I guess bounty hunters really kill projects

[Darktongue]

Youengine tokens volume is still thousands of dollars, how can this tokens price be a stable rate? The Liquidity pool is still in zero for some exchanges. Without volume, we saw that several exchanges got listed in the top list of coinmarketcap. I have the best exchange that price must be pumped after finishing all of these bounty tokens.

[nomenclatur]

You just realized that bounty hunters can throw away all their tokens and can make the price fall because they sell them simultaneously and it becomes a problem. The price will definitely be even worse if all bounty hunters throw away all their tokens, the bounty manager should distribute youc at 3 part so Youc prices did not fall as they are today however prices have fallen. So far, I have also followed the Youc signature tokens and are still holding on until now.

[Botnake]

You just realized that bounty hunters can throw away all their tokens and can make the price fall because they sell them simultaneously and it becomes a problem. The price will definitely be even worse if all bounty hunters throw away all their tokens, the bounty manager should distribute youc at 3 part so Youc prices did not fall as they are today however prices have fallen. So far, I have also followed the Youc signature tokens and are still holding on until now.

Even a small dump would already make the project bad, thing is, no one is buying and you cannot just blame it all to the bounty hunters as there are investors who take advantages of the bonuses or discount, hence, it's easy for them to dump right away as long as they make a small profit.

Problem is, they blame it all to the bounty hunters.

[aryana42]

Bounty hunters - just workers, they earn salary for promoting, how salary for workers could kill the project?? Projects team in the beginning must calculate how much they can pay for promoting!

Yes, bounty hunters are just a promotion worker on every bounty project, but I also feel surprised that in the previous post I made you say that the bounty participants are killers, but in this post you have said something else, which is the truth.  

[Vaskiy]

Projects never gets killed by bounty hunters. The allocation for bounties compared to other promotions were very small.

Bounties gave big earning in the past, now most of the bounties go unused. In few bounties I received the rewards, weren't able to trade through exchanges. Many have experienced it, and this way bounties never kill projects. Bounty hunters are just a part of promotion and they spread the word about the project.

[simpelplan]

It's no wonder dumping comes irregularly when a project is just launched or the coin is listed on the exchange and bounty hunters have already acquired tokens that bounty hunters can sell, though not all. but bounty hunters have always been associated like that.

[prosperoustop]

Bounty hunters - just workers, they earn salary for promoting, how salary for workers could kill the project?? Projects team in the beginning must calculate how much they can pay for promoting!

Yes, bounty hunters are just a promotion worker on every bounty project, but I also feel surprised that in the previous post I made you say that the bounty participants are killers, but in this post you have said something else, which is the truth.  

I think each project should not only pay for promotion, but give away for free for its own success, this is the only way to create a trading volume and attract professional traders

[prosperoustop]

Bounty hunters - just workers, they earn salary for promoting, how salary for workers could kill the project?? Projects team in the beginning must calculate how much they can pay for promoting!

true, surely the project team has considered the allocation given to the bounty hunter, and of course the team has another strategy so that the price doesn't fall when the bounty hunters sell their coins, actually what kills the project is not the bounty hunter, but the investors, because investors get a very large bonus, and sometimes when they get a profit they will sell immediately

of course, only investors have a large package of tokens, not bounty hunters. I heard that some projects specifically do not affect the price after the bounty distribution, so that investors and bounty hunters would sell their tokens cheaper

[Lanatsa]

Bounty hunters - just workers, they earn salary for promoting, how salary for workers could kill the project?? Projects team in the beginning must calculate how much they can pay for promoting!

true, surely the project team has considered the allocation given to the bounty hunter, and of course the team has another strategy so that the price doesn't fall when the bounty hunters sell their coins, actually what kills the project is not the bounty hunter, but the investors, because investors get a very large bonus, and sometimes when they get a profit they will sell immediately

of course, only investors have a large package of tokens, not bounty hunters. I heard that some projects specifically do not affect the price after the bounty distribution, so that investors and bounty hunters would sell their tokens cheaper

Investors are the main killers but bounty hunters do always took the blame when the price had dumped after such distribution without even thinking that
the main sellers or dumpers are the investors itself.

Project survival will always vary or depend on projects potential because even if it suffers from dump it will still eventually recovers afterwards.

If the project does really have relevance and actual utility then it will surely be considered by other investors later on and that what make it pumping.

[layoutph]

Dont blame the bounty hunters, remember there are also private investors and investors in this YouEngine project. They might afraid so they sell at loss their tokens prior to bounty hunters dump.
The secret to have a strong token is to have a strong buy wall that will prevent bounty hunters and fomo investors from dumping the coin.

[Astvile]

Its a big no for me. Considering how low the budget allocation for bounties it is not enough for bounty hunters to totally kill the project they are just putting the blame onto them when their coins price goes into failure after their ICO. Instead I see bounty hunters are the ones who are helping the project be successful.

[Inkdull]

Lame teams with bad projects that have bad use case  will surely go around putting blame on bounty hunters for their failure but who really deserves the blame? I believe it's bounty hunters themselves, why promote projects with too many competitors? When new project teams aren't professionals things will go side ways

[rahmatullah9305]

It's no wonder dumping comes irregularly when a project is just launched or the coin is listed on the exchange and bounty hunters have already acquired tokens that bounty hunters can sell, though not all. but bounty hunters have always been associated like that.

It's actually not worth associating like that because the hunters only get a very small amount of coins, so even though almost all of the hunters are selling at the same time, it has little effect on the coin price.

[malikg18]

It is not totally due to Bounty Hunters. Bounty and Project Team are also responsible of this dump.You quoted good Example but Now Youc is recovered. Bad example of this is P2p which was around 200+ satoshi before bounty distribution but now it is trading 5-10 satoshi only.Bounty/project team should manage this and give reward in parts ,they also should active by posting in social media about trading and try to list in more exchanges.

[iamaruf]

Why always blame bounty hunters? can you tell why YOUC trade volume is low? even under 1btc trade volume in 24 hours. Actually, the project is not good enough that's why YOUC is down. Youc team made the budget of 4Million USD for bounty. I think the price totally depends on project. If the project is legit then no one can dump the price.

[loopes]

Bounty hunters - just workers, they earn salary for promoting, how salary for workers could kill the project?? Projects team in the beginning must calculate how much they can pay for promoting!

true, surely the project team has considered the allocation given to the bounty hunter, and of course the team has another strategy so that the price doesn't fall when the bounty hunters sell their coins, actually what kills the project is not the bounty hunter, but the investors, because investors get a very large bonus, and sometimes when they get a profit they will sell immediately

of course, only investors have a large package of tokens, not bounty hunters. I heard that some projects specifically do not affect the price after the bounty distribution, so that investors and bounty hunters would sell their tokens cheaper

Investors are the main killers but bounty hunters do always took the blame when the price had dumped after such distribution without even thinking that
the main sellers or dumpers are the investors itself.

Project survival will always vary or depend on projects potential because even if it suffers from dump it will still eventually recovers afterwards.

If the project does really have relevance and actual utility then it will surely be considered by other investors later on and that what make it pumping.

Since i entered to this forum about 2016, the big dump will always occurs by the bounty hunters, almost all of the new project start up feel that. But some start up project can survive with the dump from bounty hunters but the rest others receive a bad significant affect that their price of the coin got drooping down. They who can survive had a big enough volume, big community, and promising project so the bounty hunters from their project have incentive and intention to hold the payment of bounty.

[maartenhaha]

Why always blame bounty hunters? can you tell why YOUC trade volume is low? even under 1btc trade volume in 24 hours. Actually, the project is not good enough that's why YOUC is down. Youc team made the budget of 4Million USD for bounty. I think the price totally depends on project. If the project is legit then no one can dump the price.

The trading volume is smaller than the bounty budget allocation then not only Youc, but all projects will experience the same in that condition. It should not be distributed to 2-4 stages according to the progress of the bounty stage because that is more to defend the market from selling bounty hunter tokens.

[fileo]

I personally think you are wrong as well as because do you know how much budget for bounty hunters? its only 2 or 3% of total budget -snip-

It is true, bounty hunters only have a very small number of the tokens. Commonly, the allocation is only around 0.5% - 1%, lower than you stated above. How they can dump the price for a long time? Furthermore, not all bounty hunters sell their tokens after the distribution happens. Some of them decide to hold or keep the tokens to dream of selling at a bigger price in the future. With this fact, OP shouldn't blame the bounty hunters for the dumping price of YOUC lately. Even if bounty hunters really sell their tokens, the dump won't last a long time.

Yea, hunters are just the one whom they blame without a real proof they did dump where at the first place it is impossible that hunters can dump the price in small percentage of tokens they had received. Maybe hunters just triggered the decline but they are not the reason why dump. There are traders and manipulators behind the scenes of buy and sell scenarios. I think we should not always think hunters are the one to be blame in dump.

When Bitcoin dump to $8,000 few months ago can we say Hunters are must to be blame??
NO, of course.
Actually, hunters are just victims of wrong perceptions when the price of the token dump.

[MadeMen]

There's no doubt that the dump must have been caused by bounty hunters because a whole lot of the tokens was distributed to hunters and since the bounty ran for four rounds, some persons would get so much more tokens and them dumping would affect the value of the token. In my opinion, the developers should be able to forsee and strategically distribute the tokens to reduce the impact of dumping.

[viananda2525]

There's no doubt that the dump must have been caused by bounty hunters because a whole lot of the tokens was distributed to hunters and since the bounty ran for four rounds, some persons would get so much more tokens and them dumping would affect the value of the token. In my opinion, the developers should be able to forsee and strategically distribute the tokens to reduce the impact of dumping.

dont be wrong, bounty allocation only less than 2 percents from total token even some of bounty campaign using fix token payment each weeks.if bounty hunter sell their reward it doesnt mean they dumped their token , dumped only happen if major token holders sell their token that caused by many reason. for example dev team didnt bring their project to reputable exchanges , and deliver useless product.