@crairezx20 (banned account ) alt of @BitMaxz chipmixer

[Husires]

I was looking for a scammer and found some addresses linked to @crairezx20.

crairezx20 Autobanned on 1/16/2020 9:44:58 PM    Changed to Archived status https://bpip.org/Profile?id=539350

here is the case https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5218159.msg53622116#msg53622116

airezx20 is alt account https://archive.is/jygOh (Not banned https://bpip.org/Profile?id=677202 )

and this account connected to @BitMaxz by using this address  
1Py7dZRgKNYMycvzgzYWnxdjhZMTuY85Pa Source: https://blockchain.info/tx/dffb815f5f53013e1c1ffb9d5b6d6eb0c36c126a0444f0242f9f3e20492d5d72

@BitMaxz account did not changed password and used his address from 2016 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1716351.0  https://archive.is/SH17v

https://bpip.org/Profile?id=525056

scammer that i looking for was part of @FrilledShark selling accounts owners/load.
if you have any information about this case or @crairezx20 alt please update it here


edit

Now this is interesting:  crairezx20 was attempting to discredit Blitzboy, which was connected to BitMaxz.  If all of these accounts are connected, why would he try to discredit his own alt?

Apparently it was hacked or sold: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5218159.msg53633015#msg53633015

For how long does BPIP Security/Moderator Log show account changes?@BitMaxz account did not changed password

Let's go deeper

@BitMaxz used 1Py7dZRgKNYMycvzgzYWnxdjhZMTuY85Pa on 11/15/2016 this address is alt of @airezx20 which is alt of @crairezx20 (Banned account)

https://archive.is/8Vj9u
1

Old address: 1Py7dZRgKNYMycvzgzYWnxdjhZMTuY85Pa
Message: This is BitMaxz asking for loan of 0.02 today is 11/15/2016
Signature: IGspXw9MTXynjZLO3zbr5ENhaGrlVjoI2AmRsPyTq6qRo7vctxJVq2tKIHSL9fBxravpyj1enEHr9e1 6MCY3wIk=

2
@BitMaxz used 1Fh2GwdSfSDpfB5PpYjscB9u2inCoTmumX on 12/15/2016

sign: This is bitmaxz i am asking for loan for 2 weeks. today is 12/15/2016
address: 1Fh2GwdSfSDpfB5PpYjscB9u2inCoTmumX
signature: H1jL4U6WCnzy0fma3kKF0Ja32KYIkpT8xt7UCUbv1INqLGFdSIFDWuMvvSlypIBba4Ul2ltYqDBT2FT PCtrxZsk=

on November 24, 2016, 10:55:52 AM @BitMaxz used the same address 1Fh2GwdSfSDpfB5PpYjscB9u2inCoTmumX
 https://web.archive.org/web/20161124105551/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=525056;

According to this if @BitMaxz hacked it must be between 11/15/2016 to 11/24/2016.
edit
both addresses found here

on August 30, 2016, 10:08:08 PM BitMaxz used number 1 address to sign a message and  number 2 (first Chipmixer address) to send payment https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1585696.msg15924695#msg15924695

Thanks for giving me loan for small amount here is my sign message

- -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is BitMaxz borrowing 0.015 without collateral from Atomicat and giving me 2 weeks deadline Today is 8/15/2016
- -----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1Py7dZRgKNYMycvzgzYWnxdjhZMTuY85Pa
IKf8LGlbeokVpAmL/JEK8fy7oQOjfLE8ndIXVduZfrZMiYSuXPOy+iiT6nu1lvTR7PUn9iKv2n4BYdkW8GPiCeM=
- -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----


Here is the address where you send the loan thanks
3QatDfn9nx6CgNKTEJLWd8NyKKaTMstz91
Loan funded without interest.

Please repay 0.015 BTC to 1BL3FPtvsQhWMAinVokoR5yEZoMXRu1CF1
Repayment done
Sorry for delay i was looking in this thread to find the repayment address thanks to let me know..
Sorry also for delay and i am happy that you give me a chance to loan without interest and no collateral thanks

Here is the TXId
https://blockchain.info/tx/70b57e86655319cef5eaf889df142a4d57d28b1264266f43d3e5582f2c79bce7

Thanks again  Wink

OK found more

@crairezx20 used this address 12RLH8Lm8ZFbdv3Wz4oRbv57gtpFDyoqef the same address used by bitcoinboy12 (sold account)  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1169310.150

@bitcoinboy12 used facebook name : Cristine Princess Bautista
@BitMaxz used same facebook name: Cristine Princess Bautista

i think i can find more

[1714151119]

1714151119

[1714151119]

1714151119

[1714151119]

1714151119

[1714151119]

1714151119

[DireWolfM14]

Okay, so there's proof that address 1Py7dZRgKNYMycvzgzYWnxdjhZMTuY85Pa belongs to BitMaxz.  How does that connect to the other two accounts you mentioned?

~
Here is my old address i can give my sign message here 1Py7dZRgKNYMycvzgzYWnxdjhZMTuY85Pa Posted here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1206776.msg12731236#msg12731236

Message: This is BitMaxz of bitcointalk today is october 20,2016
Address: 1Py7dZRgKNYMycvzgzYWnxdjhZMTuY85Pa
Signature: IPmoiTb11ef8vkjlXRoGP2rEYuOTsV3ANv+gVkpPnaN83UgPc9IVLbrNxPMfbt9iRol7RbJiymt92ZAxOsRo9eo=
~

[Archive]

ETA:
Now this is interesting:  crairezx20 was attempting to discredit Blitzboy, which was connected to BitMaxz.  If all of these accounts are connected, why would he try to discredit his own alt?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5218159.msg53622116#msg53622116

[rhomelmabini]

If you've found that these scammers are link to the account crairezx20 then may we know how did you connect the dots that it lead to crairezx20? If you're just looking for crairezx20 alts then you should head in this marlboroza's investigation: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg53621837#msg53621837

I think you should clear first here on how did you come up that these scammers are connected to crairezx20 before anyone does some more depth investigation regarding the case. I guess the only hint here was that FrilledShark before we get into more other connections and alts, at least share some idea about this FrilledShark in this thread, that's I advice.

Or we can assume too that these scammers just happen to have had a few transactions with crairezx20 and you assume as well they might be alts or something.

[suchmoon]

Now this is interesting:  crairezx20 was attempting to discredit Blitzboy, which was connected to BitMaxz.  If all of these accounts are connected, why would he try to discredit his own alt?

Apparently it was hacked or sold: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5218159.msg53633015#msg53633015

I'm a bit suprised that BitMaxz is still in the the CM campaign despite these links to banned/scammy/sold accounts.

[The Cryptovator]

It's pretty clear these three account. According to forum rules, all connected accounts are supposed to be banned since one account is already banned. Don't know why still all accounts exist without a ban. Most likely moderators didn't notice the thread. I think a van evasion thread should open on meta with proper explanations and evidence that should be easier to understand for moderators.

I'm a bit suprised that BitMaxz is still in the the CM campaign despite these links to banned/scammy/sold accounts.

Perhaps DS unaware or missed the case.

[Findingnemo]

Don't know why still all accounts exist without a ban. I think a van evasion thread should open on meta with proper explanations and evidence that should be easier to understand for moderators.

It exists already, : [Report] Ban Evasion [Requesting Admin/mod to check those and ban]

But it didn't got enough attention since reporter(s) simply using Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2021 Q1) to report such cases.

[The Cryptovator]

Don't know why still all accounts exist without a ban. I think a van evasion thread should open on meta with proper explanations and evidence that should be easier to understand for moderators.

It exists already, : [Report] Ban Evasion [Requesting Admin/mod to check those and ban]

Was this case raised there? I can't find the report of this case there even using the search button. Am I missing something? I am talking about this case specifically, not all over ban evasion. I have seen occasionally users creating unique threads for each ban evasion. In the thread you have mentioned, OP is inactive of that thread, so there is a lack of maintenance. Anyways, a single thread would appropriate for this case, it's quite a serious case IMO.

[Husires]

Now this is interesting:  crairezx20 was attempting to discredit Blitzboy, which was connected to BitMaxz.  If all of these accounts are connected, why would he try to discredit his own alt?

Apparently it was hacked or sold: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5218159.msg53633015#msg53633015

For how long does BPIP Security/Moderator Log show account changes?@BitMaxz account did not changed password

Let's go deeper

@BitMaxz used 1Py7dZRgKNYMycvzgzYWnxdjhZMTuY85Pa on 11/15/2016 this address is alt of @airezx20 which is alt of @crairezx20 (Banned account)

https://archive.is/8Vj9u

Old address: 1Py7dZRgKNYMycvzgzYWnxdjhZMTuY85Pa
Message: This is BitMaxz asking for loan of 0.02 today is 11/15/2016
Signature: IGspXw9MTXynjZLO3zbr5ENhaGrlVjoI2AmRsPyTq6qRo7vctxJVq2tKIHSL9fBxravpyj1enEHr9e1 6MCY3wIk=

@BitMaxz used 1Fh2GwdSfSDpfB5PpYjscB9u2inCoTmumX on 12/15/2016

sign: This is bitmaxz i am asking for loan for 2 weeks. today is 12/15/2016
address: 1Fh2GwdSfSDpfB5PpYjscB9u2inCoTmumX
signature: H1jL4U6WCnzy0fma3kKF0Ja32KYIkpT8xt7UCUbv1INqLGFdSIFDWuMvvSlypIBba4Ul2ltYqDBT2FT PCtrxZsk=

on November 24, 2016, 10:55:52 AM @BitMaxz used the same address 1Fh2GwdSfSDpfB5PpYjscB9u2inCoTmumX
 https://web.archive.org/web/20161124105551/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=525056;

According to this if @BitMaxz hacked it must be between 11/15/2016 to 11/24/2016.

edit both addresses found here.

Thanks for giving me loan for small amount here is my sign message

- -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is BitMaxz borrowing 0.015 without collateral from Atomicat and giving me 2 weeks deadline Today is 8/15/2016
- -----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1Py7dZRgKNYMycvzgzYWnxdjhZMTuY85Pa
IKf8LGlbeokVpAmL/JEK8fy7oQOjfLE8ndIXVduZfrZMiYSuXPOy+iiT6nu1lvTR7PUn9iKv2n4BYdkW8GPiCeM=
- -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----


Here is the address where you send the loan thanks
3QatDfn9nx6CgNKTEJLWd8NyKKaTMstz91
Loan funded without interest.

Please repay 0.015 BTC to 1BL3FPtvsQhWMAinVokoR5yEZoMXRu1CF1
Repayment done
Sorry for delay i was looking in this thread to find the repayment address thanks to let me know..
Sorry also for delay and i am happy that you give me a chance to loan without interest and no collateral thanks

Here is the TXId
https://blockchain.info/tx/70b57e86655319cef5eaf889df142a4d57d28b1264266f43d3e5582f2c79bce7

Thanks again  Wink

[suchmoon]

Now this is interesting:  crairezx20 was attempting to discredit Blitzboy, which was connected to BitMaxz.  If all of these accounts are connected, why would he try to discredit his own alt?

Apparently it was hacked or sold: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5218159.msg53633015#msg53633015

For how long does BPIP Security/Moderator Log show account changes?@BitMaxz account did not changed password

I mean Blitzboy was allegedly hacked or sold. Not sure about BitMaxz.

BPIP has mod/sec log data starting sometime in 2018. It wouldn't show changes that happened in 2016.

[notblox1]

Are we going to see one more chipmixer campaign purge?
Maybe other forum detectives are already working on this case behind the scenes because I am not fully convinced with evidence presented in this topic, and I would like to here what accused BitMaxz has to say.

[Findingnemo]

Was this case raised there? I can't find the report of this case there even using the search button. Am I missing something? I am talking about this case specifically, not all over ban evasion. I have seen occasionally users creating unique threads for each ban evasion. In the thread you have mentioned, OP is inactive of that thread, so there is a lack of maintenance. Anyways, a single thread would appropriate for this case, it's quite a serious case IMO.

I don't see any thread on META regarding this case but talking about the thread, it is better to have one. ST was inactive who was the one created it but if the community think it needs proper maintenance then someone can open a new thread for such purpose and can maintain them. I feel it is mandatory because moderators are not like DT in numbers so helping them to reduce their workload by giving dedicated threads can help to keep the place clean with ease.

[Husires]

I mean Blitzboy was allegedly hacked or sold. Not sure about BitMaxz.

It is suspicious. I created this topic to know what happened in the previous topic https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5218159.msg53622116#msg53622116

I don't see any thread on META regarding this case but talking about the thread, it is better to have one. ST was inactive who was the one created it but if the community think it needs proper maintenance then someone can open a new thread for such purpose and can maintain them. I feel it is mandatory because moderators are not like DT in numbers so helping them to reduce their workload by giving dedicated threads can help to keep the place clean with ease.

Are we going to see one more chipmixer campaign purge?
Maybe other forum detectives are already working on this case behind the scenes because I am not fully convinced with evidence presented in this topic, and I would like to here what accused BitMaxz has to say.

I don't think we need to create more topics, lets see BitMaxz response or other forum detectives

I believe there were accounts that were sold, maybe it was legal in the past

[DarkStar_]

I'm a bit suprised that BitMaxz is still in the the CM campaign despite these links to banned/scammy/sold accounts.

My understanding was that the connected accounts (or the BitMaxz account) were sold a long time ago, so those connections might not be accurate. I don't think it's right to remove someone simply for being a bought account back when account selling/buying was common and not really frowned upon. I think at one point I even sold accounts myself obtained from defaulted loans.

Definitely could be wrong; someone please correct me if so.

[hacker1001101001]

My understanding was that the connected accounts (or the BitMaxz account) were sold a long time ago, so those connections might not be accurate. I don't think it's right to remove someone simply for being a bought account back when account selling/buying was common and not really frowned upon. I think at one point I even sold accounts myself obtained from defaulted loans.

Definitely could be wrong; someone please correct me if so.

Maybe only BitMaxz can confirm what's the correct story here or if he sold or bought those auto banned accounts in the past.

Also, if nobody noticed here @BitMaxz had both crairezx20 and bitcoinboy12 in his trust list until 2019-02-16. That somehow points to some connection until then at least.

https://loyce.club/trust/2019-02-16_Sat_13.06h/525056.html

Note: I just hope BitMaxz has a better explanation to it.

[Husires]

Maybe only BitMaxz can confirm what's the correct story here or if he sold or bought those auto banned accounts in the past.

I believe that @BitMaxz  created this account @bitcoinboy12 and then sold it in 2016.
they used the same facebook account and Bitcointalk address linked to @crairezx20
@bitcoinboy12 used facebook name : Cristine Princess Bautista
@BitMaxz used same facebook name: Cristine Princess Bautista


i was tracking old scam address linked to 1Py7dZRgKNYMycvzgzYWnxdjhZMTuY85Pa which is owned by @BitMaxz/@crairezx20 and the same user still have that account.
If any mod give a reason why @crairezx20 was banned, the story would make more sense.


hahaha i found more accounts. Defaulted on loan.

@BitMaxz used this address asking for loan 3QatDfn9nx6CgNKTEJLWd8NyKKaTMstz91 source https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1585696.msg15928381

this address used by @ebookscreator asking for another loan. @ebookscreator/@BitMaxz failed to repayment that loan, so the account transferred @Jeremycoin's ownership.

So, it's official that the ebookscreator account is now mine

if i have more time will search for more.

[hacker1001101001]

Maybe only BitMaxz can confirm what's the correct story here or if he sold or bought those auto banned accounts in the past.

I believe that @BitMaxz  created this account @bitcoinboy12 and then sold it in 2016.

That doesn't explain why @BitMaxz includes @bitcoinboy12 into his trust list until 2019 if he sold it in 2016.

[Husires]

That doesn't explain why @BitMaxz includes @bitcoinboy12 into his trust list until 2019 if he sold it in 2016.

I couldn't find an explanation for that,  what evidence can be provided.
above is sufficient to link between @crairezx20 and @BitMaxz.
If there are any more links between @crairezx20 addresses. please update it here

[Husires]

bump

[nutildah]

@BitMaxz used this address asking for loan 3QatDfn9nx6CgNKTEJLWd8NyKKaTMstz91 source https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1585696.msg15928381

this address used by @ebookscreator asking for another loan.

I looked into it and I couldn't confirm this. Where did you get that ebookscreator used that address? If your final goal is to get BitMaxz tagged for being an alt of a banned account, that's not what trust is supposed to be used for. If your goal is to get BitMaxz banned for ban evasion, you'll need to provide more substantial evidence.

[TryNinja]

I looked into it and I couldn't confirm this. Where did you get that ebookscreator used that address?

The ninjastic.space search found:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1455355.msg14738166#msg14738166 (archive)