coins come to your mind that could have done well if they were able to raise decent funds?
Also if someone from the team of such projects reads this, he/she can share his thoughts and opinion too.

It will be hard to pick and as far as I can recall they are too many of them but mostly are redundant type of projects. The one I'm afraid of is if they'll just collect funds then does nothing it will be dangerous for investors and just live with the hype of bull market.

[Viscore]

I was thinking about it so i thought to post about it here and discuss about this matter. Actually I have seen many good projects that either paused or cancelled there projects due to long bears market and decline of ICOs, I am talking about 2018 and onwards.
There were some good projects that got discouraged and closed the projects due to low or no funding in the bear market. My personal suggestion would be that the teams should consider reviving their projects now, modify them according to new market needs and then come up with a MVP and then start IEO or ITO as the market conditions seems to be improved now.
So what do you guys think about it?
Which projects or coins come to your mind that could have done well if they were able to raise decent funds?
Also if someone from the team of such projects reads this, he/she can share his thoughts and opinion too.

That could be there decision. If they are true into their project, it is absolutely that they are willing to continue it. But the question is, how the ccommunity/investors make a response to them since they are already been in question for how many months that they've been quiet and dead. We can't simply give them trust for sure? Because it probably the mind of the people would be in doubts and are not also having the interest to take the risk as well.

[smyslov]

I was thinking about it so i thought to post about it here and discuss about this matter. Actually I have seen many good projects that either paused or cancelled there projects due to long bears market and decline of ICOs, I am talking about 2018 and onwards.
There were some good projects that got discouraged and closed the projects due to low or no funding in the bear market. My personal suggestion would be that the teams should consider reviving their projects now, modify them according to new market needs and then come up with a MVP and then start IEO or ITO as the market conditions seems to be improved now.
So what do you guys think about it?
Which projects or coins come to your mind that could have done well if they were able to raise decent funds?
Also if someone from the team of such projects reads this, he/she can share his thoughts and opinion too.

They can start again but that doesn't mean that they will be successful this time around, the scenario is very much different on 2018 compared now, there are many new project coming up with a good concept and some of them are concepts that will look like updated and upgrade version of past project that failed to sustain.

[Strongkored]

I doubt that a project that is paused or canceled will be able to get money from either IEO or ITO if launch nowdays, because could be why they paused or canceled their project because they saw that their project idea was the same as other projects that existed and also some failed in development, and it turned out that the project idea was not something that could be implemented immediately or seems unrealistic.

[Finestream]

There's a lot of good projects in the space that didn't get the attention of the investors, maybe if they'll work hard enough in this timing, they will get noticed.
Usually when the market is bullish, investors will be looking to invest on altcoins also, old and new projects as long as it has a potential and the team knows how to hype the project, they'll certainly get invested.

Marketing is the most important in this market where the competition is getting tighter, so I hope we will see some old projects to prosper this time, and I won't be surprise as it's expected.