ICO, IEO! Which one do you want to return again?

[manfredmann]

ICO, Though that IEO was once a good form.of crowdfunding but we know that the relatives good number of projects being created by the ICO are several. This means that ICO contributed more on what market has now with cryptocurrency. It is a good form actually of crowdfunding but it just need a little bit of regulation because scammers are abusing it.

[Salauddin1994]

ICO, IEO will go back to these projects the market needs to be closely monitored and then determined most of the projects are scammed even if they perform well in the beginning they are not able to rise very high due to lack of sufficient knowledge. This is why research should be done before joining from IEO to ICO the projects are much more risky the demand for these is much higher most traders choose the ICO project to join.

[SyndicateLabs]

We that every time these new concepts appear, the market grows very strongly, this is the way to attract money from outside to the market. Personally, i have gone through the above concepts, i like IEO because it is the safest compared to other forms, and you know that IEO on binance, okex, huobi, ... all have a very high ROI. As for Defi, i am also a bit disappointed by the exaggeration in the market, I think this is not the real time for DeFi to explode and everything is getting started, please wait for the next time we will see more new ways of attracting money from this market.

[plr]

I don't want any of these two, these two cause investors to lose a lot of money and they gave the Cryptocurrency a bad reputation because of the many developers running with investor's money, it's better that they create their platform and put their token in the market and promote their trading pair among investors.
 

[poodle63]

ICO  and IEO are both still in use and is jus that recently people prefer to participate in IEO because of guaranteed exchange listings. With the recently success of Uniswap now I can see ICO coming back with full force as long as you are able to build a strong community around your project

I dont agree personally I think ICO market will be stagnant like the current condition and there will be some new method to replace ICO. IEO exist to prevent from exit scam or nonexistent coin listing but they are not really effective anymore since people always expect instant money and they failed to deliver that recently. It's actually will always be like this hype first realization later and both of them actually still alive until it's just swept under your radar maybe.

[unusualfacts30]

Creating new concepts means increasing the amount of scamming in new ways. I think i had to come back to invest in IEO.

- You know ICO had a lot of success at a time where investors weren’t disappointed, but a few days later a lot of scam ICOs were invented where investors lost a lot of their money.

- In the same way, many projects run by IEO got a lot of response at first but later they did not last long.

Again at this point in the same way Defi has created excitement where investors were smart at first time by making more profits but that is now where the scam scheme has grown and i don't think this concept will matter much anymore.[b/]

Objectively speaking, I think most people here would say ICO due to it timing when it happened during last bull season and many of them were very successful at least in the short term. IEO are not any different, problem with IEO is that investors don't get all their tokens at one time so many hold back from investing, but in theory there is less chance of dump. Success of the project is not dependent on being ICO or IEO but their vision and how much work they are putting into it.

[FairUser]

Let me tell you this, around the time that i just started learning about blockchain, there was a new ICO at that time, i don't know if there were other concepts before to attract people, but i noticed that the early days when the 'trending' came in it was very successful and the ROI was huge, i have seen x100 ICO projects and many people will make a lot. money, or people who have lost money. In general, this process is still going on, it is neither good nor bad for me, it makes this market stronger as it attracts more people to learn about this market.

[shoreno]

there is no perfect concept in the space so except that every new concept there will always be new scams but that scams can be controlled just like what ieo did .

there are still ieo but idk why its fame died down so fast when infact ieo is much better than the ico and defi because lesser scams are only being reported , ah i know , maybe because ieo is more controlled and there can be less hype/pump for the coin because of that . you knew them , those investors they want more easier pumps  .

[Maestro75]

I would prefer ICO because most of the time IEO are instantly filled up. ICO back then is powered by the community while IEO its the whales that are buying the token.

Who told you that whales did not buy in ICOs? Whales will always buy in any project that can make them money. The same way they buy in IEOs is the same way they buy in ICOs. In fact they made buying ICOs very difficult for investors who have few cash to throw around as they took up buying space and make traffic heavy on those sites. Anybody buying ICO is exposing himself to a bigger risk than those on IEO.

[culuuton]

I would prefer ICO because most of the time IEO are instantly filled up. ICO back then is powered by the community while IEO its the whales that are buying the token.

The whales participates in all projects as long as they can manipulate the prices of coins. They don't give up their ability to make large sums of money, ICOs or IEOs can't limit them.

[Strongkored]

As far as I remember, I have never invested in IEOs, only ICOs.
There was also my investment in ICO which ended up being ashes, forgetting exactly how much BTC was turned into ash because investing in ICO.
If I have to choose then I choose ICO, but from experience, if I have to choose I'm prefer to save BTC,ETH and a couple Altcoin better than invest in ICOs.

[taufik0911]

what I like is IEO especially if the IEO is implemented in binance because usually the IEO there has a good price and can give me short-term profit
for now ICO in my eyes is not good because ICO is very easy to do and the risk is too big

[restuibu]

I prefer IEO because we don't have to worry about exchanges besides that we don't have to wait long, if an ICO we have to wait months to see the tokens traded

[Eddyc]

ICO because the great success of Ethereum derives from this great event and market adhesion and it is worth remembering that most of the projects found at Binance are ICOs and in relation to the topic we can consider ICO as an IPO in the real life of shares of large companies and the level of collection was huge. However, ICO, IEO, DeFi are just a marketing style to bring investors to an initial project that has potential. However, the vast majority does not leave the paper and remains only in illusion.

[blckhawk]

Well if I gotta choose I'll go with ICO simply because there's a lot of good ICOs way back then they are a truly worthy investment. I'm not saying that IEO isn't that good but take a look at the difference, ICO runs a lot longer than IEO. In fact, if ICO doesn't get infiltrated by scammers pretty sure that this will bring more investment and that could cause hype in the crypto industry. Thought the good sides of IEO is that you don't need to wait for the coin to be get listed on exchanges, unlike ICO and that is what I like about IEO.

[(o)(o)ilikeboobs(o)(o)]

I want to go back to ICOs because it's more popular and good for everyone to participate in them. We do not need to hold a large number of exchange tokens like IEOs. It can be said that ICOs are more equal and have more positive effects. The problem is that going back to an ICO is unlikely to skyrocket when people are smart enough to stay away from poor quality projects.

[lunnatic]

both are good systems but must be with provisions, such as ICO must have legality,
and IEO must be held at the top exchanger, otherwise it is still useless,
because there are many scammers there,

[Chrystora123]

snip..

You have already explained that both ICO and IEO have the same potential to be a scam/useless.  I feel safer when joining (investment or bounty programs) in the IEO, although in the end the IEO tokens/coins are likely to be useless but the losses can be much less than the ICO..

[DU18]

If I have to choose between an ICO and an IEO, of course I would prefer to invest in an IEO, because the risk of fraud on an IEO project is smaller than what happens in an ICO, because obviously IEOs are managed by crypto exchanges on behalf of projects that seek to raise funds with tokens that are just released the project. Because the token sale is carried out on an exchange platform, of course the crypto project must pay the IEO fee so that in this case of course the exchange will not be careless in collaborating with a crypto project that is indicated as a scam because this will certainly damage the reputation of the exchange later, even though IEO can be a fraud, but I don't think the risk is as big as that of an ICO project.

[Spaffin]

Perhaps it is the ICO that is easier and more accessible for the developers themselves to implement their project, since IEO is accompanied by a lot of difficulties. But nevertheless, if IEO is implemented on a rating cryptocurrency exchange, such as binance, then there are still great chances that the project will indeed have further development and will not turn out to be a fraud.