Are there any truly safe bets in sports betting?

[Mahanton]

For a fix or specific odds to call it safe, I doubt that because in my experience of betting low odds, it still does not give me a profitable result in the long run, therefore, blindly picking a team with an odds like that would not really give you a win though you are always playing in a trusted gambling site.

Well picking low odds means that you get high chances of good result which means I could think that you could profit into it. However, I also agree that it is not a guarantee to win over in the long run even if you had pick always the low odds. There are cases that low odds betting losses in a streak that means that you too will made big losses. Well, betting is not about getting profit in my opinion rather it is choice to make fun in it enjoying the sports you like and bet.

The results of each game when you play gambling is literally unpredictable so I bet that there is no Totally a safe bet because anytime you may experience to lose a game and sometimes you may win depending on how fortunate and lucky you are because if we take a look at some instances there players who are newly players but had experience a winning streak at first play so for me its a matter of luck and fate.

Matter of luck and fate is really that much of needed but we know that analysis and skills on decision making will really be having a good role on increasing up the chance
which is way more better rather than playing with those pure luck based one.Safe bets doesnt exist on real life specially when dealing with gambling thats why its called
gamble because it has the risk of losing and if gambling is way this profitable then there would be lots of gamblers are riding in lambos now yet they do able to make money on this one too
easy.People who do believe that there are safe bets in sports betting then they should remove that kind of mindset but instead they should work on how they do make
analysis into those games on where they do make out some bet.

[1715335004]

1715335004

[1715335004]

1715335004

[1715335004]

1715335004

[CarnagexD]

I've read some strats that will help increase the odds of you winning regardless of whose team you are betting on. But essentially, there's no way you can predict the odds on a sporting bet. especially if it's going to be a multiple contestants game like horse race unless if the game is unfairly tipped over to one contender. But again, essentially, there is no safe bets in sports betting.

[Botnake]

I've read some strats that will help increase the odds of you winning regardless of whose team you are betting on.

This is quite interesting, can you share more about it? I haven't read any of that in my years of experience as a gambler, is that good only for a specific type of game, or you can apply in any types?

[goinmerry]

I've read some strats that will help increase the odds of you winning regardless of whose team you are betting on. But essentially, there's no way you can predict the odds on a sporting bet. especially if it's going to be a multiple contestants game like horse race unless if the game is unfairly tipped over to one contender. But again, essentially, there is no safe bets in sports betting.

There is no safe odds or low odds on horse racing. Most of the horse participants are sharing close odds or the low odds can still consider as risky (around 1.6).

But anyway, on whatever sports, betting at minimum 1.1 or lower is a waste of money to me.

Can't believe someone will put some amount on that odds.

[KTChampions]

I've read some strats that will help increase the odds of you winning regardless of whose team you are betting on.

This is quite interesting, can you share more about it? I haven't read any of that in my years of experience as a gambler, is that good only for a specific type of game, or you can apply in any types?

I don't know what exactly he meant, but most likely these are nonsense strategies like "the top team cannot lose three matches in a row." Based on this statement, the bank is divided into three parts and bets are placed on matches. After the first defeat, the second part of the bank is used, after the second, the third part of the bank. The bottom line is that profits are meager, but even top teams sometimes lose three matches in a row ...

[Danslip]

I've read some strats that will help increase the odds of you winning regardless of whose team you are betting on. But essentially, there's no way you can predict the odds on a sporting bet. especially if it's going to be a multiple contestants game like horse race unless if the game is unfairly tipped over to one contender. But again, essentially, there is no safe bets in sports betting.

There is no safe odds or low odds on horse racing. Most of the horse participants are sharing close odds or the low odds can still consider as risky (around 1.6).

But anyway, on whatever sports, betting at minimum 1.1 or lower is a waste of money to me.

Can't believe someone will put some amount on that odds.

Just a small example from yesterday if someone still believes they can catch something by checking the odds on big bookies:
Pinnacle as one of the biggest bookmakers in the sports gambling industry has decreased the odds of 3.5 total goals in the Barcelona-Dynamo match. At 22:13 the odd was 1.63 but it has sharply gone down 20 minutes before the match. At 00:00 the odd was exactly 1.52 while the same bet was 1.56-1.65 on other bookies. Telegram betting groups have sent alerts about this "fixed bet" but the outcome has not changed. The final score was 2:1 and it is under 3.5. I just shared this explanation because I have made a bet on this bet selection too 

[South Park]

For a fix or specific odds to call it safe, I doubt that because in my experience of betting low odds, it still does not give me a profitable result in the long run, therefore, blindly picking a team with an odds like that would not really give you a win though you are always playing in a trusted gambling site.

Well picking low odds means that you get high chances of good result which means I could think that you could profit into it. However, I also agree that it is not a guarantee to win over in the long run even if you had pick always the low odds. There are cases that low odds betting losses in a streak that means that you too will made big losses. Well, betting is not about getting profit in my opinion rather it is choice to make fun in it enjoying the sports you like and bet.

But casinos know this and as such they compensate by offering very low returns on those kind of bets giving them an edge regardless of what you do, it is important to remember that casinos are a business and they want to earn money, so even if you had a system that could produce you profits if they check your account and they realize that you have been earning money over the long term and that it is unlikely this can be explained away by just you being lucky then they will most likely ban you even if you did nothing wrong as some casinos have rules on their TOS against professional gamblers.

[bitbunnny]

I've read some strats that will help increase the odds of you winning regardless of whose team you are betting on.

This is quite interesting, can you share more about it? I haven't read any of that in my years of experience as a gambler, is that good only for a specific type of game, or you can apply in any types?

I don't think there are strats which really help in practice, in real betting. They might be good in theory and they might give you some extra self confidence thinking you have some advantage and game under control but at the end thus you only deceive yourself. There is no guarantee for winning in any case.

[KTChampions]

I don't think there are strats which really help in practice, in real betting. They might be good in theory and they might give you some extra self confidence thinking you have some advantage and game under control but at the end thus you only deceive yourself. There is no guarantee for winning in any case.

In fact, in theory, all strategies are bad and unprofitable (if not, then there is an error in the calculations). The paradox is that in practice you sometimes see a "profitable" strategy and it even works at a certain range of bets. But this is just a fluctuation of the normal distribution, and if you take a longer distance, you will still receive a total loss.

[KTChampions]

In fact, in theory, all strategies are bad and unprofitable (if not, then there is an error in the calculations). The paradox is that in practice you sometimes see a "profitable" strategy and it even works at a certain range of bets. But this is just a fluctuation of the normal distribution, and if you take a longer distance, you will still receive a total loss.

As it sounds logical if you are wrong all the time do vice versa and be profitable. But we are not wrong on all bets, as you mentioned the distribution is random. In theory, the strategy can be profitable for the short term but the time factor changes the outcome drastically due to the external factors. In my opinion, changing the strategies will not make the betting profitable because the market is rigged for many years.

Do you mean sports betting? I do not know what could be the reasons for falsifying something on a systematic basis there - the theory of probability does all the work legally and effectively. Sometimes "strange" results do happen in competitions, but these are actually rare cases, and we should not think from this that there is a "conspiracy of all".

[mirakal]

In fact, in theory, all strategies are bad and unprofitable (if not, then there is an error in the calculations). The paradox is that in practice you sometimes see a "profitable" strategy and it even works at a certain range of bets. But this is just a fluctuation of the normal distribution, and if you take a longer distance, you will still receive a total loss.

As it sounds logical if you are wrong all the time do vice versa and be profitable. But we are not wrong on all bets, as you mentioned the distribution is random. In theory, the strategy can be profitable for the short term but the time factor changes the outcome drastically due to the external factors. In my opinion, changing the strategies will not make the betting profitable because the market is rigged for many years.

Do you mean sports betting? I do not know what could be the reasons for falsifying something on a systematic basis there - the theory of probability does all the work legally and effectively. Sometimes "strange" results do happen in competitions, but these are actually rare cases, and we should not think from this that there is a "conspiracy of all".

Some gamblers have that belief that it's rigged, however, it will remained a theory since we can't prove that statement anyway. As a gambler, we have some mix belief or we are fully convince that the market is really rigged, however we are still betting on it, that means we are finding it favorable on our part.

[KTChampions]

Do you mean sports betting? I do not know what could be the reasons for falsifying something on a systematic basis there - the theory of probability does all the work legally and effectively. Sometimes "strange" results do happen in competitions, but these are actually rare cases, and we should not think from this that there is a "conspiracy of all".

Some gamblers have that belief that it's rigged, however, it will remained a theory since we can't prove that statement anyway. As a gambler, we have some mix belief or we are fully convince that the market is really rigged, however we are still betting on it, that means we are finding it favorable on our part.

I think the main reason for this behavior is that most bettors view it as a hobby/entertainment.
And here's my funny observation: let's say a match has 3 outcomes. Player A bets on 1st, Player B bets on 2nd, Player C bets on 3rd. And all three think the market is rigged against him 
In fact, the risk / reward ratio plays against each of them and there is no falsification here.

[iv4n]

My two sure bets:



Betnomi have a very nice sports book! Today I decided to give a chance to favorites, and we will see ho will that go!
We can talk about this for eternity, but in the end it's gambling and all you can do is to place a bet and hope for the best outcome! There are no truly safe bets, be sure in that. It's ours to try it, if you don't try you don't have a chance to win! Well this week is my try on favorites, let's see how sure that is!

[smyslov]

There are safe bets, but not something that will give you a profit, the one that will give you profits is the one that has the higher odds, some people are winning this, it's pure gambling betting on the opposite but that's gambling you have to take some risks to get a higher payout, there's no excitement if you are betting on the obvious.

[fortebettor]

The greater the odds the higher stakes you can win however there is least chance of you winning that odd. Is there any safe bets? YES, when odds are low that means that the game might go fair enough or a close game, either of them can win in that case. But still it depends on the composing team, as we know all players have different moods in the game, even Lebron can just score a single digit in a game with 48 minute appearance. I'd say comfort bet is safer.

I love to read such butter butter written only to make statistics for the signature campaign.

[South Park]

There are safe bets, but not something that will give you a profit, the one that will give you profits is the one that has the higher odds, some people are winning this, it's pure gambling betting on the opposite but that's gambling you have to take some risks to get a higher payout, there's no excitement if you are betting on the obvious.

It seems there is a confusion on the thread, and this is why I do not like the term safe bets to begin with, when professional gamblers talk about safe bets they are talking about arbitrage opportunities that arise when the line on a certain bet moves in different casinos and making a bet on all the outcomes of the match will offer you a positive outcome for you regardless of who wins, this may seem as something impossible but it happens and smart gamblers use these kind of opportunities to make money in a safe way, and that is where the name of safe bets comes from.

[Gotumoot]

There aren't any safe bets in gambling for my opinion unless the match is rigged,
For me that is the only safe bet that you could have but even betting in a low profit could make you lose your money it doesn't mean that you would win 100%.

[sempak]

Yes, there is a very safe bet. Don't bet anything so you can't lose. 100% successful. That is the best bet.

[pankowri]

Yes, there is a very safe bet. Don't bet anything so you can't lose. 100% successful. That is the best bet.

The best idea ever I have seen though Jokes apart. I don't think any websites or gambling sites are exists in the world which is truly safe. Even after submitting KYC, I lost my funds from BITTREX exchange which is reputed company. I contacted them but they can't even try to understand. So I don't don't believe anything in word to hear that there has truly safe bets in sport betting.

[KnightElite]

Actually, if you are in the gambling world; the word safe is not existing because every game, every bet and everything have a certain risk. If you want your money to be safe, then better to keep it and do not put it in betting sites. In reality, gambling is also a game of probabilities where there is no sure win here, there are strategies have high winning rate probability but still it cannot guarantee you that it will give you profits all the time. You can become a profitable bettor through sports betting but it will really take a time because you need to gain a lot of experiences first before you able to be profitable.