Anonymous teams

[cryptoknightt]

easy, if you doubt it then you shouldn't get involved in it. I suggest that you follow another project that you think is safe no one forces you to do it, but if the aim is to investigate the project further so that no one becomes a victim of fraud, then that is an honor.

[1715208696]

1715208696

[1715208696]

1715208696

[Mandarava]

I'm sure that 99 percent of the time the team's anonymity says only one thing - that this is a potential scam. No other factors play a role here. There are certainly some exceptions, but these are the rarest cases. Usially this is always a sign of possible fraud.

[thesmallgod]

Almost all projects are doing this except some projects that is fully registered and comply with the financial regulation of the country in which they are based. The reason for this is that many of this projects are being carried out by some team that already conducted a known project that is already dead but keeps pushing for another new projet. Some also do this with the aim of scamming investors

[yslyv]

Is it just me or what? I honestly dislike projects that have anonymous team when the project isn't a privacy Monero kinda thing, even few Privacy tokens have teams that aren't anonymous, shit I just feel like they are hidden for a purposes, some kinda easy getaway? What's your thought about this?

projects with anonymous team are mostly scam. And what the scammers can say is only showing monero project or telling bitcoin is also created anonymously. bullshit. anonymous team = possible scam.

[Sebas.tian]

Is it just me or what? I honestly dislike projects that have anonymous team when the project isn't a privacy Monero kinda thing, even few Privacy tokens have teams that aren't anonymous, shit I just feel like they are hidden for a purposes, some kinda easy getaway? What's your thought about this?

You have already answer your question: they have something not good for investors. Some projects without teams do succeed but not much does and most of them went into the dark-shortly after they mopped investors funds into their confers. Most of these cryptocurrency projects that has disappeared are likely to be operational under the scope of not disclosing their team, so, don't invest on a project which don't agreed on displaying of team publicly.

[bitbollo]

Is it just me or what? I honestly dislike projects that have anonymous team when the project isn't a privacy Monero kinda thing, even few Privacy tokens have teams that aren't anonymous, shit I just feel like they are hidden for a purposes, some kinda easy getaway? What's your thought about this?

most of the times (take a look on scam accusation board) anonymous teams have been caught scamming people
However this is not the only signal to check before trust any new product or idea. I know it can be useful but I have seen good projects even with no public team member, so this should not be the only rule to follow. Also note, scammer could launch a project with fake people or just profile created ad hoc in linkedin.

[BlackFor3st]

I definitely agree with you, 99% of the projects that have an anonymous team will likely to end up scamming the investors money or they will just abandon the project if they
already achieve their goal.

It is very easy to exit if the identity of the project creators are anonymous, so I really hate those projects that have an anonymous team even if there are very few who
become successful or still continuing their operation without any problem. As a conclusion, I hate those projects that have anonymous team and I will avoid them at all cost just
to avoid facing any problem in the future.

[Maestro75]

Don't do it, a project with anonymous team are probably scammers, team information is very vital, this is a way of knowing how capable the team will handle a project, if you can't find any information about the team then you are alone in the dark on this one, this ain't year 2012 where majority of altcoins without team still performs better

Do you think Bitcoin had the team members revealed at its inception? Till date no single person knows who Satoshi Nakamoto who is believed to have established Bitcoin is but that has not stopped Bitcoin from getting to where it is today. I do not think that not knowing team members of projects is a bad thing or a big deal.

[Sam-Os]

It depends on what kind of project it is really. If an anonymous source creates a coin that solves real problems with scalability and the code is all open sourced there's nothing to fear. But for projects that require trust in a team of people to be a success and they are anonymous, I will never risk my funds on something like that.

[serjent05]

Is it just me or what? I honestly dislike projects that have anonymous team when the project isn't a privacy Monero kinda thing, even few Privacy tokens have teams that aren't anonymous, shit I just feel like they are hidden for a purposes, some kinda easy getaway? What's your thought about this?

Well, the era of the anonymous team had long passed.  Almost all project that is proposing crowdfunding now have their team members show their identities, capabilities, and academic status.  So whenever I see a project that offers to crowdfund but hides their team identity, I get suspicious of it.  Without any identity behind a project only means that they are free to run away with the investors' money.

[kingzpro]

Is it just me or what? I honestly dislike projects that have anonymous team when the project isn't a privacy Monero kinda thing, even few Privacy tokens have teams that aren't anonymous, shit I just feel like they are hidden for a purposes, some kinda easy getaway? What's your thought about this?

I have always said this that if you have a bad feeling about a project during your due diligence phase just stay away from such a project.
This bad feeling can be due to hidden team, bad interface, incomplete website, whitepaper or roaadmap..
In the end it is your own decision but these signs can definitely save you from loss if you make the right decision.

[cryptofirm]

Is it just me or what? I honestly dislike projects that have anonymous team when the project isn't a privacy Monero kinda thing, even few Privacy tokens have teams that aren't anonymous, shit I just feel like they are hidden for a purposes, some kinda easy getaway? What's your thought about this?

for now its better to stay away to a new crypto project with anonymous team,
because most of new project with anonymous team scam now

[articlecity]

Is it just me or what? I honestly dislike projects that have anonymous team when the project isn't a privacy Monero kinda thing, even few Privacy tokens have teams that aren't anonymous, shit I just feel like they are hidden for a purposes, some kinda easy getaway? What's your thought about this?

No doubt that anonymous team is not sugegsted for a new project. Infact, most people will take it as a red flag so why would a professional project do such a thing? There are not many legit reasons to justify this. So i reckon anonymous kind of projects are mostly scams that intend to raise funds and disappear. So do report them as soon as you find such projects.

[ardentvolcanoes]

Is it just me or what? I honestly dislike projects that have anonymous team when the project isn't a privacy Monero kinda thing, even few Privacy tokens have teams that aren't anonymous, shit I just feel like they are hidden for a purposes, some kinda easy getaway? What's your thought about this?

I have always said this that if you have a bad feeling about a project during your due diligence phase just stay away from such a project.
This bad feeling can be due to hidden team, bad interface, incomplete website, whitepaper or roaadmap..
In the end it is your own decision but these signs can definitely save you from loss if you make the right decision.

You have to be more specific, if the team are hidden then who you going to blame once scam happened? there's nothing you can do so better to

avoid participating or investing to such project like that, there are many available project that have good back up teams they already developed

and established their name inside this industry, if you plan to support or invest the chance is more higher than those who are hiding.

[ije07]

it is very impossible to trust a team that is not anonymous, for me the transparency of the team in a project is of course very important, although not a full guarantee, but I know that a good project always has a good team & Dev performance and is also transparent.

[Zeehaxan]

Is it just me or what? I honestly dislike projects that have anonymous team when the project isn't a privacy Monero kinda thing, even few Privacy tokens have teams that aren't anonymous, shit I just feel like they are hidden for a purposes, some kinda easy getaway? What's your thought about this?

I think for me this makes the decision making easier. When i was very new to online business and marketing i thought why would displaying real people behind every new project matter because online it can be anonymous especially when it comes to crypto based projects but after making some loss i realized eacha nd every factor makes a difference so i try to skip a project if i get something negative or bad and i take anonymous project as a negative too.

[seleme]

it is very impossible to trust a team that is not anonymous, for me the transparency of the team in a project is of course very important, although not a full guarantee, but I know that a good project always has a good team & Dev performance and is also transparent.

I don't agree, there are many established projects with an anonymous team and their projects are on the top lists of investors. Anonymous projects also provide a privacy advantage for different types of purposes, the governments will not able to ask for the project data simply. The working product is more important rather than the known team members, if the project has a vision the rest can be done somehow. Anonymous team members can be tracked too by the state security organizations but someone should have strong evidence in order to convince the government boards.

[nelson4lov]

I'm not a fan of anonymous teams either, cus knowing the team behind a project is really important, so if a team  decides to stay anonymous, then it's better not to invest in such project, investing in project with an anonymous Tema is just like giving a stranger a huge some of money and expecting it back, there's no way that's going to happen, cause the strange would definitely run away with your money, and there is no way you can trace and get back your money, so always avoid investing in projects with anonymous teams it's as good as throwing away your money.

[24Kt]

it is very impossible to trust a team that is not anonymous, for me the transparency of the team in a project is of course very important, although not a full guarantee, but I know that a good project always has a good team & Dev performance and is also transparent.

I don't agree, there are many established projects with an anonymous team and their projects are on the top lists of investors. Anonymous projects also provide a privacy advantage for different types of purposes, the governments will not able to ask for the project data simply. The working product is more important rather than the known team members, if the project has a vision the rest can be done somehow.

Only few projects with anonymous teams are still alive today. But most new projects employing anonymous teams are created to collect money for their pockets. A lot of them disappear into thin air once they got their funds. Though there are still few of them that really do achieve their objectives without disclosing their identities but you need to watch out also about their development plans.

[MCobian]

I will also immediately avoid projects with anonymous teams, because legit projects usually have a real team and show their faces
and social media links. So we can see the project team's profile, because choosing projects with an anonymous team is very risky.
The possibility of these projects scams is very large, after all I cannot accept any reason for projects with anonymous teams.