ICO, IEO! Which one do you want to return again?

[ningrum]

In terms of fund safety I prefer IEO, because it is guaranteed by the exchange,
but the ICO is not guaranteed or there is no third party, IEO is better than ICO, in my opinion.

[istiak2277]

IEO is still very popular so why you said gone! An IEO in Binance is highly demandable that's why we have seen they required to fill many criteria and conditions to join an IEO. But I think bonding curve sale is much more effective. There will be no fixed price and token price will go up the more token has been sold. Buyer can sell their token if they want to at the same time.

[Baimovic]

many investors have lost faith in ICOs, so if the project developer wants to attract more market investment, look for any way to restore investor confidence first. Because it is indeed not an easy thing to restore investor confidence or interest back, but now investors are certainly more careful and know better what is good or not to put their money in it.

[Kelvinid]

many investors have lost faith in ICOs, so if the project developer wants to attract more market investment, look for any way to restore investor confidence first. Because it is indeed not an easy thing to restore investor confidence or interest back, but now investors are certainly more careful and know better what is good or not to put their money in it.

it was hopeless and I don't think also that ICO or even IEO are still welcome.
TBH, none of them giving such valuable in time and the efforts that investors getting through into trusting and investing them.

The bad experience that it brought back with these two projects, makes them not to like it but much preferred to have a new one which it gives assurance.
Not ICO or even IEO will make please to the people, if that one of them would like to get back, better not to happen because probably the expectation won't make good and appreciated. It's dying end again.

[JeotQ]

ICO are now less attractive to investors because of scam projects but IEO is still more reliable than ICO because of top exchanges but lately there isn't any new promising upcoming IEO crowdfunding simply because there are no new projects available right now, I still like IEO more than ICO because a third party (top exchanges) is available to take full responsibility

[Questat]

ICO are now less attractive to investors because of scam projects but IEO is still more reliable than ICO because of top exchanges but lately there isn't any new promising upcoming IEO crowdfunding simply because there are no new projects available right now, I still like IEO more than ICO because a third party (top exchanges) is available to take full responsibility

Do they really take full responsibility? I think when a big exchange accept and IEO, they will demand a fee from the project but they are not in control of the project, so if it will be scam afterwards, a big exchange cannot undo that, but of course we can always take legal action as a big exchange will always ensure they will get the information of the teams who compose the project.

Sometimes, I think big exchange do hype a certain project, so we can't just easily trust and blindly invest on a certain IEO because it's listed in big exchanges.

[Jocuserious]

I still prefer IEO to ICO. No much scam was performed with IEO and you can trade the token you purchase. Just that the ieo hype has gone low.

Yes, if we look at scam, IEOs are still lower than the scam that occurs in ICOs, but scam in IEO is much more dangerous than ICO, because if you are deceived in IEO, you will experience huge losses, and this is clearly different from scam that happens inside the ICO.

A big advantage for IEO is that you can know in advance what the amount of funds of the project is because if they can enter the top exchange because to enter the top exchange you have to provide there have lot of funds power. There are also reliable guidelines that you can easily sell the token in the future. However, the number of such projects is constantly declining because defi has now taken its place as a new concept in the competition.

[suparigach]

ICO is better than IEO. If ICO is successful in a good way, Tokens / Coins are likely to be listed in a good market and give a good profit to their investors. But in the market where IEO is done, the price is very good. When IEO is purchased at the price at which the IEO is finished, it cannot be sold at that price. So ICO is better than IEO.

[zaim7413]

ICO is better than IEO. If ICO is successful in a good way, Tokens / Coins are likely to be listed in a good market and give a good profit to their investors. But in the market where IEO is done, the price is very good. When IEO is purchased at the price at which the IEO is finished, it cannot be sold at that price. So ICO is better than IEO.

Historically what has happened, yes an ICO is better than an IEO because it can be seen from the point of view that the profits are very multiplied, but from the perspective of the exchange, sometimes ICO projects can only be listed in an intermediate exchange, only one or two projects are able to make listings on the exchange are great.

[kayvie]

I prefer no one. What happened in the past will remain as past. We should not hope for ICO or IEO to return since the history will do happen again. What this community need is something new that can filter every project, I know this seems impossible for now andscammers will always be around, but to choose between ICO or IEO to return, that is something that we should hope for.

[gurunanakji777]

In my opinion, ICOs were more successful than IEOs and Defi. I want ICOs should back again like in late 2017 where most of the projects were successful and investors/bounty hunters also made good money in that time period. The main thing is trust should be developed again for ICOs.

[zaim7413]

currently the return is ICO, because Defi is back in hype, then the ICO will also be hype again,
many ICOs from the Defi project have been successful, this is good and remain careful.

What do you think if the DeFi and ICO systems are combined into a project, will that result in a good project and can make everyone lucky? if so, it is very necessary to try out by project developers for the next year.

[Ziskinberg]

currently the return is ICO, because Defi is back in hype, then the ICO will also be hype again,
many ICOs from the Defi project have been successful, this is good and remain careful.

What do you think if the DeFi and ICO systems are combined into a project, will that result in a good project and can make everyone lucky? if so, it is very necessary to try out by project developers for the next year.

Combining it is not good, ICO will only ruined the hype of the DeFi, so no team that understands the current situation would do that as it will only result to a failure of their project, just frankly speaking.

[harapan]

of course I want an IEO because in my opinion IEO on top exchanges can still filter out real projects and this is very helpful for investors, while no one in ICO controls it and makes it easy for scammers to do ICO

[nrvasquez]

currently the return is ICO, because Defi is back in hype, then the ICO will also be hype again,
many ICOs from the Defi project have been successful, this is good and remain careful.

What do you think if the DeFi and ICO systems are combined into a project, will that result in a good project and can make everyone lucky? if so, it is very necessary to try out by project developers for the next year.

Combining it is not good, ICO will only ruined the hype of the DeFi, so no team that understands the current situation would do that as it will only result to a failure of their project, just frankly speaking.

ICOs are prone to scams. DeFi is better when compared to ICOs, although defi still has many shortcomings in terms of technology. Although currently there are several projects that are still carrying out ICOs, I am sure that investors will choose a safer path and more can increase their confidence in investing

[Kezacky]

many IEOs fail for several reasons and mainly The only problem affecting IEO is projects that are not able to afford top exchanges, IEOs that are happening on top exchanges are all fine especially those from binance exchanges, ICOs are still a thing today but only high-quality projects have the courage to use ICOs to raise funds, IEOs will last a long time.

[Freescan]

IEOs and ICOs are just as risky, but If I had to choose between the two, I would prefer the top IEO in the market because there is less risk of fraud compared to ICOs. The IEOs listed on Binance are successful and have attracted more market investment as well.

[Josefjix]

IEOs and ICOs are just as risky, but If I had to choose between the two, I would prefer the top IEO in the market because there is less risk of fraud compared to ICOs. The IEOs listed on Binance are successful and have attracted more market investment as well.

Almost everyone on the the topic voted for the return of ICO in case we are trapped to choose either of the two but you. The reason might be the only successful ones who were able to get listed on Binance and thrived. I personally would go for ICO I don't have much explanation but, it actually lifted a lot of capital invested with little or no losses at all.

[hulla]

IEOs and ICOs are just as risky, but If I had to choose between the two, I would prefer the top IEO in the market because there is less risk of fraud compared to ICOs. The IEOs listed on Binance are successful and have attracted more market investment as well.

Every investment is risky but IEO still provides a little investors protection while some are not (although that also depend on the exchange where the IEO is held) cause exchange Binance usually collect some certain amount of fund from project owner which will serve as investors protection incase the project team exit. However, this also doesn't guarantee the project prosperity because the project concept and community support is also needed.

[kramchers]

ICO is better than IEO. If ICO is successful in a good way, Tokens / Coins are likely to be listed in a good market and give a good profit to their investors. But in the market where IEO is done, the price is very good. When IEO is purchased at the price at which the IEO is finished, it cannot be sold at that price. So ICO is better than IEO.

IEO bun with a good start with Binance but in the long run it was turned into bad result where the scammers also came up there using IEO, in what way? via exchange that are not good in the market where they're most of the coins list on the shitty exchange ended up into a dead coins something like that.