No Voter Fraud: International Monitors Praise US Election

[squatz1]

Doesn't really matter what the vote totals are anymore. The results are going to be certified at the end of the week or early next and the Trump legal team, like utter incompetent dumb fucks, are going on TV talking about how much evidence of voter fraud there is without, ya know, showing the damn evidence.

I wasn't actually mad at the election results rather than disappointed, but seeing Trump's lawyers going on Fox News convincing their rabid viewers that their sitting on a bombshell without actually releasing it makes me overly bitter. You have less than 10 days before it's completely over and the results, no matter what, can't be changed once the states certify the results. Lawsuits take time. Release the damn evidence instead of going on Fox.

Yup. This is exactly what is going to happen. They're going to go on TV and complain about it, retweet false claims all over social media and confuse the hell out of their voter base that believes every single thing that they say and will not do any of their own investigations into the matter.

But all of that is strategy in a way. The Trump legal team knows they're not going to get anywhere and all of this is being done to ensure that Trump is still the leader of the GOP even after he has left. He knows he still wields a MASSIVE amount of power within the party and is going to try to utilize that to raise money and then make politicians beholden to his world view and his policy view.

Press conference was today with Rudi Guliani and some Powell(?) lady who apparently represented Michael Flynn iirc.

Of course, nothing meaningful came out of the press conference and they floated around voter fraud without showing evidence.

The hair dye dripping down his face was entertaining.



Since then 3 more lawsuits have gone up in smoke (GA, AZ and PA).  I think that's 20 now?

But all of that is strategy in a way. The Trump legal team knows they're not going to get anywhere and all of this is being done to ensure that Trump is still the leader of the GOP even after he has left. He knows he still wields a MASSIVE amount of power within the party and is going to try to utilize that to raise money and then make politicians beholden to his world view and his policy view.

He's also raising quite a bit of money off the whole fraud fraud.

Heh, yeah. All of this money that is being raised is going to a NEW PAC that Donald Trump just founded. Pretty sure it's a leadership PAC, which is going to allow him to use the money how he sees fits on ensuring that 'Trump people' continue to win Republican elections. Here's some info on that - https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/09/us/politics/trump-pac.html

Seems like Trump wanted to try to court some Michigan members of the state legislature in an attempt to have them appoint electora that would support Trump instead of Biden, who won the state, but that was cancelled b/c of a COVID Exposure - https://www.axios.com/trump-giuliani-white-house-michigan-covid-abbbbcf3-e415-4d9d-8911-427be7b645b1.html

[JollyGood]

Rudy Giuliani looks like a man possessed, almost like something out of The Exorcist  

Those big eyes are just a distraction to take the conversation away from the incoherent fairytale stories that he reads when standing in front of an audience explaining without any real evidence how the election was rigged.

[TwitchySeal]

I do suggest you listen to the various lying cunts of the manufacturing of post modern right think.

Why am I reading this in an English accent?

[Spendulus]

I do suggest you listen to the various lying cunts of the manufacturing of post modern right think.

Why am I reading this in an English accent?

Ah, a True Fabian?

[Searing]

All the evidence that is tossed out on voter fraud..is never really evidence.

It is news  of someone saying they have evidence it seems, but, never actually delves down to the evidence...then this fades

and then new evidence or rinse/wash/repeat

Ok...gonna go with an actual way/timeline here, in this order.

As an example of someone 'saying' something as news, but without any real verifiable or legal facts to the level to have investiaged

sent to a court of law and rising to the level of legal facts...well, not. But the news is stated in a way that IF so and so or Trump or

whoever simply 'says' something is so, you are left with the impression that the news is factual.

https://www.waynedupree.com/2020/12/georgia-dominion-forensic-audit/

I should be fair above however the most of this news source simply reported on what the representative said was the facts..not the facts themselves. Below is along the

the same theme, it has to be backed up in court with more than supposition, and even if some equipment did not work or some other flaws,

it has to rise to the occasion of

changing 1st the votes in the county, or beyond. So far the FBI has said no fraud rises to that level by AG Barr. Anyway, an example of reporting what someone says as a

the fact just based on them saying such.

Sure it may be news but seems like yelling fraud everywhere until it actually is the case someplace. But it has to meet the criteria of 'actual fraud by intent' and or 'legal

facts for a court or prosecution' by legal means. Then even if shown to be worse of above..has to rise to the level to reverse the election. The last point, if all the same

equipment and the rest were used in the very close 2016 election does that also mean using this logic..that the 2016 election needs to be re-looked at as well. The quote

below is also news, but news based only on what the person says, with no evidence provided. https://news.yahoo.com/roger-stone-claims-north-korea-053809333.html

Then of course as 'above' article or the statement is shown to be in 'error' 3 days or so later. Suddenly a new 'fact' stated by someone to take its place.

So it goes rinse/wash/repeat

Brad