Who cares about the wallet functionality of ledger live?
Stupid question.
Please elaborate.
Trezor app actually works on something and not only on shitcoins like ledger
Ledger supports about 26 coins and more than 1500 tokens.Trezor supports 1631 cryptocurrencies.
Not that big of a difference.
and Trezor actually care about people privacy with integrating Tor switch.
Tor can't be integrated into a hardware wallet.
It has to be integrated into the interface used to interact with the hardware wallet and the internet.
Wasabi automatically uses the tor network. And electrum also offers the option to connect via tor using your hardware wallet (both ledger and trezor).
Electrum and wasabi are definitely better and more recommendable than ledger live or the trezor web application.
They will also add Coinjoin in next year (something ledger can only dream about)
CoinJoin is also something which can't be implemented into a hardware wallet properly.
It is being implemented into the interface.
Wasabi offers CoinJoin with the ability to deposit onto hardware wallets.
CoinJoining from hardware wallets isn't as easy since the transactions havve to be signed in a timely manner. This would mean a person has to sit in front of the hardware wallet all the time waiting for a small time window to press a button.
I understand that you for some reason hate on ledger and try to praise trezor.
But the fact is that the trezor wallet does have an unfixable architectural vulnerability.
I feel like your aren't technically versed enough to make a competent decision on which wallet is "better" or "more secure". No offense tho.