AdkinsBET's reputation. Is something wrong?

[AB de Royse777]

Few days ago I was invited by Steamtyme to share my thoughts on a scam accusation on this topic. The moment I saw it's against a bookie I had double mind (the reason is the bad experience I had when I stood up against sportsbet.io, we even had a team to investigate the case, I hope you all will read this topic) but I read the accusation and also the responses from the users in it.

I am not specifying any name but responses from most of the users did not make much sense to me in fact surprisingly I felt most of these users were giving their all to stop the accuser (yes there are some other few users who are also taking against AdkinsBET). They were angry, pissed, in bad mood against the accuser. Since I was trying to figure out the case, I was doing my things and ignoring what other's said but looking for the response that was from their official which is user AdkinsBET. According to AdkinsBET the accuser's bets and accounts were valid and they also confirmed that the accuser has nothing to do with the group of scammers. If all these are fine then what was wrong and not to pay him?

Later another user explained me the reason. And as a summary I understood that the accuser accused AdkinsBET to have some "paid dogs" in the forum to defend them and this damaged their image badly so they denied to pay the accuser. Anyway, AdkinsBET later changed their mind and paid the user, accusation solved. Happy ending.

Question remains - do you seize your clients money just because they get bad tampered? I never seen such case before. 

In the next few days, accusations are being created against AdkinsBET
- [SOLVED] Adkinsbet scamming me close to £2000 in winnings : User created the account from restricted region but he got his deposit back after creating the scam accusation.
- [SOLVED] Adkinsbet.com - PENDING WITHDRAWAL 10.000 EUR 24 hours  << this seemed a premature accusation. I would like not to count it but I think now I would like to see some proof of the payment made by AdkinsBET and deposit made the user pranjicka. In my mind there is a doubt of this being planned, I am not sure 100% of course.
- Adkinsbet SCAM SCAM 30mBTC : I do not know the status since I did not pay much attention.
- [SCAM] Adkinsbet not pay! 41.55 mbtc : Topic that caught my attention to create this topic for investigation.

It started here:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5302600.msg55903374#msg55903374
The moment I posted this comment, suddenly two user started to justify me very quickly.

What strikes me most about Royse is that he is very active in every accusation topic and focuses all his attention on Adkinsbet.

At first I thought he was honest and sincere, but he seems to side with the customer in every message.

I would like to ask Royse what his problem with Adkinsbet is, the way he talks now really makes no sense.

I am very surprised that Royse777 continues to interfere with every topic in this thread directed against Adkinsbet. Apparently it doesn't occur to him at all that this might be the same user.
 His claim about the KYC is, of course, nonsense. If you have users of the same IP address, isn't that 100% proof? Yes in theory you can also live with the four of you at that address, but you can also manipulate a KYC by having someone else take a photo or use someone else's ID.
Also, don't fully understand why you state that you have to perform a kyc before someone has to deposit money. If you get 20 registrations in a day, and those people want to gamble, how do you plan to do that?
Indicate that they cannot deposit anything before they have been verified? Royse777, you may be a respected member of the forum, but you don't understand gambling and business.
If you don't understand it, then you shouldn't write nonsense and be the smart ass, which is what you're doing every time. I am very annoyed by that. In the previous accusations topic you were already dealing with nonsense information, and now you are involved in every topic directed to Adkinsbet. Funny that you always choose the side of the op.

Immediately I realized something is not right here.
Both users are angry, both users are accusing me that my talks are not making sense, one asked me if I have any problem with Adkinsbet that I focuses all my attention on Adkinsbet (yes I a have now), questions my honesty and sincerity, that I am taking a side which is customers, that I continue to interfere with every topic in this thread directed against Adkinsbet, that I don't understand gambling and business, I shouldn't write nonsense, I am being an smart ass, that they are annoyed, I was dealing with nonsense information, and overall it's funny that I take a side to OP.

I do not understand why are these two users so angry about it. It's not something for them to defend but it's something that AdkinsBET to ask me. Whatever I was responding, I was asking AdkinsBET not anyone of them. Users can have difference in opinion but that does not mean that they come after me and show their angry face. They have their thoughts, I have mine and we can disagree with it without any problem. AdkinsBET is the one who will decide what is best for them in solving these accusations.

For the record, when I speak in any scam accusation - I try to find out which side is wrong, I look for evidences and the incident that brought the accusation topic. If this is the bookie (it could be AdkinsBET or sportsbet.io or anyone) who is wrong then I give my suggestions to make it right if I see the accuser is wrong then I take the side of the bookie and the accuser gets nothing.

Anyway, asking these two users about anything is not going to help on solving the accusations that are popping up against AdkinsBET. Only AdkinsBET can help themselves. But the reason for me to create this topic is to find what is actually going on about AdkinsBET. Are they doing everything right or there are a group behind them who are coming up like the above two users and trying to protect something which is not right.

Everyone is welcome to share their thoughts however I would specifically love some responses from few reputed members who were in the group and together we worked to solve the accusation that was against sportsbet.io. We shared some common thoughts in that case and I think if the bookies could follow those ideas then we would not see so many scam accusations from users.

[Steamtyme]

I legitimately wouldn't even know the Adkinsbet brand if they hadn't botched 2 very simple Customer Service issues. I'm glad those were resolved. The problem is when you fail to provide the simplest part of your service effectively, it leaves doubts. There are bookmaker issues which are simple fairly transparent and easy to solve, then there's ones that are difficult such as claims of multi-accounting. I like to look at each case separately and wait until I have a clear picture before I weigh in, but past experiences make it tougher to believe claims I can't dig into further to verify, due to a lack of good faith.

I'm not in any of their social media or active on their thread. The chorus that sounds off, almost cult like is concerning. I pretty much just ignored them as they don't add anything to any of the discussions. The problem is when there is no one with common sense participating in the thread, it can make all claims seem invalid. No matter how obvious it is that the company was not acting in good faith. I did ignore the "paid dog" comments as they weren't relevant to the claim at the time. I seem to recall him saying something about it being admitted. It kind of reminds me of when some low quality posters sig spam in the company thread "good project", just ramped up and aggressive.

Like I said to you previously. I held off on tagging them because eventually they did the right thing.

[actmyname]

The chorus that sounds off, almost cult like is concerning. I pretty much just ignored them as they don't add anything to any of the discussions. The problem is when there is no one with common sense participating in the thread, it can make all claims seem invalid. No matter how obvious it is that the company was not acting in good faith. I did ignore the "paid dog" comments as they weren't relevant to the claim at the time. I seem to recall him saying something about it being admitted. It kind of reminds me of when some low quality posters sig spam in the company thread "good project", just ramped up and aggressive.

Plenty of users will approach the Scam Accusations section, wiggle their way into something against a casino, and check to see if they can quickly pop a "did u break the ToS? lol u cheater"-type post.

These blanket responses are lazy but they barely pass the spam threshold. Almost as bad as those old Auction "selling accounts is not allowed!!!" or Investor-based games "watch out this is a ponzi do not invest" posts, which are essentially the same semantics copy-pasted under slight variations every time.People choose the path of least resistance. If someone sees the rhetoric applied on a thread already, it grants them credence to continue. A cycle of shit, sloshing around in the centrifuge of asinine replies.

[examplens]

and I have noticed here an unusually large number of reports of fraud to AdkinsBET. although some have resolved positively.

- Adkinsbet SCAM SCAM 30mBTC : I do not know the status since I did not pay much attention.

I follow a little bit this accusation, it seems to me there is an organised attack to AdkinsBET because they prevented the abuse of bonuses by multiple accounters. Also, some of them placing bets after the game finished and it is logical that they refuse such payouts. It is quite obvious that one or two people, control few BTT accounts and shill against AdkinsBET in this thread.
I give them an offer to mediate and check all of his evidence from this case, but still, nothing is happening.

Here is one of the accuser to them, @wildan88 find deleted post

It's very possible that AdkinsBET had some bugs on his platform, and fraudsters use it abundantly.

[notblox1]

I agree with examplens and I think some people are targeting and attacking Adkinsbet.
Now I used both Adkinsbet and Sportsbet and I had no issues with them at all, and deposit/withdrawals worked perfectly in my case.
They are both very active in forum with campaigns, but it is obvious that Adkinsbet is new company and they are still working on some things they need to fix.
 

[spyrosc200]

and I have noticed here an unusually large number of reports of fraud to AdkinsBET. although some have resolved positively.

- Adkinsbet SCAM SCAM 30mBTC : I do not know the status since I did not pay much attention.

I follow a little bit this accusation, it seems to me there is an organised attack to AdkinsBET because they prevented the abuse of bonuses by multiple accounters. Also, some of them placing bets after the game finished and it is logical that they refuse such payouts. It is quite obvious that one or two people, control few BTT accounts and shill against AdkinsBET in this thread.
I give them an offer to mediate and check all of his evidence from this case, but still, nothing is happening.

Here is one of the accuser to them, @wildan88 find deleted post

It's very possible that AdkinsBET had some bugs on his platform, and fraudsters use it abundantly.

Was following that case and the impression i got is that you were talking to Adkinsbet and not the OP.

You wrote ''@AdkinsBET I have never used your platform, I haven't any connection with your casino so I am completely neutral. if you need to show evidence to someone and don’t want to go in public or here, I can check it for you.''

Think you should make it clear that you are asking the OP's if they accept you as a mediator.

[Mike Pompeo]

AdkinsBet is a fairly new name in the crypto sports betting market. There are other, more reputable & trusted places to bet. I personally would not be risking my money betting there.

[examplens]

AdkinsBet is a fairly new name in the crypto sports betting market. There are other, more reputable & trusted places to bet. I personally would not be risking my money betting there.

Mike Pompeo is also a new name here, although the one behind that name is not new here. Do you really think that we need some Newbie to come and bury the reputation board, attack someone's else business or defend some other members without clear facts?
When you say, "you personally" then you need to say something about you or not to post from your alt account, otherwise, it has no value.

[AB de Royse777]

So can we say that adkinsbet has hired some users on the forum to shill for them?
Or they are spamming?

I was asked privately by a user and my answer was clearly they are shilling.

Let me know what you think after reading some responses from few users in this topic : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5308700.0
Especially on the page 3 to 6.

[cutesgirl]

You are very funny, you know that? Your account was sold 4 years ago.
And now Royse is a DT member? Is this a joke?

[gadado]

I wouldn't take Royse777 seriously. From day 1 he has been digging into Adkinsbet. He is also actively present in every accusation topic to always take it up for the customer. Adkinsbet is always to blame, he says. And then use a bought account yourself as DT status to do a little interesting on the forum. Laughable.

[AB de Royse777]

You are very funny, you know that?

I know that I am not funny. I also know that you are not reading but spamming.

Did adkinsbet paid you for shilling them or you are spamming to get paid from the signature campaign. Adkinsbet should be the one to attack me with whatever BS they can think of. What is your reason instead?

Edit:
Here comes one after anther. @gadado
So you guys are proving a point that I am right.

You are welcome.

[actmyname]

You are very funny, you know that? Your account was sold 4 years ago.
And now Royse is a DT member? Is this a joke?

Ironically, even if your claim is true, the cryptographic age between your two accounts wouldn't actually differ by more than a few months.

Given that all the trust ratings they've accumulated happened only after 2017, I'd say that they've accomplished more than you did in the four years you spent regurgitating useless two-liners in the banal discussion threads.If people simply resort to the common belief that every single claim the casino provides is true, then why even have the scam accusation board at all when your replies are all going to be the same algorithmic, "you are a liar because the casino says you broke their arbitrary rules," response?

Imagine wanting to use a decentralized currency to start posing spread eagle for a centralized, all-powerful authority.

[spyrosc200]

Don't let them distract you Royse.

You are doing great job in forum.

It is now more obvious than ever that i was 100% correct when i called a list of members here ''paid dogs''.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5299499.msg55813569#msg55813569

Really hoped i was wrong, but i am not unfortunately.

[Steamtyme]

I wouldn't take Royse777 seriously. From day 1 he has been digging into Adkinsbet. He is also actively present in every accusation topic to always take it up for the customer. Adkinsbet is always to blame, he says. And then use a bought account yourself as DT status to do a little interesting on the forum. Laughable.

I take you even less seriously. You could easily do minimal research through the threads where Adkinsbet shit the bed royally on the simplest of issues a sportsbook can face. You would have noted this little exchange

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5299499.msg55830076#msg55830076 From a locked topic you were a part of. Royse777 plays there and may still. I don't know. This topic was from before they piled up another bunch of scam accusations. Which at this moment are simply accusations but their past actions, don't leave them much room for credit in their unilateral decisions.

For example withholding winnings because the bookmakers feeling were hurt. FFS

Honestly you seem a bit obsessed with this casino, I don't quite understand why.

OK, so they have shills. That's not a crime. How does that separate them from any other major casino around here?

I'm wary of DT that constantly attack the same casinos attacked by sockpuppets.

The actual problem to the forum isn't casino shills -- they've been here for as long as I have. It's the persistent, baseless attacks on casinos by scum who solely exist to exploit defects in the casino. When they get caught, they write up a scam accusation here, and you tend to give them the benefit of the doubt more often than not. Why?

I would start with reading the OP and following some links, it's fairly simple to see where the issue has been and why it was necessary for DT intervention. This thread was reasonable and seems to have become more relevant. The sockpuppet shit is just because they were stupid enough to come and bump the thread... fucking dense.
It was a major point in how several of the users with issues early where attacked verbally of course for attempting to resolve their very simple issues.
 
I'll say this much Sorry Royce777 for dragging you into this shitshow originally, as 1 DT members opinion wasn't good enough for ADkinsbet to realize they owed a user their legitimate winnings.

So no Royce isn't giving extra scrutiny. Adkinsbet wiffed it on a few softballs blowing their credibility as I said above.
Edit: corrected term used "scrutiny"

[gadado]

I wouldn't take Royse777 seriously. From day 1 he has been digging into Adkinsbet. He is also actively present in every accusation topic to always take it up for the customer. Adkinsbet is always to blame, he says. And then use a bought account yourself as DT status to do a little interesting on the forum. Laughable.

I take you even less seriously. You could easily do minimal research through the threads where Adkinsbet shit the bed royally on the simplest of issues a sportsbook can face. You would have noted this little exchange

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5299499.msg55830076#msg55830076 From a locked topic you were a part of. Royse777 plays there and may still. I don't know. This topic was from before they piled up another bunch of scam accusations. Which at this moment are simply accusations but their past actions, don't leave them much room for credit in their unilateral decisions.

For example withholding winnings because the bookmakers feeling were hurt. FFS

Honestly you seem a bit obsessed with this casino, I don't quite understand why.

OK, so they have shills. That's not a crime. How does that separate them from any other major casino around here?

I'm wary of DT that constantly attack the same casinos attacked by sockpuppets.

The actual problem to the forum isn't casino shills -- they've been here for as long as I have. It's the persistent, baseless attacks on casinos by scum who solely exist to exploit defects in the casino. When they get caught, they write up a scam accusation here, and you tend to give them the benefit of the doubt more often than not. Why?

I would start with reading the OP and following some links, it's fairly simple to see where the issue has been and why it was necessary for DT intervention. This thread was reasonable and seems to have become more relevant. The sockpuppet shit is just because they were stupid enough to come and bump the thread... fucking dense.
It was a major point in how several of the users with issues early where attacked verbally of course for attempting to resolve their very simple issues.
 
I'll say this much Sorry Royce777 for dragging you into this shitshow originally, as 1 DT members opinion wasn't good enough for ADkinsbet to realize they owed a user their legitimate winnings.

So no Royce isn't giving extra credit. Adkinsbet wiffed it on a few softballs blowing their credibility as I said above.

Nutildah is right. Interesting that Royse777 and Steamtyme are involved in every Adkinsbet accusation topic. You would think that these accounts are managed by the same person, or at least that there is a collaboration. A good example of Royse777's expertise on Betnomi.

The owner of Betnomi posts a copy of a customer's passport online, which is of course every customer's worst nightmare! You are on a forum and then you see your own passport on a public forum.
That's the worst thing you can do. Royse777 then responded coolly with "Let's not be too difficult about this guys, they apologized and we need to get over this."
In short terms: Not a problem at all, as they admit their fault. 
It seems pretty clear to me that there is a line here with Betnomi. noteworthy also that Steamyme also bears Betnomi's signature and is always in the topis of Royse with gambling and always agree with Royse.
Both always side with the customer, and Adkinsbet is always to blame.
Spyros is nothing more than a pathetic n00b who is trying to make money with shady business by holes in bookmakers.
I seriously have my doubts if Royse would deserve his DT status, as from what I can see he is completely abusing his status now.

[MI6]

Steamtyme and Royse are always in every Adkinsbet case. Other cases seems to be not interesting to them. For sure there is one person involved who manage these accounts both. I would not be surprised if Betnomi is trying to blow Adkinsbet away as Adkinsbet is a serious competitor. Is is to obvious how they work. Spyros is also only interested in Adkinsbet topics.
Adkinsbet wrote yesterday the user breached the terms because users are slendering them on the forum. They can decide whatever they want to fill in the terms. It is the responsibility from the user to read it.
If it is against the law, then you have to bring it to court if you disagree. Damaging a reputation on a forum can cost your credibility and cost a lot of money. If they want to avoid it like this, I think it is their right.
The accusation from the user did not make any sense actually. Claiming that Adkinsbet have placed a bet for him, why should they do that and also write he violated the terms as well? Simply only placing the bet would be enough.
It is time to report the conspiracy from Royse777 and steamtyme and take action, and this action will come quickly.

[actmyname]

Adkinsbet wrote yesterday the user breached the terms because users are slendering them on the forum. They can decide whatever they want to fill in the terms. It is the responsibility from the user to read it.

What if the user couldn't read those terms because they didn't exist before January 4th? I'm not even sure if they sent out an update - that they had changed the Terms and Conditions.

I think the idea of adding in a clause that is effectively a forced NDA is pretty bad. I also think that letting casinos add in clauses to retroactively apply on situations that last over multiple weeks is worse. If a bad actor wanted to do so, they could use changes in the terms to deny players withdrawals and use the ToS/TaC clauses as justification to do so: if they retaliate with any public ousting, they can claim they are following their image damage clause and justify the confiscation that way.

It effectively makes the casino the final judge, jury, and executioner: do you really want a casino to be able to do all that and automatically dismiss any accusation against them purely because they said so?If you're still going to stick to your guns, then we should set up a poker match. I'm sure you would be very popular.

[Steamtyme]

Interesting that Royse777 and Steamtyme are involved in every Adkinsbet accusation topic.

Prove it, or your first statement is utter bullshit.

You would think that these accounts are managed by the same person, or at least that there is a collaboration. A good example of Royse777's expertise on Betnomi.

If you have an inability to review users posts and areas of expertise then yeah definitely something people might think.

noteworthy also that Steamyme also bears Betnomi's signature and is always in the topis of Royse with gambling and always agree with Royse.

Again completely false. Chipmixer holds my signature - You probably meant my Avatar, yes that is paid for on a 3 month term.

For your off-topic Betnomi stuff. That is an interesting example as I gave them the same treatment I gave Adkinsbet. They then took me up on my offer to act a as forum liaison, as my field of expertise is more forum than gambling. Where as they were not handling things on forum professionally. It was a mutually beneficial and short partnership but it worked and they have a better handle on how to communicate and act on forum.

Both always side with the customer, and Adkinsbet is always to blame.

Only when they are in the wrong.

Steamtyme and Royse are always in every Adkinsbet case.

Prove your bullshit

Other cases seems to be not interesting to them. For sure there is one person involved who manage these accounts both. I would not be surprised if Betnomi is trying to blow Adkinsbet away as Adkinsbet is a serious competitor. Is is to obvious how they work.

I definitely cherry pick what accusations I dig into. for one I want to feel informed enough about a subject to be able to make an impartial judgement. Should really check up on things as I'm no longer affiliated with Betnomi, outside of playing poker and renting them my Avatar space for a little over another month unless they decide to continue renting it.

Adkinsbet wrote yesterday the user breached the terms because users are slendering them on the forum. They can decide whatever they want to fill in the terms.

You should put that in your personal text, really advertise that sweet sweet term. They are definitely separating themselves from the pack with that one. It is the responsibility from the user to read it.

Damaging a reputation on a forum can cost your credibility and cost a lot of money. If they want to avoid it like this

I couldn't agree more. That's why I advised them to look into Customer Service and Customer retention training. Most of the issues I reviewed were slam dunk easy cases for a business to handle, and avoid them ever making it to the forum.

It is time to report the conspiracy from Royse777 and steamtyme and take action, and this action will come quickly.

Giver shit bud.

[AB de Royse777]

Honestly you seem a bit obsessed with this casino, I don't quite understand why.

- Are you going to say the same when I stood up in favour of Best_change? TMAN left them negative and some other users were also justifying their service and not escrowing the signature campaign fund as shady without any solid reason.

- Are you going to say the same when I stood up against sportsbet.io for a user called (Neymar12 or 13) and eventually we had a board of few trusted users to resolve the case.

- Are you going to say the same when I had a stand against Bitcasino.io for a user who won big but later it was found that he cheated the system and the user admitted it himself. Karl had a very good explanation of what was going on, and it was satisfactory.

There are many cases where I stood up against wrong doings which I believed wrong. Are you going to say that I was obsessed?

I still regret that I should not go so hard against sportsbet.io, I said it publicly that Steve and I had a good relationship, but I believe after that case it disappeared. This community comes first for me. Not any business, not any service or anything else.

Anyway, I will take your words, and maybe it looks like that I am obsessed with this casino but believe me I always try to escape these kinds of topics, but they do not leave me alone (Sorry Steamtyme and another user - no hurt feeling in fact, I appreciate and I belive it was the right thing for you to ask my input).

Steamtyme first messaged me to look at this case, it was a few weeks ago as you can see. This was the first time when I got involved with akinsbet case.

Shall I tell a truth to all? I saw this topic even when the day it was posted (I have notification active for scam accusation board along with many other boards), but I did not make a comment, I pretended that I did not see it. Of course no one can blame me not to comment in a post.

Do you know the reason? I did not even bother to look at the case details because a few weeks prior I was given a small free bet from adkinsbet to try their system and I in fact doubled it and withdraw that money, so I had a good impression for two reasons.
1. Someone gave me something which I did not expect. A kind gesture and in return I was kind too.
2. There were no problem of withdrawing money. So, my personal experience was good although the money was around only 0.002 BTC.

Do you see why I wanted to avoid the case, do you see how kind I was when I was asked to give a look in the case? When I was asked to look at the case I just can not pretend then any more, can I? Besides, after I was being asked when I looked at the case carefully I realized OP of that topic has a case and he deservs what he was asking.

After resolving that case there were a few more cases and all gone fairly okay if I can remember (Sorry, I do not have the energy to look at all the cases now and give a detail about each of them). But one thing was noticeable that a group of users are always protecting adkinsbet. They start threatening any user who tells anything against adkinsbet. Do you see that? Do you see how you are blessed with merits from gadado (3), MI6 (2) in the post you made, do you see since I left a negative to adkinsbet trust page how users are returning favour in my trust wall? Do you see some of them even threatening me?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5308700.msg56095419#msg56095419

but I will dig until I find out.

Are you seeing the same group of people also attacking actmyname, Steamtyme and others? They are trying to toss up anything in the dark. No one is getting away from them - sometimes they're accusing someone to be the shill for sportsbet.io or betnomi or forthunejack. What will be your explanation in all these? Take note that nothing from them is bothering me much, and I am pretty sure others have the same feeling. Those trolls are trying their best to fulfil their signature cap and if anything they have received from adkinsbet (I may wrong in there by the way).

I wanted to forget and wanted to avoid adkinsbet again. But another user (as reputed as Steamtyme) directed me to this topic.

Do you think I was supposed to stay clam and silent even after knowing what is going on with one of the user I know and the same reason I discovered in this accusation too? I took the step that I needed to take to serve the community in my good faith.

Have you looked at the these two cases yet?
adkinsbet.com scam 0.555 BTC! help!
SCAM!!! AdkinsBet scammed me for amount of 196 mBTC in completely blatant way
Are you going to support or oppose the flag created against adkinsbet?

I'm wary of DT that constantly attack the same casinos attacked by sockpuppets.

True but at-least after all these years some of us developed a sense to realize which one is genuine and which one is fake. I am not saying that we do not make mistakes. Even after all experiences, we make mistakes like it happened in the case of bitcasino. That user had all of us believing in his case but that's an exception of course.

The actual problem to the forum isn't casino shills -- they've been here for as long as I have. It's the persistent, baseless attacks on casinos by scum who solely exist to exploit defects in the casino. When they get caught, they write up a scam accusation here, and you tend to give them the benefit of the doubt more often than not. Why?

Are you going to deny the evidences presented against adkinsbet but going to accept the words adkinsbet is saying without giving any fact?
I can not speak for others, but I will first look at the evidences, proofs before seeing a user's status whether they are newbie or established account or a casino with a billion dollar yearly turnover.

Let me know if you have the answer of the "Why".