"50% to funding individuals or NGO's"
What kind of NGO's you are planning to fund? Did you decide in what area, e.g., politics, rights, food supply?
I can support you if you choose stuff with real-life usage in the current situation like food supply/shelters, etc.
Politics are excluded. They have enough money and never serve people directly. Religious affiliations would also be excluded, as there shouldn't be a tie to religion if you are trying to help someone, meet them on their own terms. Example is building a school which is amazing, but there isn't a need to have religious studies as requirement in the curriculum. That is my humble opinion.
It essentially would be decided by the group, but food supply, water supply, shelters, healthcare, water purification, renewable electrification, education and maybe even innovative R+D for low cost solutions. At least those would be the things I personally would vote for.