The AdkinsBET Army of Alts

[Steamtyme]

I've been handling bounty campaig, design services and management services. I don't know what are you talking about I've stated on my design that I am no related to the Adkins Interactive Group N.V. and they use my to create design and post it.

Flag has been created.

Yeah great exclusion of liability at the end, doesn't matter. Your actions make you untrustworthy and I believe newbies are at a risk of dealing with you or reviewing anything you have to do with business. If it was truly only about selling your design, then the client should have posted it.

You obviously knew something was up when you absolved yourself of liability.

Edit: Further to that, you are obviously in control and deleting replies to the thread, so you are intertwined no matter what you say.

[1714914907]

1714914907

[suchmoon]

I've been handling bounty campaig, design services and management services. I don't know what are you talking about I've stated on my design that I am no related to the Adkins Interactive Group N.V. and they use my to create design and post it.

It doesn't matter. You're responsible for content you post here. If the content breaks the rules you'll be banned. Same with trust ratings, if you "manage" a scam you'll get red trust. If you didn't want to be related to AdkinsBET you should have given them your design and told them to post it themselves, they have quite a few accounts for that.

[examplens]

I've been handling bounty campaig, design services and management services. I don't know what are you talking about I've stated on my design that I am no related to the Adkins Interactive Group N.V. and they use my to create design and post it.

It doesn't matter. You're responsible for content you post here. If the content breaks the rules you'll be banned. Same with trust ratings, if you "manage" a scam you'll get red trust. If you didn't want to be related to AdkinsBET you should have given them your design and told them to post it themselves, they have quite a few accounts for that.

He is also responsible for posts that have been deleted in his topic. For example, @Adzivu posted info about open scam accusations against them, which is the info so important for all potential players on there.
so he didn’t just do the design for them, he moderates this topic and removes all posts that do not write positively about these fraudsters.

https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5650/56503955.html

Post 56503955 (by Adzivu) (scraped on Sat Mar 6 16:31:12 CET 2021):

And all the scam accusations that are not resolved.

Nice one

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5310071.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5302402.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5314932.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5308700.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5309454.0

[Adzivu]

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

I just created an account on the site and made a deposit with bitcoins, when will it be credited to my balance?

I thought it would be credited to a balance after 1 confirmation on the network. Some sites even require 2 confirmations or more.
I advice to wait for 1 confirmation and then check if it is credited to your balance for example.

You were right, it was credited after 1 confirmation on the blockchain. The fees nowadays is crazy for transactions by the way.
No problem if I won something with gambling of course.

Good luck. Let us know how did it go

They just deleted this post. What did I say here that upset them?

[actmyname]

Well, I guess this is, "good luck, fuckers" as the red flags are gone and now you're only left with type one flags for Newbies.

Good luck finding someone who suffered a written agreement with "mikelsmith2020"Scammer paradise - just get rid of your problems by making more accounts.

[acroman08]

They just deleted this post. What did I say here that upset them?

well, you've posted links to their scam accusation and that probably earned you a "permaban" from posting on their thread. I wouldn't waste any more time posting in that thread since anything that you say that is even remotely against them will be definitely deleted.

edit: new account representative from adkinsbet(at least he claims to be) adkinsbet_official

[Steamtyme]

Scammer paradise - just get rid of your problems by making more accounts.

It's shitty. I've done the only other thing I can think of. I PM's campaign managers, not all just the couple I could think of. I requested they exclude that particular thread from post counts. It won't do much but at least it  might help keep the traffic down, if the only people talking are Adkinsbet and their Alts.

Other than that, I noticed the OP of that thread was offline so I dropped the old scam post it lasted about 15 minutes. So I'll do it whenever I see him offline <Insert "It ain't much but it's honest" Meme>

Edit: Apparently there is an adkinsbet_official now. I've tagged them, I would think that any wronged user could Flag this account not that it will help with teir shadow thread.

[LoyceV]

Good luck finding someone who suffered a written agreement with "mikelsmith2020"

It's okay for victims to create red Flags for confirmed alt accounts of a scammer:

Can I also create a scammer flag for alt-accounts of the contract violator? Example: BetKing.io violated a contract, but BetKing Support, dean nolan and PocketRocketsCasino are his alt-accounts.

Yes, one of the victims can.

[notblox1]

Member mikelsmith2020 is obviously controlled by Adkinsbet and anyone who continues posting in that new Adkinsbet thread should be considered a spammer.
Just look how many merits he received from his adkins buddies:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1111151

[actmyname]

It's okay for victims to create red Flags for confirmed alt accounts of a scammer:

Can I also create a scammer flag for alt-accounts of the contract violator? Example: BetKing.io violated a contract, but BetKing Support, dean nolan and PocketRocketsCasino are his alt-accounts.

Yes, one of the victims can.

Good find, though any response will be delayed (waiting for victims) and you can have certain situations running into plausible deniability something something, making a fuss and smokescreen until the next alt comes up with another flag-free thread

Endgame would just be to constantly prop up those threads - what then? Users (in particular, new users) on the forum get scammed despite flags and tags (eg) and obviously unless you understand the trust system (i.e. are not new and are not at risk of getting scammed by Adkinsbet), the forum mechanics have a hell of a learning curve.

Here's the umpteenth time I'll mention that old welcome message. Eliminate the false sense of security for incoming members. "Trust no one" should be a much more widely-spread mantra.And again:

Of course, the thing is, if other members were allowed to create many, many threads before being banned... what would happen if someone wanted to actually maliciously spam and troll the forum boards? Give this a thought.

[Adzivu]

17 deleted posts by 9 users.

Raise your hand if you are one of the lucky ones.

Their activity has increased a lot after they opened that new thread.

Now they are not bashing other sport betting companies.

[AB de Royse777]

Maybe we need a new community rule.
If anyone support AdkinsBET and make posts to promote AdkinsBET then tag them.

If someone support a scam, but they did not scam anyone directly then what do we do. Just leave them to support and help a proven scammer?

I would appreciate inputs from everyone on this.

Cheers,

[notblox1]

Maybe we need a new community rule.
If anyone support AdkinsBET and make posts to promote AdkinsBET then tag them.

Problem is that people write all kind of shit just to fill their signature requiered posts and they don't even care what topic is about.
Look at this ya.ya.yo guy for example commenting something about Juventus, and BestChange manager should pay more attention on this, but this guy is not even in BestChange campaign just weatring their signature to confuse people.

The odds for Juventus at 1.42 seems to be a little low for me. And Porto to high. The gap between these teams is not so big as bookmakers think it is.
Could be really profitable if you place a bet on the draw or away team to win. Juventus is better, but there is no advantage anymore of homeplaying teams. Porto has a strong squad too.
In the last 20 years, Porto won the Champions League once, and Juventus 0 ?  

ya.ya.yo!

https://bpip.org/Profile?id=101572

[DireWolfM14]

Maybe we need a new community rule.
If anyone support AdkinsBET and make posts to promote AdkinsBET then tag them.

I would be careful about applying such general rules of that sort.  AdkinsBet's shills have been annoying, and they haven't addressed their scam accusations from January, but we have no way of knowing for certain that the accusations are real.  Sure, if it quacks like a duck, and walks like a duck, it's probably a duck, but circumstantial evidence of that sort isn't sufficient in my opinion.

The more DT members go on assumptions and presumptions to leave reviews and tags, the less valuable the system becomes.  Saturating the trust system is already a problem, and this kind of attitude will only make it worse.

I understand the frustration of many members.  Actmyname has made references to how easy it is for a scammer to just switch accounts, create a new alt, or buy a high ranking account, and keep promoting the same scam.  But, if nothing else, this latest episode of whack-a-mole has taught us is that the system can identify scammers and their alts rather quickly.

If someone support a scam, but they did not scam anyone directly then what do we do. Just leave them to support and help a proven scammer?

That already happens on a regular basis.  Look at all the people who got tagged for wearing the Yobit or LiveCoin signatures.  If anything I think there are many people here who are overzealous when it comes to tagging other for supporting scams, and rightfully so.

[actmyname]

But, if nothing else, this latest episode of whack-a-mole has taught us is that the system can identify scammers and their alts rather quickly.

Took a while to see it, in my opinion. Bear in mind the negatives started coming in after you had a half-dozen worth of threads pop up about Adkinsbet, and after they ignore them with unsatisfactory subsequent replies.

If finding the scam through that mess constitutes as quickness then I suppose the new forum will arrive very soon. If the claims about the owners being the same as malubit are true, then you can probably expect another one of these sites to pop up in a few months. Bitcointalk is free advertising to anyone who wants it - double-edged sword.

[wildan88]

Maybe we need a new community rule.
If anyone support AdkinsBET and make posts to promote AdkinsBET then tag them.

If someone support a scam, but they did not scam anyone directly then what do we do. Just leave them to support and help a proven scammer?

I would appreciate inputs from everyone on this.

Cheers,

The only input that you received for the moment that somebody removed his Positive trust from your account.
Luckily I am not the only one who is seeing that you are abusing your DT status and that you are only focusing on attacking Adkinsbet without being objective.
Keep going like this, and it is just a matter of time before you will lose your DT status. You already made yourself more ridiculous than you already act.

[Timelord2067]

You already made yourself more ridiculous than you already act.

Are you sure you're not Barney Rubble and not Fred Flintstone?  Either way, you've been caught with your pants down (in more ways than one) and your Trust Feedback score isn't something to be overly proud of...

(I can see I'm going to have to put some of these sock-puppets on ignore)

[wildan88]

You already made yourself more ridiculous than you already act.

Are you sure you're not Barney Rubble and not Fred Flintstone?  Either way, you've been caught with your pants down (in more ways than one) and your Trust Feedback score isn't something to be overly proud of...

(I can see I'm going to have to put some of these sock-puppets on ignore)

Royse wrote that I am an alt account of Game Protect, I think that is really something to be proud of. So I have to disappoint you: I am proud of my trust feedback score.
Not everybody can say that he is compared with Game Protect.
a DT member removed his positive trust from Royse. I am sure nobody will remove his positive trust from my account since I do not have any 

[decodx]

...only focusing on attacking Adkinsbet without being objective.

Without being objective? It's funny to hear that.
What part of my question in the Adkinsbet topic do you think was not objective? However, it was deleted within a few minutes. So legitimate questions are not allowed there?

And you're talking about objectivity ...

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic.
...

So this is the new official thread for Adkinsbet? And who is the representative of the company on this forum now?
I see member adkinsbet_official to post here, but that user was registered only a few days ago. Why a new account?

[coin.princess]

Jollygood = stompix = decodx