[Warning] FAKE Chipmixer

[Serious475]

One of the biggest and top campaigns is the Chipmixer and we don't want to destroy their image by this fake mixer, now I want to spread awareness about the Fake Chipmixer I found

Real Chipmixer

Code:

https://chipmixer.com/

FAKE Chipmixer

Code:

https://chippmixer.com/

Code:

Domain name: chippmixer.com
Registry Domain ID: 
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.eranet.com
Registrar URL: http://www.eranet.com
Updated Date: 2020-11-05T00:00:00Z
Creation Date: 2019-10-27T22:10:34Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2021-10-27T00:00:00Z
Registrar: ERANET INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Registrar IANA ID: 1868
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: email@eranet.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +852.39995400
Reseller:     
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited http://www.icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Registry Registrant ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Registrant Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Registrant Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Registrant Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Registrant City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Registrant State/Province: VICTORIA 
Registrant Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Registrant Country: AU 
Registrant Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Registrant Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Registrant Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Registrant Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Registrant Email: http://www.tnet.hk/whois/message_to_contact.php?domain=chippmixer.com&contact=Owner 
Registry Admin ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Admin Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Admin Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY  
Admin Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Admin City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Admin State/Province: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Admin Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Admin Country: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Admin Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Admin Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Admin Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Admin Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Admin Email: http://www.tnet.hk/whois/message_to_contact.php?domain=chippmixer.com&contact=Admin 
Registry Tech ID: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Tech Name: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Tech Organization: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Tech Street: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Tech City: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Tech State/Province: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Tech Postal Code: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Tech Country: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Tech Phone: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Tech Phone Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Tech Fax: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Tech Fax Ext: REDACTED FOR PRIVACY 
Tech Email: http://www.tnet.hk/whois/message_to_contact.php?domain=chippmixer.com&contact=Tech 
Name Server: luke.ns.cloudflare.com
Name Server: ulla.ns.cloudflare.com
DNSSEC: unsigned

[1714712133]

1714712133

[1714712133]

1714712133

[DdmrDdmr]

There are some threads that focus on this fake site here, reported different boards within the forum:

[Scam alert] Chippmixer.com
[ANN] ChipMixer.com - Bitcoin mixer / Bitcoin tumbler - mixing reinvented
Scam Bitcoin Mixers to avoid
Detected in November 2019
some with similar names

The site has been around and even detected and reported since November 2019, at it’s still out there at large. I wonder if one of the reasons for the longevity of this site is that fact that it may not be that simple to prove as other cases. A mean a fake Nike site would be trivial, but a mixer site is likely not that easy to understand. In addition, the number of reports of these sites is possibly low, which, all in all, may make it slow for these sites to be taken down.

[Serious475]

Snip

Thank you DdmrDdmr this courage me to find more fake mixers, so far I just found out this chipmixer and the
[PHISHING/CLONE] [banned mixer]
I will hunt more!.

[Lucius]

The site has been around and even detected and reported since November 2019, at it’s still out there at large. I wonder if one of the reasons for the longevity of this site is that fact that it may not be that simple to prove as other cases. A mean a fake Nike site would be trivial, but a mixer site is likely not that easy to understand. In addition, the number of reports of these sites is possibly low, which, all in all, may make it slow for these sites to be taken down.

It's amazing that the same page is still active after all this time and not blocked as deceptive by Google. I don't understand how difficult it is to prove the difference between the original and the copy, so the fake has two p's and that's more than obvious. What I always do with the report is to put the original link in the comment so that anyone who handles the report can see the difference.

https://safebrowsing.google.com/safebrowsing/report_phish/?hl=en