Explain how it is a rep thread??
Not even gonna bother the rest, but the reason why it is a reputation-based thread is because it has nothing to do about the forum itself, but rather on DT members.
And you're ranting and blabbering, which I think you should stop. You're being a dick in your own arse. do something better in life honestly.
Of course hilarious would move it, just like she would mark bad a report of suchmoon stalking and spamming every thread I make with conclusively debunked and off topic claims and to stop debating with my trolling posts. Then running away from any debates I attempt to draw her into. I mean clearly that proven scammer supporter and protector is scared of any real examination into her behavior. (Suchmoon , although hilarious knowingly kept proven scammers on his DT includes list and supported them against members that presented independently verifiable evidence of their scamming so not much better really )
If hilarious says they would do something where I am concerned or not doing something you can be sure the opposite of what they say is correct fair and optimal. So thanks for chiming in to verify I was correct to post it here in meta.
Look pugwash. These are the same non specific terms all imbeciles use to avoid debating specific points.
What blabbering do you want to specifically address?
Go to them now debunk them or field an opposing argument that you're capable of and I'll come and eviscerate it in 30 seconds.
I mean we all know you will not. Because I will pull you apart in public with great pleasure like I do all turds that seek to deny independently variable truths.
Now back on topic.
It's very simple.
1. It is regarding the use of the forums control systems and potential safeguards being implemented
2. It is not about a single person on DT is it? I mean some topics can be applied to single events but how many " is it okay, is it acceptable, would it improve the forum, threads are there in meta? Tons because that's where you discuss how to improve the forum.
3. It is about an acceptable precedent for the use of the forums software in general.
4. This has far reaching implications for freedom of speech and whom you can even respond to.
5. I notice there has been a change since I brought this up. Lol slimy weasel, his post history
Yes of course a specific event can spark a debate that is a meta topic. Like a scammer posting an obvious scam attempt on a self moderated thread on the sales board and blocking others reporting it as such by deleting others warnings. Then someone coming tknmeta and starting a debate about asking should it be acceptable and possible to have self moderated sales threads?
Then some mod going well make a rep thread about the scammer?
No, because j want to start a debate and suggest changes or create precedents than have great benefits for the entire forum and all of its members.
Do you get it yet.
Sure I could make a rep thread if I only wanted do specifically address that specific member and that specific event in isolation. I dont.
No more mr nice guy. Everytime I see clear abuse of the trust system and the dilution of legitmate and valuable warnings.
I'm going to make a lot of debates and specific discussion on them as to how they effect the entire forum and what improvements and safeguards can be put in place to ensure there is an improved standard of free speech and equal and fair opportunity. This will help the forum expand and grow. Nobody wants to join unless is a reasonably fair place to contribute and you're allowed to speak to who you wish.
Presenting on topic independently verifiable valuable truths must not be punishable.
If it is going to be tolerated and supported I'm going to make sure there is no excuses like oh well I never knew that kind of thing was taking place.
So pugwash I hope at this point you start to get the idea that your reply made about as much difference to this community as your entire membership here. Zero. Let that sink in. Nothing here of any real consequence would be any different should you have never joined.
Now, you may thank me for donating my precious time in providing you a both valuable and accurate appraisal of your worth. With careful reflection and a lot more help from myself, then perhaps you could make a valid contribution albeit a very small one.
What has : post your highest merit score or hey I'm a hero member now, got to do with meta? Unless you say hey I'm a hero member now and I found I had to eat a lot of ass and look the other way of a ton of shady shit from merit sources and DT to get here. How can we prevent others having to eat so much ass and colluding with things they see are clearly wrong just to level up their accounts in future?
Then that would be discussing how to help and improve the forums software and control systems and make the forum a far better place conducive for growth and success not a broken corrupt echo chamber that puts new members off from joining due to the lack of instant financial gratification.
Let's face it the lure of bitcointalk over reddit, Twitter etc is that average people and even below average talented people could come with nothing and make some coin. I mean obviously not the super below average verging on retarded members that have been here years and still have to spam sig for dust. But the majority.
Get the merits applied. I like helping you guys but dont be so ungrateful.