🔥🔥🔥🏈⚽ EVERBET.IO: MULTI-CHAIN SOCIAL BETTING DAPP !!! ⚽🏈🔥🔥🔥

[traderethereum]

You need to do a lot of things before people can try your website because after I am visiting your site, it seems many links are not available.
I realize that because, on the first page, you write about the site still developed and needs time to work properly.
I hope that you and your team can work hard and make sure that your site can reach every goal you have, and you can attract more users in the future because I feel that your site is different than the other websites.
If ethereum gas still high like now, I think people will use alternative coins to place a bet because not all people will have many ethereum, and they will prefer to use a low coin price.

[1714196522]

1714196522

[1714196522]

1714196522

[1714196522]

1714196522

[CoinStudio]

I am not sure what links shouldn't be available? Could you please be more specific?
If you don't have a wallet installed, it will use the infura network to read blockchain data, the site and its links are accessible to me.

Regarding the gas fees: That's why it is multi-chain. Atm the gas prices for ethereum are acceptable (somewhat), but if they go haywire once more, users have the option to use the Tron or Binance Smartchain instead (the latter works well with MetaMask as it is 100% compatible to Ethereum).

Once eth 2.0 is out, the gas problem will be hopefully solved if it works as promised.

You need to do a lot of things before people can try your website because after I am visiting your site, it seems many links are not available.
I realize that because, on the first page, you write about the site still developed and needs time to work properly.
I hope that you and your team can work hard and make sure that your site can reach every goal you have, and you can attract more users in the future because I feel that your site is different than the other websites.
If ethereum gas still high like now, I think people will use alternative coins to place a bet because not all people will have many ethereum, and they will prefer to use a low coin price.

[btcltcdigger]

Before i connect my wallet to your dapp, any info you can give on what sports are supported.
And will there be any reward for early testers once it goes to mainnet?

[CoinStudio]

The point is that everything is supported. The dapp offers a loose list of categories which can be decided by the community.

We ourselves are not going to offer bets (maybe offering an odds market that people can use for their bets if that's demanded).

I am indeed trying to find out how such rewards could work. The problem is that it is all running on testnets and I am not sure yet how to track activity from there to feed a mainnet contract with that information safely.

If you have an idea, feel free to suggest it. Nothing hammered in stone.

Before i connect my wallet to your dapp, any info you can give on what sports are supported.
And will there be any reward for early testers once it goes to mainnet?

[Lakai01]

I am indeed trying to find out how such rewards could work. The problem is that it is all running on testnets and I am not sure yet how to track activity from there to feed a mainnet contract with that information safely.

I participated in a testnet program of a project in 2018. For the participation we periodically got some ETH, depending on the frequency of participation and feedback sometimes more, sometimes less. The ETH were payed out to a testnet address.

At the end of the testnet phase we had to sign a message from this address with a mainnet address as comment, to which the ETH were then transferred on mainnet. The implementation is surely not very complex, depending on the size of the group of participants it can even be done manually

Anyways  I would reward such a beta testing program for your site with a fixed number of coins which are then only spendable at your site, this will surely save a lot of time and effort!

[john_nautica]

Upon looking up to this thread and reading comment, I became interested with the concept of this social betting. Although I got confused for a minute, I’m glad that OP had explained the idea in the comments. I’ll be trying this one out now.

[okala]

I just dive opun this project today and I was happy to give it a try since it is at it testing mode and does not require real deposits to go through the various games and betting on the site. But one thing I could not get now is the deposit process and it timing, I will be following up with the development to see how things unfold in the future.

[CoinStudio]

I just dive opun this project today and I was happy to give it a try since it is at it testing mode and does not require real deposits to go through the various games and betting on the site. But one thing I could not get now is the deposit process and it timing, I will be following up with the development to see how things unfold in the future.

Hi,

you need a web3 wallet extension for your browser (usually Metamask).
Then in the wallet, switch to "Ropsten Testnet".

As soon as you did that, the page will reload and give you the options to create bets. In the wallet-less version these buttons are hidden.

You can get test ETH from the link in the site's HowTo section (the faucet links).

Upon creating a bet, you basically decide the duration of the event. Betting will be possible from the point the event has been submitted until the event actually starts.

Once the event is expired, the voting phase begins (or the booth owner concludes the bet if he bought the right to conclude instead of voting, see "my account" => "manage booth").

[kamadazje]

Upon visiting the link, I tried clicking bet on Ethereum and I was ask to connect my metamask to it. May I know if it is safe to connect our metamask wallet in your platform even if it is still in the testing phase?

I am hesitant in connecting my wallet as I have stored most of my currencies there and I cannot afford to lost a single in my portfolio.

[CoinStudio]

Upon visiting the link, I tried clicking bet on Ethereum and I was ask to connect my metamask to it. May I know if it is safe to connect our metamask wallet in your platform even if it is still in the testing phase?

I am hesitant in connecting my wallet as I have stored most of my currencies there and I cannot afford to lost a single in my portfolio.

Hi,

yes, it is safe. As it doesn't interact with mainnet.
All you need to do is switch to "Ropsten Testnet" in MetaMask and get some test ETH from here:

https://faucet.ropsten.be/

or from here

https://faucet.metamask.io/

[jossiel]

Yeah, something like this would work. It really depends how frequently the dapp is being used.

I could imagine it like this:

 - Everyone having rep > 0 can vote to get it banned or shadow banned.
- If a certain threshold is reached (time vs amount of voters for example), an independent referee is selected randomly who does the final decision and gets rewarded for it.
- If the selected referee doesn't react within a certain time-frame, another one will be chosen.
- In order to become a referee, you need to stake X amount of EVREP tokens but you'll earn actual eth/trx/bnb rewards (to prevent clash of interest).

You always need to keep in mind that this won't run automatically on the blockchain (it's not threaded).
The above would for example getting triggered only as soon as somebody interacts with the contracts (voting, adding bets, creating booths, withdraw gains, mining rep, etc).

This is always the logic lies within any system. Just liked that idea that you have made.

It's basically the if, yes or no statement that devs do, I'm not a developer but somehow knew about that logic only. It's just for that show of banned events. I'll check if there are other things that I can suggest for your platform since it's running on different networks.

Thanks for having your time to answer my suggestion.

[ReiMomo]

Dapp is always considered safe since it is decentralized, but I suggest them to use a dummy account of metamask, not your main wallet.

Upon having quick research, this is a very good project that would be improved. But I really find the initiation impressive. Instead
of leaving feedback on the telegram group, I will be leaving suggestions on this one. I'll be trying the Dapp and will leave one here, then after instead. Can you initiate a promotion?

[LimLims]

It feels great, when you are the Beta Tester for an awesome project.
The site has a really unique concept of social Gambling
And to be honest i really like it.
But it would have been better if you could have mentioned more about the details of the game in the OP itself.

Moreover as the site will not accept Bitcoin, or currently not accepting Bitcoins, then it should be Moved to Altcoins section.

Nevertheless a cool project, which every one will love to be the part of it.

[CoinStudio]

It feels great, when you are the Beta Tester for an awesome project.
The site has a really unique concept of social Gambling
And to be honest i really like it.
But it would have been better if you could have mentioned more about the details of the game in the OP itself.

Moreover as the site will not accept Bitcoin, or currently not accepting Bitcoins, then it should be Moved to Altcoins section.

Nevertheless a cool project, which every one will love to be the part of it.

Hi,

thank you. WBTC (wrapped Bitcoin) will be supported.

[Ucy]

Sounds interesting.
I can imagine how useful this will be if done right. Could work like social trading or something... where the good/skilled traders are followed by others.
Just hope it's really decentralized and there is sufficient rules to prevent irresponsible or very risky activities by participatants.
Bookmarked.

It is planned to address such bets through a community governance process.
Likely through the selection of randomized referees that get rewards for acting as such (that part is actually the most complicated in terms of doing-it-right).

You mean moderators (at randomized "referees") . Still close in meaning though, assuming you are referring to mods.

I guess you mean randomizing the referees is difficult to do or you are not sure how to go about selecting quality referees through the randomized process?

[CoinStudio]

Sounds interesting.
I can imagine how useful this will be if done right. Could work like social trading or something... where the good/skilled traders are followed by others.
Just hope it's really decentralized and there is sufficient rules to prevent irresponsible or very risky activities by participatants.
Bookmarked.

It is planned to address such bets through a community governance process.
Likely through the selection of randomized referees that get rewards for acting as such (that part is actually the most complicated in terms of doing-it-right).

You mean moderators (at randomized "referees") . Still close in meaning though, assuming you are referring to mods.

I guess you mean randomizing the referees is difficult to do or you are not sure how to go about selecting quality referees through the randomized process?

Actually it is both: a) difficult on-chain to get reliable randomness b) it is probably even more difficult to find quality referees.
Especially the referee part of the dapp needs very careful planning from our side but b) should be solvable with a good-enough incentive in terms of rewards vs. reputation.

btw: I favor the term "referee" because it makes clear that this person is supposed to be independent from the devs/admins of the contract.

[CoinStudio]

24hr bump

[Ucy]

Sounds interesting.
I can imagine how useful this will be if done right. Could work like social trading or something... where the good/skilled traders are followed by others.
Just hope it's really decentralized and there is sufficient rules to prevent irresponsible or very risky activities by participatants.
Bookmarked.

It is planned to address such bets through a community governance process.
Likely through the selection of randomized referees that get rewards for acting as such (that part is actually the most complicated in terms of doing-it-right).

You mean moderators (at randomized "referees") . Still close in meaning though, assuming you are referring to mods.

I guess you mean randomizing the referees is difficult to do or you are not sure how to go about selecting quality referees through the randomized process?

Actually it is both: a) difficult on-chain to get reliable randomness b) it is probably even more difficult to find quality referees.
Especially the referee part of the dapp needs very careful planning from our side but b) should be solvable with a good-enough incentive in terms of rewards vs. reputation.

btw: I favor the term "referee" because it makes clear that this person is supposed to be independent from the devs/admins of the contract.

Wish we could discuss this somewhere else so I don't derail from the main subject of your post.  Will be willing to share ideas with you on a safe channel. I just want this to be right so people/bettors don't get themselves into problems in the betting/predictions markets.


I think both admin and referee are OK as long as they are decentralized and random

[CoinStudio]

Hi,

did you join the telegram already?

https://t.me/everbet_io

Sounds interesting.
I can imagine how useful this will be if done right. Could work like social trading or something... where the good/skilled traders are followed by others.
Just hope it's really decentralized and there is sufficient rules to prevent irresponsible or very risky activities by participatants.
Bookmarked.

It is planned to address such bets through a community governance process.
Likely through the selection of randomized referees that get rewards for acting as such (that part is actually the most complicated in terms of doing-it-right).

You mean moderators (at randomized "referees") . Still close in meaning though, assuming you are referring to mods.

I guess you mean randomizing the referees is difficult to do or you are not sure how to go about selecting quality referees through the randomized process?

Actually it is both: a) difficult on-chain to get reliable randomness b) it is probably even more difficult to find quality referees.
Especially the referee part of the dapp needs very careful planning from our side but b) should be solvable with a good-enough incentive in terms of rewards vs. reputation.

btw: I favor the term "referee" because it makes clear that this person is supposed to be independent from the devs/admins of the contract.

Wish we could discuss this somewhere else so I don't derail from the main subject of your post.  Will be willing to share ideas with you on a safe channel. I just want this to be right so people/bettors don't get themselves into problems in the betting/predictions markets.


I think both admin and referee are OK as long as they are decentralized and random

[ScamViruS]

I like the idea. Something good can be done if your team managed this platform properly. Since this concept is new, there will be many challenges. I hope you can overcome all the challenges and make this site live.

Because of this concept it will be easier to bet between friends. I liked the platform so I will try to join the testnet program.