...
In my country, it's also one of the strategies since the stablecoins aren't taxed but to be honest I'm surprised they don't tax it like any other trading activity, whatever it's about crypto or not.
Look what I mean:
Traditional traders making money, while trading for example USD/EUR, are taxed. Traders making money with cryptocurrencies are taxed. But when it's about stablecoins you are not taxed. Yet a stablecoin is a currency by nature too.
I can't explain why, is it because they haven't yet taken the time to expand the laws to include the stablecoins, or because they don't know about stablecoins, which is impossible nowadays. But I find it really contradictory.
In any case, using the stablecoins to optimize the taxes is only a short-term solution. Because the time will come sooner or later when it will be considered like any crypto. They're not that crazy.
And the day it happens, those who have chosen the stablecoin solution could find themselves in a delicate situation.
Nowadays, when we talk about tax optimization, it often comes down to changing country.
That's what many companies like Amazon, Google, and the other giants are doing.
...
What the hell are you talking about? The original poster is talking about the taxes and you come up talking about the transaction fees.