Satoshi female or men ?

[eaLiTy]

This question comes up in my mind once but I didn't convince that Satoshi is a female in gender.

Let me elaborate you on what content in the article in some important points and reason why women aren't in crypto and Satoshi isn't a female in gender.

• Women are not interested in blockchain and cryptocurrency
• Women are not skilled in investing in crypto
• Blockchain companies are not women-friendly
• Women don't occupy top positions in blockchain
• Women cannot contribute to blockchain development

But in my assumption, Satoshi is a group of people.

First and foremost it is a bit silly to talk about gender in an online forum until some claim them as a particular gender, if anyone wants to attack you especially the woman's group the explanation you have given is quite sexist to be frank, you should not hand them the stone to throw at you is my opinion.

If you have not heard about it, there is a Women in Blockchain collaboration, just to give you a head start regarding that  .

So group of womens ? Or some men some women ?
Or all men ?

Does it even matter, after gender then race will be the next curious point of identification . The creator wanted anonymity and hence he/ she/ third is still a ghost and there is no meaning in discussion about it.

[1715228097]

1715228097

[1715228097]

1715228097

[1715228097]

1715228097

[1715228097]

1715228097

[kryptqnick]

Until such time I found the Binance Blog that it is impossible from a characteristic of a woman become a crypto enthusiast.

Yeah, I've read this article about a year ago as well, but the article is not about it being impossible for women, quite the opposite.
Regarding the op's question, I think that given how we don't know almost anything about Satoshi and how people often choose nicknames which don't correspond to their gender, Satoshi can easily be female. Especially since females are half of this planet, so the chance of this is pretty high. Then again, even though I'm a feminist myself, I don't think that it really matters in this particular situation. It's wrong to presuppose that Satoshi is male, but even this is indeed not completely ungrounded since the Japanese name is male.
I think we'll never know, and I'm fine with it.

[xSkylarx]

This question comes up in my mind once but I didn't convince that Satoshi is a female in gender.

Let me elaborate you on what content in the article in some important points and reason why women aren't in crypto and Satoshi isn't a female in gender.

• Women are not interested in blockchain and cryptocurrency
• Women are not skilled in investing in crypto
• Blockchain companies are not women-friendly
• Women don't occupy top positions in blockchain
• Women cannot contribute to blockchain development

But in my assumption, Satoshi is a group of people.

First and foremost it is a bit silly to talk about gender in an online forum until some claim them as a particular gender, if anyone wants to attack you especially the woman's group the explanation you have given is quite sexist to be frank, you should not hand them the stone to throw at you is my opinion.

If you have not heard about it, there is a  Women in Blockchain collaboration, just to give you a head start regarding that  .

It would be amazing if she is female. From my observation, we have the same opinion as sheenshane. Some female I know that are interested in cryptocurrencies only because of their price.
If you ask them why there are many cryptos, what's their purpose and why many big institutions are into investing in it now, they can't answer.
If she go public and is really female then this can attract more women to get interested in blockchain and cryptocurrency.

[Sparrow96]

My guess says, Satoshi is a team of people. Because it's too difficult for a person to build a new revolutionary things which have to fight against Governments for survival. Bitcoin's first days wasn't easy. So, a man can't handle all this. Also, I think maybe Satoshi is their Head. Satoshi is female or male - Bitcoin does not care now.

[imstillthebest]

We have no idea if he's male or female; and Satoshi might even be a group. Mostly the assumption is just that Satoshi is male, because Satoshi is apparently a name mostly given to dudes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satoshi

is that satoshi ship related to satoshi nakamoto or they accept a satoshi & bitcoins to cruise  .

satoshi can be an "it" too or a thing not only a human but the last definition describes that satoshi is a name for a guy because of that masculine word .

If we insist instantly that he was he not she then its very sexists ... and against femnism and women rights...
Its discrimination *

satoshi didnt showed up , satoshi is considered unknown but if he showed up and we identify if what is its real gender  . we can correct our mistakes but till this date no laws can accuse us for calling if whatever term we want for satoshi

[roadrunnerjaiv2025]

Bitcoin will still hit $40K regardless of Satoshi's gender.

[goldade]

One question we should ask is why does it matter whether Satoshi is a male or female? We'd realize it doesn't matter at all. There is no point in arguing whether or not Satoshi is male. If he was to be a female, what would that change? Absolutely nothing.
What really matters is that Satoshi (even if it's a group of people, I don't really care) created Bitcoin and changed the course of money.
Satoshi created something of immense benefits which has helped improved the living status of quite a lot of people and for we are grateful to Satoshi, male or female.

[Obi theo]

Satoshi gender doses not matter in any case, we aren't there for satoshi, we are here for his works to keep it running ,if satoshi was important he would have revealed his self to the world as the Creator of bitcoin but he didn't I hope you understand that