ICO, IEO! Which one do you want to return again?

[Ratash]

If i had to choose between these two i prefer ieo' s because there is less scam risks and there is less possibility for the coin to be dumped if its in the right exchange and it will help you decide if the project is a good one to invest in.

[ScamViruS]

I don't want IEO or ICO or any other name to come back. I just want a good project that grows back, because whatever the IEO / ICO fundraising method is or whatever if the project is bad it won't be successful.

This is an important. Nowadays it is not easy to trust anyone, it becomes difficult to understand if the exchanges in which IEO is launched are involved in a bad project. A lot of ieo has come in the market at the moment, it remains to be seen how many of these projects have actually been developed with people's money. If we check, we will find a few projects that are doing development, and the rest are asleep. The crypto community should look for good projects and support those projects.

[Innocant]

In the past year I must choose ICO you why many project that has been totally succeed and I earn enough participating some project it have and a lot of potential coins shown up with a high price but until many days has come some people doing some ICO project to doing scam from investor so that's why the ICO project has have a bad record on that time. If I choosing on which I want to comeback or return ICO will be the best.

[Questat]

if I have to choose then I will choose IEO but it is done in large eexchange, why do I choose IEO? because it is safer in investment, ICO is too many scammers and bear in mind that ICO will not be as beautiful as 2017

The question is when they return, if ICO would return in a different way, the better ICO then I guess ICO would still be better.

IEO is no doubt better than IEO due to the fact that it's done in exchanges where exchanges doing their part to evaluate the IEO project they'll accept, so the risk is lesser but the market is already big, more projects are always welcome so we can choose a quality projects, which some projects although quality failed to succeed since they lack budget to get listed in big exchanges.

[Twinkledoe]

Creating new concepts means increasing the amount of scamming in new ways. I think i had to come back to invest in IEO.

- You know ICO had a lot of success at a time where investors weren’t disappointed, but a few days later a lot of scam ICOs were invented where investors lost a lot of their money.

- In the same way, many projects run by IEO got a lot of response at first but later they did not last long.

Again at this point in the same way Defi has created excitement where investors were smart at first time by making more profits but that is now where the scam scheme has grown and i don't think this concept will matter much anymore.[b/]

What do you mean by return again? I mean all these fundraising methods and up and live and i do not think that they were stopped anytime.
It is just that these methods lost hype after market went into a downtrend and now as market is recovering we can expect some recovery for new projects as well but now community is more careful and selective to avoid scams.

Yes, they don't need to return because up until now, there are still projects holding these types of crowdsourcing, IEO/ICO. If you also look here in the forum, in the ANN/Tokens boards, you will see that a lot are still doing their ICO/IEO to raise funds. But only few of them can actually raise enough funds as most investors were already burned by so many crap projects. So they don't need to return, because they are still existing. 

[BChydro]

I am not going to pick them all back. I hope they will be packaged together, which results in an even better system in the following years. I think that will definitely happen when you look at the situation in the last few years.

To be frank i do not want to see any of these to return like the way it did, i was happy to see the initial stages and i was rooting for them but the difficulties in controlling the scams and the ability to push the projects that were good and died off eventually because none of them progressed and the investors lost the money while the developers kept the money. If there is a strict regulation to monitor these then it would be great.

[Viscore]

ICO and IEO, there is no far difference the both of them. If they are good to be true, if they are consistent with what they have said, both of them are welcome to turn back IMO. But that is something different as their past show up had already marked failure and negative which people aren't confident to trust them back and put their money on.

I know that some good ICO and IEO left around but what the others do to the crypto space is feeds people's mindset to think and approach differently when we are talking about them.

[TopT3ns]

ICO and IEO, there is no far difference the both of them. If they are good to be true, if they are consistent with what they have said, both of them are welcome to turn back IMO. But that is something different as their past show up had already marked failure and negative which people aren't confident to trust them back and put their money on.

I know that some good ICO and IEO left around but what the others do to the crypto space is feeds people's mindset to think and approach differently when we are talking about them.

I think both of them have very far differences and of course IEOs can be better than ICOs because by working together from several trusted exchanges it will make IEOs successful and can sell out quickly, after that they can enter the exchange so immediately there is interaction between buyers and sellers at the exchange and can have high trading volume, this very fast process is preferred by investors than using ICO method which has too long process.

[MCobian]

I am one of the people who felt the profit from ICO when the trend was in 2017, but in the end there were too many scams on the ICO project.
And there is a trend of IEOs that are safer than ICOs, but in 2020 IEOs are starting to be less attractive, because DeFi projects are much more
profitable. So it's not a good idea to make ICOs and IEOs back again. There will always be new trends emerging in the cryptocurrency world,
we just need to move on to the latest trends to survive in the cryptocurrency world.

[Fakhrulenclix]

Creating new concepts means increasing the amount of scamming in new ways. I think i had to come back to invest in IEO.

IEO is the best of all, but still at risk. No guarantee your investment will success and profitable for you

There is no safe way in cryptocurrency, you can be scammed in all ways, but we can reduce the risky by choosing the top coin. Deciding to invest in ICO or IEO is your choice but you should prepare yourself

[NewRanger]

one thing that must fullfilled were safety and profit probability, in which scheme this condition will meet. in ICO i am still affraid if this project will be scamm and we loss our money here, although its not all project but previous accident must be experienced for us.look at binance launchpad , this is be most profitable place to invest our money in IEO. all IEO there gain profit when traded in exchange.

[lionheart78]

No matter what kind of crowdfunding a project use whether it is an ICO, IPO, ITO or IEO, investors should do their diligent research towards the project, project creator, administrators and their capabilities.  No matter how successful the funding is if the people behind the project is not capable, it will always turn into a failure worst an exit scam.

[sulendra12]

It doesn't matter which one we would like to return again, the problem is not the system but the owner who runs this system.

• Do you know who makes ICO died and make ICOs reputation really bad? The scammers!
• Same thing with IEO, the scammers make it really worse.

It ruins the investors interest and make people don't want to even try to invest again, if there is a way to actually decrease the scammers population and then this world would be great, but it's nearly impossible to make it real.

[kevinzxz]

Creating new concepts means increasing the amount of scamming in new ways. I think i had to come back to invest in IEO.

- You know ICO had a lot of success at a time where investors weren’t disappointed, but a few days later a lot of scam ICOs were invented where investors lost a lot of their money.

- In the same way, many projects run by IEO got a lot of response at first but later they did not last long.

Again at this point in the same way Defi has created excitement where investors were smart at first time by making more profits but that is now where the scam scheme has grown and i don't think this concept will matter much anymore.[b/]

I also thought if I should invest in IEO again, because in my opinion IEO are the best way to invest in new cryptocurrency project and of course IEO have many advantages, that is :
1. Investing in IEO is very easy and fast;
2. Coin are definitely listed on exchange without having to wait a long time;
3. Most project from IEO already have a product and that makes it safer to invest in new project.

[Ayiranorea]

IEO gave huge return in a very short time period, but ICO on the other side gave a big growth with during the previous bull market. Without doubt I prefer ICO over IEO, because I kept investing over ICO and finally I wasn't able to benefit out of it. So once again I wish those days to come again and profit out of the same. I don't prefer IEO, because I try to invest when it gets launched through different exchanges. Myself used to keep on waiting, and never got an opportunity to buy.

[2double0]

<<>>

When you have already described the types of projects that took place under various categories, my answer is the same like almost every single loyal user of Bitcointalk will say - we do not need any of them back in our lives. ICOs - total shit ones were pumped up during bull run and then dumped down following btc crash, IEOs - almost the same situation but the difference was that they were being launched at exchanges, Defi - was never worth it as it was already there but it just caught fire because of the heat in the name Defi and those newly added terms which were already there but we were made familiar with these new terms like something new has been added. Defi tokens are (and will be) the biggest failures of all these categories.

[FinneysTrueVision]

We don't need any more new coins. Instead we should be reducing the amount of useless tokens that are out there. If somebody thinks they have a really revolutionary idea then maybe they should work on trying to implement it on an existing cryptocurrency network instead of trying to print money out of thin air. The get rich quick mentality is why most projects fail. Their developers have no motivation left to keep improving their product once they've cashed out and they just move on to the next project with a pre-mined token.

[kpierce77]

No matter what kind of crowdfunding a project use whether it is an ICO, IPO, ITO or IEO, investors should do their diligent research towards the project, project creator, administrators and their capabilities.  No matter how successful the funding is if the people behind the project is not capable, it will always turn into a failure worst an exit scam.

yes that's right, the most important thing is to do your research before investing. but we also have to know that the crowdfunding procedure is also quite important and must be considered, for example, IEO, not all exchanges are able to crowdfund as well as binance launchpad, right? so like that, every aspect is quite important to consider

[JeffBrad12]

No matter what kind of crowdfunding a project use whether it is an ICO, IPO, ITO or IEO, investors should do their diligent research towards the project, project creator, administrators and their capabilities.  No matter how successful the funding is if the people behind the project is not capable, it will always turn into a failure worst an exit scam.

In fact some of that crowdfunding like ITO, IPO being used by so many scam projects and these kind of crowdfunding have almost 100% scam projects. The only way to do crowdfunding has proven how reliable it is just only ICO and IEO.
That matters a lot consider when IPO has a very bad reputation and almost none of successful project happened from there and people must not choose it as a way to participate or bet on it.
We must see the old history of crypto.

[bussybuddy]

Creating new concepts means increasing the amount of scamming in new ways. I think i had to come back to invest in IEO.

- You know ICO had a lot of success at a time where investors weren’t disappointed, but a few days later a lot of scam ICOs were invented where investors lost a lot of their money.

- In the same way, many projects run by IEO got a lot of response at first but later they did not last long.

Again at this point in the same way Defi has created excitement where investors were smart at first time by making more profits but that is now where the scam scheme has grown and i don't think this concept will matter much anymore.[b/]

I won't want to go back. Obviously there were a lot of people making a lot of money from IEO, ICO or DeFi and there were also a lot of people who lost money. But i think these are just trends that appear in the market to attract people to it, and what has passed, i think in the future we will have more new trends and this market will day by day grows bigger and is known by many people.