In-play or pre-match staking

[Oshosondy]

I did noticed predicting football is not easy, that is why betting company can not go bankrupted, people always stake and either gain or lose, but most people do lose. That is why we should only take betting for fun, and using only the funds that we can afford to lose to bet, and not also be addicted.


I will like you people to let us discuss about pre-match type of staking or in-play staking in football, which one did you prefer? Which one is more risky?

[1715651131]

1715651131

[1715651131]

1715651131

[1715651131]

1715651131

[1715651131]

1715651131

[1715651131]

1715651131

[1715651131]

1715651131

[goinmerry]

I will like you people to let us discuss about pre-match type of staking or in-play staking in football, which one did you prefer? Which one is more risky?

It depends on your level of confidence. Either can be both effective if plays well.

Both also have the same level of risk.

But seeing how you are reacting to that problem, I think in-play staking isn't recommended for you, for now. Just try to improve your pre-match analysis with the help of other site analysis as your guide. Soon, you will be used to it and you can address the problem by yourself.

[Darker45]

The good thing about a betting company is that it doesn't care which side will win or lose. There is no house to go against. Compared to casinos, the bets in a bookie are not placed against the house but against other bettors. In every result, the site earns from the loser. There is no way for the site to lose as compared to a casino which could sometimes end up losing despite its house edge.

I'm not betting on football but, just like in every game, there are pros and cons in live betting as in pre-match betting. Sometimes pre-match odds will turn out better than live odds, sometimes it is the opposite. The good thing about live betting is when you're already rooting for a certain team or player even before the game begins. During the game, you just wait for the tide to somehow turn to the opponent's favor. The odds will certainly rise on your team or player. That's when you grab it.  

[chaser15]

Not just in football but in every sport, betting isn't that easy even how knowledgeable you are.

Between betting in-play or pre-match, it's up to you what to choose.

I always prefer betting on pre-match as sometimes, not able to watch live games. But it doesn't mean I don't want to bet on live games.

[bitterguy28]

I did noticed predicting football is not easy, that is why betting company can not go bankrupted, people always stake and either gain or lose, but most people do lose. That is why we should only take betting for fun, and using only the funds that we can afford to lose to bet, and not also be addicted.

Then welcome to gambling world,at least at some point of your gambling career you realized that gambling operators/owners will never let
 their Pocket emptied in gambling business.
Gambling Maybe for fun but also to profit (though there is no assurance at all) if we know how to manage our
self whenever we are in gambling places.

I will like you people to let us discuss about pre-match type of staking or in-play staking in football, which one did you prefer? Which one is more risky?

Of course Pre-Match of staking in which risky but higher chances of winning.

[Wexnident]

Both have their advantages and disadvantages, up to you really what you want. I'd rather go for Pre-match though, mostly because with enough analysis and relevant data, you could pretty much predict a result very close, if not equal, to the outcome of the game. On the other hand, live betting makes your bets a lot more accurate, though you might lose more money in case you make a stupid decision. It basically requires a lot of discipline and patience, plus a quick mind to actually analyze whatever is happening on the entirety of the match. As I said, there are pros and cons to it, and tldr of it is that Pre-match mainly relies on statistics, while in-play is basically a gut feeling by watching the match and pretty much analyzing and predicting what each team could do.

[Official_krs]

I will like you people to let us discuss about pre-match type of staking or in-play staking in football, which one did you prefer? Which one is more risky?

Both have their respective risks, but indeed in-play is more risky than pre-match. And most of them prefer pre-match

[ingiltere]

I prefer well prepared bets, you think about matches all day, analyzing both teams and make a decision. Let's put this in our hands.

You can make live bets too, but it should only include your prepared games. That means you already study that game and think about consequences. When you make live bets there is a big factor, excitement and that would affect your decision-making ability.

Odds are also another factor. Don't put too much money too low odds and think about a guaranteed bet. Because you can win most of the times but when you lose it, you lose more money than you win all along with this strategy.

I'm not completely against live bets but that is not my first choice and I wouldn't put too much money on them.

[ralle14]

I will like you people to let us discuss about pre-match type of staking or in-play staking in football, which one did you prefer? Which one is more risky?

Imo they're both equally risky but I think you'll get more value out of live betting just because you can get better odds on the favorites if the match ends up scoreless until half time for example or if they get a red card. The risky part with live bets is that it can quickly turn against you. It's very difficult to execute and takes up most of your time unlike pre live bets.

You can also get some value bets from doing pre live but you have to take it very early before the public is all over it. The risks in pre live is that sometimes betting on a match feels like you're betting blindly because there will be matches where the favorites will look like the underdog. For me pre live is better since I don't always have the time to watch the full match.

[YOSHIE]

I will like you people to let us discuss about pre-match type of staking or in-play staking in football, which one did you prefer? Which one is more risky?

In general, football gamblers often do is make bets before the game takes place.

Be it online or real looking for an opponent to bet on. If you play online you can go directly against the soccer bookie, However, what you need to know if you play online pre-match, not the one thing that prevents you from fighting, you can still do it even though the game is in progress, that's the name of a game that is often called street ball or in other languages ​​is real time.

If you talk about the risk all gambling has the risk of losing your money, however, to prevent that all I have a little tip for you to bet on football.
1. If you start out in street soccer betting, the main thing you do is 'Thorough'.
In this case it is very decisive for you to win, namely: choosing the type of match, this is where you can determine your good and bad odds.
2. And if you place a pre match bet, generally people do hdp, 1 x 2, over under mugkin, many others, if you often bet on soccer gambling you will know the real way.

[Alucard1]

I did noticed predicting football is not easy, that is why betting company can not go bankrupted, people always stake and either gain or lose, but most people do lose. That is why we should only take betting for fun, and using only the funds that we can afford to lose to bet, and not also be addicted.

That's true but it is not only for football predicting because all games can be risky, some people considered gambling as a way of their entertainment and some are for earning money purposes, those who only want entertainment are those who are not an active gambler, maybe they are playing when they are with their friends just like me while those people who considered gambling as a source of income are those who can be called as an active gambler, they are already familiar about gambling and they also have the strategy and skills to win the game.

I will like you people to let us discuss about pre-match type of staking or in-play staking in football, which one did you prefer? Which one is more risky?

Both are risky but I would still choose to play on pre match type because I never watch live sports.

[btc_angela]

I will like you people to let us discuss about pre-match type of staking or in-play staking in football, which one did you prefer? Which one is more risky?

Both are effective and risky as well, I haven't done this is football, but in other games, yes, staking pre-match and then even at in-play, won several times with this strategy and it makes the games more exciting to watch. So I prefer both and for me both is riskier though and it's up to you, how much you are willing to stake pre and in-play. Are you staking many games, 3 or more? or just one game?

[shoreno]

Not just in football but in every sport, betting isn't that easy even how knowledgeable you are.

Between betting in-play or pre-match, it's up to you what to choose.

I always prefer betting on pre-match as sometimes, not able to watch live games. But it doesn't mean I don't want to bet on live games.

knowledge on sport do helps than betting completely without knowledge   . you must also pick sport depending on the knowledge you have , betting on football is hard if you are not familiar with the team but betting in basketball is easy because you know how every team play , just like that .

we also have a bonus on sports games because they are more easy compare to casino and non sport betting , easy in a way that you can pick your sport and team but the betting interface may not be user friendly for begginers and also depend on the betting platform your using .

[Google+]

I will like you people to let us discuss about pre-match type of staking or in-play staking in football, which one did you prefer? Which one is more risky?

Both are effective and risky as well, I haven't done this is football, but in other games, yes, staking pre-match and then even at in-play, won several times with this strategy and it makes the games more exciting to watch. So I prefer both and for me both is riskier though and it's up to you, how much you are willing to stake pre and in-play. Are you staking many games, 3 or more? or just one game?

If you look at the risks that have each risk, I prefer to bet before the game starts because it's simpler to do this method, instead of having to bet twice with a lot of capital, it will only make a very large amount of loss when losing, so I prefer to manage less risk.

[Gotumoot]

I only bet in-play when I am not sure about the teams but I love the game not just in football but also in other sports betting.
I only bet on pre-match if I have known the team and know that they have a high chance of winning the game.

[erikoy]

Pre match staking is ideal. In play betting is a little bit sort like you will not get excited and get the fun betting for you are only after the winnings and not the essense of having fun amd gets excited with the bet and the result.

I am not a fan of betting in an in game because I am will not get excited to see the result of the bets. For the game is already in play.

The ideal bet for me is betting in a pre match. However, I wished to see other replies so that I can get idea from them why they love to bet during in game.

[Jating]

I prefer in-game staking though, at least you can see the match and probably get the feel of what going to happened, either the favourite is really doing good or the underdogs will have a chance and make the odds very attractive.

I have experienced this during the Miami series, I remember a game wherein I put a stake pre-match and then continue to beat on the Miami even though the Boston takes the lead, the odds grew like 3.xx something for Miami after that, so I take it and Miami regain the lead and won in the game, very fun and exciting to hit a good odds and very satisfying. 

[swogerino]

When live betting was introduced several years ago I remember people in lotto (sport betting only) shops always betting on the next goal live.Soon the people released that it was not as easy as it looked so they start to go back to traditional pre-match betting.

I personally also love traditional and have had really bad results with live betting.

[bisdak40]

I will like you people to let us discuss about pre-match type of staking or in-play staking in football, which one did you prefer? Which one is more risky?

I'm a basketball/boxing fan so almost all of my bettings were on that sports.

When talking about risk, i think both are equally risky and there are always advantages and disadvantages on either type of betting.

On my part, mostly i go on pre-game staking as most of the games played in the NBA or PBA coincide with my working hours and seldom i could see live games on tv, time constraint to be specific. 

Also you are right, bet just for the sake of fun as this gambling activity of ours is full of uncertainty, we never know what the future holds so bet only what you afford to lose.

[madnessteat]

In my opinion, the risk in pre-match and in-play stakes is approximately the same, since anything can happen during the game and no pre-match analytics will help. Like most players, I prefer pre-match stakes, as this type of stakes does not require viewing the match, which for most players is important enough.

[barbara44]

Pre-live is always more risky because you get an idea in play for example there is a match between favorites and underdogs and somehow the underdogs make the 1st goal then you can always bet on the 2nd goal to come from the favorites because they get aggressive and the chances are high that they will find the next goal. These are little things that sound weird but really they give better chances than you would find on pre-live markets.

Wagering or staking is all about getting the best odds and making sure to bet on the highest possible outcomes even if they pay less. I have often seen draw-no-bet markets and the game is at 80 mins gone and score is 2-0 now draw no bet is the best possible market for staking because the opposition might score 1 or even 2 goals but surely not 3 goals without conceding one.

[kryptqnick]

I did noticed predicting football is not easy, that is why betting company can not go bankrupted, people always stake and either gain or lose, but most people do lose. That is why we should only take betting for fun, and using only the funds that we can afford to lose to bet, and not also be addicted.


I will like you people to let us discuss about pre-match type of staking or in-play staking in football, which one did you prefer? Which one is more risky?

I'm a pre-match kind of person. I think this allows to weigh in various things and make a reasonable decision. Betting while the game is ongoing means making fast, possibly very emotional decisions. This stresses me out, so I don't do it. But if someone can be calm and make an informed and reasonable decision in the middle of the game, the risk can decrease because in the game it gets more obvious how the teams are today. Then again, something unexpected can always happen, so I'm not sure if it's much of a use to take into account what's happening now.

[imstillthebest]

Pre-live is always more risky because you get an idea in play for example there is a match between favorites and underdogs and somehow the underdogs make the 1st goal then you can always bet on the 2nd goal to come from the favorites because they get aggressive and the chances are high that they will find the next goal.

favorite as in your favorite team ? you know how your favorite team play and there is no need for you to watch and observed the actual live game before you bet but you can decide as early as possible if your favorite team has a chance to thier opponents or not .

Wagering or staking is all about getting the best odds and making sure to bet on the highest possible outcomes even if they pay less.

best odds means higher payout ? they are  risky but more rewarding than those smaller odds but high chance of winning . betting isnt about how small or high your odds but it depends on you or on the gambler if what play he likes .  you can wagger fast on higher odds and you can win bigger profits on the same time than small odds but you may want to consider the risk that youl be getting

[perla]

I think both have a risk and I prefer both sometimes I do in-play and sometimes pre-match. But since I have some work and not be able to watch the live game I mostly bet on pre-match but whenever I have time to watch live games I do an in-play betting.

[Fredomago]

I prefer in-game staking though, at least you can see the match and probably get the feel of what going to happened, either the favourite is really doing good or the underdogs will have a chance and make the odds very attractive.

I have experienced this during the Miami series, I remember a game wherein I put a stake pre-match and then continue to beat on the Miami even though the Boston takes the lead, the odds grew like 3.xx something for Miami after that, so I take it and Miami regain the lead and won in the game, very fun and exciting to hit a good odds and very satisfying. 

The kind of satisfactions where gamblers always wanted to feel, keep pushing for your favorite team even they seems to lose the game and turned things favorable to you.

Most of the time after betting with pre-match I follow it up during the live games, checking what's the take of my bet and try to add some if I saw some interesting events.

Either to bet with something that can let me recover my possible loss or add some once my
bets are mostly to win it.

[Lavander]

I actually placing bets on pre-match however if there's a chance that I could watch live the game I would be placing it in an in-play match since I can see and create decision based on the team's performance live since even the best team have some bad days and through it I can make a good bet. I've already tested that multiple times and I can say that it's a good strategy for me.

[sempak]

Placing bets that are live does give more excitement and sensation. Only my experience is that you then no longer make well-considered choices, and often lose the pressure.
Then you bet on that moment on matches, of which you have too little knowledge and then it becomes gambling instead of betting. We all know how that usually ends.

[harizen]

I will like you people to let us discuss about pre-match type of staking or in-play staking in football, which one did you prefer? Which one is more risky?

Generally, I always prefer pre-match betting as I'm more comfortable doing it. The only reason why I can't do live bets most of the time is because of my unavailability to watch live games. But if ever there's a chance and for let's say, the said match catch my interest, then I will do live betting.

The risk is just the same since after all, your winning chance depends on how well you analyzed the game.

That is why we should only take betting for fun, and using only the funds that we can afford to lose to bet, and not also be addicted.

Not a good mindset if you are a regular gambler.

I'm doing gambling to expect something good in return. There are lots of ways to have fun. You won't realize how much you are losing now because you are gambling for fun.

[sunsilk]

I did noticed predicting football is not easy, that is why betting company can not go bankrupted, people always stake and either gain or lose, but most people do lose.  

They are the casinos and sports books, they will never go bankrupt unless there's a mishandling on their part. The existence of them has been tested and proven that it's a profitable business once they've made their brand established.

That is why we should only take betting for fun, and using only the funds that we can afford to lose to bet, and not also be addicted.

Bet as if you want it. Whether your choice is for fun or for profit, gamble and acknowledge the possible consequences that you may get after doing it.

I will like you people to let us discuss about pre-match type of staking or in-play staking in football, which one did you prefer? Which one is more risky?

Although I don't bet in football but pre-match is better IMO.

[goldade]

That is why we should only take betting for fun, and using only the funds that we can afford to lose to bet, and not also be addicted.

I absolutely agree that one should only gamble or bet with what one can afford to lose.  What I do not agree with is taking betting for fun. Many gamblers, myself inclusive, do not gamble just for the fun of it because we're hoping to make winnings and get something of it and it's because of that we do not just make guesses when we bet but calculated attempts at winning.
To answer your question, it's just a matter of strategy that works best for one. Personally, I prefer pre-match staking. I do this to avoid the tension that comes with watching a live match when one makes an in-play bet. What I do is simply make a calculated prediction, place a bet and wait for the result.

[Fortify]

I much prefer pre-match staking because the odds are a lot more stable and it's possible to place a lay bet without any disruption. In-play is necessary sometimes in order to unlock special betting offers, but is much more unpredictable and that makes it more dangerous. Probably not relevant to most people who gamble, but for those who are trying to maximize their money by unlocking free bets at no risk, in-play can ruin your profits in a split second.

[crwth]

I did noticed predicting football is not easy, that is why betting company can not go bankrupted, people always stake and either gain or lose, but most people do lose.

As long as there are differences in beliefs and opinions with who can win and who the stronger team is, there would be two opposite gamblers that would be willing to bet against something. That's why a gambling company is profitable. Additionally, with the house edge, it's an advantage.

I will like you people to let us discuss about pre-match type of staking or in-play staking in football, which one did you prefer? Which one is more risky?

I feel more emotional with in-play staking, so I prefer pre-match. It would depend on the odds that I would have. I think it's riskier with in-play because you are more closely watching the match and it would hurt more. Lol.

[ralle14]

favorite as in your favorite team ? you know how your favorite team play and there is no need for you to watch and observed the actual live game before you bet but you can decide as early as possible if your favorite team has a chance to thier opponents or not .

It's not his favorite team he mentioned the term underdog as well so most likely he meant was the favored team to win.

best odds means higher payout ? they are  risky but more rewarding than those smaller odds but high chance of winning . betting isnt about how small or high your odds but it depends on you or on the gambler if what play he likes .  you can wagger fast on higher odds and you can win bigger profits on the same time than small odds but you may want to consider the risk that youl be getting

The odds are a big factor in sports betting and there are gamblers that would use the odds as a deciding factor like for example they'll make a bet just because they find a lot of value in that market.

[Mauser]

I will like you people to let us discuss about pre-match type of staking or in-play staking in football, which one did you prefer? Which one is more risky?

My experience in staking is very limited. I think pre match staking depends a lot on your track record and how good you are in general, while in-play staking depends more on your daily play. The thing about in-play staking is that you have more information available, then when staking before. I would say that the latter is more risky. But overall staking shouldn't make a big difference in the performance of a professional.

[kkaroul4]

I think the pre-match betting is much risky since you might not know what will happen during fight for instance a player or two injured on the team this would really affect the game and probably the result of the game but if you bet on a in-play game there's a chance that you would be able to predict which team will win.

[Oshosondy]

I think the pre-match betting is much risky since you might not know what will happen during fight for instance a player or two injured on the team this would really affect the game and probably the result of the game but if you bet on a in-play game there's a chance that you would be able to predict which team will win.

What I do commonly noticed is penalty, there are many times I lose because of the penalty played by the opponent of the team I chose, and if the opponent team is strong, there is a chance to later win the game within 80 minutes to 90 minutes. I too have seen in-play matches to be very risky. But also, I have tried betting pre-matches, losses often ensued also. Although, I am not addicted to betting, and using funds that I can afford to lose as been my best option.

[bunglor]

I think both is risky but I think betting in in-play betting is has little chance of risk since you would see them live and what is happening, just not quite sure which odds is better the in-game or the pre-match.

[Oshosondy]

just not quite sure which odds is better the in-game or the pre-match.

The odds depends, it depends on the type you selected. For example, if you choose straight win for a strong team which is 1.3 odds, in 60 minutes of the game, if the strong team is already winning, the odd could be at 1.01 and will continue to be reducing. But, on the other hand, if you choose 1.1 odds for over 0.5, if no club has scored at 60 minutes, the odd could have increased to 2.9 and the more it will continuing increasing. And know that in-play matches are truly riskier.

[Lucasgabd]

risk management is a must when it comes to any style of betting
golden rules:
never bet more than what you can afford to loose.
never lose more than 3% of total portfolio in a bet.

useful for gamblers and for traders.

Betting on sports is hard but I remember a nice story about it:
once my father bet on soccer games and was checking the news channel to see the results, he doesn't usually bet, but this time was his birthday and for some reason he did it.
he was checking results one by one and when the final result appeared on tv he had won!
it was quite amazing.

it wasn't a big prize, but I remember the joy of that moment hahahahh

[slapper]

I did noticed predicting football is not easy, that is why betting company can not go bankrupted, people always stake and either gain or lose, but most people do lose. That is why we should only take betting for fun, and using only the funds that we can afford to lose to bet, and not also be addicted.


I will like you people to let us discuss about pre-match type of staking or in-play staking in football, which one did you prefer? Which one is more risky?

Of course, betting companies cant not go bankrupt. If so, there would be no place for you to put your money and have fun with your homies. The gambling industry is very strong right now and many founders have been recorded of holding more than 1 billion net worth

In my opinion, both of them have the same level of risk. It is up to you. Find a more suitable way to make your bet and remember to use your money wisely. Each person has their own edge and as long as you bet, you will find your own point where you are most confident. My suggestion: Money management can make a big impact on your portfolio. The concept of control your pocket is not really hard. Try to read some book or follow some professional sports gamblers. Surely they will give you some useful guide

[akram143]

I don't believe that more people lose in sport betting because there arr chances everyone can win a game since one person's win or lose is not going to affect other players bet.But sport betting rewards are not like casino rewards,this is stake based so no matter how much people win the rewards will be distributed based on the total amount to the winners.

[Stedsm]

I truly believe that pre-match staking is way more risky in football if we go for over/under bets for the number of goals to be made. I recently received a bet where we were supposed to bet over 2.5 goals but the teams didn't score a single goal yet and it's currently the 70th minute slot going on. I know we can have better odds if we bet live of if we just watch the match when the odds go high too much. Live betting can be much more successful in many different types of games if you know when to cashout. I love this cashout feature but it's only good if you know when to use it and well, hodl your greed aside and get out with a percentage of winnings instead of going for the full win.

[jostorres]

Not just in football but in every sport, betting isn't that easy even how knowledgeable you are.

That is right but actually in some sports you can always make better decisions based on late injury updates which sometimes the odds provider does take into consideration and update odds as fast.

betting in-play or pre-match, it's up to you what to choose.

Pre match is better because you don't use the brain too much like sometimes events happening in live can make you think and make poor bets for example someone betting on cricket might get dumbfounded when a few wickets fall and he puts money on under runs market or similarly they can make bets on over market once there is some hitting in the first few overs.

[toast]

I will like you people to let us discuss about pre-match type of staking or in-play staking in football, which one did you prefer? Which one is more risky?

i've been betting in pre-match since then and will watch the team where i place my bet. whenever i'm watching sports game i'm really on the game and i mostly forgot to place bet so i think i'm more into pre-match bettor.

[mardaed]

I think I mostly bet in a pre-match game, this might be a newbie questions does most of the existing sports betting website right now (cryptocurrency based) does support in-play betting or just some?

[Johnyz]

I did noticed predicting football is not easy, that is why betting company can not go bankrupted, people always stake and either gain or lose, but most people do lose. That is why we should only take betting for fun, and using only the funds that we can afford to lose to bet, and not also be addicted.


I will like you people to let us discuss about pre-match type of staking or in-play staking in football, which one did you prefer? Which one is more risky?

Both are risky, and it will depend on your research about the team and your strategy on betting. The house will always win because if you win the bet someone will lose the bet as well. Gambling is not easy at all same as the betting, and if you just want to have fun on betting then choose who has the highest bet and join them to at least have the peace of mind while watching the game. I do bet on pre-match staking, this is more exciting for me.

[john_nautica]

Pre-match or In-play you can't still predict it both are still risky, it's just some of us have their own preferences or maybe they have a strategy that I or we doesn't know but for me I still prefer the pre-match betting and just watch and enjoy the game no matter what the outcome of it.

[Fundamentals Of]

My bets are almost all pre-match staking. The number one obstacle for me to get involved with in-play betting is that I may not be available when the games I want to bet on is ongoing. That's my primary concern.

Another concern is that I may not have access to the games in real time. And lastly, I cannot rely on my internet connection all the time. Sometimes it is very delayed that I need to refresh the page several times before I can do my business.

[yazher]

I didn't understand your questions until I remember an event of my life where I was watching a cockfight the people were shouting to bet on the rooster who had the advantage. In-play staking might be the same at this one where you will gonna bet on the team who is about to win. but the tide might turn especially if there is more time left that's why is really hard to choose between the two staking method. I prefer pre-match staking because you don't need to watch the match at all. If you are busy, you can watch the result.

[CLS63]

Live betting has always been my favorite. You can observe what the team is doing and how the referee behaves during the match. This affects the bet you will make. I've lost so many times just because of referees.

[matchi2011]

Pre-match or In-play you can't still predict it both are still risky, it's just some of us have their own preferences or maybe they have a strategy that I or we doesn't know but for me I still prefer the pre-match betting and just watch and enjoy the game no matter what the outcome of it.

Precisely right, every gamblers have their own preferred types of betting, some might find a good strategy while picking with pre-match others have some knowledge when the game is in-play.

We can't really say what is best but we are enforce by our desire to win, sports bets are mostly knowledge based gambling where you are comparing teams or players against each others so basically we do have differences in classifying those stats.

[rijaljun]

I will like you people to let us discuss about pre-match type of staking or in-play staking in football, which one did you prefer? Which one is more risky?

Actually either of the two but mostly I am betting in a pre-match so that I wouldn't have anything in mind and just wait for the result sometimes I'm a little bit busy and wasn't able to watch the game. I think both is risky since we don't know what will be the outcome of the game or match.

[3meek]

If you bet during a match, it means that you are constantly watching the games live! I prefer to bet on matches before they start, because I don't always have time to watch them... And I'm more interested in guessing the result...

[Lanatsa]

If you bet during a match, it means that you are constantly watching the games live! I prefer to bet on matches before they start, because I don't always have time to watch them... And I'm more interested in guessing the result...

In most time where I do make out bets then betting before the match start was always my norm but there are instances where I do consider on making some live bets

when I do have sufficient vacant time for me to watch but since im a busy person due to having day stable job then its just a rare case for me to enjoy live betting.

Comparing the two on which I do prefer live ones but due to circumstances I do end up on pre-match ones.

[kamadazje]

Both of them are risky as the casino owners knows well how to adjust the odds if you are going to bet in In-play but in my case I prefer pre-match  staking as long as I have confidence to the team that I like to bet.

In sports we have a little advantage compare to cards as we can do some comparing in skills especially in football as there are teams where we can consider as better compare to other teams like they excel in individual skills or to their teamwork.

[DoublerHunter]

I did noticed predicting football is not easy, that is why betting company can not go bankrupted, people always stake and either gain or lose, but most people do lose. That is why we should only take betting for fun, and using only the funds that we can afford to lose to bet, and not also be addicted.


I will like you people to let us discuss about pre-match type of staking or in-play staking in football, which one did you prefer? Which one is more risky?

^ Regardless in play or pre-match betting would not guarantee anyone of their winnings for it is still another form of gambling and we all know that in gambling we couldn't predict when we will win or lose. However, in an in-play betting will give you a glance at how a particular team already performs during the game and you will have somehow can be more confident to whom you will place your bet but the world is still round that anytime the game may be favorable to the other team and you will still end up to nothing. Nevertheless, pre-match can be recommended to those who are confident and a loyal fan of a specific team that they would not mind their team will nail the game or lose. But any of these two might still give you the chance of winning anyway if you are fond of sports betting the ratio will still be the same 50% winning and 50% losing your money.

[7788bitcoin]

I will like you people to let us discuss about pre-match type of staking or in-play staking in football, which one did you prefer? Which one is more risky?

The pandemic has changed my way of looking at things in a different perspective and hence i would wait till the match starts before placing a bet to know the team that are playing, earlier i would not care and i would make a big parlay well in advance but things have changed and many teams who are favorites by the sportsbook are getting defeated and we had many upsets in the past 2 months and hence In play is what i play now a days most of the time.

[Ryker1]

Well, I can't conclude on which one is riskier for every game including betting has the same ratio when it comes to the result we always have half the chance of winning and half the chance of losing. But if you are in pre-match staking I supposed that you are an avid fan of a particular team for you will stake to them because -- you believe and trust on their performance and if you choose in play staking that means you are not into the team instead you are more after with betting because you will have a glance on each teams performance while the game is running before you place your bet. However, it will not be the risk of winning or losing but it depends on how you perceive the game.

[bitterguy28]

I don't believe that more people lose in sport betting because there arr chances everyone can win a game since one person's win or lose is not going to affect other players bet.But sport betting rewards are not like casino rewards,this is stake based so no matter how much people win the rewards will be distributed based on the total amount to the winners.

This is still gambling so win and lose are always available though the chance of losing is smaller compared in Luck based gambling.
so In this part we can win good if we know the game we are betting and familiar in teams and players in each team or even in single sports games.

[Ucy]

I did noticed predicting football is not easy, that is why betting company can not go bankrupted, people always stake and either gain or lose, but most people do lose. That is why we should only take betting for fun, and using only the funds that we can afford to lose to bet, and not also be addicted.
...

I would say don't get attached to your bets if you are betting based on luck or have no skill, experience or knowledge. The attachment is part of what causes the addiction. And the 'fun' is part of what get people attached or addicted. It wont be a good idea to get attached to something you are not consistently profitable in. The profits/benefits shouldn't be in prize money alone. They could also come inform of things like good knowledge and skills that's can be applied in real world or other areas of life.
When you bet, always have it in your mind that you may not be lucky... and don't bother yourself with the outcome of the bets. Bet what you can afford to lose/risk so you don't get bothered too much if you are not lucky.

[Oshosondy]

I would say don't get attached to your bets if you are betting based on luck or have no skill, experience or knowledge.

This should also be applicable to in-play matches, and even it is beyond having good knowledge about it at times, for example, the match between Tottenham and West Ham United in October 18, 2020, Tottenham scored 3 goals before the first 17 minutes at the beginning of the match, and they were still playing 3 goals to nothing at the 81st minutes. People can stake Tottenham to win the game after the 3 goals in the first half of the match, but West Ham before 82nd to ending of the game equalized and played 3-3. People that will stake such game will put high amount of money, and they just lost it. Betting at times are just luck.

[Natsuu]

I will like you people to let us discuss about pre-match type of staking or in-play staking in football, which one did you prefer? Which one is more risky?

I prefer in-play staking rather than pre-match type of staking in sports cause I would like to see the condition of the players I am betting into. I'd like to see if the player I'm rooting for in that team looks well, and active just like how I know them. Although, I know that the probability of that team winning is equal to the percentage of the opposing team winning. It still gives that satisfaction, and contentment that you place your bet based on your own decision, and principles in betting. 

For the 2nd question, Pre match type can be more risky cause they can be emergency changes in the sports that can diminish the chance of the team winning.

[Questat]

I can't choose one as I do both, I usually put a bet on pre-match, then while watching the game if I see some opportunity or value on a certain team, I would not hesitate to beet on them live, actually I have better winning rate betting on In-play or live betting.

[matchi2011]

I would say don't get attached to your bets if you are betting based on luck or have no skill, experience or knowledge.

This should also be applicable to in-play matches, and even it is beyond having good knowledge about it at times, for example, the match between Tottenham and West Ham United in October 18, 2020, Tottenham scored 3 goals before the first 17 minutes at the beginning of the match, and they were still playing 3 goals to nothing at the 81st minutes. People can stake Tottenham to win the game after the 3 goals in the first half of the match, but West Ham before 82nd to ending of the game equalized and played 3-3. People that will stake such game will put high amount of money, and they just lost it. Betting at times are just luck.

That's really annoying, when you already placed your bets thinking that the game was already finished since the score is really huge some might place bets with handicap to make something much decent.

Only to realize that shit happened when the opposing team makes a sudden comeback this really annoyed you, but no one can really dictate what possibilities can be done while betting in the live games bet.

[GeorgeJohn]

I did noticed predicting football is not easy, that is why betting company can not go bankrupted, people always stake and either gain or lose, but most people do lose. That is why we should only take betting for fun, and using only the funds that we can afford to lose to bet, and not also be addicted.

As you said that via match prediction, see, from my perspective its not really easy to predict accurately via matches which we know clearly that's gambling, assuming it's easy as everyone taught many people would have not to condemn gambling or portrays negatively about gambling in all ramifications, thousands of people Normally emphasis negatively as I said before concerning gamble, because it's obvious that it's difficult to predict it currently.

[Lanatsa]

I can't choose one as I do both, I usually put a bet on pre-match, then while watching the game if I see some opportunity or value on a certain team, I would not hesitate to beet on them live, actually I have better winning rate betting on In-play or live betting.

We would usually stick on where we do see ourselves to be that effective or profitable and same a yours I do make pre-match bets as preferred but

there are times that I do make in-plays which aren't really that often though or in some circumstances where I do see some chance for a team to win
or hitting up a line.

Its up to us but majority will be sticking with pre-match bets.