Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently

[South Park]

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

Being a newbie, I would like to know your thoughts through experience.

No it does not for me and in theory it should not do so for anyone, a signature campaign is just a way to advertise on the forum, it is a away to raise awareness that a coin exists at all as it is impossible for everyone to keep track of the thousands of coins in the market, if the developers of a coin want to increase their credibility then they need to do so by being on time on the development of their coin, by fulfilling their promises, by being honest with the community, by not hiding behind an alias or fake identities, if they do any of that then they should have no credibility for you and no one should invest in their project.

[Wysi]

No, signature campaign has nothing to do with cred with credibility of ICO or any projects but it will attract more users and investors and it will give the project a slight advantage over other projects in terms of filtering the project to avoid scam projects since scams projects will not run Bitcoin paid signature campaign, this is just my opinion.

[scolary23]

Confidence in one or another ICO, even without reaching the signature, can be justified by the rule of careful study of the project. This should be the rule. If in doubt, leave the ICO for later or mark it as unwanted. And the signature and wearing it is an advertising move to attract potential investors, as well as to attract new participants to promote the project. Something like this.

[Tigerheart3026]

signature promotion never make credibility for a project. it's a part of advertisement nothing related with credibility. mostly project offering signature campaign it can be through of tokens and some projects will pay btc payment it’s depend on team. and i think a project credibility comes from teams work and project readmap.

[jacafbiz]

It helps to build trust in the project, when you see some trusted members of the forum carrying a signature, you tend to want to look into the project and research it, by doing so you find out the plus and the minus about the project and if a red flag is found it would easily be raised.  It does help the project

[albon]

This is only a promotion and the project that was promoted may be scam and may not be paid in the end to the bounty hunters who worked in the signature compaign, and this promotion never indicates the credibility of any project, if you are an investor, you must examine the project well and the decision to invest in it is at your own risk .

[tvplus006]

Having a signature campaign is very important to promote the project. It allows you to pay attention to the project and go to the site to get acquainted with the details. And that's where her task ends. How much the investor will be interested in this project will depend on the team in the future, namely on how it will present its information on the site in order to interest the investor to invest their money.

[eaLiTy]

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

Being a newbie, I would like to know your thoughts through experience.

The credibility and legitimacy of the project is not determined by the campaigns they organize, if you look at this forum two or three years back you will see many scam projects that were heavily promoted here using signature campaigns and other social media campaigns and reputed campaign managers at that time were involved in those and some even tarnished their reputation helping out the scammers. 

[Slow death]

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility?

if a signature campaign has 50 members and pays $35 each member per week, that would be something like $7000 per month (4 weeks running the  signature campaign) and if there are 100 members that would be $14000 in just one month and $42000 in 3 months, I think it would be enough time and people to be able to bring in investors if:

1 - the project is very good

2 - the team members are people who have competence and a good curriculum

and there is also twitter, telegram and facebook and tiktok that can be used to publicize the project and I think adding another $50,000 in funds could be enough to pay people and have good results.

But what happens is that many people come to this forum without a penny, they only have ideas and want free publicity to then pay in Tokens that can have a very cheap price and in the end those who lose out are the Bounty Hunters

Answering your question:

yes! but many people who arrive at this forum do not have money, but want to run a project.

I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

must be a project that has capital ready to pay for advertising something very good and admirable

[pilosopotasyo]

Signature campaign has nothing to do with credibility, signature can do awareness of the project so investors will look on the project and see if they want or not to invest here, they can generate awareness and traffic and that's all they can do, it's up to the team on what they will do to make their project credible.

[deathcode]

Signature campaign has nothing to do with credibility, signature can do awareness of the project so investors will look on the project and see if they want or not to invest here, they can generate awareness and traffic and that's all they can do, it's up to the team on what they will do to make their project credible.

seeing the project as credible, I think it is difficult to classify it against a new ICO project. whatever is done, currently the ICO project is no longer in the spotlight of the investor market. those who are registered and cooperate with major exchanges are credible projects. whether it's a matter of support from a bounty manager or a campaign with a large allocation, I don't think it's an issue that needs to be discussed.

[tbterryboy]

No, signature campaign has nothing to do with cred with credibility of ICO or any projects but it will attract more users and investors and it will give the project a slight advantage over other projects in terms of filtering the project to avoid scam projects since scams projects will not run Bitcoin paid signature campaign, this is just my opinion.

I agree but then having some contest and campaigns going on bring some trust too. I given you an example, I was not aware about roobet even though I had heard about them but after they do so many giveaways and promotions I got convinced and actually started playing there and that is because of their positive activity and promotions.

Sometimes you need some promotions and campaigns to be run to get attention as well as some trust from the community. I agree that investors would always verify and check the project before investing so you must have good roadmap and team behind the project but having some campaigns/promotions always helps out.

[Smitty Werben Man Jensen]

A signature campaign is only a program of bounty, the same as a social media campaign or blog campaign,
but in my opinion a signature can indeed give an ICO better credibility, provided that the ICO has a good background and is worth investing in.
All need analysis first to determine credibility for ICO.

[amonymous]

If a project use signature campaign for promoting there ICO/token period then it doesn't matter this is a successful project. Because i have been seen many projects before failed. A project can be successful token sales if they have good partnership with clear project roadrun. Anyway signature part a great way where you can promote your project for impressed lot of investors.

[xZork]

The signature is just to introduce people to the project and it doesn't have much to do with the credibility of the ICO.
An ICO is highly appreciated by everyone because it has a good product and a professional development team, it has nothing to do with the signature campaign.

[acdc]

I think the signature campaign has something to do with the credibility of the ICO but it doesn't involve too much.
Sometimes every ICO project gets better reviews because their signature campaign is professional and has great rewards. Sometimes a project is rated better when there are many reputable members on the forum wearing the project's signature.

[akirasendo17]

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

Being a newbie, I would like to know your thoughts through experience.

Well, I think yes because it will be advertised and the community will try to look for the good and the bad, that happens every time, someone will dig deep into a project looking for mistakes or signs of a scam, then he /she will share what he/she finds out, which means people will be curious if it's true by also looking in the whitepaper, members, and person behind the project, by the time an ico starts people already know if it's fake.

[Alert31]

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

Being a newbie, I would like to know your thoughts through experience.

The credibility of the project depends on the project itself and the team behind it, on how they support their project to become successful. Signature campaign is just a part of it. It is only their promotional tools to attract people and investors but the project itself will show to the people if they are reliable so that people would trust their project and invest to it.

[Snappycoco]

For me, yes. By investing in signature campaign, the Project team for me is quite serious with their project. It shows how they want to have a crowd for their ICO and probably succeed their project.

[shinratensei_]

For me, yes. By investing in signature campaign, the Project team for me is quite serious with their project. It shows how they want to have a crowd for their ICO and probably succeed their project.

Im not sure about this as there were so many scam projects that have been also using the signature campaign to promote their scam projects too. The campaign is to create awareness and it has nothing to do with the reputation of the team.
If the project has already owned by the trusted developers and that would be a good thing but otherwise.
How serious the project must be seen from the how good the product or MVP that has made by the developers. Signature is a way to do promotion in this forum.