Is live betting better than betting in advance?

[kryptqnick]

I've been experimenting with betting for some time, but I must admit that I consistently avoid live bets. It's very annoying to me that the odds are changing fast, and that while placing a bet you're likely to see the odds changing again right in front of you, and then you have to accept the new ones before you can proceed. I also prefer to bet in advance because it gives more time to think and make calm informed decisions, whereas live bets put additional stress to the process, and I believe it makes the choices more emotional rather than rational. Then again, it might become way more obvious who's going to win the match after it started because you've already seen how the teams are doing today.
I placed a small low-risk live bet on Sportsbet.io today to see through the process, but I don't think I'll change my habits:

What about you? Do you prefer live bets or not? Why?

[1715614302]

1715614302

[1715614302]

1715614302

[1715614302]

1715614302

[1715614302]

1715614302

[1715614302]

1715614302

[RokokGudangGaram]

It depends on the bettor some bettors are good with in game or live game and some bettor are good when betting in pre match game, since not all bettor could analyze the game pretty well in live game also in live game it could be risky in my opinion.

[Smartvirus]

Live nettings seems better than betting in advance. That's because, live bets gives you the chance to use the gaming statistics at that point to know which team is having the upper hand at the games at that particular time and the odds are often increased when one side isn't winning already but then, it always because bad when one team is winning but, it offers another advantage which is, the chance to bet huge on a small odd and have some valuable profit but should you loose, it's going to be huge as well.
Again, live bets puts your emotions directly on the line because, you become restless untill the final whistle is blown. It's left for you to choose as a gambler which you can manage more excellently. Despite the advantages a live bet has got, I still prefer betting in advance. Your more settled making predictions that way.

[Taskford]

I've been experimenting with betting for some time, but I must admit that I consistently avoid live bets. It's very annoying to me that the odds are changing fast, and that while placing a bet you're likely to see the odds changing again right in front of you, and then you have to accept the new ones before you can proceed. I also prefer to bet in advance because it gives more time to think and make calm informed decisions, whereas live bets put additional stress to the process, and I believe it makes the choices more emotional rather than rational. Then again, it might become way more obvious who's going to win the match after it started because you've already seen how the teams are doing today.
I placed a small low-risk live bet on Sportsbet.io today to see through the process, but I don't think I'll change my habits:
What about you? Do you prefer live bets or not? Why?

People have different answers to this since there are different scenarios came that's why sometimes we select advance betting and live betting but I think there's no better on this since I think the outcome is the same if we are lucky or not, also the game result will still random even though how good you are in analysis.

But if you are easily get hook with your emotions I think the best thing for you is do the live bets since for me this is much better.

[perla]

I'm into quick profit so I would go with the live betting though if you are betting in advance the odds of the game is way more better than the live betting games. But on the other hand you could easily bet on live games.

[Sanitough]

I think so, live betting is fun because you are watching the game so you can find a good opportunity to bet.

Bookies will not be able to adjust the odds easily because they are not watching the game, but us gamblers can see what's going to happen and we can find that as a value so we will bet on it. For example, a superstar in one team is fouled out, the betting odds will not react right away as it's only calculated based on the scores, so that's the advantage I'm talking about.

[Mauser]

I think life betting is much slower and will result in lower winnings for us because we are restrained to one bookie. We need to go there in person and place the bet, come back to pick up our winnings or place new bets. When betting online it's much faster and we can compare a bet across multiple sites who offers the best odds. When I started out in the bettin world I used to gamble only on the national and world cup in football. I wasn't aware that betting can be done online much cheaper and faster so I always went to the bookie in my city. It was a very shady place with some wierd people hanging out so I didn't really enjoy it so much.

[Yudhisthir]

In my experience, the odds are best beforehand the match.
The in game betting reflects the current situation of the game and is highly volatile. The reward is much lower when you are betting on the winning team which would have been much better in pre-match. But if you still believes your player/team is going to have a comeback, than in game betting could be suitable.

[kkaroul4]

I'm placing bet during pre match and live match. Sometimes if you are lucky even if you placed wrong bet on prematch you can still recover it by placing bet on live game but sometimes you could double your losses it's a little bit risky to do.

[Russlenat]

If you are so confident that your team would win, pregame bet is best suit for you.

In my experience, I only do live betting on games that I can watch, I don't have a lot of time to watch games but I do put a lot of bets on the game available, and that is from different sports.

I think pregame or live betting both provide advantage to bettors, but the hard task here is to find that advantage.

According to what I read, it says find the value and you'll win, and betting on limited number of games is well recommended to find a value, may it be on live betting or in pre game betting.

[Darker45]

There are advantages and disadvantages in both life betting and betting in advance.

However, take this situation for instance. Suppose you are very much convinced that Team A will win over Team B because, as you've said, sometimes it is very obvious which team will come out the winner. One way to bet on your team with higher odds and therefore bigger profit is to bet live. You wait for that exact moment when the opposing team is ahead by some points or appears to be keeping up with the other team's performance and place your bet.

[DabsPoorVersion]

It depends on the bettor,

If they have the same thought as you who hates seeing the odds changing fast in front of you then betting in advance is better because you have enough time to think. But for us who prefer live betting because we can actually see the movement and analyze it on the spot before proceeding on betting, live is better.

[Finestream]

Actually there are bettors who are not comfortable in watching the game when they are betting, so they will not do a live betting. There's no statistics that says bet on live betting and you have a better chance of winning, everything I read is just all about the right bankroll management and study a certain match before putting a bet.

Now,  based on my personal experience, live betting would only make you lose more sometimes if you don't control your emotion because if you are seeing that your team is losing, you might continue to chase betting on them regardless of the odds available.

[celot]

I've been experimenting with betting for some time, but I must admit that I consistently avoid live bets. It's very annoying to me that the odds are changing fast, and that while placing a bet you're likely to see the odds changing again right in front of you, and then you have to accept the new ones before you can proceed. I also prefer to bet in advance because it gives more time to think and make calm informed decisions, whereas live bets put additional stress to the process, and I believe it makes the choices more emotional rather than rational. Then again, it might become way more obvious who's going to win the match after it started because you've already seen how the teams are doing today.
I placed a small low-risk live bet on Sportsbet.io today to see through the process, but I don't think I'll change my habits:

What about you? Do you prefer live bets or not? Why?

I dislike with live betting because odd change suddenly and during we put our choose for betting we see odd ration have been change, better before match starting you should put your betting and become most favorite way how to get good odds than we put betting during game have been starting, maybe you can try when match for soccer have running about twenty or thirty minutes you will see how different odds before you put betting before match start, I very angry when put betting during match running or live betting because always change before success put my betting and have clear all my betting than put again.

[alegotardo]

I also like to bet in advance.
Analyzing the lineups, the performance of the teams in the championship up to that moment and their weaknesses help me to determine which team is more likely to win.

However, we all know that this only a 50% chance of getting it right, so I don't dispense additional bets in the course of the game.

It's also common to sell my position to the site before the game is over and use part of the profit to place more risky bets towards the end of the game.

Well... I'm a terrible gambler, usually lose money so I bet only for fun even what I am willing to lose ... it is never to earn money, however desirable.

[STT]

Live bets are the best odds often I see but you have to be confident in the result.   If the favourite starts off strong and goes from low pay off to almost certainity in terms of odds then you wont ever get a chance but if the favorite team falters and live odds give you a nice result to back them then you have a greater opportunity for watching live then just laying down a bet days before.  Its probably going to make up more time and it requires patience and resolve to not panic I guess; its paired to the cash out option I guess so companies gains something from this.

[samcrypto]

Betting in advance is more exciting I think and you really have to do your effort to analyze the match and of course if you bet live, I assume that you have your study in advance before going to the match. I don’t know what’s better on this two, only the bettor can tell and it will also depend on how you handle things in gambling.

[angrybirdy]

Betting in advance is better, I can make bets after I have done with analyzing and doing research about the team that I am betting. Unlike in live bets, odds is changing, after placing your bet it changes again which will make you think again which team to choose, it gives me a hard time choosing the team I will be betting.

[lifeOK]

At your first impression your first thoughts possibly it's good idea to bet on pre match but sometimes it could be crucial and that's point you're in serious dilemma cause betting in live match gives you higher odd. I have blend feeling and it relies upon circumstance much of the time. There's much more advantages and reasons why you should use live betting.

[Oshosondy]

Both live betting and prematch are good, but learning and knowing how to analyze the matches before betting will be good, having single bet while not betting frequently will be good. What can make betting not to be good is addiction, having a single bet at ones be it live match or prematch are both good. But as for me I prefer live matches.

[Maslate]

I can't answer that because I don't see an advantage where I win most of the time when betting on live betting.

Most of my bets are advance betting, that made me relax while watching the game, the thing is when you are doing some live betting, sometimes it makes a bettor so stressful as everyone point matters a lot. I also remember when I bet on a certain team in basketball where it gives +3.5, then my team go behind with more points, so I took another live bet at +7.5 then so on.. and still end up a loss, I learn that I should just let it go and focus on the next game rather than chasing odds in just one game.

Live betting requires a gambler to learn how to control his emotion, otherwise it will wiped out all his bankroll.

[zidanw]

I really don't do a live betting since for me it's really risky to place bet on it also i'm not really comfortable since every time the odds changes and it could be really risky.

[ampere]

Betting live matches and also in advance are two unique ways to win in gambling; and there are no distinct differences from them both. For advance betting; you have enough time to research and find out about the game before staking your gamble. But for live betting (especially if you are watching the match), you are able to predict even far more correctly the outcome in the next minutes; half time, or even predict a gamble on the next goal scoring team.

Finally; it depends on the individual and attained skill in gambling.

[Becky666]

I'm into quick profit so I would go with the live betting though if you are betting in advance the odds of the game is way more better than the live betting games. But on the other hand you could easily bet on live games.

For quick profit as you said; live bet seem the best IMO. The odds of the advance game bet and that of the live bet are somehow interesting, live bet odds are just too good for anyone who want to bet on single game with high odds but the advance bets seem less IMO, though this depend  absolutely on gambling platform. Personally, i love the live bet game than advance bet becasue through the live bet anyone can somehow easily determine the scores or how the game is likely to end, though it depends on luck too.

[khaled0111]

Bookies will not be able to adjust the odds easily because they are not watching the game, but us gamblers can see what's going to happen and we can find that as a value so we will bet on it. For example, a superstar in one team is fouled out, the betting odds will not react right away as it's only calculated based on the scores

That's not always true. If you try to make an in-play bet you will notice that the odds keep changing and if you select two or three events it will be almost impossible to place your bet without instantly accepting the new odds proposed by the bookie. Bookies rely mainly on third party services to feed them with real-time data which allow them to adjust their odds accordingly.

Personally, I prefer live betting because I don't like to wait too long to see if I won or not and because it makes watching the match more entertaining but I don't bet on more than one or two events at the same time.

[TGD]

Live has disadvantage and advantage. Its good to bet during live when you are confident to the team you are betting. You can bet on handicap bet that favorable to your team to the time when they are behind score because you can guarantee that they recover soon before the game ends, In that case. You will have an advantage on getting better odds compared when you bet in advance.

The only disadvantage is the time pressure since the bet change every seconds/minute. You might experience panic and you can't analyze properly your bet.

[thisappointed]

It depends on the bettor some bettors are good with in game or live game and some bettor are good when betting in pre match game, since not all bettor could analyze the game pretty well in live game also in live game it could be risky in my opinion.

Correct. Betting in live game will just give you crumpled decisions that will lead to future losses. Analyzing a game is a must, knowing the possibility of chances of a certain team in winning by using the information they have like watching the past videos of a game in sports to have solid decision on where to bet and how much bet they will risk.

[wildan88]

Live betting can also mainly be for the players who want quick action and see whether their bet has won or lost.
If you place a bet at a football match before it has started, you have to wait at least 2 hours before there is a clear result. With Live betting it can be a lot faster, sometimes in 2 minutes.
With point betting even faster, but whether that is wise to bet on is another question.

[fiulpro]

Hello
This is something that is dependent on the person who is using it. If the person is more comfortable and can make informed decisions under the pressure then they should ofcourse go to the "live betting".
On the other hand , if the person is actually very fragile when it comes to changing decisions fast then he should now engage in such cases, if would just make them more frustrated and likely to fail.
I don't think anyone here should go for bookies since we have to pay them money 💰 , their commission and at the same time when you can access all the things already through internet.

[death69]

Well, it is your opinion. There are still many people love live betting. It is more fasicinated to them or might be they just need more information to make a decent decision

I dont have much time to watch live match and make a bet. Therefore, i prefer betting in advance. It is much faster and i dont have to worry much about the results.

[Fredomago]

Both live betting and prematch are good, but learning and knowing how to analyze the matches before betting will be good, having single bet while not betting frequently will be good.

Knowledge about the games are big advantages, it's gives you the right timing in picking the team of player to bet with, analysing and weighting the possiblities. High chances in winning if you understand the game and what are the hints that let you to pick one over the other.

What can make betting not to be good is addiction, having a single bet at ones be it live match or prematch are both good. But as for me I prefer live matches.

Inside live betting, you'll be able to analyze well, though odd are changing from time to time. The good catch is you are well capable knowing which is which is having the advanate if you know the game and you really paying attention from each advantages that your choosen pick have between the opposing team/player.

[robelneo]

I've been experimenting with betting for some time, but I must admit that I consistently avoid live bets. It's very annoying to me that the odds are changing fast, and that while placing a bet you're likely to see the odds changing again right in front of you, and then you have to accept the new ones before you can proceed. I also prefer to bet in advance because it gives more time to think and make calm informed decisions, whereas live bets put additional stress to the process, and I believe it makes the choices more emotional rather than rational. Then again, it might become way more obvious who's going to win the match after it started because you've already seen how the teams are doing today.
I placed a small low-risk live bet on Sportsbet.io today to see through the process, but I don't think I'll change my habits:

What about you? Do you prefer live bets or not? Why?

It's on the user's experience and preference, some bettors who are good in the analysis do betting in advance and then just challenge their bet if it's going to win, those who are not good in the analysis are good in live betting, they know how to time their bet on who's going to win, both preferences need skills.
I prefer advanced betting, so I can concentrate on the performance of the team I bet and enjoy watching at the same time, live betting takes away the enjoyment of watching.

[GrinZ]

The point I pay attention to in live bets is to watch the match and get a goal bet. My personal opinion is always basketball betting is more fun than live football betting. These issues should always be viewed in terms of entertainment and should stay away from ambition.

[imstillthebest]

im not really into sports but seeing you and other comentors makes me visualize that live betting are more thrilling .

if we can used a carnival rides as example , the live betting will be a roller coaster and the advance betting is a carousel .

 if your a person that seeks for more thrill , live betting can be a good match to you but for a person that are not that brave enough to face more thrills he is fine with non live bets .

[Furious 7]

Live betting can also mainly be for the players who want quick action and see whether their bet has won or lost.
If you place a bet at a football match before it has started, you have to wait at least 2 hours before there is a clear result. With Live betting it can be a lot faster, sometimes in 2 minutes.
With point betting even faster, but whether that is wise to bet on is another question.

I think live betting is very thrilling, especially in my favorite football, I will bet every match because it will be more challenging than other bets.
Look, we will know the results faster, how the bookie announces it, we also know what they like every time there is a match that is taking place, always enthusiastic to keep betting on their respective choices so live betting will be preferred more than the usual.

[Mahdirakib]

I have good knowledge about few games and team. I like to place advance bet when the sports event and team is fully known to me. And I prefer live bets while I don't have much knowledge about any team. By watching the game for a while I place bet at low odds in live events. It gives me much confidence. Though the profit become low but it gives higher possiblity to choose the winning team correctly.

[GrinZ]

The point I pay attention to in live bets is to watch the match and get a goal bet. My personal opinion is always basketball betting is more fun than live football betting. These issues should always be viewed in terms of entertainment and should stay away from ambition.

Unfortunately for sports betting in the field of basketball it is not very attractive to me because the very fast movements will make it even more difficult for me to guess the score, whereas in other sports I still have pretty good potential to predict the team's victory.

My advice for live basketball betting, the second quarter will be total number bets, usually teams can score numbers that can be surprised if the game structure is fast in certain quarters. As a result of my analysis, it is usually the second and third quarters in which the fast teams score a lot. If the basketball game structure is not suitable for you, it would be better to get used to another game structure.

[smyslov]

Those who are good in analysis will prefer advance betting and those who wants excitement and and believe in their hunch will go for live betting there is excitement in live betting because it requires quick thinking and right timing in putting up a bet, OP should put a poll on this one since it's an interesting topic to see the effectiveness of both option.

[Oceat]

So there you go people choose different betting style based on their preference, some may bet in advance because they are certain that the team they were chosen will win. But, of course, the chances of winning is not really 100% but it's higher chance than losing. While others choose to bet in live because they aren't certain who's going to win and this is mostly what I should do if in doubt.

[Lordhermes]

Those odd changes are one of the disadvantage of placing live bets both you have to accept it.
I have really love live betting because I followed it with strategy that works out for me.
-I start placing bets at 75' minutes to end and my bet option to play then, is to pick a particular team and predict them not to score again till match finishes.
-Also I used higher stakes for smaller odd during live betting, this helps boast your balance if the bet goes well.

Live bets opens up the weakness of a team and gives a bettor better ways and opinion to place bets, never play live bets without checking statistics, because that's the real and actual hints to place good live bets.

[FontSeli]

~
What about you? Do you prefer live bets or not? Why?

I generally prefer not to make a live bet, because I usually only watch the matches of my favorite teams and I want to enjoy the game, not constantly look at the bookmaker's website and wait for the moment when you can bet with a good odds.
If I'm betting on my favorite teams I know, I do so long before the match.

[abhiseshakana]

The point I pay attention to in live bets is to watch the match and get a goal bet. My personal opinion is always basketball betting is more fun than live football betting. These issues should always be viewed in terms of entertainment and should stay away from ambition.

But for some people, live betting on basketball is more difficult to predict than football. Basketball involves a lot of substitutions and there are some coaches who have a strategy by sacrificing 1-2 quarters so that their core players can get time to recover or intentionally rest their star players in the early quarter.

The strategies and the substitution patterns adopted by each coach make live betting on basketball difficult to predict. So to be able to get a good chance to win the bet, the bettors must have good analytical skills and can predict the strategies that will be carried out by the team s/he supports.

[FIFA worldcup]

I've been experimenting with betting for some time, but I must admit that I consistently avoid live bets. It's very annoying to me that the odds are changing fast, and that while placing a bet you're likely to see the odds changing again right in front of you, and then you have to accept the new ones before you can proceed. I also prefer to bet in advance because it gives more time to think and make calm informed decisions, whereas live bets put additional stress to the process, and I believe it makes the choices more emotional rather than rational. Then again, it might become way more obvious who's going to win the match after it started because you've already seen how the teams are doing today.
I placed a small low-risk live bet on Sportsbet.io today to see through the process, but I don't think I'll change my habits:

What about you? Do you prefer live bets or not? Why?

I personally also believe that betting in advance is a piece of mind only if you are winning. In case your team is losing, you would never be in a clam state.
Live betting is more technical in nature but it can give you better results since you can change your decisions based upon the team performance in the current match.

[Bttzed03]

I don't often bet live. I've done that in three matches so far and it's currently 1-1 (still waiting for the Valencia vs. Atletico Madrid to finish). If given only one choice, I would still prefer betting in advance as I tend to be influenced by the rapid changes in odds in live betting. That thrill could work for others but definitely not for me.

[XZERO1]

Some of it would depend on whether you bet on a single or multiple matches at the same, if you're using multi bets then I think you can also bet while it's in the middle of the game and I don't think that will have much affect on your result, but if you're usually betting on one single game then that completely different and I agree with you since that way it can be too risky to just stumble upon a game and instantly bet on that game based on the live odds, the only exception would be when you know the teams very well already and you done some analyzes on them before and based on that you can see enough possibility of winning that makes it worth betting at that moment.

[onrise]

Depending upon odds, or match timings does not suit me then do place the bets in advance under such cases. Also, at times when have an advance bets placed still bet in between matches just on other team then my initial bet was placed because chances of winning of other team has suddenly changed or likely they may win it. So multiple different bets in same matches are also being placed.

[ecnalubma]

It depends on your mood, sometimes live betting could be fun too most specially if you have awaited the particular  match and its really more exciting than advance betting. But if you prefer a stress free betting, less excitement and don’t cost you time then definitely advance betting fits for you.

[Findingnemo]

I am kind of person who bets before the game starts but not much often because it gives the real adrenaline while watching the game, if we are going to bet in between the game is live it is going to affect the game experience and also will make us more stressed and excited which can really bad for us if the result is not going into our side.

[tippytoes]

It depends on your mood, sometimes live betting could be fun too most specially if you have awaited the particular  match and its really more exciting than advance betting. But if you prefer a stress free betting, less excitement and don’t cost you time then definitely advance betting fits for you.

Yes, it depends on your preference for the particular match. There are games that are worth waiting for live betting and some are good to bet in advance. Sometimes the odds are good if you will bet in advance, because as the match is getting near, the odds change a lil bit. So if you feel that you can take advantage of the odds pre-betting, go for it. But if you want the excitement in live betting and you have the time, live betting is fun.

[FontSeli]

I am kind of person who bets before the game starts but not much often because it gives the real adrenaline while watching the game, if we are going to bet in between the game is live it is going to affect the game experience and also will make us more stressed and excited which can really bad for us if the result is not going into our side.

Besides, if the teams among which one is clearly stronger play, the coefficient during the match may only decrease. Therefore, to bet on such matches is worth only before the matches, although then the odds are also low.

If suddenly the favorite in the match starts losing 1:0 or 2:0, how much will the odds change? Has anyone ever watched such matches? Please share your impressions.

[ChiBitCTy]

Of course live betting is not as good as betting in advanced.  I'll admit up front that I am no professional gambler.  I often make my NFL bets that Sunday morning.  I am also well aware that this is not the right way to gamble normally.  Even though this is not technically "live" betting, the point remains the same.  Gambling on football right when the odds come out tend to product the best numbers/point spreads and rewards those who do their homework and get in there early.  Live betting removes all of that pre-game advantages. 

[ReiMomo]

Pre-match betting or betting in advance are only good for people who know the performance of both opponents in a match that they can easily figure out who has the edge on the game. On the other hand for people who prefer in game betting or live betting are less knowledgeable on the team's performance for they cannot presume who will win in the match.

I often do in a game betting because real-time it gives me how both teams perform and who among them stands out and better than the other. I also agree with what OP mentioned that with live betting the odds keep changing and it is somehow stressful but on my end, I still find in a game betting more entertaining because it makes me keen on every action on both opponents

[sana54210]

I do not like live betting, it is always a bit more problematic for me, whenever I try I am either a bit too late, or too early to what I want to wager. The odds change constantly and instantly and from the moment I decide to gamble to the moment I wagered, there is a huuuge difference. In order to gamble live, you shouldn't be just watching a game and suddenly say "oh wait I should wager on this" in the middle of the game, you should have the game right there open on the sport book in order to gamble right away.

Hence with all of these in mind, I try to stay away from gambling as much as I can, it is not something I would care neither, I mean I do not gamble live but I keep gambling in advance so why should I care about live betting and why I can't do it etc etc.

[acroman08]

I've been experimenting with betting for some time, but I must admit that I consistently avoid live bets. It's very annoying to me that the odds are changing fast, and that while placing a bet you're likely to see the odds changing again right in front of you, and then you have to accept the new ones before you can proceed. I also prefer to bet in advance because it gives more time to think and make calm informed decisions, whereas live bets put additional stress to the process, and I believe it makes the choices more emotional rather than rational. Then again, it might become way more obvious who's going to win the match after it started because you've already seen how the teams are doing today.
I placed a small low-risk live bet on Sportsbet.io today to see through the process, but I don't think I'll change my habits:
-snip
What about you? Do you prefer live bets or not? Why?

I haven't done any live betting but hearing it from your experience, it does sound annoying, but I guess there are more chances(or maybe higher) of winning when doing live bets than betting in advance that is why there are people prefer it than betting in advance. and yeah, I agree that betting in advance gives me or a bettor more time to think and make calm and rational decisions than live betting.

[FontSeli]

Pre-match betting or betting in advance are only good for people who know the performance of both opponents in a match that they can easily figure out who has the edge on the game. On the other hand for people who prefer in game betting or live betting are less knowledgeable on the team's performance for they cannot presume who will win in the match.

Sometimes it happens that a weak team at the beginning of a football match manages to score a goal and the coefficient can immediately be in its favor. However, this does not mean that this team will necessarily win.
If a person does not understand teams, then I would recommend that they do not make any bets at all, because this will be a bet not based on knowledge, but a bet based only on luck.

[Twinkledoe]

I'm not a fan of live betting, it's just not for me. It's too much stresful and demanding, it's not easy to predict situation and make fast decision. I preferre gambling in advance and I guess most of gamblers will say the same.
But if you like thrill and excitement you will probably chose live betting.

Same here. I haven't done live betting yet. I can't handle the adrenaline rush in live betting.  But I think it is fun if you are up for it. Betting in pre-match is already exciting for me, how much more in live betting?

[iv4n]

I'm not a fan of live betting, it's just not for me. It's too much stresful and demanding, it's not easy to predict situation and make fast decision. I preferre gambling in advance and I guess most of gamblers will say the same.
But if you like thrill and excitement you will probably chose live betting.

Same here. I haven't done live betting yet. I can't handle the adrenaline rush in live betting.  But I think it is fun if you are up for it. Betting in pre-match is already exciting for me, how much more in live betting?

As you said live betting have some adrenaline rush, especially if you watch the game and you think some player will score in next minutes, or some team will wake up and turn the game in their favor... literally anything can happen on the filed, and you are watching and betting on that!
For me it's just for fun, I don't think about it seriously, I can spend a few bucks, but never too much! When it comes to higher bets I like to make them in advance, of course you can prepare better!