Requesting DT to take a look at Siigari (defrauding investors)

[StackGambler]

this was the last straw for me at an attempt to gamble, even though I believe in the long run I could make it out positive. Some others crashed as well, and I don't want that to be me again in the future.

Take this opportunity to learn some statistics: I think it would help you greatly in your life. If you truly believe that your strategy would have been positive in the long run then it is merely a case of Hanlon's razor.

Here, maybe this module will help: Mean (expected value) of a discrete random variable

My nephew tells me that Sal is a pretty good teacher. If he can explain it to a child, anyone can learn.

I tried to teach him basic casino EV. He's a smart man. It all went over his head. Hanlon's razor was my initial assumption, but after learning that David clearly isn't stupid, the only remaining conclusion is this was all a fraud attempt. Hell, if he actually thought it was +EV, the script would be back on tomorrow. It won't be.

[1714798109]

1714798109

[1714798109]

1714798109

[1714798109]

1714798109

[StealthyXor]

Not a word about me huh buddy.
You've been an absolute ass towards me, rejected every simple fact that I had laid out to you as to a child.
I literally spoonfed you because your logic was broken and I wanted to help you and you took everything I said as a personal attack or as if I wanted to get something out of you instead.

The absolute delusion, pride and stupidity that takes the better of gamblers is hilarious mate.
You lost more than yours and peoples money. You lost your mind.

I made you a smilulator to speed-test, you could've verified it all.

Let me lay out the facts once again:

- The house edge is not relevant in the way an earlier reply stated.
  Every game takes an equally (lesser) random part of an absolutely random SHA256 hash.
  This makes the probability to a bust which is absolutely the same for every separate game and there is no relationship between past games.
  "Skipping" is retarded.

- Generating a (wager) curve from a "magic constant" creates a curve that will not line up with the requirement to recover your sum of losses.
  You will spend too little or too large.

- Your script, is in fact, EV+ if you get the wagers correct, to recover or +1, for every recovery cycle.
   However that's not a selling point nor proves survivability because your hard boundaries are your
    - Bankroll
    - table limit or max profit

Here's another piece of advise. Fire your "personal financial advisor" and "statistician".
You're giving a few people their losses back but not a word nor a cent nor a "thank you" to me, for anything I've given you.

[LoyceV]

Your math is really, really bad, in so many ways.

I had already given up, there's no arguing against ignorance.

It's probably the most poetic moment I've been blessed enough to witness.

That's a nice introduction to the concept of a house edge and chance

I am closing my program now, and this was the last straw for me at an attempt to gamble, even though I believe in the long run I could make it out positive.

That's what all gamblers believe, and it's what makes them lose everything. Any "strategy" works, until it busts.