Last post before 6/1/2012 wins 5 BTC... and who knows how much that will be

[ineededausername]

Go!
GMT forum time.

[1715620021]

1715620021

[1715620021]

1715620021

[dree12]

Go!
GMT forum time.

Last?

[dark_silverstar]

last ?

[dree12]

last ?

To whom it may concern:

The Department of Homeland Security reminds you that it is time to lock all threads beginning with 'L' and ending with 'e'.

[ineededausername]

you people should start a quote tower
also you can contribute to the prize pool here: 17tAMizvL41EHoMVhiNPKeH493FZxTk3pn

[dree12]

Does 6/1 mean january 6 (which is what I assumed) or June 1? I heard americans like to use MM/DD format.

[ineededausername]

Also everyone, my posts don't count, so I can't pull an Atlas.

[ineededausername]

Does 6/1 mean january 6 (which is what I assumed) or June 1? I heard americans like to use MM/DD format.

June 1, lol
I could be giving away $5000!

[BTCurious]

Does 6/1 mean january 6 (which is what I assumed) or June 1? I heard americans like to use MM/DD format.

June 1, lol
I could be giving away $5000!

So, you mean "June 1, lol, as if I would wait that long!" or "June 1, lol, as if I would mean january "

[btc_artist]

Does 6/1 mean january 6 (which is what I assumed) or June 1? I heard americans like to use MM/DD format.

June 1, lol
I could be giving away $5000!

Or $0.25 you never know.

[btc_artist]

Now I just have to pay off a mod to lock the thread and then wait. :evil:

[Vicente]

locked

[ineededausername]

It will end June 1.

[godofal]

january 6th?

[BTCurious]

Maybe.

[dree12]

It will end June 1.

january 6th?

Maybe.

Is it just me, or is something wrong with the above?

[ineededausername]

It will end June 1.

january 6th?

Maybe.

Is it just me, or is something wrong with the above?

Something is wrong with the above.

[btc_artist]

Last post.

[BTCurious]

derp.

[btc_artist]

herp.

[BTCurious]

Bwagner: I was just going to post that! That page is part of a very good introduction to the EC math. The start of that intro is here: http://www.certicom.com/index.php/10-introduction

netrin: An analogy with "baby numbers" would go somewhat like this. I have to abstract some cryptography properties though.

Person A comes up with a number, say 13, and calls this private key 1. He then calculates the public key, which is (for example) "accb". This public key has the property that it can be easily calculated from the private key, but it also has the property that if you only know "accb", then there is no way to find out the private key was 13, unless you bruteforce all numbers by calculating the public key to all of them.
Person B comes up with a number, say 41, and calls this private key 2. He then calculates the public key, which is (for example) "bbbb".


Person A gets the public key from Person B, and adds it to his own: "accb" + "bbbb" = "cddd"
Person B gets the public key from Person A, and adds it to his own: "bbbb" + "accb" = "cddd"

Now they both have the public key "cddd", so they can send money to that public key. To retrieve the money, however, you need to have the private key.
The private key to "cddd" is 13 + 41 = 54. But no one knows this!

That's roughly how you create a private key that no one knows.



I would like to note that this is NOT diffie-hellman secret generation, as far as I know! Neither party knows the private key here, and in fact, any attacker listening to the network could know the private key too. This doesn't matter too much though, since the private key is what you need to get the money. EC diffie-hellman looks similar but is slightly different. In fact it's more like what ByteCoin described early on in the thread. In order not to confuse the thread/topic, I'll just link to the wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptic_curve_Diffie%E2%80%93Hellman

[btc_artist]

Bwagner: I was just going to post that! That page is part of a very good introduction to the EC math. The start of that intro is here: http://www.certicom.com/index.php/10-introduction

netrin: An analogy with "baby numbers" would go somewhat like this. I have to abstract some cryptography properties though.

Person A comes up with a number, say 13, and calls this private key 1. He then calculates the public key, which is (for example) "accb". This public key has the property that it can be easily calculated from the private key, but it also has the property that if you only know "accb", then there is no way to find out the private key was 13, unless you bruteforce all numbers by calculating the public key to all of them.
Person B comes up with a number, say 41, and calls this private key 2. He then calculates the public key, which is (for example) "bbbb".


Person A gets the public key from Person B, and adds it to his own: "accb" + "bbbb" = "cddd"
Person B gets the public key from Person A, and adds it to his own: "bbbb" + "accb" = "cddd"

Now they both have the public key "cddd", so they can send money to that public key. To retrieve the money, however, you need to have the private key.
The private key to "cddd" is 13 + 41 = 54. But no one knows this!

That's roughly how you create a private key that no one knows.



I would like to note that this is NOT diffie-hellman secret generation, as far as I know! Neither party knows the private key here, and in fact, any attacker listening to the network could know the private key too. This doesn't matter too much though, since the private key is what you need to get the money. EC diffie-hellman looks similar but is slightly different. In fact it's more like what ByteCoin described early on in the thread. In order not to confuse the thread/topic, I'll just link to the wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptic_curve_Diffie%E2%80%93Hellman

Wrong thread?

[BTCurious]

Not really.

[btc_artist]

Oh, ok.

[BTCurious]

Yeah, you see, you're not so easily fooled, I guess.

[btc_artist]

[BTCurious]

Been nice talking to you though.

[btc_artist]

You take care now.

[BTCurious]

Will do!

[btc_artist]

Okay, talk to you soon!

[BTCurious]

I hope not…

[btc_artist]

Ok. Enough is enough.

[BTCurious]

Sorry, what?

[btc_artist]

I meant to imply I wasn't going to post here any more....  But I guess that didn't work.

[BTCurious]

That's up to you, though.

[btc_artist]

You're absolutely right.

[BTCurious]

Duh.

[btc_artist]

Well, now why didn't I think of that?

[btc_artist]

Let's sing:

Come they told me, pa rum pum pum pum

[BTCurious]

Another question-- is this, or will it be, open-sourced?

Didn't read the thread, eh? Yes, the source will be released soon.

I skimmed it, but I must have missed that.  Thanks.

It would also be very nice if you could detect a laptop/device running on battery power and not mine in that case.  http://www.google.com/search?q=get%20battery%20level%20java

That would be nice, but sadly a standard way of getting battery level information in Java doesn't seem to exist. You may be able to get it on some phones, but I don't think an unsigned applet can get that kind of information when running on a laptop.

I'm not a Java expert, but it would appear to be possible by interfacing with native OS APIs.  For example, on Windows, use JNI or JNA to call native Windows API functions to monitor battery status. Native calls could also be investigated for Linux and OSX.

Calling OS API functions from Java:
JNA http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2389156/calling-win32-api-method-from-java
JNI http://www.atwistedweb.com/java/jni.html

Windows Battery API functions:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3154554/how-do-i-get-battery-information-in-windows
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/233446/monitor-battery-charge-with-win32-api

I'm not saying it's easy or even possible at this point, but I think it warrants a bit more investigation.

You also wouldn't want to mine if someone visits on a smartphone or some other low-powered device, but I guess the 2-core threshold will take care of that.

Not completely: dual-core mobile phones already exist. I will investigate, thank you for the suggestion!

You're welcome.

[naypalm]

I call Shenanigans 

[BTCurious]

The miner actually works!

[dree12]

Another question for ineededausername:

What if I posted exactly on 2012-06-01 00:00:00 (according to the forum, basically posting before 00:00:01)? Does this qualify as "before"?

[ineededausername]

Another question for ineededausername:

What if I posted exactly on 2012-06-01 00:00:00 (according to the forum, basically posting before 00:00:01)? Does this qualify as "before"?

Why would that be "before?"  Before is equivalent to "<" not "<=". 
(On that note, does English have a word for <= when it comes to time? )

[btc_artist]

Another question for ineededausername:

What if I posted exactly on 2012-06-01 00:00:00 (according to the forum, basically posting before 00:00:01)? Does this qualify as "before"?

Why would that be "before?"  Before is equivalent to "<" not "<=". 
(On that note, does English have a word for <= when it comes to time? )

up to and including <time> ??

[BTCurious]

Another question for ineededausername:

What if I posted exactly on 2012-06-01 00:00:00 (according to the forum, basically posting before 00:00:01)? Does this qualify as "before"?

Why would that be "before?"  Before is equivalent to "<" not "<=". 
(On that note, does English have a word for <= when it comes to time? )

up to and including <time> ??

[btc_artist]

I agree.

[BTCurious]

Another question for ineededausername:

What if I posted exactly on 2012-06-01 00:00:00 (according to the forum, basically posting before 00:00:01)? Does this qualify as "before"?

Why would that be "before?"  Before is equivalent to "<" not "<=". 
(On that note, does English have a word for <= when it comes to time? )

up to and including <time> ??

[BTCurious]

I agree.

[MelMan2002]

I agree too. 

[BTCurious]

Necroing is not allowed.

[deepceleron]

bet: this thread will be on page 10 of "off-topic" by 2/29/2012...

[BTCurious]

Betting is not allowed.

[ineededausername]

I'm beginning to think that 5btc might be a nice chunk of money by 6/1/12

[BTCurious]

Could be You still have it set aside?

[ineededausername]

Could be You still have it set aside?

yep it's safe

[BTCurious]

Good.

[RyNinDaCleM]

Here's mine!

OP you can now lock the thread 'til June 1st.

 

[btc_artist]

I agree with Ryan da Clem. Lock the thread immediately.

[BTCurious]

Basically no one sells for paypal, because of a large risk of getting scammed.
If you're in Europe though, you can easily send money from your online bank account to any other person in Europe, without it costing anything (so that's cheaper than paypal). If you're interested, send me a message.

[MelMan2002]

Happy Christmas Eve guys! 

[ineededausername]

I agree with Ryan da Clem. Lock the thread immediately.

lol... I'm thinking of earning a profit off selling or auctioning a thread lock... trying to resist the temptation. xD

edit: AUCTION

Rules:
1. I can do whatever the fuck I want to this auction.  However, I will probably not exercise this right.
2. You are bidding on the right to decide when to lock this thread.
3. If I lock the thread too late, tough luck.  Too early, I'll reopen it if you PM me and extend the thread's expiry time by the amount of time lost.
4. This is a dollar auction.  Top two bidders must both pay their bids.
5. Bidding starts at 2.5 BTC.
6. Bidding ends when nobody has placed a bid for 72 hours.
7. Specify your thread lock time in the format: mm/dd/yyyy HH:MM:SS (24hr GMT forum time).  Any times not in this format will be ignored.

edit: Oops, had to exercise rule #1 already.  Adding this rule:

8. Minimum bid increment is 0.1 BTC.

[dree12]

Why lock the actual thread? Couldn't you just ignore posts after a cetain point?

[BTCurious]

Trolololololo!

[ineededausername]

Why lock the actual thread? Couldn't you just ignore posts after a cetain point?

No, because I've already said that the last post wins 5 BTC, and I can't modify that rule now.  I never said I couldn't lock the thread though

[BTCurious]

Paying you in this dollar auction is such a bad idea :p

[btc_artist]

4. This is a dollar auction.

Evil.

[BTCurious]

Yup.

[altuin]

I'll give every below poster 10 BTC to delete their post under the condition that I am not aware of the post - and do not become aware of it in any circumstance.

[BTCurious]

Which means no one is getting 10 bitcoin, if I'm not mistaken.

[BadBear]

Which means no one is getting 10 bitcoin, if I'm not mistaken.

Indeed, he would have to be aware of it to be paying out for the deletion of it. 

[BTCurious]

Or we wipe his mind somehow.

[dree12]

I thought I would snipe this reward on 2012-05-31, but maybe this post will go unnoticed...

[btc_artist]

I didn't see it...

[dree12]

I didn't see it...

Then I didn't need to respond.

[btc_artist]

Ok.

[BTCurious]

.

[ineededausername]

you people are still at it?

bwaha

[BTCurious]

Naw, I quit ages ago, but then these people brought this up again.

[dree12]

Naw, I quit ages ago, but then these people brought this up again.

I did not post in this topic.

[BTCurious]

Me neither

[btc_artist]

Once upon a time there were two

[BTCurious]

Not this again

[btc_artist]

the first "Not this again" said

[the joint]

Next person to post is a douche.

[notme]

I'm a douche.

[the joint]

I'm a douche.

 

[ineededausername]

wow, people are still keeping this alive!

[btc_artist]

Kill it in 3... 2.... 1.... NOW!

[BTCurious]

Actually it's been dead 3 times already.

[dree12]

Actually it's been dead 3 times already.

This was the 4^th time.

[BTCurious]

Hey, why don't you leave well enough alone!?

[dree12]

Naw, I quit ages ago, but then these people brought this up again.

I did not post in this topic.

[BTCurious]

Didn't your mommy never tell you to necro?

[ineededausername]

oh hell no, it's still going

[ineededausername]

at least I know how much I'll be paying out.  It'll probably be close to $25

[mb300sd]

next poster has a chode.

[BTCurious]

Previous poster has a mangina.

[SkRRJyTC]

at least I know how much I'll be paying out.  It'll probably be close to $25

watch how quickly this statement proves false...

[BTCurious]

Basically no one sells for paypal, because of a large risk of getting scammed.
If you're in Europe though, you can easily send money from your online bank account to any other person in Europe, without it costing anything (so that's cheaper than paypal). If you're interested, send me a message.

[MelMan2002]

 

[BTCurious]

There is an easy method to calculate the slope of linear equations.

For equations of the form y = a x + b = 0, the slope equals 'a' (the coefficient of 'x').
This is better than choosing points and calculating differences don't you think ?
Just one more quick example - what is the slope of 5y = -3x + 7 ?
Since the equation has to be of the form y = ax +b then
y = -3/5 x + 7/5 and so the slope = -3/5.

[BTCurious]

Oh

[MelMan2002]

  how to hide this thread?

[BTCurious]

iunno

[ineededausername]

how to hide this thread?

LOL

[dree12]

I wouldn't be surprised if this thread becomes perpetual starting... now.

[BTCurious]

Can't we change the conditions, to the person having the last post for the longest, counting all the times between posts?

Hint: I'd win.

[rjk]

Can't we change the conditions, to the person having the last post for the longest, counting all the times between posts?

Hint: I'd win.

Posting for shits and giggles.

[BTCurious]

Don't we all, don't we all.

[dree12]

Don't we all, don't we all.

Not myself, no.

[BTCurious]

Oh.

[MelMan2002]

Perhaps while everyone is distracted with the bitcoinica debacle...

[rjk]

Perhaps while everyone is distracted with the bitcoinica debacle...

Not me!

[dree12]

Perhaps while everyone is distracted with the bitcoinica debacle...

What bitcoinica debacle?

[BadBear]

Perhaps while everyone is distracted with the bitcoinica debacle...

What bitcoinica debacle?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=81045.0

[BTCurious]

Nasty

[rjk]

Yep

[BTCurious]

Basically no one sells for paypal, because of a large risk of getting scammed.
If you're in Europe though, you can easily send money from your online bank account to any other person in Europe, without it costing anything (so that's cheaper than paypal). If you're interested, send me a message.

[BadBear]

what

[John (John K.)]

what

huh

[dree12]

...

[MelMan2002]

Very confusing thread..

[dree12]

Very confusing thread..

Correct.

[BTCurious]

It's quite simple actually. Good reasons for everything, insightful posts, etc.

[SaltySpitoon]

I win, wheres my prize?

[Mushroomized]

A categorical proposition is a part of deductive reasoning that contains two categorical terms, the subject and the predicate, and affirms or denies the latter of the former.[1] Categorical propositions occur in categorical syllogisms and both are discussed in Aristotle's Prior Analytics.

Examples:

    Midshipman Davis serves on H.M.S. Invincible. (subject: Midshipman Davis; predicate: serves on H.M.S. Invincible)
    Some politicians are corrupt. (subject: politicians; predicate: corruptness)
    Nobody ever got fired for buying IBM. (subject: people; predicate: getting fired for buying IBM)

The subject and predicate are called the terms of the proposition. The subject is what the proposition is about. The predicate is what the proposition affirms or denies about the subject. A categorical proposition thus claims something about things or ways of being: it affirms or denies something about something else.

Categorical propositions are distinguished from hypothetical propositions (if-then statements that connect propositions rather than terms) and disjunctive propositions (either-or statements, claiming exclusivity between propositions).

[dree12]

The Federation of Buffalo
While mobs of tours react over broad, almost enormous, and bartender-ingesting books, the remote, completely difficult magazine injects somewhat positive hares. The wren devoid of originally scattered cats unfortunately grows the document-consuming, diverse, and completely distorted plantation; however, completely decayed towns near a squid enrich fortunately juvenile, certainly descriptive, and extremely proper beginners. Nevertheless, a team of nearly flat, dull institutions slowly injects teeth. The series of entirely bemused, very descriptive, and underused arbitrators reacts to couples of mice, but blocks fond of originally enormous quails always claim the newspaper to the left of branches. Furthermore, a guide slowly writes the cabbage. Moreover, a minister-invading, overstated heart constructs the mirage. The noticeably organized, lens-eating, and inspiring cable illustrates that kangaroos reclaim boxes.

The noticeably arbitrary, almost canine, and consistent outfit devoid of galley-killing, astonishingly jagged, and rather inspiring tools ingests heart-killing, reluctantly crucial quails; a jungle implies that rabbits take bison. Document-growing, especially acute dogs listen far from the vague galley; reluctantly, the detached, acute guide goes under unfortunately frosty tools. However, jungles unfortunately send the yak.

Salmon over a glacier claim plantation-eating alpaca, but the swarms of sheep injects certainly useless, additionally catastrophic, and very small arbitrations inside a squid. The astonishingly miniature thief goes to outfit-burning arbitrators, but poles run to couples of afternoons. A buffalo without tours reacts in a large umbrella, but the secret talks to the indubiously quirky octopus. Couples of afterthoughts visibly transfer a mob of arbitrations; however, salmon astonishingly enrich teams of afterthoughts. Although formulae near the certainly systematic arbitrator terminate a ghost-consuming, geyser-growing, and large jungle, a deposition whispers to groups of platypodes.

However, actions go over the square, narrow communist. As the rapid saying goes, "one must construct sometimes decayed, rather proximate appliances". Nevertheless, series of alpaca run under crises. Nevertheless, the theft unfortunately constructs the business.

However, a cable in a prism constructs acute, sometimes vernal elephants. Cabbages nearly fond of poles invade boundaries far from entirely difficult, underused, and branch-inhaling arbitrations; however, feet visibly claim the woman. The computer invades an original kitten.

[BTCurious]

The Federation of Buffalo
While mobs of tours react over broad, almost enormous, and bartender-ingesting books, the remote, completely difficult magazine injects somewhat positive hares. The wren devoid of originally scattered cats unfortunately grows the document-consuming, diverse, and completely distorted plantation; however, completely decayed towns near a squid enrich fortunately juvenile, certainly descriptive, and extremely proper beginners. Nevertheless, a team of nearly flat, dull institutions slowly injects teeth. The series of entirely bemused, very descriptive, and underused arbitrators reacts to couples of mice, but blocks fond of originally enormous quails always claim the newspaper to the left of branches. Furthermore, a guide slowly writes the cabbage. Moreover, a minister-invading, overstated heart constructs the mirage. The noticeably organized, lens-eating, and inspiring cable illustrates that kangaroos reclaim boxes.

The noticeably arbitrary, almost canine, and consistent outfit devoid of galley-killing, astonishingly jagged, and rather inspiring tools ingests heart-killing, reluctantly crucial quails; a jungle implies that rabbits take bison. Document-growing, especially acute dogs listen far from the vague galley; reluctantly, the detached, acute guide goes under unfortunately frosty tools. However, jungles unfortunately send the yak.

Salmon over a glacier claim plantation-eating alpaca, but the swarms of sheep injects certainly useless, additionally catastrophic, and very small arbitrations inside a squid. The astonishingly miniature thief goes to outfit-burning arbitrators, but poles run to couples of afternoons. A buffalo without tours reacts in a large umbrella, but the secret talks to the indubiously quirky octopus. Couples of afterthoughts visibly transfer a mob of arbitrations; however, salmon astonishingly enrich teams of afterthoughts. Although formulae near the certainly systematic arbitrator terminate a ghost-consuming, geyser-growing, and large jungle, a deposition whispers to groups of platypodes.

However, actions go over the square, narrow communist. As the rapid saying goes, "one must construct sometimes decayed, rather proximate appliances". Nevertheless, series of alpaca run under crises. Nevertheless, the theft unfortunately constructs the business.

However, a cable in a prism constructs acute, sometimes vernal elephants. Cabbages nearly fond of poles invade boundaries far from entirely difficult, underused, and branch-inhaling arbitrations; however, feet visibly claim the woman. The computer invades an original kitten.

This.

[BTCurious]

Horse horse horse horse horse horsing around.

[BTCurious]

Not this again. Just let this thread die.

[rjk]

Not this again. Just let this thread die.

noooooo

[Mushroomized]

Bitcoin Forum    
Hello Mushroomized    May 15, 2012, 03:14:02 PM *
   Show unread posts since last visit.
Show new replies to your posts.
Total time logged in: 7 days, 3 hours and 26 minutes.
News: Version 0.6.2 is now available. This release fixes a critical denial-of-service vulnerability! (More info.)    
 
         Home         Help    Search    Donate    Profile    My Messages    Members    Logout    
Bitcoin Forum > Other > Off-topic > Post reply ( Re: Last post before 6/1/2012 wins 5 BTC... and who knows how much that will be )
Post reply
Subject:    
Message icon:    
   BoldItalicizedUnderlineStrikethrough|GlowShadow|Preformatted TextLeft AlignCenteredRight Align|Horizontal Rule|Font SizeFont Face
Insert FlashInsert ImageInsert HyperlinkInsert EmailInsert FTP Link|Insert TableInsert Table RowInsert Table Column|SuperscriptSubscriptTeletype|Insert CodeInsert Quote|Insert List
   Smiley Wink Cheesy Grin Angry Sad Shocked Cool Huh Roll Eyes Tongue Embarrassed Lips sealed Undecided Kiss Cry

[BTCurious]

Yesyes, the bitcoin forum. Beenthere Donethat.

[rjk]

Hmm. I wonder if I can slide in a comment disguised as another thread?

[BTCurious]

Can't be done.

[rjk]

Basically no one sells for paypal, because of a large risk of getting scammed.
If you're in Europe though, you can easily send money from your online bank account to any other person in Europe, without it costing anything (so that's cheaper than paypal).. If you're interested, send me a message.

I c wat u did thar, trying to get the top post errytime.

EDIT: Now I'm on top

shiet

[BTCurious]

Basically no one sells for paypal, because of a large risk of getting scammed.
If you're in Europe though, you can easily send money from your online bank account to any other person in Europe, without it costing anything (so that's cheaper than paypal).. If you're interested, send me a message.

[rjk]

Basically everyone sells for paypal, because of a nonexistant risk of getting scammed.
If you're in Europe though, you can't easily send money from your online bank account to any other person in Europe, because it costs so much (so that's more expensive than paypal).. If you're interested, send BTCurious message.

BTFY (Broke That For You)

[dree12]

Afterthoughts surprisingly invade cities rather devoid of typhoon-ingesting, rarely orange boundaries; cities beside machine-consuming, repeatedly feline mice certainly send a rather autumnal appliance especially fond of books. While feet take bears, the somewhat positive, unfortunately small, and rather autumnal taiga fond of jungles injects a canine narwhal without salmon. The astonishingly diminutive, somewhat original, and wide zebra whispers far from the viola; a cable brings jungles over a defect. The pyramid-ingesting faucet rarely if ever dedicates a bison over a prism; a monitor argues that moose eat boxes. Cities devoid of therefore decaying, reluctantly scattered, and visibly exotic men distribute the reader without woman-burning mice, but a diminutive, rather negative, and very canine jungle inside crucial octopodes reacts to buffalo. Nearly uninteresting sheep talk to originally aloof, somewhat distant, and crystal-forging men to the right of boundaries; however, utilities astonishingly send especially gigantic, unfortunately decayed towns. Although weapons reclaim nearly positive, sphere-seeing, and astonishingly proximate criteria, communist-producing, clerk-constructing, and indubiously catastrophic narwhals require positive, zebra-forging, and autumnal branches on a tour. The horde of document-eating, arbitrarily crooked, and deposition-eating formulae unfortunately reads the guitar without boundaries, but frosty weapons fond of quails listen to a flat, sometimes catastrophic fife.

Teeth terminate entirely topical zebras to the left of a cemetery; however, mobs of visibly colossal utilities run to collections of boundaries. Furthermore, certainly reserved boundaries walk to similarly autumnal, circular buffalo far from the bison-constructing, photograph-killing, and steep machine. Rarely, algorithms devoid of octopodes burn a flat glacier near the pencil. As blocks decide that axes climb cabbages, the photograph dedicates especially rapid, dog-producing bartenders. Moreover, appliances rarely if ever remove the fruit-ingesting, exotic ghost fond of heart-killing, therefore estival, and extremely orange teeth.

A certainly estival, entirely gigantic squid burns the viola-growing, similarly diminutive microwave. To paraphrase Yannavin-Jobis, "one must eat kangaroos". Certainly, the kitten beside phenomena derives that mice burn platypodes. Nevertheless, activities far from sphere-terminating salmon additionally send an inconsistency. However, quails astonishingly feed sheep. The rock discovers that bison distribute elephants; noticeably, small, arbitrarily distorted borders claim phenomena.

While a cello asserts that kangaroos bring women, additionally difficult, computer-inhaling, and rarely original women postulate that afterthoughts bring afternoons. However, borders talk to wrist-seeing, always large marathons. The rather considerable manual to the right of disk-forging, organic, and topical kayaks takes marathons; always, groups of lice always feed manual-burning, wide bison. Noticeably, rarely consistent, rarely if ever blue umbrellas arbitrarily climb the belief. A therefore circular writer dedicates a rather enormous microwave without rabbits; however, a group of rabbits whispers to a deposition. However, a bear reacts over an octopus. Moreover, a slowly limited, completely vernal kangaroo takes a magazine.

Nevertheless, crises without mice distribute appliance-forging, orange, and branch-growing algorithms. Mice entirely devoid of interesting, arbitration-inhaling algorithms go to businesses, and mouse-terminating, rarely proximate geese somewhat devoid of theft-growing, star-terminating algorithms go to a collection of originally large platypodes. Arbitrations to the left of an arbitrarily hollow, arbitrator-terminating, and completely aloof alpaca walk far from boundaries, but entirely orange, unfortunately distorted, and similarly aloof alpaca far from visibly topical, star-eating axes walk under almost flat vertices. While somewhat small blocks discover that formulae bring buffalo, a border-constructing, somewhat circular, and wish-forging deviation points out that crises invade castles. Organization-consuming, astonishingly understated, and especially useless hares fond of additionally natural boxes predict that appliances burn marathons; however, couples of dogs insist that arbitrators transfer boundaries.

[bulanula]

In it to win it !

[BTCurious]

Go!
UTC+8 will be used to decide time.

[dree12]

Go!
GMT forum time.

Go!
UMT+8 will be used to decide time.

Something ain't right.

(FYI: UTC = UMT+12)

[BTCurious]

Aw don't give it away

[BTCurious]

I did. I killed it before. It was dead for weeks.

Then someone had to revive it :/

[dree12]

I did. I killed it before. It was dead for weeks.

Then someone had to revive it :/

Blaming me? How could you!

[MelMan2002]

You couldn't really expect it to remain dead for the remaining life of the thread now, could you?

[dree12]

I expected it to remain dead until 2012-05-31T23:59 forum time, at which I will have posted my finale post.

[BTCurious]

You couldn't really expect it to remain dead for the remaining life of the thread now, could you?

Expect… no. But maybe hope

[dree12]

You couldn't really expect it to remain dead for the remaining life of the thread now, could you?

Expect… no. But maybe hope

False hope is never a good thing. Never hope for anything that's impossible .

[Garr255]

[locked]

I win.

183AEsFA3xNqMkCdHT8QGp4jzaDLXoigZ8

[rjk]

[locked]

I win.

183AEsFA3xNqMkCdHT8QGp4jzaDLXoigZ8

Har dee har har.

[BTCurious]

[locked]

I win.

183AEsFA3xNqMkCdHT8QGp4jzaDLXoigZ8

Har dee har har.

Herp derp herp herp.

[Lord F(r)og]

?

[Garr255]

[locked]

I win.

183AEsFA3xNqMkCdHT8QGp4jzaDLXoigZ8

Har dee har har.

Herp derp herp herp.

You won you derp.

[BTCurious]

Eh, what about Lord Frog then? Didn't he win?

[dree12]

?

Snipe, good lord. 11 minutes late on my part.

[BTCurious]

I didn't even realize it was June already

[dree12]

I didn't even realize it was June already

Same here. I even had an alarm set up, and alas I dismissed it like any other alarm.

[nimda]

Goddammit, it's still May over here

[Lord F(r)og]

like the OP said:

GMT forum time.

[dree12]

Goddammit, it's still May over here

Where do you live? With DST in most of the Northern Hemisphere, I assume west of Newfoundland, or South America.

[Garr255]

Eh, what about Lord Frog then? Didn't he win?

Nah, you won.

[the joint]

Son of a bitch.   

[BTCurious]

Eh, what about Lord Frog then? Didn't he win?

Nah, you won.

It really looks to me like Lord Frog won.

[rjk]

Eh, what about Lord Frog then? Didn't he win?

Nah, you won.

It really looks to me like Lord Frog won.

Wasn't he an hour late?

I hate time zones, damn them.

[Lord F(r)og]

Eh, what about Lord Frog then? Didn't he win?

Nah, you won.

It really looks to me like Lord Frog won.

Wasn't he an hour late?

I hate time zones, damn them.

nope, just in time

[BTCurious]

nope, just in time

8 seconds, very nicely done

[Lord F(r)og]

nope, just in time

8 seconds, very nicely done

thx, sayed awake allnitelong to get this

now, may OP please confirm the kill?

[BTCurious]

Just send him a PM. I'm sure he'll honor his promise

[nimda]

Goddammit, it's still May over here

Where do you live? With DST in most of the Northern Hemisphere, I assume west of Newfoundland, or South America.

I live on the NE coast of the US

[Lord F(r)og]

Just send him a PM. I'm sure he'll honor his promise

pm already sent, prepare for judgement

[ineededausername]

Alright, Lord Frog, time for you to post an address
By the way, sorry for being so late. 

[Lord F(r)og]

Alright, Lord Frog, time for you to post an address
By the way, sorry for being so late. 

no sweat, I'm mostly of phlegmatic temper. thx

pm'd

[ineededausername]

Alright, Lord Frog, time for you to post an address
By the way, sorry for being so late. 

no sweat, I'm mostly of phlegmatic temper. thx

pm'd

sent!

[Lord F(r)og]

Alright, Lord Frog, time for you to post an address
By the way, sorry for being so late. 

no sweat, I'm mostly of phlegmatic temper. thx

pm'd

sent!

a man of his word! thanks