Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently

[bayu7adi]

The signature campaign is a promotional medium, this cannot be used as a parameter for a project to be in the good category or not. To find out whether a project is good or not, you must directly read and analyze existing data. Starting from whitepapers, communities, communication media, marketing strategies, teams, business models, competitors and so on.

A good signature campaign doesn't guarantee the project is safe.

[1715253726]

1715253726

[1715253726]

1715253726

[jdnthny]

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

Being a newbie, I would like to know your thoughts through experience.

It can help in someway especially in promoting a specific ICO and attracting investors that is using this forum which is looking for a good altcoins but it cannot really determine the success and credibility of an ICO project. Even a good and well-known BMs whose managing a good signature campaigns cannot tell you easily that ICO is safe and will not fail.

[Gotumoot]

Nope signature campaign doesn't increase it for me they are just promoting the project.
They are just publicity to attract investors they don't have anything to do with the projects credibility.

[amishmanish]

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

Being a newbie, I would like to know your thoughts through experience.

Any signature campaign that pays in the form of its own stakes or tokens is hardly going to be worth your time these days because of the sheer amount of scams that have taken place with this model.
Though if a Sig Campaign is serious enough to pay its participants in BTC and ETH, they can then actually attract attention in the form of better participants from the main section of BCT forums. The people who take BTC seriously and will doubt ICOs to be scams are also the best people to judge and demonstrate your campaigns legitimacy if it is legit in the first place. This is because these people will not take fake promises as a given without analyzing your project. When they do, they will actually be able to contribute to your community as a developer.

BCT forum is filled with people interested in finding something worth their time. Hence a decent BTC paying campaign is your best bet, both as someone wanting to market their project or as someone looking to join a bounty that isn't just a waste of your precious time (If you feel your time has value, that is).

[lienfaye]

No, signature campaign is just part of the marketing strategy. Signature campaign is being used to promote and increase the reach of the project, but it does not increase the credibility. It always depends on how promising the project is, over all including the idea and so on.

Exactly, signature campaign is just a way to promote the project and to spread awareness on the crypto community.

The credibility relies on the project itself. If the team are true to themselves and serious to achieve their goal. Then they will check every aspect to make their project succeed specially for investors to trust them.

[Akiko]

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

Being a newbie, I would like to know your thoughts through experience.

To be honest no,signature campaign  is just  away to advertise their ICO here in this forum  and get more sales the credibility of the project will only depend on the project owner and team behind that project. and that's not related if they have campaign here or not .


In addition almost all of the ICO have bounties here so does it mean All of them is legit?

[VDraci]

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

Being a newbie, I would like to know your thoughts through experience.

No, signature campaigns doesn't increase ICO credibility, can you atleast share the name of the ICO here? You need to be careful around ICO bounties, lesser investors find interest on ICO projects because they are mostly scam, you need to learn how to select good projects first

1. Make sure teams are blockchain professionals
2. Make sure the project utility makes sense and useful
3. Make sure the project have good lists of partners

[Uhde]

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

Being a newbie, I would like to know your thoughts through experience.

Bitcointalk forum is one of the major sources for crypto market. And most of the crypto investors have been following this forum. So i think signature campaigns are good advertizements for ICOs.

[Sy]

I won't say credibility but, the signature campaign does allow project owners to market their project more easily because a lot of people use the BTT forum and when we use the ICO's signature it gives them more exposure here in the forum.

[crypticj]

 Signature campaigns means nothing about credibility. It only means that they have enough money for marketing on btt

[rat03gopoh]

Yes, if their ICO is legit. Otherwise, their ICO would gain nothing but broken trust.
Running a signature campaign for the ICO only affects no more than 5% of the project's credibility. That said, this signature is only a gate to get credibility,  not as a final determinant.

[semobo]

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

Being a newbie, I would like to know your thoughts through experience.

You are talking about bounties? Or signature campaigns which pays in bitcoin weekly?

There are lot difference in the signature and bounty campaign itself even though the both campaign ask the same task to do done to get the rewards.If there is an signature campaign to promote new ICO then it means the project team is serious with their project since they are spending their own money to promote the project but if it is a bounty then no need to give any attention to it.

[manfredmann]

Some investors and knows about cryptocurrency are in here in the forum so signature campaign is one good way of advertisement. Besides, there are bounty hunter turns out investor after the project has been put to exchange and some bounty hunters dump their tokens get from the rewards. This somehow could be promising but in my own opinion it should not be advise. Anyway, whats best to a project is when it gets listed for sure that there could be only two things that happen either it will pump up or pump down.

[Crypto_lion]

I think we need to see the different needs a project which is trying to raise money needs. Signature doesn't provide credibility but it provides marketing for any project which is certainly needed.

[bitpotter]

Yes, if their ICO is legit. Otherwise, their ICO would gain nothing but broken trust.
Running a signature campaign for the ICO only affects no more than 5% of the project's credibility. That said, this signature is only a gate to get credibility,  not as a final determinant.

Yes, the function of the signature campaign is the same as other types of bounty campaigns, it's just that our signature campaign promotes the project in this forum while the social media campaigns are in different places such as Facebook and Twitter. But both do have an influence on the project being promoted.

[maxreish]

Not all. But I have seen some ICO that was being promoted by signature campaigns and build their credibility. However, a good projects always depend on different aspects as what others already stated. More particularly, we will also know if ICO project has a future and credibility if the product has a significant use and the team is very open to what is happening and showing off transparent progress of their project.
 
 Signature campaigns is part of their promotion but the credibility always depend on the objective of the project, the team behind and the sincerity and eligibility of it.

[bitcampaign]

I don't see at all an interesting ICO at the moment, I also don't see any signature bounty from the ICO project, where you say it's good, to be honest maybe a lot of bitcoin holders are in this forum or a lot of investors are here, so I think using a sign campaign good enough hands too for introducing the project to investors and the people here

[btcdie]

Bounty campaigns, sigcamp, social media, blogs, and others. this is a form of promotion and marketing strategy of a project. I don't think the signature campaign really matters to increase the credibility of the ICO, because basically investors see the use case and how important the project will be in the future. Investors can not only see from the bounty, it needs serious research and analysis. But with the bounty, the project will be widely reached and targeted, namely crypto enthusiasts.

[Quintrix]

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

Being a newbie, I would like to know your thoughts through experience.

Absolutely not and it investors should not even consider signature campaign as a sign that the project is legit, there are other ways to prove if the project is legit like the people working on the project, the whitepaper and their platform, even a scam project can launch a signature campaign so don't make the perception that signature campaign can make a project legit.

[fuer44]

I think yes, because so far the signature campaign has been the bounty that the few scammers and spammers have found. with clear rules for several sections that are allowed to post there, making this bounty a neat looking bounty. If you see, many social media bounties are fraudulent by using other people's social media accounts and that will be detrimental.