ㅤ

I have doubt it is, but that still remains a doubt on me. Since no one can sign a message in a hardcoded block address or let's called Genesis block address. We can't consider Hal is the real Bitcoin creator or the real Satoshi Nakamoto.

Okay, let assume, what if Hal Finney really is Satoshi Nakamoto??!
There's an angle on which Hal Finney is keeping the anonymity of Bitcoin. And if that is his real motives, then having a code name as the main developer is
te first thing to do, and look at how he was able to do it successfully. He was able to hide the identity and has successfully grown a platform that was just an idea. I'm basic this assumption/theory with the twit he posted saying "Looking at ways to add anonymity of Bitcoin" that he posted in 2009.
What do you think?

Anways, thank you OP for the compilation and sharing of Hal Finney's history.

This whole topic is just google translated russian article and OP lied that he wrote it and he hide the source among many other links

https://forklog.com/genezis-arhivy-hel-finni-chelovek-bez-kotorogo-ne-bylo-by-bitkoina/


ImThour (6), KonstantinosM (2), DdmrDdmr (2), BitcoinFX (1), ETFbitcoin (1), Pmalek (1), BeardyMan (1) are you aware that you give merit to google translate?

Some will even tell you about Hal Finney that they believed he's Satoshi Nakamoto himself and you keep getting different appellations over Hal because he's a unique existance of his time and had contributed alot in the cyberspace of digital technology we all benefited today, aside that he had worked together with Satoshi Nakamoto towards the success of bitcoin and also being the first to receive bitcoin transaction from Satoshi, he's a cypherpunk every one into digital currency and technology will trail of his footsteps to their own ladder of success along the line, i also write about his death on tgis thread and recently bumped his remembrance https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5411596.0 it's nine years, gone already.