Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently

[silkbitcoin]

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

Being a newbie, I would like to know your thoughts through experience.

[thesmallgod]

You would not mind copying the ICO website and analyze on site to provide statistics for a website such as the alexa. You would see that many of the traffic to the website is coming from bitcointalk due to the numerous posting generated by users that wear the signature of the website. such a campaign help the platform to rank high on google do to the DOFOLLOW backlink

[ryzaadit]

Nah.

The credibility always sees from the project itself, everyone and project can create their own signature. Signature only part of the promotion to attract and try to visit the project so everyone can know about the project it self, but about the credibility always see from the project aspect could be:

• The idea
• Team
• Service
• Feature
  
• Other

[bigcash2011]

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

Being a newbie, I would like to know your thoughts through experience.

Type of campaigns usually do not matter much but if you ask my personal opinion i do give an extra point to the project if they have a professional looking signature campaign. For me it gives the signal that the team is serious and professional about the project so they have given proper time to design their bounty campaign in general and signature campaign specifically.

[flagpara]

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

Being a newbie, I would like to know your thoughts through experience.

Newbies aren't enough educated to know the real one. Newbies are free to support all new altcoins by social network. Signature has the highest credibility more than others. Why investor will trust you when they even knows you. When a project will be supportive by so many signature users, project must be successful.

[X-ray]

Signature was a part of promotion to create awareness but if you are talking about the credibility of an ico and it totally depends on the ico's reputation but sometimes the promotion can bring a good impression to the platforms but this thing was very subjective because it depends on the personal opinion after the first impression with the ico.

If the team has already used the trusted managers to manage its campaign and then it could be considered as a commitment to run the project.
There's a lot of factors that has played very important roles in this case.

[benthach]

my answer is no

[Mealea]

Signature campaign can only create more awareness for any project, it has nothing to do with credibility. ICO is gradually coming back If I may say, couple of ICO recently sis well and personally I have expecting some positive attitude towards ICO from the community.

[kawetsriyanto]

Signature campaign is only a part of the promotion, it never determines the project's credibility. If you want to know more about credibility, you must learn the project as a whole. Anyway, ICO has lost its reputation, even the project provides a signature campaign with big rewards, the investors won't consider to join the project only based on the signature campaign performance. Unless, the project chooses top exchanges to list their tokens, it is probably to bring effects on the interest of investors.

[error08]

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

Being a newbie, I would like to know your thoughts through experience.

Type of campaigns usually do not matter much but if you ask my personal opinion i do give an extra point to the project if they have a professional looking signature campaign. For me it gives the signal that the team is serious and professional about the project so they have given proper time to design their bounty campaign in general and signature campaign specifically.

Agree, sig-camp increases the chances of being recognized by more people and makes a positive impression that the team wants to disseminate information about the project they are working on. However, the credibility depends on the team and the project itself, everyone has to do their own research about the aim of the project, what makes it better than other projects, how the market reacts, and how the project will evolve in the future.

[Zeke_23]

No, signature campaign is just part of the marketing strategy. Signature campaign is being used to promote and increase the reach of the project, but it does not increase the credibility. It always depends on how promising the project is, over all including the idea and so on.

[AmoreJaz]

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

Being a newbie, I would like to know your thoughts through experience.

Type of campaigns usually do not matter much but if you ask my personal opinion i do give an extra point to the project if they have a professional looking signature campaign. For me it gives the signal that the team is serious and professional about the project so they have given proper time to design their bounty campaign in general and signature campaign specifically.

Agree, sig-camp increases the chances of being recognized by more people and makes a positive impression that the team wants to disseminate information about the project they are working on. However, the credibility depends on the team and the project itself, everyone has to do their own research about the aim of the project, what makes it better than other projects, how the market reacts, and how the project will evolve in the future.

sig campaign may increase the visibility here in the forum but as others have said, credibility depends on the team handling it. even if it is handled by reputable manager in the forum, if the team will not do their part, the failure is always forthcoming. as the manager can only handle the campaign and the team is fully responsible in realizing their objectives, the final ball is still on them.
the success of the project depends on the resilience and sincerity of the team. and to what extent they are willing to undertake in accomplishing their mission. because most projects wane their enthusiasm as time goes by, up until they totally abandon the project. most of them are only active at the initial stage but when it comes to actual application, very few can achieve that stage.

[StephenJH]

No, the signature campaigns are for increasing awareness and for promoting the project. The campaign managers are hired by the team in order to run their promotions here. So, it doesn't matter for ICOs to be here or not if there are no features to promote. Just one more point is important here, the signature campaigns increase the traffic for the project website and Alexa ranking goes higher than average daily clicks.

[angrybirdy]

-

-

-

sig campaign may increase the visibility here in the forum but as others have said, credibility depends on the team handling it. even if it is handled by reputable manager in the forum, if the team will not do their part, the failure is always forthcoming. as the manager can only handle the campaign and the team is fully responsible in realizing their objectives, the final ball is still on them.
the success of the project depends on the resilience and sincerity of the team. and to what extent they are willing to undertake in accomplishing their mission. because most projects wane their enthusiasm as time goes by, up until they totally abandon the project. most of them are only active at the initial stage but when it comes to actual application, very few can achieve that stage.

Basically, it is just another tool to make it known by many people. The team will be the one to decide and the one who will be making their move towards the success or if they even have the plan to be one of the successful project. Even if it is handled by known manager, it is still depends on how they will do at the end.

[Kasabus]

No, signature campaign is just part of the marketing strategy. Signature campaign is being used to promote and increase the reach of the project, but it does not increase the credibility. It always depends on how promising the project is, over all including the idea and so on.

Credibility of the ICO is definitely based on the project itself but sometimes having a sucessful signature campaign can also create good impression on the project particularly if the bounty manager has carried the bounty project well. The credibility of ICO nowadays is not that high anymore compared to its previous years but still some good projects still managed to survive because of its legitimacy.

[hd49728]

Credibility can not be built up with signature campaigns. Signature campaigns can catch eyes of readers, bring more traffics on company sites, and the message in signature is too short to fully represent ideas, developments, roadmaps of one project. Investors need to visit website, social media, and other channels to investigate before they can have enough details on projects. From all details, they can make decisions.

Signature campaigns contribute to success or failure of one project but it is not the only factor and not a decisive factor. A company has many other tools for their advertisements.

[Coin_trader]

Certainly will increase the credibility of the project, if not how could they be willing to pay a fortune to make the campaign. Because the community of this Forum is very large and diverse and from all over the world joining this Forum, this forum also has a good reputation in the world of crypto.

Credibility is not what they are boosting for launching this kind of promotion. They should hire professional with good background on there field to there team or partner with a well known related project if they really want to increase the credibility of there own project. Signature campaign main goal is too boost there exposure to possible investors here in the forum.

 As you can see on current signature campaign especially those bounty of ICO. They are hiring bunch of user regardless of the reputation of that user to promote there campaign. So they want a credibility boost, they should hire only reputable member in the forum and ignore those spammer user applications which is not the case.

[Dragonfund]

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

Being a newbie, I would like to know your thoughts through experience.

Signature campaign can be done by any project to raise awareness about the existence of that particular project within forum
Even scam projects can organize and set up a campaign on this same forum, one need to be careful in promotions and not been greedy about their payments in other not to lure innocent investors into believing what is not real. Example is Yobit, they had so many scam accusations in this forum about users fund, they paid signature campaign promoters with good incentives then.

I can only wear projects as signature if they have been listed on any Exchange, that reduce my risk and others. I can't do that for ICOs except for gambling projects.

[makishart]

It doesn't but it's not 100% true at all consider the main purpose to create the signature campaign is for the promotion to spread the awareness regarding the project to the a lot of users in this forum.

I think that it's not having any correlation with how trusted or reputable the project because it's actually depend on the team and various things.
Just remember if signature is a part of promotion and it's having a very small correlation to determine the fundamental of project.

[bitmover]

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

Being a newbie, I would like to know your thoughts through experience.

Well, it can certainly increase credibility if done right. The campaign must at least:

• pays in BTC or ETH or any other coin which actually has any value and could be instantly traded in an exchange.
• hire a reputable campaign manager or escrow

A signature campaign may also decrease ICO credibility if it is just trying to fool people around. For example:

• payments with tokens from the ICO
• payments only after the ICO ends
• request KYC to pay bounty hunter. They are using bounty hunters documents to inflate their numbers and call them investors, clients, or just to sell their data. Anyway, that's just terrible.

So, if someone wants to make a signature campaign, just hire someone who knows the job.