Quality Projects Revival

[kotajikikox]

I doubt that a project that is paused or canceled will be able to get money from either IEO or ITO if launch nowdays, because could be why they paused or canceled their project because they saw that their project idea was the same as other projects that existed and also some failed in development, and it turned out that the project idea was not something that could be implemented immediately or seems unrealistic.

Big reason for developers to stop or pause their project is lack of interest from investors.

It's tough to compete with so many projects around and if your idea is not that interesting investors won't take  the risk

they will pass this up and proceed with potential project, ideas that have addition to the industries, if now those developers

will go back the competitions is more harder and lots of the same concepts project will surely move the investors away.

[1714490611]

1714490611

[Iyeman]

I'm sorry to tell you that I don't have one to advise you. Because of inactive for a long time, but what will you do? Invest again in these projects will not be worth it. But I see so many projects that are still active in telegram groups but those weren't failed projects. These projects raise only low money and try to survive.

When the project became inactive and that means there was a problem that happened with such project. When the problem is not yet resolved and it will be only wasting a lot of our time to revive the crap project. this is difficult to be done.

[ElmedoRator]

I doubt that a project that is paused or canceled will be able to get money from either IEO or ITO if launch nowdays, because could be why they paused or canceled their project because they saw that their project idea was the same as other projects that existed and also some failed in development, and it turned out that the project idea was not something that could be implemented immediately or seems unrealistic.

Big reason for developers to stop or pause their project is lack of interest from investors.

It's tough to compete with so many projects around and if your idea is not that interesting investors won't take  the risk

they will pass this up and proceed with potential project, ideas that have addition to the industries, if now those developers

will go back the competitions is more harder and lots of the same concepts project will surely move the investors away.

If they want to receive attention from investors, their project must have a good product and a clear idea. How do investors get interested in bullshit projects, with no products and ideas that are too difficult to execute?

[kindbtc]

I was thinking about it so i thought to post about it here and discuss about this matter. Actually I have seen many good projects that either paused or cancelled there projects due to long bears market and decline of ICOs, I am talking about 2018 and onwards.
There were some good projects that got discouraged and closed the projects due to low or no funding in the bear market. My personal suggestion would be that the teams should consider reviving their projects now, modify them according to new market needs and then come up with a MVP and then start IEO or ITO as the market conditions seems to be improved now.
So what do you guys think about it?
Which projects or coins come to your mind that could have done well if they were able to raise decent funds?
Also if someone from the team of such projects reads this, he/she can share his thoughts and opinion too.

I do not remember any high quality project that was cancelled due to lack of funding but i do want Telegram Open Network TON to revive and continue development as it was the most anticipated and quality project for blockchain enthusiasts. It was stopped due to the interference of SEC.

[sana54210]

I think it is easier to get some interest if you try to do it again with bigger marketing and new buzzwords. Something that wanted to ICO 5 months ago and couldn't get the interest and funding could instead scrap everything about it, and restart today with adding "defi" word into it and spending some more money on the marketing with articles on all big places with paid writing and ads on there plus doing a lot bigger giveaways of their project and having bounties as well.

When you do that it gets instant attention, it is easier to pick up funds that way because now you are talking what people want to hear, not what you want to tell which is how marketing is done, you can switch your project to what people want to hear later but first you lie about it. It is unethical and immoral but we all know there are people who are unethical and immoral as well.

[dataispower]

I was thinking about it so i thought to post about it here and discuss about this matter. Actually I have seen many good projects that either paused or cancelled there projects due to long bears market and decline of ICOs, I am talking about 2018 and onwards.
There were some good projects that got discouraged and closed the projects due to low or no funding in the bear market. My personal suggestion would be that the teams should consider reviving their projects now, modify them according to new market needs and then come up with a MVP and then start IEO or ITO as the market conditions seems to be improved now.
So what do you guys think about it?
Which projects or coins come to your mind that could have done well if they were able to raise decent funds?
Also if someone from the team of such projects reads this, he/she can share his thoughts and opinion too.

Some projects which raised sufficient funds during ICO back in 2017/2018 either mismanaged their funds or had selfish interest. Most of those crypto projects were created just for making money, with zero interest in product development, so how will you know the few genuine projects which should be revived, probably by the proposed comeback via raising funds with IEO?. I think the projects to be supported wrt funding are those which even with the little funds they raised via ICO still continued with product development. One of them is Internxt, they already developed a cloud storage working product but I doubt if they have enough funds to list their token on big exchanges. This is just an instance.

[H1N1]

Some good projects has been paused due their raised ETH value was falling in bear market.
But i think most paused projects unable to revive the project again, because they might have sold their raised ETH or other coins with low price at the  time of bear market.

[joshua123]

Some good projects has been paused due their raised ETH value was falling in bear market.
But i think most paused projects unable to revive the project again, because they might have sold their raised ETH or other coins with low price at the  time of bear market.

Maybe we can keep it that way but not the case for every proejct out there. I know that some of them are full of lies and just making false hope for investors. I know the fact that they can easily scam the money and gone. Projects being revive and making their concept as defi are what we can called opportunist. Trying to ride with the hype of the market and earn funds.

[Inkdull]

I was thinking about it so i thought to post about it here and discuss about this matter. Actually I have seen many good projects that either paused or cancelled there projects due to long bears market and decline of ICOs, I am talking about 2018 and onwards.
There were some good projects that got discouraged and closed the projects due to low or no funding in the bear market. My personal suggestion would be that the teams should consider reviving their projects now, modify them according to new market needs and then come up with a MVP and then start IEO or ITO as the market conditions seems to be improved now.
So what do you guys think about it?
Which projects or coins come to your mind that could have done well if they were able to raise decent funds?
Also if someone from the team of such projects reads this, he/she can share his thoughts and opinion too.

Some projects got closed due to incapability of the team and some teams are so stubborn that they won't listen to advice.

1. You use p2pb2b exchange for raising fund, what do you expect ?
2. You put the community not in the first place
3. You lied about your professions
4. You gathered the wrong team

These can easily ruin the life of any new and old crypto project

[Andrews193]

Some good projects has been paused due their raised ETH value was falling in bear market.
But i think most paused projects unable to revive the project again, because they might have sold their raised ETH or other coins with low price at the  time of bear market.

Agree, projects have had a pause and limited update information with investors, they have no chance to come back in one way or another because their community was undoubtedly frustrated with what the project was demonstrating, running away during sensitive times, a lot of information about phishing was released at that time, back just to let investors refuse again, no resurgence here when confidence has been eliminated

[kingzpro]

I was thinking about it so i thought to post about it here and discuss about this matter. Actually I have seen many good projects that either paused or cancelled there projects due to long bears market and decline of ICOs, I am talking about 2018 and onwards.
There were some good projects that got discouraged and closed the projects due to low or no funding in the bear market. My personal suggestion would be that the teams should consider reviving their projects now, modify them according to new market needs and then come up with a MVP and then start IEO or ITO as the market conditions seems to be improved now.
So what do you guys think about it?
Which projects or coins come to your mind that could have done well if they were able to raise decent funds?
Also if someone from the team of such projects reads this, he/she can share his thoughts and opinion too.

It is not a bad idea but such projects should come up with confidence building measures first like some development and for that they should find private investors or fund the project themselves at the start or revival and only do it if they truly believe in the idea and practicality of the project. I know many projects had delayed or cancelled thier fund raising campaigns due to long bear market so now they definitely have a chance to relaunch.

[Convery]

Do research which projects actively developed solutions in the time of the crypto bear market and invest in these cryptocurrencies, sooner or later you will enjoy the profit. Because crypto projects that worked hard no matter the times will always succeed. 

[Warkop]

I think projects that have failed in the past, they will never come back to update them, because some of these projects always rely on money from investors, not their personal money, therefore without investors participating in the project will never be able to continue, so to That is, they have to make new projects to ensure to all investors that what they make is really good in the future.

[ghost424]

I was thinking about it so i thought to post about it here and discuss about this matter. Actually I have seen many good projects that either paused or cancelled there projects due to long bears market and decline of ICOs, I am talking about 2018 and onwards.
There were some good projects that got discouraged and closed the projects due to low or no funding in the bear market. My personal suggestion would be that the teams should consider reviving their projects now, modify them according to new market needs and then come up with a MVP and then start IEO or ITO as the market conditions seems to be improved now.
So what do you guys think about it?
Which projects or coins come to your mind that could have done well if they were able to raise decent funds?
Also if someone from the team of such projects reads this, he/she can share his thoughts and opinion too.

I would really like to promote Electroneum even though it has been branded as Shitcoin but I can still see the fact that some of their developers are willing to continue the project and that is a really great way to invite more people to use them. Electroneum is now being used in some countries on where they can pay for their stuff locally. They also changed lots of stuff in their mobile application in which you can now do referral programs to gain more ETN.

[othell_rogue]

In my opinion there is no point in reviving a project, no matter what are the conditions it failed. Why? Because if it failed once because team left, developers left (because no one is working for free) why makes me think it won't fail again, if a bear will come after they make the new IEO ITO?

I better put my money in a new coin, rather than a failed-revived project.

[khunyung]

I was thinking about it so i thought to post about it here and discuss about this matter. Actually I have seen many good projects that either paused or cancelled there projects due to long bears market and decline of ICOs, I am talking about 2018 and onwards.
There were some good projects that got discouraged and closed the projects due to low or no funding in the bear market. My personal suggestion would be that the teams should consider reviving their projects now, modify them according to new market needs and then come up with a MVP and then start IEO or ITO as the market conditions seems to be improved now.
So what do you guys think about it?
Which projects or coins come to your mind that could have done well if they were able to raise decent funds?
Also if someone from the team of such projects reads this, he/she can share his thoughts and opinion too.

Not a member of any team, but would like to tell my sincere opinion on the topic.
I think that industry is overcrowded and that what makes it go forward so rapidly.
However, I don't see that industry somehow is in the need of projects that were leftovers couple years ago.
I mean its all up to the team that abandoned their project - if they have the will, power, energy, time and resources to try again - do it, that is great.
But I don't see community being an engine of that process, because there are already so many projects that you barely can keep the track of them, I'm not even saying about engaging in each one of them.

[Iyeman]

Some good projects has been paused due their raised ETH value was falling in bear market.
But i think most paused projects unable to revive the project again, because they might have sold their raised ETH or other coins with low price at the  time of bear market.

that means they can't develop a proper product because when they know there was a possibility for the price of ethereum to be falled and they must use their funds wisely. it looks like they were money grabber project only and no more.

[Rafiqul]

I was thinking about it so i thought to post about it here and discuss about this matter. Actually I have seen many good projects that either paused or cancelled there projects due to long bears market and decline of ICOs, I am talking about 2018 and onwards.
There were some good projects that got discouraged and closed the projects due to low or no funding in the bear market. My personal suggestion would be that the teams should consider reviving their projects now, modify them according to new market needs and then come up with a MVP and then start IEO or ITO as the market conditions seems to be improved now.
So what do you guys think about it?
Which projects or coins come to your mind that could have done well if they were able to raise decent funds?
Also if someone from the team of such projects reads this, he/she can share his thoughts and opinion too.

Since the crypto market has started to get better again after 2018, I agree with your advice.
I also think that in 2018, due to the subsequent market situation, I was disappointed that the projects could not be implemented Teams should bring the projects in a revised form through IEO or ICO as needed in new ventures. I think this will make the crypto market more prosperous.

[nutriagrigia]

Some good projects has been paused due their raised ETH value was falling in bear market.
But i think most paused projects unable to revive the project again, because they might have sold their raised ETH or other coins with low price at the  time of bear market.

that means they can't develop a proper product because when they know there was a possibility for the price of ethereum to be falled and they must use their funds wisely. it looks like they were money grabber project only and no more.

and this is the law of the market. it happens all the time and you must always be ready for it. diversify your money and it will be your salvation

[optimisticcm]

I fully respect everyone's opinion here and i have seen that most people are opposing the idea but please consider i suggested this purely out of good intention.
It was basically an after thought as i was discussing this topic with a friend and he told me that innovation and market growth slowed down massively if we can say died due to long bear market.
Most of the people will agree that there were hardly any good new ico project in all the bear market.
And also please note that im not talking about all the failed or projects who were not able to raise enough funds, i was also talking about projects that got discouraged and paused or delayed or cancelled their projects.
As with everything in life, there is always a second chance, a second opportunity a new hope that is why i suggested this just to encourage quality projects and competent developers to come up with their projects now.
More projects mean more innovation, more solutions and more adoption. This way crypto market in general will grow massively as well.