Is live betting better than betting in advance?

[kryptqnick]

I've been experimenting with betting for some time, but I must admit that I consistently avoid live bets. It's very annoying to me that the odds are changing fast, and that while placing a bet you're likely to see the odds changing again right in front of you, and then you have to accept the new ones before you can proceed. I also prefer to bet in advance because it gives more time to think and make calm informed decisions, whereas live bets put additional stress to the process, and I believe it makes the choices more emotional rather than rational. Then again, it might become way more obvious who's going to win the match after it started because you've already seen how the teams are doing today.
I placed a small low-risk live bet on Sportsbet.io today to see through the process, but I don't think I'll change my habits:

What about you? Do you prefer live bets or not? Why?

[RokokGudangGaram]

It depends on the bettor some bettors are good with in game or live game and some bettor are good when betting in pre match game, since not all bettor could analyze the game pretty well in live game also in live game it could be risky in my opinion.

[Smartvirus]

Live nettings seems better than betting in advance. That's because, live bets gives you the chance to use the gaming statistics at that point to know which team is having the upper hand at the games at that particular time and the odds are often increased when one side isn't winning already but then, it always because bad when one team is winning but, it offers another advantage which is, the chance to bet huge on a small odd and have some valuable profit but should you loose, it's going to be huge as well.
Again, live bets puts your emotions directly on the line because, you become restless untill the final whistle is blown. It's left for you to choose as a gambler which you can manage more excellently. Despite the advantages a live bet has got, I still prefer betting in advance. Your more settled making predictions that way.

[Taskford]

I've been experimenting with betting for some time, but I must admit that I consistently avoid live bets. It's very annoying to me that the odds are changing fast, and that while placing a bet you're likely to see the odds changing again right in front of you, and then you have to accept the new ones before you can proceed. I also prefer to bet in advance because it gives more time to think and make calm informed decisions, whereas live bets put additional stress to the process, and I believe it makes the choices more emotional rather than rational. Then again, it might become way more obvious who's going to win the match after it started because you've already seen how the teams are doing today.
I placed a small low-risk live bet on Sportsbet.io today to see through the process, but I don't think I'll change my habits:
What about you? Do you prefer live bets or not? Why?

People have different answers to this since there are different scenarios came that's why sometimes we select advance betting and live betting but I think there's no better on this since I think the outcome is the same if we are lucky or not, also the game result will still random even though how good you are in analysis.

But if you are easily get hook with your emotions I think the best thing for you is do the live bets since for me this is much better.

[perla]

I'm into quick profit so I would go with the live betting though if you are betting in advance the odds of the game is way more better than the live betting games. But on the other hand you could easily bet on live games.

[Sanitough]

I think so, live betting is fun because you are watching the game so you can find a good opportunity to bet.

Bookies will not be able to adjust the odds easily because they are not watching the game, but us gamblers can see what's going to happen and we can find that as a value so we will bet on it. For example, a superstar in one team is fouled out, the betting odds will not react right away as it's only calculated based on the scores, so that's the advantage I'm talking about.

[Mauser]

I think life betting is much slower and will result in lower winnings for us because we are restrained to one bookie. We need to go there in person and place the bet, come back to pick up our winnings or place new bets. When betting online it's much faster and we can compare a bet across multiple sites who offers the best odds. When I started out in the bettin world I used to gamble only on the national and world cup in football. I wasn't aware that betting can be done online much cheaper and faster so I always went to the bookie in my city. It was a very shady place with some wierd people hanging out so I didn't really enjoy it so much.

[Yudhisthir]

In my experience, the odds are best beforehand the match.
The in game betting reflects the current situation of the game and is highly volatile. The reward is much lower when you are betting on the winning team which would have been much better in pre-match. But if you still believes your player/team is going to have a comeback, than in game betting could be suitable.

[kkaroul4]

I'm placing bet during pre match and live match. Sometimes if you are lucky even if you placed wrong bet on prematch you can still recover it by placing bet on live game but sometimes you could double your losses it's a little bit risky to do.

[Russlenat]

If you are so confident that your team would win, pregame bet is best suit for you.

In my experience, I only do live betting on games that I can watch, I don't have a lot of time to watch games but I do put a lot of bets on the game available, and that is from different sports.

I think pregame or live betting both provide advantage to bettors, but the hard task here is to find that advantage.

According to what I read, it says find the value and you'll win, and betting on limited number of games is well recommended to find a value, may it be on live betting or in pre game betting.

[Darker45]

There are advantages and disadvantages in both life betting and betting in advance.

However, take this situation for instance. Suppose you are very much convinced that Team A will win over Team B because, as you've said, sometimes it is very obvious which team will come out the winner. One way to bet on your team with higher odds and therefore bigger profit is to bet live. You wait for that exact moment when the opposing team is ahead by some points or appears to be keeping up with the other team's performance and place your bet.

[DabsPoorVersion]

It depends on the bettor,

If they have the same thought as you who hates seeing the odds changing fast in front of you then betting in advance is better because you have enough time to think. But for us who prefer live betting because we can actually see the movement and analyze it on the spot before proceeding on betting, live is better.

[Finestream]

Actually there are bettors who are not comfortable in watching the game when they are betting, so they will not do a live betting. There's no statistics that says bet on live betting and you have a better chance of winning, everything I read is just all about the right bankroll management and study a certain match before putting a bet.

Now,  based on my personal experience, live betting would only make you lose more sometimes if you don't control your emotion because if you are seeing that your team is losing, you might continue to chase betting on them regardless of the odds available.

[celot]

I've been experimenting with betting for some time, but I must admit that I consistently avoid live bets. It's very annoying to me that the odds are changing fast, and that while placing a bet you're likely to see the odds changing again right in front of you, and then you have to accept the new ones before you can proceed. I also prefer to bet in advance because it gives more time to think and make calm informed decisions, whereas live bets put additional stress to the process, and I believe it makes the choices more emotional rather than rational. Then again, it might become way more obvious who's going to win the match after it started because you've already seen how the teams are doing today.
I placed a small low-risk live bet on Sportsbet.io today to see through the process, but I don't think I'll change my habits:

What about you? Do you prefer live bets or not? Why?

I dislike with live betting because odd change suddenly and during we put our choose for betting we see odd ration have been change, better before match starting you should put your betting and become most favorite way how to get good odds than we put betting during game have been starting, maybe you can try when match for soccer have running about twenty or thirty minutes you will see how different odds before you put betting before match start, I very angry when put betting during match running or live betting because always change before success put my betting and have clear all my betting than put again.

[alegotardo]

I also like to bet in advance.
Analyzing the lineups, the performance of the teams in the championship up to that moment and their weaknesses help me to determine which team is more likely to win.

However, we all know that this only a 50% chance of getting it right, so I don't dispense additional bets in the course of the game.

It's also common to sell my position to the site before the game is over and use part of the profit to place more risky bets towards the end of the game.

Well... I'm a terrible gambler, usually lose money so I bet only for fun even what I am willing to lose ... it is never to earn money, however desirable.

[STT]

Live bets are the best odds often I see but you have to be confident in the result.   If the favourite starts off strong and goes from low pay off to almost certainity in terms of odds then you wont ever get a chance but if the favorite team falters and live odds give you a nice result to back them then you have a greater opportunity for watching live then just laying down a bet days before.  Its probably going to make up more time and it requires patience and resolve to not panic I guess; its paired to the cash out option I guess so companies gains something from this.

[samcrypto]

Betting in advance is more exciting I think and you really have to do your effort to analyze the match and of course if you bet live, I assume that you have your study in advance before going to the match. I don’t know what’s better on this two, only the bettor can tell and it will also depend on how you handle things in gambling.

[angrybirdy]

Betting in advance is better, I can make bets after I have done with analyzing and doing research about the team that I am betting. Unlike in live bets, odds is changing, after placing your bet it changes again which will make you think again which team to choose, it gives me a hard time choosing the team I will be betting.

[lifeOK]

At your first impression your first thoughts possibly it's good idea to bet on pre match but sometimes it could be crucial and that's point you're in serious dilemma cause betting in live match gives you higher odd. I have blend feeling and it relies upon circumstance much of the time. There's much more advantages and reasons why you should use live betting.

[Oshosondy]

Both live betting and prematch are good, but learning and knowing how to analyze the matches before betting will be good, having single bet while not betting frequently will be good. What can make betting not to be good is addiction, having a single bet at ones be it live match or prematch are both good. But as for me I prefer live matches.