Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently

[MadeMen]

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

Being a newbie, I would like to know your thoughts through experience.

credibility has nothing to do with the signature campaign. Signature is only part of promotion, to assess the credibility of a project you can see it from the experience of members of the development team or from their goals and readiness to launch the project. for the first stage you can judge from their whitepaper, roadmap, website. a credible project must have prepared it very carefully.

I'm in support of your opinion, bounty campaign is something else that is far away from the project credibility. Most projects outsource their bounties on this forum and the bounty manager determines the kind of bounty campaign that would be carried out for the project while the team concentrate on other aspects of the project.

[South Park]

I believe it can, if the ICO manager is one of the high trusted members in bitcointalk it can add some credits to ICO because he/she would get negative trust if the ICO turns out scam or doesn't pay, but it is not true for newbies as bounty managers.

Not necessarily, even good managers can be deceived from time to time and there have been cases on the forum on the past in which this happened and the managers were forgiven as they were just as unaware as anyone else, they can receive negative trust however if they know from the beginning the project was a scam and still decided to support it, if this was not the case it would become extremely risky for reputable managers to take any ico bounty campaign and if we let newbies to take on those campaigns then we will have even more scams on the forum as things will go out of control really quickly, as such having a reputable manager while good is not really a guarantee the project is any good and will not scam their clients.

[articlecity]

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

Being a newbie, I would like to know your thoughts through experience.

I somehow really like signature campaigns and i do truly support the project that i promote with signature campaign. For example the current blockmembers campaign that im participating i got really impressed with the project as it is aimed to revolutionize and automate the construction industry which was something never heard of before.

[Janation]

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

Being a newbie, I would like to know your thoughts through experience.

I somehow really like signature campaigns and i do truly support the project that i promote with signature campaign. For example the current blockmembers campaign that im participating i got really impressed with the project as it is aimed to revolutionize and automate the construction industry which was something never heard of before.

A lot of projects already said that.

You should still be careful since you never know how true their statements are. You never know unless you read the reason behind their project, where they wanted to go or where will they bring this project. Some projects are so good to be true and most of them are just a scam targeting investors of their money then you never know they could just start another one for another scam.

[Strongkored]

Signature campaign can't increased the credibility of ICO's or any other type of token sales,signature campaign or other promotions is just to attract investor or introduce their project and the idea behind the project.
The tittle said "few" it has been explained that the ICO's credibility is not from the promotion carried out but the team's ability to achieve each of their targets of the project.
But credible project will hire good campaign manager, because they understand that good handling will give impact to their token sales.

[bryant.coleman]

credibility has nothing to do with the signature campaign. Signature is only part of promotion, to assess the credibility of a project you can see it from the experience of members of the development team or from their goals and readiness to launch the project. for the first stage you can judge from their whitepaper, roadmap, website. a credible project must have prepared it very carefully.

Well... I may have to slightly disagree. In the world of cryptocurrency, there is a lot of emphasis on trust. If you have respected members promoting your project, then it may be possible for you to get more investment. So if a project gets higher ranking members in its signature campaign, the chances of its success will increase. But at the same time, there are users who want to take advantage of their popularity. A perfect example is that of John McAfee, who promoted dozens of scam projects in 2017 and 2018, causing tens of millions of $$$ in losses to the investors.

[iTradeChips]

Signature campaigns are designed to advertise the campaign or the project in general and it is not designed to increase a company's profile hence its credibility. We only join signature campaigns because we work to advertise the project and make it known to many people using bitcointalk, that's it. I don't see myself as someone who can elevate a company's profile, unless you are Elon Musk and you invested 10 million dollars to the project thereby elevating its prestige but still, the product or service would still be a big factor in determining where the project is good or bad.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

Being a newbie, I would like to know your thoughts through experience.

Signature campaign or which ever campaign it is does not increase ICO, IEO private sale, pre sale (or whatever its called) credibility, some of the projects even after running many different campaigns still end up as scam thereby, scamming both the campaign participants and investors alike, one have to be extra careful this days to avoid falling a victim to this kind of projects.

[Oneandpure]

Trough promotion an ICO project with signature campaign I think give bigger impact how to make many investor interested and wanna get part to invest with ICO project during pre sale or ICO sale, without promotion exactly with signature campaign I think many investor do not know how an ICO project running and how long will take time for ICO sale. I know many investor said with bounty hunter make coin price down but is not true and wrong decision. When ICO project promote by bounty hunter and signature campaign get part with promotion will give good reputation and many investor will know how seriously an ICO project with their planning design, from promoting until how to give income for investor wanna be part or ICO.

[Genemind]

The signature campaign has nothing to do with the project's credibility. It all falls on the team, how it managed, developed and how transparent are they. Signature campaign or any bounty program is just a good way to advertise or publicize a project, it doesn't add to the project's credibility as a whole.

[Festac]

The highest a signature campaign can do for a new project is to create awareness to unknown people that may want to invest or have interest in new crypto projects, that's the aim of bounty campaigns, credibility? That's on the team not signature campaign or bounty hunters

[Adreman23]

When you say credibility it means that the project is trusted, and signature campaign is only a kind of promotion. But in your question, does signature campaign increase ICO credibility my opinion is no, because credibility of a project depends on team reputation, professionalism and past experiences. If the team are trustwothy then the project is credible. On the other hand signature campaign will help you to spot the credible projects if many high ranking members joined the signature campaign, this is the sign for you to look at that project and conduct a check if project is credible .

[BitcoinTurk]

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

Being a newbie, I would like to know your thoughts through experience.

Although it is not possible to say exactly that the signature campaigns created for new projects increase the credibility rate, it is very easy to say that they have a very serious effect on sales. Generally, project managers are very careful to use this method because they get potential investors with such advertising works and in this way they use the budget allocated for advertising effectively. In short, although it is not possible to say that such campaigns increase credibility, it is very clear that they increase the potential investor audience and sales volume.

[Shallow]

Signature campaign is just another form of campaign, that is, just like there is Twitter and Facebook campaigns where people use their accounts to promote a project, the same can be said about signature campaign as well. So, signature campaign do not increase the credibility of ICO rather it helps to spread the project around the forum thus making it possible for potential investors to come onboard.
On the other hand, what increases ICO credibility is the idea, use case or working product of the platform, this is very important because it helps to clarify the investor if the team knows what they are doing or not. Others are, the experience of the team, the community and their partners. For a project to have good partners goes a long way to show how rooted the project is.

[ufaiz50]

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

Being a newbie, I would like to know your thoughts through experience.

ICO credibility is seen from the ICO project itself, I think the signature campaign does not have a big influence in determining the credibility of an ICO. maybe some people see that if their campaign is followed by many people then the project is good, it's not always true. I used to think like that because I couldn't further analyze a project, but it was a thought when I was a newbie. In fact, what can make a good project is the development team itself, because if the team and their product or project concept are good, it will be good in the future.

[jcarlo]

Signature campaign is a campaign that is held in this forum and I think this forum is the biggest forum currently for cryptocurrency. Signature campaigns can attract many potential investors to join new projects because they are seen by many forum members and I think their effectiveness depends on the project itself, whether it is good for investment or not.

[khiholangkang]

Your words need to be slightly improved, not increasing the credibility of the ICO but increasing the reach of a project to get investors. Because not all projects hold an ICO.
It's true, promoting projects on forums the size of bitcointalk is a good marketing technique.

[Kvalentine]

No, signature campaign don't have anything to do with credibility of a project, signature campaign only creates and increase the rate of popularity of a project, awareness creation, that's all

[unusualfacts30]

You would see there are a lot of signature campaign participants so its more of promotion than anything else from my point of view. Credibility comes from the project itself and the team behind it. Signature is only there so people can checkout the project themselves and make their own decision. Does marketing help the project? of course it can help any project but only if they have other more important pieces of puzzle in place. Without them marketing won't help at all.

Things you should always look for is their payment structure. Have they paid they bounty participants on time? If not, skip investing. They are most likely a scam.

Whitepaper, Team, Management, Website, Sponsors and their values.

[leea-1334]

The signature campaign has nothing to do with the project's credibility. It all falls on the team, how it managed, developed and how transparent are they. Signature campaign or any bounty program is just a good way to advertise or publicize a project, it doesn't add to the project's credibility as a whole.

It actually kind of does though. If you look at the oldest signature campaigns, they all started out with a good bang of signature campaigns for a new business,,, and especially if you see the participants AND the manager are really good ones, then you know the project itself at least recognizes good people and wants to work with them.